Loading…

The Role of Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Inguinal Lymph Nodes in Patients with Vulvar Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective. To determine the efficacy of ultrasound in assessing the inguinal lymph nodes in patients with vulvar cancer. Methods. A systematic review of published research up to October 2020 that compares the results of ultrasound to determine groin node status with histology was conducted. All stud...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancers 2022-06, Vol.14 (13), p.3082
Main Authors: Verri, Debora, Moro, Francesca, Fragomeni, Simona Maria, Zaçe, Drieda, Bove, Sonia, Pozzati, Federica, Gui, Benedetta, Scambia, Giovanni, Testa, Antonia Carla, Garganese, Giorgia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-8f5cea6fec87f9e9d78da61597975b66b6b509e9095ca32bac375cbef3f9b9ee3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-8f5cea6fec87f9e9d78da61597975b66b6b509e9095ca32bac375cbef3f9b9ee3
container_end_page
container_issue 13
container_start_page 3082
container_title Cancers
container_volume 14
creator Verri, Debora
Moro, Francesca
Fragomeni, Simona Maria
Zaçe, Drieda
Bove, Sonia
Pozzati, Federica
Gui, Benedetta
Scambia, Giovanni
Testa, Antonia Carla
Garganese, Giorgia
description Objective. To determine the efficacy of ultrasound in assessing the inguinal lymph nodes in patients with vulvar cancer. Methods. A systematic review of published research up to October 2020 that compares the results of ultrasound to determine groin node status with histology was conducted. All study types that reported primary data on the role of ultrasound in the evaluation of groin lymph nodes in vulvar cancer were included in the systematic review. Data retrieved from the included studies were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Results. After the screening and selection process, eight articles were deemed pertinent for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The random-effects model showed a pooled Se of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81–0.89), Sp of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81–0.91), PPV of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.54–0.79) and NPV of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.91–0.94). There was a pooled LR+ and LR− of 6.44 (95% CI: 3.72–11.4) and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14–0.27), respectively. The pooled accuracy was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80–0.91). Conclusions. Although the studies had small sample sizes, this review represents the best summary of the data so far. Ultrasound has revealed high sensitivity and high negative predictive value in the assessment of nodal status in vulvar cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/cancers14133082
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9265034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2687717736</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-8f5cea6fec87f9e9d78da61597975b66b6b509e9095ca32bac375cbef3f9b9ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtvEzEUhS0EolXpmq0lNmyGesbxiwVSFBWoFB4qLVvL47nTuPLYwfakyh_gd-O0FYJ6Y-ueT-ce6yD0uiXvKFXkzJpgIeV20VJKZPcMHXdEdA3navH8n_cROs35ltRDaSu4eImOKJNkIRk9Rr-vNoAvowccR3ztSzI5zmHALuBSlfOd8bMpLoaDfhFuZheMx-v9tN3gr3GAfCC_VwJCyfjOlQ3-OfudSXh1n-49XuIf-1xgqozFl7BzcIdN3fAFimmW1W2fXX6FXozGZzh9vE_Q9cfzq9XnZv3t08VquW4s7WRp5MgsGD6ClWJUoAYhB8NbpoQSrOe85z0jdU4Us4Z2vbFUMNvDSEfVKwB6gj48-G7nfoLB1tTJeL1NbjJpr6Nx-n8luI2-iTutOs4IXVSDt48GKf6aIRc9uWzBexMgzll3XArRCkF5Rd88QW_jnOqH76mauZVEVersgbIp5pxg_BumJfpQs35SM_0DkH6dDw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2685971809</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Inguinal Lymph Nodes in Patients with Vulvar Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Verri, Debora ; Moro, Francesca ; Fragomeni, Simona Maria ; Zaçe, Drieda ; Bove, Sonia ; Pozzati, Federica ; Gui, Benedetta ; Scambia, Giovanni ; Testa, Antonia Carla ; Garganese, Giorgia</creator><creatorcontrib>Verri, Debora ; Moro, Francesca ; Fragomeni, Simona Maria ; Zaçe, Drieda ; Bove, Sonia ; Pozzati, Federica ; Gui, Benedetta ; Scambia, Giovanni ; Testa, Antonia Carla ; Garganese, Giorgia</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. To determine the efficacy of ultrasound in assessing the inguinal lymph nodes in patients with vulvar cancer. Methods. A systematic review of published research up to October 2020 that compares the results of ultrasound to determine groin node status with histology was conducted. All study types that reported primary data on the role of ultrasound in the evaluation of groin lymph nodes in vulvar cancer were included in the systematic review. Data retrieved from the included studies were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Results. After the screening and selection process, eight articles were deemed pertinent for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The random-effects model showed a pooled Se of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81–0.89), Sp of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81–0.91), PPV of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.54–0.79) and NPV of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.91–0.94). There was a pooled LR+ and LR− of 6.44 (95% CI: 3.72–11.4) and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14–0.27), respectively. The pooled accuracy was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80–0.91). Conclusions. Although the studies had small sample sizes, this review represents the best summary of the data so far. Ultrasound has revealed high sensitivity and high negative predictive value in the assessment of nodal status in vulvar cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133082</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35804853</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Computed tomography ; Genital cancers ; Histology ; Lymph nodes ; Lymphatic system ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical prognosis ; Melanoma ; Meta-analysis ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Patients ; Risk assessment ; Skin cancer ; Surgery ; Systematic Review ; Tomography ; Tumors ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Cancers, 2022-06, Vol.14 (13), p.3082</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-8f5cea6fec87f9e9d78da61597975b66b6b509e9095ca32bac375cbef3f9b9ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-8f5cea6fec87f9e9d78da61597975b66b6b509e9095ca32bac375cbef3f9b9ee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5130-2100 ; 0000-0003-3623-6800</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2685971809/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2685971809?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792,74997</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Verri, Debora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moro, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fragomeni, Simona Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaçe, Drieda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bove, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozzati, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gui, Benedetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scambia, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Testa, Antonia Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garganese, Giorgia</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Inguinal Lymph Nodes in Patients with Vulvar Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>Cancers</title><description>Objective. To determine the efficacy of ultrasound in assessing the inguinal lymph nodes in patients with vulvar cancer. Methods. A systematic review of published research up to October 2020 that compares the results of ultrasound to determine groin node status with histology was conducted. All study types that reported primary data on the role of ultrasound in the evaluation of groin lymph nodes in vulvar cancer were included in the systematic review. Data retrieved from the included studies were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Results. After the screening and selection process, eight articles were deemed pertinent for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The random-effects model showed a pooled Se of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81–0.89), Sp of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81–0.91), PPV of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.54–0.79) and NPV of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.91–0.94). There was a pooled LR+ and LR− of 6.44 (95% CI: 3.72–11.4) and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14–0.27), respectively. The pooled accuracy was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80–0.91). Conclusions. Although the studies had small sample sizes, this review represents the best summary of the data so far. Ultrasound has revealed high sensitivity and high negative predictive value in the assessment of nodal status in vulvar cancer.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Genital cancers</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Skin cancer</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Systematic Review</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>2072-6694</issn><issn>2072-6694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtvEzEUhS0EolXpmq0lNmyGesbxiwVSFBWoFB4qLVvL47nTuPLYwfakyh_gd-O0FYJ6Y-ueT-ce6yD0uiXvKFXkzJpgIeV20VJKZPcMHXdEdA3navH8n_cROs35ltRDaSu4eImOKJNkIRk9Rr-vNoAvowccR3ztSzI5zmHALuBSlfOd8bMpLoaDfhFuZheMx-v9tN3gr3GAfCC_VwJCyfjOlQ3-OfudSXh1n-49XuIf-1xgqozFl7BzcIdN3fAFimmW1W2fXX6FXozGZzh9vE_Q9cfzq9XnZv3t08VquW4s7WRp5MgsGD6ClWJUoAYhB8NbpoQSrOe85z0jdU4Us4Z2vbFUMNvDSEfVKwB6gj48-G7nfoLB1tTJeL1NbjJpr6Nx-n8luI2-iTutOs4IXVSDt48GKf6aIRc9uWzBexMgzll3XArRCkF5Rd88QW_jnOqH76mauZVEVersgbIp5pxg_BumJfpQs35SM_0DkH6dDw</recordid><startdate>20220623</startdate><enddate>20220623</enddate><creator>Verri, Debora</creator><creator>Moro, Francesca</creator><creator>Fragomeni, Simona Maria</creator><creator>Zaçe, Drieda</creator><creator>Bove, Sonia</creator><creator>Pozzati, Federica</creator><creator>Gui, Benedetta</creator><creator>Scambia, Giovanni</creator><creator>Testa, Antonia Carla</creator><creator>Garganese, Giorgia</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5130-2100</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3623-6800</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220623</creationdate><title>The Role of Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Inguinal Lymph Nodes in Patients with Vulvar Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Verri, Debora ; Moro, Francesca ; Fragomeni, Simona Maria ; Zaçe, Drieda ; Bove, Sonia ; Pozzati, Federica ; Gui, Benedetta ; Scambia, Giovanni ; Testa, Antonia Carla ; Garganese, Giorgia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-8f5cea6fec87f9e9d78da61597975b66b6b509e9095ca32bac375cbef3f9b9ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Genital cancers</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Skin cancer</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Systematic Review</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Verri, Debora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moro, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fragomeni, Simona Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaçe, Drieda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bove, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozzati, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gui, Benedetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scambia, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Testa, Antonia Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garganese, Giorgia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Verri, Debora</au><au>Moro, Francesca</au><au>Fragomeni, Simona Maria</au><au>Zaçe, Drieda</au><au>Bove, Sonia</au><au>Pozzati, Federica</au><au>Gui, Benedetta</au><au>Scambia, Giovanni</au><au>Testa, Antonia Carla</au><au>Garganese, Giorgia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Role of Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Inguinal Lymph Nodes in Patients with Vulvar Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle><date>2022-06-23</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>3082</spage><pages>3082-</pages><issn>2072-6694</issn><eissn>2072-6694</eissn><abstract>Objective. To determine the efficacy of ultrasound in assessing the inguinal lymph nodes in patients with vulvar cancer. Methods. A systematic review of published research up to October 2020 that compares the results of ultrasound to determine groin node status with histology was conducted. All study types that reported primary data on the role of ultrasound in the evaluation of groin lymph nodes in vulvar cancer were included in the systematic review. Data retrieved from the included studies were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Results. After the screening and selection process, eight articles were deemed pertinent for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The random-effects model showed a pooled Se of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81–0.89), Sp of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81–0.91), PPV of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.54–0.79) and NPV of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.91–0.94). There was a pooled LR+ and LR− of 6.44 (95% CI: 3.72–11.4) and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14–0.27), respectively. The pooled accuracy was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80–0.91). Conclusions. Although the studies had small sample sizes, this review represents the best summary of the data so far. Ultrasound has revealed high sensitivity and high negative predictive value in the assessment of nodal status in vulvar cancer.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35804853</pmid><doi>10.3390/cancers14133082</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5130-2100</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3623-6800</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-6694
ispartof Cancers, 2022-06, Vol.14 (13), p.3082
issn 2072-6694
2072-6694
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9265034
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central
subjects Biopsy
Breast cancer
Computed tomography
Genital cancers
Histology
Lymph nodes
Lymphatic system
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medical prognosis
Melanoma
Meta-analysis
Metastases
Metastasis
Patients
Risk assessment
Skin cancer
Surgery
Systematic Review
Tomography
Tumors
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasound
Womens health
title The Role of Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Inguinal Lymph Nodes in Patients with Vulvar Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T04%3A25%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20Ultrasound%20in%20the%20Evaluation%20of%20Inguinal%20Lymph%20Nodes%20in%20Patients%20with%20Vulvar%20Cancer:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Cancers&rft.au=Verri,%20Debora&rft.date=2022-06-23&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=3082&rft.pages=3082-&rft.issn=2072-6694&rft.eissn=2072-6694&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/cancers14133082&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2687717736%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-8f5cea6fec87f9e9d78da61597975b66b6b509e9095ca32bac375cbef3f9b9ee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2685971809&rft_id=info:pmid/35804853&rfr_iscdi=true