Risk Assessment of Gypsum Amendment on Agricultural Fields: Effects of Sulfate on Riverine Biota

• Published in: Environmental toxicology and chemistry 2022-01, Vol.41 (1), p.108-121
• Main Authors: Rantamo, Krista, Arola, Hanna, Aroviita, Jukka, Hämälainen, Heikki, Hannula, Maija, Laaksonen, Rami, Laamanen, Tiina, Leppänen, Matti T., Salmelin, Johanna, Syrjänen, Jukka T., Taskinen, Antti, Turunen, Jarno, Ekholm, Petri
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural land; Algae; Animals; Arable land; Baltic Sea; Biota; Bivalvia; Calcium Sulfate - toxicity; Catchment areas; Environmental Toxicology; Eutrophication; Fresh water; Gypsum; Laboratories; Mollusks; Mussels; Phosphorus; Polls & surveys; Risk Assessment; Rivers; Salmo trutta; sulfate; Sulfates; Survival; Toxicity; Toxicity testing; Toxicology; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis; Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity; Water quality
• ISSN: 0730-7268; 1552-8618
• DOI: 10.1002/etc.5248

Gypsum (CaSO4∙2H2O) amendment is a promising way of decreasing the phosphorus loading of arable lands, and thus preventing aquatic eutrophication. However, in freshwaters with low sulfate concentrations, gypsum‐released sulfate may pose a threat to the biota. To assess such risks, we performed a series of sulfate toxicity tests in the laboratory and conducted field surveys. These field surveys were associated with a large‐scale pilot exercise involving spreading gypsum on agricultural fields covering 18% of the Savijoki River (Finland) catchment area. The gypsum amendment in such fields resulted in approximately a four‐fold increase in the mean sulfate concentration for a 2‐month period, and a transient, early peak reaching approximately 220 mg/L. The sulfate concentration gradually decreased almost to the pregypsum level after 3 years. Laboratory experiments with Unio crassus mussels and gypsum‐spiked river water showed significant effects on foot movement activity, which was more intense with the highest sulfate concentration (1100 mg/L) than with the control. Survival of the glochidia after 24 and 48 h of exposure was not significantly affected by sulfate concentrations up to 1000 mg/L, nor was the length growth of the moss Fontinalis antipyretica affected. The field studies on benthic algal biomass accrual, mussel and fish density, and Salmo trutta embryo survival did not show gypsum amendment effects. Gypsum treatment did not raise the sulfate concentrations even to a level just close to critical for the biota studied. However, because the effects of sulfate are dependent on both the spatial and the temporal contexts, we advocate water quality and biota monitoring with proper temporal and spatial control in rivers within gypsum treatment areas. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:108–121. © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.