Loading…

Unit cohesion during deployment and post-deployment mental health: is cohesion an individual- or unit-level buffer for combat-exposed soldiers?

Unit cohesion may protect service member mental health by mitigating effects of combat exposure; however, questions remain about the origins of potential stress-buffering effects. We examined buffering effects associated with two forms of unit cohesion (peer-oriented horizontal cohesion and subordin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychological medicine 2022-01, Vol.52 (1), p.121-131
Main Authors: Campbell-Sills, Laura, Flynn, Patrick J., Choi, Karmel W., Ng, Tsz Hin H., Aliaga, Pablo A., Broshek, Catherine, Jain, Sonia, Kessler, Ronald C., Stein, Murray B., Ursano, Robert J., Bliese, Paul D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e9288721e024931911bce1e724d40f258f9e8500e127a75fb3c60af5fafd49aa3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e9288721e024931911bce1e724d40f258f9e8500e127a75fb3c60af5fafd49aa3
container_end_page 131
container_issue 1
container_start_page 121
container_title Psychological medicine
container_volume 52
creator Campbell-Sills, Laura
Flynn, Patrick J.
Choi, Karmel W.
Ng, Tsz Hin H.
Aliaga, Pablo A.
Broshek, Catherine
Jain, Sonia
Kessler, Ronald C.
Stein, Murray B.
Ursano, Robert J.
Bliese, Paul D.
description Unit cohesion may protect service member mental health by mitigating effects of combat exposure; however, questions remain about the origins of potential stress-buffering effects. We examined buffering effects associated with two forms of unit cohesion (peer-oriented horizontal cohesion and subordinate-leader vertical cohesion) defined as either individual-level or aggregated unit-level variables. Longitudinal survey data from US Army soldiers who deployed to Afghanistan in 2012 were analyzed using mixed-effects regression. Models evaluated individual- and unit-level interaction effects of combat exposure and cohesion during deployment on symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and suicidal ideation reported at 3 months post-deployment (model 's = 6684 to 6826). Given the small effective sample size ( = 89), the significance of unit-level interactions was evaluated at a 90% confidence level. At the individual-level, buffering effects of horizontal cohesion were found for PTSD symptoms [ = -0.11, 95% CI (-0.18 to -0.04), < 0.01] and depressive symptoms [ = -0.06, 95% CI (-0.10 to -0.01), < 0.05]; while a buffering effect of vertical cohesion was observed for PTSD symptoms only [ = -0.03, 95% CI (-0.06 to -0.0001), < 0.05]. At the unit-level, buffering effects of horizontal (but not vertical) cohesion were observed for PTSD symptoms [ = -0.91, 90% CI (-1.70 to -0.11), = 0.06], depressive symptoms [ = -0.83, 90% CI (-1.24 to -0.41), < 0.01], and suicidal ideation [ = -0.32, 90% CI (-0.62 to -0.01), = 0.08]. Policies and interventions that enhance horizontal cohesion may protect combat-exposed units against post-deployment mental health problems. Efforts to support individual soldiers who report low levels of horizontal or vertical cohesion may also yield mental health benefits.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0033291720001786
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9341401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0033291720001786</cupid><sourcerecordid>2411555582</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e9288721e024931911bce1e724d40f258f9e8500e127a75fb3c60af5fafd49aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc-OFCEQxonRuOPoA3gxJF68tPKvp8GDxmzc1WQTD7pnQjfFDBsaRuieuE_hK0tnx91VIwcIVd_3K4pC6Dklrymh3ZuvhHDOFO0YIfUuNw_QioqNaqTq5EO0WtLNkj9BT0q5qhpOBXuMTjhrq5y1K_TzMvoJD2kHxaeI7Zx93GIL-5CuR4gTNtHifSpTcy-2bCbgHZgw7d5iX-4AJmIfrT94O5vQ4JTxXAs0AQ4QcD87Bxm7Gh3S2JupgR-VDRaXFKyHXN4_RY-cCQWeHc81ujz7-O30U3Px5fzz6YeLZhAdrT7FpOwYBcKE4lRR2g9AoWPCCuJYK50C2RIClHWma13Phw0xrnXGWaGM4Wv07oa7n_sR7FA7yiboffajydc6Ga__zES_09t00IoLKupHrtGrIyCn7zOUSY--DBCCiZDmopmgtK1Lsip9-Zf0Ks051vY021BOpFByAdIb1ZBTKRnc7WMo0cu49T_jrp4X97u4dfyebxXwI9SMffZ2C3e1_4_9BeK6t30</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2613084981</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unit cohesion during deployment and post-deployment mental health: is cohesion an individual- or unit-level buffer for combat-exposed soldiers?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Campbell-Sills, Laura ; Flynn, Patrick J. ; Choi, Karmel W. ; Ng, Tsz Hin H. ; Aliaga, Pablo A. ; Broshek, Catherine ; Jain, Sonia ; Kessler, Ronald C. ; Stein, Murray B. ; Ursano, Robert J. ; Bliese, Paul D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Campbell-Sills, Laura ; Flynn, Patrick J. ; Choi, Karmel W. ; Ng, Tsz Hin H. ; Aliaga, Pablo A. ; Broshek, Catherine ; Jain, Sonia ; Kessler, Ronald C. ; Stein, Murray B. ; Ursano, Robert J. ; Bliese, Paul D.</creatorcontrib><description>Unit cohesion may protect service member mental health by mitigating effects of combat exposure; however, questions remain about the origins of potential stress-buffering effects. We examined buffering effects associated with two forms of unit cohesion (peer-oriented horizontal cohesion and subordinate-leader vertical cohesion) defined as either individual-level or aggregated unit-level variables. Longitudinal survey data from US Army soldiers who deployed to Afghanistan in 2012 were analyzed using mixed-effects regression. Models evaluated individual- and unit-level interaction effects of combat exposure and cohesion during deployment on symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and suicidal ideation reported at 3 months post-deployment (model 's = 6684 to 6826). Given the small effective sample size ( = 89), the significance of unit-level interactions was evaluated at a 90% confidence level. At the individual-level, buffering effects of horizontal cohesion were found for PTSD symptoms [ = -0.11, 95% CI (-0.18 to -0.04), &lt; 0.01] and depressive symptoms [ = -0.06, 95% CI (-0.10 to -0.01), &lt; 0.05]; while a buffering effect of vertical cohesion was observed for PTSD symptoms only [ = -0.03, 95% CI (-0.06 to -0.0001), &lt; 0.05]. At the unit-level, buffering effects of horizontal (but not vertical) cohesion were observed for PTSD symptoms [ = -0.91, 90% CI (-1.70 to -0.11), = 0.06], depressive symptoms [ = -0.83, 90% CI (-1.24 to -0.41), &lt; 0.01], and suicidal ideation [ = -0.32, 90% CI (-0.62 to -0.01), = 0.08]. Policies and interventions that enhance horizontal cohesion may protect combat-exposed units against post-deployment mental health problems. Efforts to support individual soldiers who report low levels of horizontal or vertical cohesion may also yield mental health benefits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0033291720001786</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32517825</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Afghan Campaign 2001 ; Armed forces ; Buffering ; Combat experience ; Deployment ; Health problems ; Humans ; Individual differences ; Intervention ; Leadership ; Mental depression ; Mental disorders ; Mental Health ; Military personnel ; Military Personnel - psychology ; Original Article ; Post traumatic stress disorder ; Regression analysis ; Risk Factors ; Soldiers ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology ; Suicidal Ideation ; Suicide ; Symptoms</subject><ispartof>Psychological medicine, 2022-01, Vol.52 (1), p.121-131</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e9288721e024931911bce1e724d40f258f9e8500e127a75fb3c60af5fafd49aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e9288721e024931911bce1e724d40f258f9e8500e127a75fb3c60af5fafd49aa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2716-5441</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2613084981/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2613084981?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,12846,21394,21395,27924,27925,30999,33611,33612,34530,34531,43733,44115,72960,74221,74639</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32517825$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Campbell-Sills, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Karmel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Tsz Hin H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aliaga, Pablo A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broshek, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, Ronald C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Murray B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ursano, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bliese, Paul D.</creatorcontrib><title>Unit cohesion during deployment and post-deployment mental health: is cohesion an individual- or unit-level buffer for combat-exposed soldiers?</title><title>Psychological medicine</title><addtitle>Psychol. Med</addtitle><description>Unit cohesion may protect service member mental health by mitigating effects of combat exposure; however, questions remain about the origins of potential stress-buffering effects. We examined buffering effects associated with two forms of unit cohesion (peer-oriented horizontal cohesion and subordinate-leader vertical cohesion) defined as either individual-level or aggregated unit-level variables. Longitudinal survey data from US Army soldiers who deployed to Afghanistan in 2012 were analyzed using mixed-effects regression. Models evaluated individual- and unit-level interaction effects of combat exposure and cohesion during deployment on symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and suicidal ideation reported at 3 months post-deployment (model 's = 6684 to 6826). Given the small effective sample size ( = 89), the significance of unit-level interactions was evaluated at a 90% confidence level. At the individual-level, buffering effects of horizontal cohesion were found for PTSD symptoms [ = -0.11, 95% CI (-0.18 to -0.04), &lt; 0.01] and depressive symptoms [ = -0.06, 95% CI (-0.10 to -0.01), &lt; 0.05]; while a buffering effect of vertical cohesion was observed for PTSD symptoms only [ = -0.03, 95% CI (-0.06 to -0.0001), &lt; 0.05]. At the unit-level, buffering effects of horizontal (but not vertical) cohesion were observed for PTSD symptoms [ = -0.91, 90% CI (-1.70 to -0.11), = 0.06], depressive symptoms [ = -0.83, 90% CI (-1.24 to -0.41), &lt; 0.01], and suicidal ideation [ = -0.32, 90% CI (-0.62 to -0.01), = 0.08]. Policies and interventions that enhance horizontal cohesion may protect combat-exposed units against post-deployment mental health problems. Efforts to support individual soldiers who report low levels of horizontal or vertical cohesion may also yield mental health benefits.</description><subject>Afghan Campaign 2001</subject><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Buffering</subject><subject>Combat experience</subject><subject>Deployment</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Military personnel</subject><subject>Military Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Post traumatic stress disorder</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Soldiers</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology</subject><subject>Suicidal Ideation</subject><subject>Suicide</subject><subject>Symptoms</subject><issn>0033-2917</issn><issn>1469-8978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc-OFCEQxonRuOPoA3gxJF68tPKvp8GDxmzc1WQTD7pnQjfFDBsaRuieuE_hK0tnx91VIwcIVd_3K4pC6Dklrymh3ZuvhHDOFO0YIfUuNw_QioqNaqTq5EO0WtLNkj9BT0q5qhpOBXuMTjhrq5y1K_TzMvoJD2kHxaeI7Zx93GIL-5CuR4gTNtHifSpTcy-2bCbgHZgw7d5iX-4AJmIfrT94O5vQ4JTxXAs0AQ4QcD87Bxm7Gh3S2JupgR-VDRaXFKyHXN4_RY-cCQWeHc81ujz7-O30U3Px5fzz6YeLZhAdrT7FpOwYBcKE4lRR2g9AoWPCCuJYK50C2RIClHWma13Phw0xrnXGWaGM4Wv07oa7n_sR7FA7yiboffajydc6Ga__zES_09t00IoLKupHrtGrIyCn7zOUSY--DBCCiZDmopmgtK1Lsip9-Zf0Ks051vY021BOpFByAdIb1ZBTKRnc7WMo0cu49T_jrp4X97u4dfyebxXwI9SMffZ2C3e1_4_9BeK6t30</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Campbell-Sills, Laura</creator><creator>Flynn, Patrick J.</creator><creator>Choi, Karmel W.</creator><creator>Ng, Tsz Hin H.</creator><creator>Aliaga, Pablo A.</creator><creator>Broshek, Catherine</creator><creator>Jain, Sonia</creator><creator>Kessler, Ronald C.</creator><creator>Stein, Murray B.</creator><creator>Ursano, Robert J.</creator><creator>Bliese, Paul D.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2716-5441</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Unit cohesion during deployment and post-deployment mental health: is cohesion an individual- or unit-level buffer for combat-exposed soldiers?</title><author>Campbell-Sills, Laura ; Flynn, Patrick J. ; Choi, Karmel W. ; Ng, Tsz Hin H. ; Aliaga, Pablo A. ; Broshek, Catherine ; Jain, Sonia ; Kessler, Ronald C. ; Stein, Murray B. ; Ursano, Robert J. ; Bliese, Paul D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e9288721e024931911bce1e724d40f258f9e8500e127a75fb3c60af5fafd49aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Afghan Campaign 2001</topic><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Buffering</topic><topic>Combat experience</topic><topic>Deployment</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Military personnel</topic><topic>Military Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Post traumatic stress disorder</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Soldiers</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology</topic><topic>Suicidal Ideation</topic><topic>Suicide</topic><topic>Symptoms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Campbell-Sills, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Karmel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Tsz Hin H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aliaga, Pablo A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broshek, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, Ronald C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Murray B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ursano, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bliese, Paul D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Psychological medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Campbell-Sills, Laura</au><au>Flynn, Patrick J.</au><au>Choi, Karmel W.</au><au>Ng, Tsz Hin H.</au><au>Aliaga, Pablo A.</au><au>Broshek, Catherine</au><au>Jain, Sonia</au><au>Kessler, Ronald C.</au><au>Stein, Murray B.</au><au>Ursano, Robert J.</au><au>Bliese, Paul D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unit cohesion during deployment and post-deployment mental health: is cohesion an individual- or unit-level buffer for combat-exposed soldiers?</atitle><jtitle>Psychological medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol. Med</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>121-131</pages><issn>0033-2917</issn><eissn>1469-8978</eissn><abstract>Unit cohesion may protect service member mental health by mitigating effects of combat exposure; however, questions remain about the origins of potential stress-buffering effects. We examined buffering effects associated with two forms of unit cohesion (peer-oriented horizontal cohesion and subordinate-leader vertical cohesion) defined as either individual-level or aggregated unit-level variables. Longitudinal survey data from US Army soldiers who deployed to Afghanistan in 2012 were analyzed using mixed-effects regression. Models evaluated individual- and unit-level interaction effects of combat exposure and cohesion during deployment on symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and suicidal ideation reported at 3 months post-deployment (model 's = 6684 to 6826). Given the small effective sample size ( = 89), the significance of unit-level interactions was evaluated at a 90% confidence level. At the individual-level, buffering effects of horizontal cohesion were found for PTSD symptoms [ = -0.11, 95% CI (-0.18 to -0.04), &lt; 0.01] and depressive symptoms [ = -0.06, 95% CI (-0.10 to -0.01), &lt; 0.05]; while a buffering effect of vertical cohesion was observed for PTSD symptoms only [ = -0.03, 95% CI (-0.06 to -0.0001), &lt; 0.05]. At the unit-level, buffering effects of horizontal (but not vertical) cohesion were observed for PTSD symptoms [ = -0.91, 90% CI (-1.70 to -0.11), = 0.06], depressive symptoms [ = -0.83, 90% CI (-1.24 to -0.41), &lt; 0.01], and suicidal ideation [ = -0.32, 90% CI (-0.62 to -0.01), = 0.08]. Policies and interventions that enhance horizontal cohesion may protect combat-exposed units against post-deployment mental health problems. Efforts to support individual soldiers who report low levels of horizontal or vertical cohesion may also yield mental health benefits.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>32517825</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0033291720001786</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2716-5441</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-2917
ispartof Psychological medicine, 2022-01, Vol.52 (1), p.121-131
issn 0033-2917
1469-8978
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9341401
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection; Cambridge University Press
subjects Afghan Campaign 2001
Armed forces
Buffering
Combat experience
Deployment
Health problems
Humans
Individual differences
Intervention
Leadership
Mental depression
Mental disorders
Mental Health
Military personnel
Military Personnel - psychology
Original Article
Post traumatic stress disorder
Regression analysis
Risk Factors
Soldiers
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology
Suicidal Ideation
Suicide
Symptoms
title Unit cohesion during deployment and post-deployment mental health: is cohesion an individual- or unit-level buffer for combat-exposed soldiers?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T10%3A28%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unit%20cohesion%20during%20deployment%20and%20post-deployment%20mental%20health:%20is%20cohesion%20an%20individual-%20or%20unit-level%20buffer%20for%20combat-exposed%20soldiers?&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20medicine&rft.au=Campbell-Sills,%20Laura&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=121-131&rft.issn=0033-2917&rft.eissn=1469-8978&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0033291720001786&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2411555582%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-e9288721e024931911bce1e724d40f258f9e8500e127a75fb3c60af5fafd49aa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2613084981&rft_id=info:pmid/32517825&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0033291720001786&rfr_iscdi=true