A Sensibility Assessment of the Job Demands and Accommodation Planning Tool (JDAPT): A Tool to Help Workers with an Episodic Disability Plan Workplace Support

• Published in: Journal of occupational rehabilitation 2023-03, Vol.33 (1), p.145-159
• Main Authors: Gignac, Monique A. M., Bowring, Julie, Tonima, Sabrina, Franche, Renee-Louise, Thompson, Aaron, Jetha, Arif, Smith, Peter M., Macdermid, Joy C., Shaw, William S., Van Eerd, Dwayne, Beaton, Dorcas E., Irvin, Emma, Tompa, Emile, Saunders, Ron
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accommodation; Charities; Chronic fatigue syndrome; Chronic illnesses; Clinical Psychology; Cognitive ability; Disability; Disabled Persons; Employment; Environmental Health; Health Psychology; Humans; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Occupational health; Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine; Orthopedics; Personal health; Planning; Questionnaires; Rehabilitation; Work environment; Workers; Working conditions; Workplace; Workplaces
• ISSN: 1053-0487; 1573-3688
• DOI: 10.1007/s10926-022-10057-4

Purpose Sensibility refers to a tool’s comprehensiveness, understandability, relevance, feasibility, and length. It is used in the early development phase to begin assessing a new tool or intervention. This study examined the sensibility of the job demands and accommodation planning tool (JDAPT). The JDAPT identifies job demands related to physical, cognitive, interpersonal, and working conditions to better target strategies for workplace supports and accommodations aimed at assisting individuals with chronic health conditions. Methods Workers with a chronic health condition and workplace representatives were recruited from health charities, workplaces, and newsletters using convenience sampling. Cognitive interviews assessed the JDAPT’s sensibility. A 70% endorsement rate was the minimum level of acceptability for sensibility concepts. A short screening tool also was administered, and answers compared to the complete JDAPT. Results Participants were 46 workers and 23 organizational representatives (n = 69). Endorsements highly exceeded the 70% cut-off for understandability, relevance, and length. Congruence between screening questions and the complete JDAPT suggested both workers and organizational representatives overlooked job demands when completing the screener. Participants provided additional examples and three new items to improve comprehensiveness. The JDAPT was rated highly relevant and useful, although not always easy to complete for someone with an episodic condition. Conclusions This study highlights the need for tools that facilitate accommodations for workers with episodic disabilities and provides early evidence for the sensibility of the JDAPT.