New Framework for Dynamic Water Environmental Capacity Estimation Integrating the Hydro-Environmental Model and Load–Duration Curve Method—A Case Study in Data-Scarce Luanhe River Basin

A better understanding of river capacity for contaminants (i.e., water environmental capacity, WEC) is essential for the reasonable utilization of water resources, providing government’s with guidance about sewage discharge management, and allocating investments for pollutant reduction. This paper a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of environmental research and public health 2022-07, Vol.19 (14), p.8389
Main Authors: Jin, Huiyu, Chen, Wanqi, Zhao, Zhenghong, Wang, Jiajia, Ma, Weichun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Ammonia
Case studies
Contaminants
Decay rate
Developing countries
Environmental modeling
Environmental protection
Flow velocity
Hydrologic models
Hydrologic regime
Hydrology
LDCs
Load
Methods
Pollutants
Pollution
Pollution control
River basins
Rivers
Sewage
Soil contamination
Soil water
Spatial distribution
Streams
Temporal distribution
Travel time
Waste management
Water pollution
Water quality
Water resources
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A better understanding of river capacity for contaminants (i.e., water environmental capacity, WEC) is essential for the reasonable utilization of water resources, providing government’s with guidance about sewage discharge management, and allocating investments for pollutant reduction. This paper applied a new framework integrating a modified hydro-environmental model, Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model, and load–duration curve (LDC) method for the dynamic estimation of the NH3-N WEC of the data-scarce Luanhe River basin in China. The impact mechanisms of hydrological and temperature conditions on WEC are discussed. We found that 77% of the WEC was concentrated in 40% hydrological guarantee flow rates. While the increasing flow velocity promoted the pollutant decay rate, it shortened its traveling time in streams, eventually reducing the river WEC. The results suggest that the integrated framework combined the merits of the traditional LDC method and the mechanism model. Thus, the integrated framework dynamically presents the WEC’s spatiotemporal distribution under different hydrological regimes with fewer data. It can also be applied in multi-segment rivers to help managers identify hot spots for fragile water environmental regions and periods at the basin scale.
ISSN:1660-4601
1661-7827
1660-4601
DOI:10.3390/ijerph19148389