Loading…

The use of Esketamine in CT-guided percutaneous liver tumor ablation reduces the consumption of remifentanil: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial

BackgroundIn the anesthesia management of percutaneous liver tumor ablation, the requirement of analgesia is very strict. Currently, intravenous anesthesia is commonly used, such as remifentanil combined with sedative drugs. However, the pain relief is not instantaneous after increasing the dosage o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of translational medicine 2022-06, Vol.10 (12), p.704-704
Main Authors: Su, Yanbing, Zhang, Jianxing, Wang, Huanwei, Gu, Yangkui, Ouyang, Handong, Huang, Wan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BackgroundIn the anesthesia management of percutaneous liver tumor ablation, the requirement of analgesia is very strict. Currently, intravenous anesthesia is commonly used, such as remifentanil combined with sedative drugs. However, the pain relief is not instantaneous after increasing the dosage of remifentanil. Esketamine, a medium- or long-term analgesic drug, does not inhibit respiration to maintain patient comfort during the ablation and reduces the consumption of remifentanil. Therefore, this experiment was designed to investigate the potential of combinational therapy and the most appropriate dose of esketamine. MethodsA total of 120 patients were randomly divided into three groups by SPSS. The regular anesthesia model included dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/kg, intravenous glucose tolerance test, remifentanil continuous infusion, flurbiprofen 50 mg, i.v., palonosetron 0.225 mg, i.v., and 1% lidocaine for local anesthesia. Group A was the regular control group, only using the regular model; Group B also received with 0.1 mg/kg esketamine, i.v.; and Group C also received 0.2 mg/kg esketamine, i.v.. The whole experiment was double-blind. ResultsFrom December 2020 to March 2021, 120 patients were randomized in total, and 108 were included in the analysis: 36, 37, 35 were allocated to Group A, Group B, and Group C, respectively. The total dosage of remifentanil in Group A, Group B, Group C was 179.38±123.37, 120.31±57.96 and 115.91±62.42 µg, respectively. We found the total dosage of remifentanil in Group B and Group C were significantly decreased in comparison to that of Group A (P=0.004, P=0.003, respectively). The maximum dosage of remifentanil in Group A, Group B, and Group C was 1.76±0.62, 1.37±0.47, and 1.33±0.56 ng/mL, respectively. The maximum dosage of remifentanil in Group B and Group C were significantly decreased in comparison to that of Group A (P=0.003, P=0.001, respectively). The incidence of severe pain during the ablation in Group B was significantly lower than that in Group A (3 vs. 12, P
ISSN:2305-5839
2305-5839
DOI:10.21037/atm-22-2756