Loading…
Seasonal Pollution Characteristics of Antibiotics on Pig Farms of Different Scales
Scientific interest in pollution from veterinary antibiotics (VAs) on intensive animal farms has been increasing in recent years. However, limited information is available on the seasonal pollution characteristics and the associated ecological risks of VAs, especially about the different scale farms...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2022-07, Vol.19 (14), p.8264 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-d8dcfa3828e77450952f7f8aac756542fe156154df5347040753883a2abc3d6a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-d8dcfa3828e77450952f7f8aac756542fe156154df5347040753883a2abc3d6a3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 14 |
container_start_page | 8264 |
container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Du, Delin Zhou, Jing Zhang, Keqiang Zhi, Suli |
description | Scientific interest in pollution from veterinary antibiotics (VAs) on intensive animal farms has been increasing in recent years. However, limited information is available on the seasonal pollution characteristics and the associated ecological risks of VAs, especially about the different scale farms. Therefore, this study investigated the seasonal pollution status and ecological risks of 42 typical VAs (5 classes) on three different scale pig farms (breeding scales of about 30,000, 1200, and 300 heads, respectively) in Tianjin, China. The results showed that large-scale pig farms usually had the highest antibiotic pollution levels, followed by small-scale pig farms and medium-scale pig farms. Among different seasons, antibiotic contamination was more severe in winter and spring than that in the other seasons. Tetracyclines (TCs) usually had higher proportions (over 51.46%) and the residual concentration detected in manure, and wastewater samples ranged from not detected (ND)-1132.64 mg/kg and ND-1692.50 μg/L, respectively, which all occurred for oxytetracycline (OTC) during winter. For the antibiotic ecological risks in the effluent, we found high-risk level of 12 selected VAs accounted for 58% in spring, and 7 kinds of VAs were selected in the amended soil, but nearly all the antibiotics had no obvious ecological risks except OTC (spring and summer). All these data provided an insight into the seasonal variability and the associated ecological risks of antibiotics on intensive pig farms, which can provide scientific guidance on decreasing antibiotic contamination to enhance environmental security in similar areas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph19148264 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9320919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2694008145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-d8dcfa3828e77450952f7f8aac756542fe156154df5347040753883a2abc3d6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtLAzEUhYMotj62LmXAjZvRZPKYzEYo1apQUHysw20maVOmk5rMCP57x7YW6-rmcr4cTnIQOiP4itICX7u5CcsZKQiTmWB7qE-EwCkTmOz_OffQUYxzjKlkojhEPcqlFITwPnp5NRB9DVXy7KuqbZyvk-EMAujGBBcbp2PibTKoGzdxfr3WybObJiMIi5V266w1wdRN8qqhMvEEHVioojndzGP0Prp7Gz6k46f7x-FgnGpGZJOWstQWqMykyXPGccEzm1sJoHMuOMusIVwQzkrLKcsxwzmnUlLIYKJpKYAeo5u177KdLEypuwQBKrUMbgHhS3lwalep3UxN_acqaIYLUnQGlxuD4D9aExu1cFGbqoLa-DaqTHSZpMxy0aEX_9C5b0P3bSuKYSwJ4x11taZ08DEGY7dhCFY_danduroL53-fsMV_-6HfyJ-Ruw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2694008145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seasonal Pollution Characteristics of Antibiotics on Pig Farms of Different Scales</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Du, Delin ; Zhou, Jing ; Zhang, Keqiang ; Zhi, Suli</creator><creatorcontrib>Du, Delin ; Zhou, Jing ; Zhang, Keqiang ; Zhi, Suli</creatorcontrib><description>Scientific interest in pollution from veterinary antibiotics (VAs) on intensive animal farms has been increasing in recent years. However, limited information is available on the seasonal pollution characteristics and the associated ecological risks of VAs, especially about the different scale farms. Therefore, this study investigated the seasonal pollution status and ecological risks of 42 typical VAs (5 classes) on three different scale pig farms (breeding scales of about 30,000, 1200, and 300 heads, respectively) in Tianjin, China. The results showed that large-scale pig farms usually had the highest antibiotic pollution levels, followed by small-scale pig farms and medium-scale pig farms. Among different seasons, antibiotic contamination was more severe in winter and spring than that in the other seasons. Tetracyclines (TCs) usually had higher proportions (over 51.46%) and the residual concentration detected in manure, and wastewater samples ranged from not detected (ND)-1132.64 mg/kg and ND-1692.50 μg/L, respectively, which all occurred for oxytetracycline (OTC) during winter. For the antibiotic ecological risks in the effluent, we found high-risk level of 12 selected VAs accounted for 58% in spring, and 7 kinds of VAs were selected in the amended soil, but nearly all the antibiotics had no obvious ecological risks except OTC (spring and summer). All these data provided an insight into the seasonal variability and the associated ecological risks of antibiotics on intensive pig farms, which can provide scientific guidance on decreasing antibiotic contamination to enhance environmental security in similar areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148264</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35886115</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Animal husbandry ; Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - analysis ; Antibiotics ; China ; Contamination ; Dairy farms ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Environmental risk ; Environmental security ; Farms ; Feeds ; Hogs ; Livestock ; Manure - analysis ; Manures ; Oxytetracycline ; Pollution levels ; Poultry ; Risk levels ; Seasonal variations ; Seasons ; Security ; Soil amendment ; Spring ; Spring (season) ; Swine ; Tetracyclines ; Wastewater ; Winter</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022-07, Vol.19 (14), p.8264</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-d8dcfa3828e77450952f7f8aac756542fe156154df5347040753883a2abc3d6a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-d8dcfa3828e77450952f7f8aac756542fe156154df5347040753883a2abc3d6a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5791-7907</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2694008145/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2694008145?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35886115$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Du, Delin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Keqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhi, Suli</creatorcontrib><title>Seasonal Pollution Characteristics of Antibiotics on Pig Farms of Different Scales</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>Scientific interest in pollution from veterinary antibiotics (VAs) on intensive animal farms has been increasing in recent years. However, limited information is available on the seasonal pollution characteristics and the associated ecological risks of VAs, especially about the different scale farms. Therefore, this study investigated the seasonal pollution status and ecological risks of 42 typical VAs (5 classes) on three different scale pig farms (breeding scales of about 30,000, 1200, and 300 heads, respectively) in Tianjin, China. The results showed that large-scale pig farms usually had the highest antibiotic pollution levels, followed by small-scale pig farms and medium-scale pig farms. Among different seasons, antibiotic contamination was more severe in winter and spring than that in the other seasons. Tetracyclines (TCs) usually had higher proportions (over 51.46%) and the residual concentration detected in manure, and wastewater samples ranged from not detected (ND)-1132.64 mg/kg and ND-1692.50 μg/L, respectively, which all occurred for oxytetracycline (OTC) during winter. For the antibiotic ecological risks in the effluent, we found high-risk level of 12 selected VAs accounted for 58% in spring, and 7 kinds of VAs were selected in the amended soil, but nearly all the antibiotics had no obvious ecological risks except OTC (spring and summer). All these data provided an insight into the seasonal variability and the associated ecological risks of antibiotics on intensive pig farms, which can provide scientific guidance on decreasing antibiotic contamination to enhance environmental security in similar areas.</description><subject>Animal husbandry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - analysis</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Dairy farms</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Environmental security</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Manure - analysis</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Oxytetracycline</subject><subject>Pollution levels</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Risk levels</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Soil amendment</subject><subject>Spring</subject><subject>Spring (season)</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Tetracyclines</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtLAzEUhYMotj62LmXAjZvRZPKYzEYo1apQUHysw20maVOmk5rMCP57x7YW6-rmcr4cTnIQOiP4itICX7u5CcsZKQiTmWB7qE-EwCkTmOz_OffQUYxzjKlkojhEPcqlFITwPnp5NRB9DVXy7KuqbZyvk-EMAujGBBcbp2PibTKoGzdxfr3WybObJiMIi5V266w1wdRN8qqhMvEEHVioojndzGP0Prp7Gz6k46f7x-FgnGpGZJOWstQWqMykyXPGccEzm1sJoHMuOMusIVwQzkrLKcsxwzmnUlLIYKJpKYAeo5u177KdLEypuwQBKrUMbgHhS3lwalep3UxN_acqaIYLUnQGlxuD4D9aExu1cFGbqoLa-DaqTHSZpMxy0aEX_9C5b0P3bSuKYSwJ4x11taZ08DEGY7dhCFY_danduroL53-fsMV_-6HfyJ-Ruw</recordid><startdate>20220706</startdate><enddate>20220706</enddate><creator>Du, Delin</creator><creator>Zhou, Jing</creator><creator>Zhang, Keqiang</creator><creator>Zhi, Suli</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5791-7907</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220706</creationdate><title>Seasonal Pollution Characteristics of Antibiotics on Pig Farms of Different Scales</title><author>Du, Delin ; Zhou, Jing ; Zhang, Keqiang ; Zhi, Suli</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-d8dcfa3828e77450952f7f8aac756542fe156154df5347040753883a2abc3d6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animal husbandry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - analysis</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Dairy farms</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Environmental security</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Manure - analysis</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Oxytetracycline</topic><topic>Pollution levels</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Risk levels</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Soil amendment</topic><topic>Spring</topic><topic>Spring (season)</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Tetracyclines</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Du, Delin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Keqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhi, Suli</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Du, Delin</au><au>Zhou, Jing</au><au>Zhang, Keqiang</au><au>Zhi, Suli</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seasonal Pollution Characteristics of Antibiotics on Pig Farms of Different Scales</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2022-07-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>8264</spage><pages>8264-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>Scientific interest in pollution from veterinary antibiotics (VAs) on intensive animal farms has been increasing in recent years. However, limited information is available on the seasonal pollution characteristics and the associated ecological risks of VAs, especially about the different scale farms. Therefore, this study investigated the seasonal pollution status and ecological risks of 42 typical VAs (5 classes) on three different scale pig farms (breeding scales of about 30,000, 1200, and 300 heads, respectively) in Tianjin, China. The results showed that large-scale pig farms usually had the highest antibiotic pollution levels, followed by small-scale pig farms and medium-scale pig farms. Among different seasons, antibiotic contamination was more severe in winter and spring than that in the other seasons. Tetracyclines (TCs) usually had higher proportions (over 51.46%) and the residual concentration detected in manure, and wastewater samples ranged from not detected (ND)-1132.64 mg/kg and ND-1692.50 μg/L, respectively, which all occurred for oxytetracycline (OTC) during winter. For the antibiotic ecological risks in the effluent, we found high-risk level of 12 selected VAs accounted for 58% in spring, and 7 kinds of VAs were selected in the amended soil, but nearly all the antibiotics had no obvious ecological risks except OTC (spring and summer). All these data provided an insight into the seasonal variability and the associated ecological risks of antibiotics on intensive pig farms, which can provide scientific guidance on decreasing antibiotic contamination to enhance environmental security in similar areas.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35886115</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph19148264</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5791-7907</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022-07, Vol.19 (14), p.8264 |
issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9320919 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Animal husbandry Animals Anti-Bacterial Agents - analysis Antibiotics China Contamination Dairy farms Environmental Monitoring - methods Environmental risk Environmental security Farms Feeds Hogs Livestock Manure - analysis Manures Oxytetracycline Pollution levels Poultry Risk levels Seasonal variations Seasons Security Soil amendment Spring Spring (season) Swine Tetracyclines Wastewater Winter |
title | Seasonal Pollution Characteristics of Antibiotics on Pig Farms of Different Scales |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T23%3A23%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seasonal%20Pollution%20Characteristics%20of%20Antibiotics%20on%20Pig%20Farms%20of%20Different%20Scales&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Du,%20Delin&rft.date=2022-07-06&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=8264&rft.pages=8264-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph19148264&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2694008145%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-d8dcfa3828e77450952f7f8aac756542fe156154df5347040753883a2abc3d6a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2694008145&rft_id=info:pmid/35886115&rfr_iscdi=true |