A comparison of two frameworks for multi-state modelling, applied to outcomes after hospital admissions with COVID-19

We compare two multi-state modelling frameworks that can be used to represent dates of events following hospital admission for people infected during an epidemic. The methods are applied to data from people admitted to hospital with COVID-19, to estimate the probability of admission to intensive car...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Statistical methods in medical research 2022-09, Vol.31 (9), p.1656-1674
Main Authors: Jackson, Christopher H, Tom, Brian DM, Kirwan, Peter D, Mandal, Sema, Seaman, Shaun R, Kunzmann, Kevin, Presanis, Anne M, De Angelis, Daniela
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Competing risks models
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Cure
Goodness of fit
Hazards
Hospitalization
Hospitals
Humans
Intensive care
Intensive Care Units
Modelling
Probabilistic models
Probability
Software
Special Issue
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We compare two multi-state modelling frameworks that can be used to represent dates of events following hospital admission for people infected during an epidemic. The methods are applied to data from people admitted to hospital with COVID-19, to estimate the probability of admission to intensive care unit, the probability of death in hospital for patients before and after intensive care unit admission, the lengths of stay in hospital, and how all these vary with age and gender. One modelling framework is based on defining transition-specific hazard functions for competing risks. A less commonly used framework defines partially-latent subpopulations who will experience each subsequent event, and uses a mixture model to estimate the probability that an individual will experience each event, and the distribution of the time to the event given that it occurs. We compare the advantages and disadvantages of these two frameworks, in the context of the COVID-19 example. The issues include the interpretation of the model parameters, the computational efficiency of estimating the quantities of interest, implementation in software and assessing goodness of fit. In the example, we find that some groups appear to be at very low risk of some events, in particular intensive care unit admission, and these are best represented by using ‘cure-rate’ models to define transition-specific hazards. We provide general-purpose software to implement all the models we describe in the flexsurv R package, which allows arbitrarily flexible distributions to be used to represent the cause-specific hazards or times to events.
ISSN:0962-2802
1477-0334
DOI:10.1177/09622802221106720