Loading…

Cardiac arrest survivors lost to follow-up after 3-Months, 6-Months and 1-Year

Long-term assessment of global functional outcomes in cardiac arrest (CA) survivors allows for evaluation of acute care practices and referral to rehabilitation services. Given that many post-CA patients are lost to follow-up (LTFU), we explored whether these patients are systematically different fr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Resuscitation 2020-05, Vol.150, p.8-16
Main Authors: Jaramillo, Stephany, Flickinger, Katharyn L., Repine, Melissa, Pacella-LaBarbara, Maria, Callaway, Clifton W., Koller, Allison, Cullison, Kevin, Rittenberger, Jon C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-228cd1051578480b876e2db4f1c54d20fee8a34d7914538537433328a23f1f8a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-228cd1051578480b876e2db4f1c54d20fee8a34d7914538537433328a23f1f8a3
container_end_page 16
container_issue
container_start_page 8
container_title Resuscitation
container_volume 150
creator Jaramillo, Stephany
Flickinger, Katharyn L.
Repine, Melissa
Pacella-LaBarbara, Maria
Callaway, Clifton W.
Koller, Allison
Cullison, Kevin
Rittenberger, Jon C.
description Long-term assessment of global functional outcomes in cardiac arrest (CA) survivors allows for evaluation of acute care practices and referral to rehabilitation services. Given that many post-CA patients are lost to follow-up (LTFU), we explored whether these patients are systematically different from those who complete follow-up based on demographic, resuscitation and outcome characteristics. We conducted a prospective cohort study of 168 English-speaking CA survivors between 9/25/2016 and 5/31/2018. We measured demographic data and global functional outcomes using Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) in-person at hospital discharge, and via telephone at 3-, 6-months, and 1-year. We compared patients LTFU (e.g., failure to contact or refused to follow-up) with those contacted. Patients who were hospitalized, in a rehabilitation facility, missed by the research team, or dead were considered not eligible for follow-up. Of the 116 patients eligible for follow-up at 3-months, the majority completed follow-up (n = 69; 59.5%) and 47 (40.5%) were LTFU. Conversely, at 6-months and 1-year, fewer subjects were assessed (42% and 47%) compared to those who were LTFU (58% and 53%), respectively. At 3-months, LTFU patients were younger, unmarried, and had longer ICU stay. At 6-months and 1-year, LTFU patients were primarily male, had a non-shockable primary rhythm, and non-cardiac arrest etiologies. Over one-third of patients are LTFU during the first year after CA, and differences emerged for demographics and characteristics of the event. Future research should account for the informative, non-random distribution of patients LTFU.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.02.026
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9354037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0300957220300927</els_id><sourcerecordid>2377351706</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-228cd1051578480b876e2db4f1c54d20fee8a34d7914538537433328a23f1f8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rGzEQhkVpaNy0f6EIcukh646k1WqXQCGYtA3k49IeehKyNJvIrFeupHXIv6-M3ZDcCgPSMO88M9JLyCmDOQPWfFnNI6YpWZ9N9mGcc-AwB16ieUNmrFWiYlLBWzIDAVB1UvFj8j6lFQAI2al35Fhw1nQNyBm5XZjovLHUxELNNE1x67chJjqEkuZA-zAM4bGaNtT0GSMV1U0Y80M6o83hRs3oKKt-o4kfyFFvhoQfD-cJ-fXt8ufiR3V99_1qcXFd2bpjueK8tY6BLHu2dQvLVjXI3bLumZW149AjtkbUTnWslqKVQtVCCN4aLnrWl9IJ-brnbqblGp3FMUcz6E30axOfdDBev66M_kHfh63uhKxBqAL4fADE8GcqL9drnywOgxkxTElzoZSQTEFTpOd7qY0hpYj98xgGeueIXulXjuidIxp4iV33p5ebPvf-s6AILvcCLP-19Rh1AeFo0fmINmsX_H8N-gt16qRt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2377351706</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cardiac arrest survivors lost to follow-up after 3-Months, 6-Months and 1-Year</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Jaramillo, Stephany ; Flickinger, Katharyn L. ; Repine, Melissa ; Pacella-LaBarbara, Maria ; Callaway, Clifton W. ; Koller, Allison ; Cullison, Kevin ; Rittenberger, Jon C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jaramillo, Stephany ; Flickinger, Katharyn L. ; Repine, Melissa ; Pacella-LaBarbara, Maria ; Callaway, Clifton W. ; Koller, Allison ; Cullison, Kevin ; Rittenberger, Jon C.</creatorcontrib><description>Long-term assessment of global functional outcomes in cardiac arrest (CA) survivors allows for evaluation of acute care practices and referral to rehabilitation services. Given that many post-CA patients are lost to follow-up (LTFU), we explored whether these patients are systematically different from those who complete follow-up based on demographic, resuscitation and outcome characteristics. We conducted a prospective cohort study of 168 English-speaking CA survivors between 9/25/2016 and 5/31/2018. We measured demographic data and global functional outcomes using Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) in-person at hospital discharge, and via telephone at 3-, 6-months, and 1-year. We compared patients LTFU (e.g., failure to contact or refused to follow-up) with those contacted. Patients who were hospitalized, in a rehabilitation facility, missed by the research team, or dead were considered not eligible for follow-up. Of the 116 patients eligible for follow-up at 3-months, the majority completed follow-up (n = 69; 59.5%) and 47 (40.5%) were LTFU. Conversely, at 6-months and 1-year, fewer subjects were assessed (42% and 47%) compared to those who were LTFU (58% and 53%), respectively. At 3-months, LTFU patients were younger, unmarried, and had longer ICU stay. At 6-months and 1-year, LTFU patients were primarily male, had a non-shockable primary rhythm, and non-cardiac arrest etiologies. Over one-third of patients are LTFU during the first year after CA, and differences emerged for demographics and characteristics of the event. Future research should account for the informative, non-random distribution of patients LTFU.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-9572</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1570</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.02.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32169605</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Cardiac arrest ; Functional outcomes ; Lost to follow-up</subject><ispartof>Resuscitation, 2020-05, Vol.150, p.8-16</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-228cd1051578480b876e2db4f1c54d20fee8a34d7914538537433328a23f1f8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-228cd1051578480b876e2db4f1c54d20fee8a34d7914538537433328a23f1f8a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0271-1829 ; 0000-0003-2001-9764</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32169605$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jaramillo, Stephany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flickinger, Katharyn L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repine, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacella-LaBarbara, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callaway, Clifton W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koller, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullison, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rittenberger, Jon C.</creatorcontrib><title>Cardiac arrest survivors lost to follow-up after 3-Months, 6-Months and 1-Year</title><title>Resuscitation</title><addtitle>Resuscitation</addtitle><description>Long-term assessment of global functional outcomes in cardiac arrest (CA) survivors allows for evaluation of acute care practices and referral to rehabilitation services. Given that many post-CA patients are lost to follow-up (LTFU), we explored whether these patients are systematically different from those who complete follow-up based on demographic, resuscitation and outcome characteristics. We conducted a prospective cohort study of 168 English-speaking CA survivors between 9/25/2016 and 5/31/2018. We measured demographic data and global functional outcomes using Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) in-person at hospital discharge, and via telephone at 3-, 6-months, and 1-year. We compared patients LTFU (e.g., failure to contact or refused to follow-up) with those contacted. Patients who were hospitalized, in a rehabilitation facility, missed by the research team, or dead were considered not eligible for follow-up. Of the 116 patients eligible for follow-up at 3-months, the majority completed follow-up (n = 69; 59.5%) and 47 (40.5%) were LTFU. Conversely, at 6-months and 1-year, fewer subjects were assessed (42% and 47%) compared to those who were LTFU (58% and 53%), respectively. At 3-months, LTFU patients were younger, unmarried, and had longer ICU stay. At 6-months and 1-year, LTFU patients were primarily male, had a non-shockable primary rhythm, and non-cardiac arrest etiologies. Over one-third of patients are LTFU during the first year after CA, and differences emerged for demographics and characteristics of the event. Future research should account for the informative, non-random distribution of patients LTFU.</description><subject>Cardiac arrest</subject><subject>Functional outcomes</subject><subject>Lost to follow-up</subject><issn>0300-9572</issn><issn>1873-1570</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1rGzEQhkVpaNy0f6EIcukh646k1WqXQCGYtA3k49IeehKyNJvIrFeupHXIv6-M3ZDcCgPSMO88M9JLyCmDOQPWfFnNI6YpWZ9N9mGcc-AwB16ieUNmrFWiYlLBWzIDAVB1UvFj8j6lFQAI2al35Fhw1nQNyBm5XZjovLHUxELNNE1x67chJjqEkuZA-zAM4bGaNtT0GSMV1U0Y80M6o83hRs3oKKt-o4kfyFFvhoQfD-cJ-fXt8ufiR3V99_1qcXFd2bpjueK8tY6BLHu2dQvLVjXI3bLumZW149AjtkbUTnWslqKVQtVCCN4aLnrWl9IJ-brnbqblGp3FMUcz6E30axOfdDBev66M_kHfh63uhKxBqAL4fADE8GcqL9drnywOgxkxTElzoZSQTEFTpOd7qY0hpYj98xgGeueIXulXjuidIxp4iV33p5ebPvf-s6AILvcCLP-19Rh1AeFo0fmINmsX_H8N-gt16qRt</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Jaramillo, Stephany</creator><creator>Flickinger, Katharyn L.</creator><creator>Repine, Melissa</creator><creator>Pacella-LaBarbara, Maria</creator><creator>Callaway, Clifton W.</creator><creator>Koller, Allison</creator><creator>Cullison, Kevin</creator><creator>Rittenberger, Jon C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0271-1829</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2001-9764</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Cardiac arrest survivors lost to follow-up after 3-Months, 6-Months and 1-Year</title><author>Jaramillo, Stephany ; Flickinger, Katharyn L. ; Repine, Melissa ; Pacella-LaBarbara, Maria ; Callaway, Clifton W. ; Koller, Allison ; Cullison, Kevin ; Rittenberger, Jon C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-228cd1051578480b876e2db4f1c54d20fee8a34d7914538537433328a23f1f8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cardiac arrest</topic><topic>Functional outcomes</topic><topic>Lost to follow-up</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jaramillo, Stephany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flickinger, Katharyn L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repine, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacella-LaBarbara, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callaway, Clifton W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koller, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullison, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rittenberger, Jon C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Resuscitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jaramillo, Stephany</au><au>Flickinger, Katharyn L.</au><au>Repine, Melissa</au><au>Pacella-LaBarbara, Maria</au><au>Callaway, Clifton W.</au><au>Koller, Allison</au><au>Cullison, Kevin</au><au>Rittenberger, Jon C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cardiac arrest survivors lost to follow-up after 3-Months, 6-Months and 1-Year</atitle><jtitle>Resuscitation</jtitle><addtitle>Resuscitation</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>150</volume><spage>8</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>8-16</pages><issn>0300-9572</issn><eissn>1873-1570</eissn><abstract>Long-term assessment of global functional outcomes in cardiac arrest (CA) survivors allows for evaluation of acute care practices and referral to rehabilitation services. Given that many post-CA patients are lost to follow-up (LTFU), we explored whether these patients are systematically different from those who complete follow-up based on demographic, resuscitation and outcome characteristics. We conducted a prospective cohort study of 168 English-speaking CA survivors between 9/25/2016 and 5/31/2018. We measured demographic data and global functional outcomes using Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) in-person at hospital discharge, and via telephone at 3-, 6-months, and 1-year. We compared patients LTFU (e.g., failure to contact or refused to follow-up) with those contacted. Patients who were hospitalized, in a rehabilitation facility, missed by the research team, or dead were considered not eligible for follow-up. Of the 116 patients eligible for follow-up at 3-months, the majority completed follow-up (n = 69; 59.5%) and 47 (40.5%) were LTFU. Conversely, at 6-months and 1-year, fewer subjects were assessed (42% and 47%) compared to those who were LTFU (58% and 53%), respectively. At 3-months, LTFU patients were younger, unmarried, and had longer ICU stay. At 6-months and 1-year, LTFU patients were primarily male, had a non-shockable primary rhythm, and non-cardiac arrest etiologies. Over one-third of patients are LTFU during the first year after CA, and differences emerged for demographics and characteristics of the event. Future research should account for the informative, non-random distribution of patients LTFU.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32169605</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.02.026</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0271-1829</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2001-9764</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-9572
ispartof Resuscitation, 2020-05, Vol.150, p.8-16
issn 0300-9572
1873-1570
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9354037
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Cardiac arrest
Functional outcomes
Lost to follow-up
title Cardiac arrest survivors lost to follow-up after 3-Months, 6-Months and 1-Year
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T04%3A01%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cardiac%20arrest%20survivors%20lost%20to%20follow-up%20after%203-Months,%206-Months%20and%201-Year&rft.jtitle=Resuscitation&rft.au=Jaramillo,%20Stephany&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=150&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=8-16&rft.issn=0300-9572&rft.eissn=1873-1570&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.02.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2377351706%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-228cd1051578480b876e2db4f1c54d20fee8a34d7914538537433328a23f1f8a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2377351706&rft_id=info:pmid/32169605&rfr_iscdi=true