Widespread contamination of SARS‐CoV‐2 on highly touched surfaces in Brazil during the second wave of the COVID‐19 pandemic

Summary Although SARS‐CoV‐2 surface contamination has been investigated in health care settings, little is known about the SARS‐CoV‐2 surface contamination in public urban areas, particularly in tropical countries. Here, we investigated the presence of SARS‐CoV‐2 on high‐touch surfaces in a large ci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental microbiology 2021-12, Vol.23 (12), p.7382-7395
Main Authors: Silva, Severino Jefferson Ribeiro, Nascimento, Jessica Catarine Frutuoso, Santos Reis, Wendell Palôma Maria, Silva, Caroline Targino Alves, Silva, Poliana Gomes, Mendes, Renata Pessôa Germano, Mendonça, Allyson Andrade, Santos, Bárbara Nazly Rodrigues, Magalhães, Jurandy Júnior Ferraz, Kohl, Alain, Pena, Lindomar
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Brazil
Contamination
COVID-19
Fomites
Handrails
Health care
Humans
Pandemics
Parks & recreation areas
Playgrounds
Public transportation
RNA, Viral
SARS-CoV-2
Severe acute respiratory syndrome
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Toilets
Touch
Transport buildings, stations and terminals
Tropical climate
Urban areas
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Although SARS‐CoV‐2 surface contamination has been investigated in health care settings, little is known about the SARS‐CoV‐2 surface contamination in public urban areas, particularly in tropical countries. Here, we investigated the presence of SARS‐CoV‐2 on high‐touch surfaces in a large city in Brazil, one of the most affected countries by the COVID‐19 pandemic in the world. A total of 400 surface samples were collected in February 2021 in the City of Recife, Northeastern Brazil. A total of 97 samples (24.2%) tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 by RT‐qPCR using the CDC‐USA protocol. All the collection sites, except one (18/19, 94.7%) had at least one environmental surface sample contaminated. SARS‐CoV‐2 positivity was higher in public transport terminals (47/84, 55.9%), followed by health care units (26/84, 30.9%), beach areas (4/21, 19.0%), public parks (14/105, 13.3%), supply centre (2/21, 9.5%), and public markets (4/85, 4.7%). Toilets, ATMs, handrails, playgrounds and outdoor gyms were identified as fomites with the highest rates of SARS‐CoV‐2 detection. Taken together, our data provide a real‐world picture of SARS‐CoV‐2 dispersion in highly populated tropical areas and identify critical control points that need to be targeted to break SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission chains.
ISSN:1462-2912
1462-2920
DOI:10.1111/1462-2920.15855