Loading…

Divergent locomotor evolution in “giant” kangaroos: Evidence from foot bone bending resistances and microanatomy

The extinct sthenurine (giant, short‐faced) kangaroos have been proposed to have a different type of locomotor behavior to extant (macropodine) kangaroos, based both on physical limitations (the size of many exceeds the proposed limit for hopping) and anatomical features (features of the hind limb a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of morphology (1931) 2022-03, Vol.283 (3), p.313-332
Main Authors: Wagstaffe, Amber Y., O'Driscoll, Adrian M., Kunz, Callum J., Rayfield, Emily J., Janis, Christine M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4205-942f93e8c683dd58467df000e45e6ee9ede648a70cfdfd45ffae27d3ecd264db3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4205-942f93e8c683dd58467df000e45e6ee9ede648a70cfdfd45ffae27d3ecd264db3
container_end_page 332
container_issue 3
container_start_page 313
container_title Journal of morphology (1931)
container_volume 283
creator Wagstaffe, Amber Y.
O'Driscoll, Adrian M.
Kunz, Callum J.
Rayfield, Emily J.
Janis, Christine M.
description The extinct sthenurine (giant, short‐faced) kangaroos have been proposed to have a different type of locomotor behavior to extant (macropodine) kangaroos, based both on physical limitations (the size of many exceeds the proposed limit for hopping) and anatomical features (features of the hind limb anatomy suggestive of weight‐bearing on one leg at a time). Here, we use micro computerised tomography (micro‐CT) scans of the pedal bones of six kangaroos, three sthenurine, and three macropodine, ranging from ~50 to 150 kg, to investigate possible differences in bone resistances to bending and cortical bone distribution that might relate to differences in locomotion. Using second moment of area analysis, we show differences in resistance to bending between the two subfamilies. Distribution of cortical bone shows that sthenurines had less resistant calcaneal tubers, implying a different foot posture during locomotion, and the long foot bones were more resistant to the medial bending stresses. These differences were the most pronounced between Pleistocene monodactyl sthenurines (Sthenurus stirlingi and Procoptodon browneorum) and the two species of Macropus (the extant M. giganteus and the extinct M. cf. M. titan) and support the hypothesis that these derived sthenurines employed bipedal striding. The Miocene sthenurine Hadronomas retains some more macropodine‐like features of bone resistance to bending, perhaps reflecting its retention of the fifth pedal digit. The Pleistocene macropodine Protemnodon has a number of unique features, possibly indicative of a type of locomotion unlike the other kangaroos. Internal bone anatomy and resistance to bending along the bone support the hypothesis of different gaits in the extinct kangaroos.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jmor.21445
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9303454</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2618236070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4205-942f93e8c683dd58467df000e45e6ee9ede648a70cfdfd45ffae27d3ecd264db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRS0EIpPAhg9AXiKkDm7b_TALJBTCI0oUCcHa8rTLjUO3K7E9g2aXDwk_ly-JwyQRbPCmFj46VVeXkBc1268Z42_OZoz7vJayeUQWNVNdJdu-e0wWTLS84g1vdshuSmeMMaWa-inZEVKprrwFyR_8GuIIIdMJB5wxY6SwxmmVPQbqA72-vBq9Cfn68jf9acJoImJ6Sw_X3kIYgLqIM3WImS4xAF1CsD6MNELyKZtCJGqCpbMfIppgMs6bZ-SJM1OC53dzj3z_ePjt4HN1fPrpy8H742qQnDWVktwpAf3Q9sLappdtZ10JAbKBFkCBhVb2pmODs87KxjkDvLMCBstbaZdij7zbes9XyxnsUFJGM-nz6GcTNxqN1__-BP9Dj7jWSjAhG1kEr-4EES9WkLKefRpgmkwAXCXN27rnomUdK-jrLVpiphTBPaypmb6tSd_WpP_UVOCXfx_2gN73UoB6C_zyE2z-o9JHJ6dft9Ib546kVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2618236070</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Divergent locomotor evolution in “giant” kangaroos: Evidence from foot bone bending resistances and microanatomy</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Wagstaffe, Amber Y. ; O'Driscoll, Adrian M. ; Kunz, Callum J. ; Rayfield, Emily J. ; Janis, Christine M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wagstaffe, Amber Y. ; O'Driscoll, Adrian M. ; Kunz, Callum J. ; Rayfield, Emily J. ; Janis, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><description>The extinct sthenurine (giant, short‐faced) kangaroos have been proposed to have a different type of locomotor behavior to extant (macropodine) kangaroos, based both on physical limitations (the size of many exceeds the proposed limit for hopping) and anatomical features (features of the hind limb anatomy suggestive of weight‐bearing on one leg at a time). Here, we use micro computerised tomography (micro‐CT) scans of the pedal bones of six kangaroos, three sthenurine, and three macropodine, ranging from ~50 to 150 kg, to investigate possible differences in bone resistances to bending and cortical bone distribution that might relate to differences in locomotion. Using second moment of area analysis, we show differences in resistance to bending between the two subfamilies. Distribution of cortical bone shows that sthenurines had less resistant calcaneal tubers, implying a different foot posture during locomotion, and the long foot bones were more resistant to the medial bending stresses. These differences were the most pronounced between Pleistocene monodactyl sthenurines (Sthenurus stirlingi and Procoptodon browneorum) and the two species of Macropus (the extant M. giganteus and the extinct M. cf. M. titan) and support the hypothesis that these derived sthenurines employed bipedal striding. The Miocene sthenurine Hadronomas retains some more macropodine‐like features of bone resistance to bending, perhaps reflecting its retention of the fifth pedal digit. The Pleistocene macropodine Protemnodon has a number of unique features, possibly indicative of a type of locomotion unlike the other kangaroos. Internal bone anatomy and resistance to bending along the bone support the hypothesis of different gaits in the extinct kangaroos.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2525</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmor.21445</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34997777</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; bone resistance to bending ; Foot Bones ; Hindlimb ; Locomotion ; Macropodidae - anatomy &amp; histology ; Macropodinae ; pedal anatomy ; Sthenurinae</subject><ispartof>Journal of morphology (1931), 2022-03, Vol.283 (3), p.313-332</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Journal of Morphology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4205-942f93e8c683dd58467df000e45e6ee9ede648a70cfdfd45ffae27d3ecd264db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4205-942f93e8c683dd58467df000e45e6ee9ede648a70cfdfd45ffae27d3ecd264db3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8248-3370</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34997777$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wagstaffe, Amber Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Driscoll, Adrian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunz, Callum J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayfield, Emily J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janis, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><title>Divergent locomotor evolution in “giant” kangaroos: Evidence from foot bone bending resistances and microanatomy</title><title>Journal of morphology (1931)</title><addtitle>J Morphol</addtitle><description>The extinct sthenurine (giant, short‐faced) kangaroos have been proposed to have a different type of locomotor behavior to extant (macropodine) kangaroos, based both on physical limitations (the size of many exceeds the proposed limit for hopping) and anatomical features (features of the hind limb anatomy suggestive of weight‐bearing on one leg at a time). Here, we use micro computerised tomography (micro‐CT) scans of the pedal bones of six kangaroos, three sthenurine, and three macropodine, ranging from ~50 to 150 kg, to investigate possible differences in bone resistances to bending and cortical bone distribution that might relate to differences in locomotion. Using second moment of area analysis, we show differences in resistance to bending between the two subfamilies. Distribution of cortical bone shows that sthenurines had less resistant calcaneal tubers, implying a different foot posture during locomotion, and the long foot bones were more resistant to the medial bending stresses. These differences were the most pronounced between Pleistocene monodactyl sthenurines (Sthenurus stirlingi and Procoptodon browneorum) and the two species of Macropus (the extant M. giganteus and the extinct M. cf. M. titan) and support the hypothesis that these derived sthenurines employed bipedal striding. The Miocene sthenurine Hadronomas retains some more macropodine‐like features of bone resistance to bending, perhaps reflecting its retention of the fifth pedal digit. The Pleistocene macropodine Protemnodon has a number of unique features, possibly indicative of a type of locomotion unlike the other kangaroos. Internal bone anatomy and resistance to bending along the bone support the hypothesis of different gaits in the extinct kangaroos.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>bone resistance to bending</subject><subject>Foot Bones</subject><subject>Hindlimb</subject><subject>Locomotion</subject><subject>Macropodidae - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Macropodinae</subject><subject>pedal anatomy</subject><subject>Sthenurinae</subject><issn>0362-2525</issn><issn>1097-4687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRS0EIpPAhg9AXiKkDm7b_TALJBTCI0oUCcHa8rTLjUO3K7E9g2aXDwk_ly-JwyQRbPCmFj46VVeXkBc1268Z42_OZoz7vJayeUQWNVNdJdu-e0wWTLS84g1vdshuSmeMMaWa-inZEVKprrwFyR_8GuIIIdMJB5wxY6SwxmmVPQbqA72-vBq9Cfn68jf9acJoImJ6Sw_X3kIYgLqIM3WImS4xAF1CsD6MNELyKZtCJGqCpbMfIppgMs6bZ-SJM1OC53dzj3z_ePjt4HN1fPrpy8H742qQnDWVktwpAf3Q9sLappdtZ10JAbKBFkCBhVb2pmODs87KxjkDvLMCBstbaZdij7zbes9XyxnsUFJGM-nz6GcTNxqN1__-BP9Dj7jWSjAhG1kEr-4EES9WkLKefRpgmkwAXCXN27rnomUdK-jrLVpiphTBPaypmb6tSd_WpP_UVOCXfx_2gN73UoB6C_zyE2z-o9JHJ6dft9Ib546kVw</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Wagstaffe, Amber Y.</creator><creator>O'Driscoll, Adrian M.</creator><creator>Kunz, Callum J.</creator><creator>Rayfield, Emily J.</creator><creator>Janis, Christine M.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8248-3370</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Divergent locomotor evolution in “giant” kangaroos: Evidence from foot bone bending resistances and microanatomy</title><author>Wagstaffe, Amber Y. ; O'Driscoll, Adrian M. ; Kunz, Callum J. ; Rayfield, Emily J. ; Janis, Christine M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4205-942f93e8c683dd58467df000e45e6ee9ede648a70cfdfd45ffae27d3ecd264db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>bone resistance to bending</topic><topic>Foot Bones</topic><topic>Hindlimb</topic><topic>Locomotion</topic><topic>Macropodidae - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Macropodinae</topic><topic>pedal anatomy</topic><topic>Sthenurinae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wagstaffe, Amber Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Driscoll, Adrian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunz, Callum J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayfield, Emily J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janis, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of morphology (1931)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wagstaffe, Amber Y.</au><au>O'Driscoll, Adrian M.</au><au>Kunz, Callum J.</au><au>Rayfield, Emily J.</au><au>Janis, Christine M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Divergent locomotor evolution in “giant” kangaroos: Evidence from foot bone bending resistances and microanatomy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of morphology (1931)</jtitle><addtitle>J Morphol</addtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>283</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>313</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>313-332</pages><issn>0362-2525</issn><eissn>1097-4687</eissn><abstract>The extinct sthenurine (giant, short‐faced) kangaroos have been proposed to have a different type of locomotor behavior to extant (macropodine) kangaroos, based both on physical limitations (the size of many exceeds the proposed limit for hopping) and anatomical features (features of the hind limb anatomy suggestive of weight‐bearing on one leg at a time). Here, we use micro computerised tomography (micro‐CT) scans of the pedal bones of six kangaroos, three sthenurine, and three macropodine, ranging from ~50 to 150 kg, to investigate possible differences in bone resistances to bending and cortical bone distribution that might relate to differences in locomotion. Using second moment of area analysis, we show differences in resistance to bending between the two subfamilies. Distribution of cortical bone shows that sthenurines had less resistant calcaneal tubers, implying a different foot posture during locomotion, and the long foot bones were more resistant to the medial bending stresses. These differences were the most pronounced between Pleistocene monodactyl sthenurines (Sthenurus stirlingi and Procoptodon browneorum) and the two species of Macropus (the extant M. giganteus and the extinct M. cf. M. titan) and support the hypothesis that these derived sthenurines employed bipedal striding. The Miocene sthenurine Hadronomas retains some more macropodine‐like features of bone resistance to bending, perhaps reflecting its retention of the fifth pedal digit. The Pleistocene macropodine Protemnodon has a number of unique features, possibly indicative of a type of locomotion unlike the other kangaroos. Internal bone anatomy and resistance to bending along the bone support the hypothesis of different gaits in the extinct kangaroos.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>34997777</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmor.21445</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8248-3370</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-2525
ispartof Journal of morphology (1931), 2022-03, Vol.283 (3), p.313-332
issn 0362-2525
1097-4687
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9303454
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Animals
bone resistance to bending
Foot Bones
Hindlimb
Locomotion
Macropodidae - anatomy & histology
Macropodinae
pedal anatomy
Sthenurinae
title Divergent locomotor evolution in “giant” kangaroos: Evidence from foot bone bending resistances and microanatomy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T20%3A54%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Divergent%20locomotor%20evolution%20in%20%E2%80%9Cgiant%E2%80%9D%20kangaroos:%20Evidence%20from%20foot%20bone%20bending%20resistances%20and%20microanatomy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20morphology%20(1931)&rft.au=Wagstaffe,%20Amber%20Y.&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=283&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=313&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=313-332&rft.issn=0362-2525&rft.eissn=1097-4687&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmor.21445&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2618236070%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4205-942f93e8c683dd58467df000e45e6ee9ede648a70cfdfd45ffae27d3ecd264db3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2618236070&rft_id=info:pmid/34997777&rfr_iscdi=true