Loading…

Developmental Potential of embryos does not Impact Pregnancy Outcomes, but it Affects Live Birth Rates in Frozen Blastocyst Transfer Cycles

Objective This study aimed to determine whether or not developmental potential impacts clinical outcomes, when good grade blastocysts from Days 5 and 6 were transferred in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.Methods 654 women, including 460 (70.33%) on Day 5 and 194 (29.66%) on Day 6 were analyzed,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JBRA assisted reproduction 2022-01, Vol.26 (3), p.426-431
Main Authors: Andrabi, Syed Waseem, Arora, Puneet Rana, Mir, Jaffar, Kaur, Satinder, Khan, Aarish, Albarki, Abdul Salam
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2529-57046c5e996f7f7c39c81f22db0cb529ffef2f308a53cce6f89694da3f59c6fa3
cites
container_end_page 431
container_issue 3
container_start_page 426
container_title JBRA assisted reproduction
container_volume 26
creator Andrabi, Syed Waseem
Arora, Puneet Rana
Mir, Jaffar
Kaur, Satinder
Khan, Aarish
Albarki, Abdul Salam
description Objective This study aimed to determine whether or not developmental potential impacts clinical outcomes, when good grade blastocysts from Days 5 and 6 were transferred in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.Methods 654 women, including 460 (70.33%) on Day 5 and 194 (29.66%) on Day 6 were analyzed, in which 905 Day-5 and 274 Day-6 blastocysts were transferred. Only grade AA, AB, BA, BB quality and expansion grade between 3-6 (Gardner grading system) blastocysts survived and were included.Results The implantation rate was higher, 41.9% (379/905) in normal Day-5 compared to delayed Day-6 blastocyst transfers - 36.5% (100/274), but not significant (p=0.1). The clinical pregnancy rate was similar and not significant (p=0.4) in normal Day-5 (32.4%), compared to delayed Day-6 (35%). Miscarriage rates were higher in normal Day-5 (13.3%) compared to delayed Day-6 (6.3%) blastocyst transfers but were not significant (p=0.06). On the other hand, the biochemical pregnancy rate was significantly higher (p=0.001) in the delayed Day-6 blastocysts (16.7%) transfer group compared to patients with normal Day-5 (2.4%) blastocyst transfers. Two patients had ectopic pregnancies from the delayed Day-6 blastocyst transfer group. Live-Birth rates were significantly higher in Day-5 blastocysts compared to Day-6 (p=0.03).Conclusions The developmental potential of embryos should not be considered a negative influence on pregnancy outcomes, especially good grade blastocysts vitrified on Days 5 and 6. Fully expanded blastocysts on Day-5 are considered similar in terms of outcomes to delayed Day-6 blastocysts; however, live-birth rates are significantly higher in Day-5 blastocysts.
doi_str_mv 10.5935/1518-0557.20210109
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9355450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2699958125</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2529-57046c5e996f7f7c39c81f22db0cb529ffef2f308a53cce6f89694da3f59c6fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd9qFDEUxoMottS-gFcBb7xwa_5sZiY3QrtttbDQIvU6ZM6etCkzyZpkFsZX8KWbpbWoN8nHyS8f55yPkPecnSgt1WeueLdgSrUnggnOONOvyOFL8fVf-oAc5_zAGOOaC7lkb8mBrBZdK9Uh-X2OOxzidsRQ7EBvYqnCVxUdxbFPc8x0EzHTEAu9GrcWCr1JeBdsgJleTwXiiPkT7adCfaGnziGUTNd-h_TMp3JPv9tSv_tAL1P8hYGeDTaXCHMu9DbZkB0mupphwPyOvHF2yHj8fB-RH5cXt6tvi_X116vV6XoBQgm9UC1bNqBQ68a1rgWpoeNOiE3PoK9AbcEJJ1lnlQTAxnW60cuNlU5paJyVR-TLk-926kfcQJ042cFskx9tmk203vz7Evy9uYs7U_eulopVg4_PBin-nDAXM_oMOAw2YJyyEY3WWnVcqIp--A99iFMKdTwjWta19Wh1pcQTBSnmnNC9NMOZ2cdt9mmafZrmT9zyEfpynds</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2708727079</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developmental Potential of embryos does not Impact Pregnancy Outcomes, but it Affects Live Birth Rates in Frozen Blastocyst Transfer Cycles</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Andrabi, Syed Waseem ; Arora, Puneet Rana ; Mir, Jaffar ; Kaur, Satinder ; Khan, Aarish ; Albarki, Abdul Salam</creator><creatorcontrib>Andrabi, Syed Waseem ; Arora, Puneet Rana ; Mir, Jaffar ; Kaur, Satinder ; Khan, Aarish ; Albarki, Abdul Salam</creatorcontrib><description>Objective This study aimed to determine whether or not developmental potential impacts clinical outcomes, when good grade blastocysts from Days 5 and 6 were transferred in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.Methods 654 women, including 460 (70.33%) on Day 5 and 194 (29.66%) on Day 6 were analyzed, in which 905 Day-5 and 274 Day-6 blastocysts were transferred. Only grade AA, AB, BA, BB quality and expansion grade between 3-6 (Gardner grading system) blastocysts survived and were included.Results The implantation rate was higher, 41.9% (379/905) in normal Day-5 compared to delayed Day-6 blastocyst transfers - 36.5% (100/274), but not significant (p=0.1). The clinical pregnancy rate was similar and not significant (p=0.4) in normal Day-5 (32.4%), compared to delayed Day-6 (35%). Miscarriage rates were higher in normal Day-5 (13.3%) compared to delayed Day-6 (6.3%) blastocyst transfers but were not significant (p=0.06). On the other hand, the biochemical pregnancy rate was significantly higher (p=0.001) in the delayed Day-6 blastocysts (16.7%) transfer group compared to patients with normal Day-5 (2.4%) blastocyst transfers. Two patients had ectopic pregnancies from the delayed Day-6 blastocyst transfer group. Live-Birth rates were significantly higher in Day-5 blastocysts compared to Day-6 (p=0.03).Conclusions The developmental potential of embryos should not be considered a negative influence on pregnancy outcomes, especially good grade blastocysts vitrified on Days 5 and 6. Fully expanded blastocysts on Day-5 are considered similar in terms of outcomes to delayed Day-6 blastocysts; however, live-birth rates are significantly higher in Day-5 blastocysts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1518-0557</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1517-5693</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1518-0557</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210109</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35938735</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brasilia: Sociedade Brasileira de Reprodução Humana (Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction)</publisher><subject>Birth rate ; Embryos ; Endometrium ; Infertility ; Original ; Ovaries ; Ovulation ; Pregnancy</subject><ispartof>JBRA assisted reproduction, 2022-01, Vol.26 (3), p.426-431</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2529-57046c5e996f7f7c39c81f22db0cb529ffef2f308a53cce6f89694da3f59c6fa3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2708727079/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2708727079?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25732,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,53769,53771,74872</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andrabi, Syed Waseem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arora, Puneet Rana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mir, Jaffar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaur, Satinder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Aarish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albarki, Abdul Salam</creatorcontrib><title>Developmental Potential of embryos does not Impact Pregnancy Outcomes, but it Affects Live Birth Rates in Frozen Blastocyst Transfer Cycles</title><title>JBRA assisted reproduction</title><description>Objective This study aimed to determine whether or not developmental potential impacts clinical outcomes, when good grade blastocysts from Days 5 and 6 were transferred in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.Methods 654 women, including 460 (70.33%) on Day 5 and 194 (29.66%) on Day 6 were analyzed, in which 905 Day-5 and 274 Day-6 blastocysts were transferred. Only grade AA, AB, BA, BB quality and expansion grade between 3-6 (Gardner grading system) blastocysts survived and were included.Results The implantation rate was higher, 41.9% (379/905) in normal Day-5 compared to delayed Day-6 blastocyst transfers - 36.5% (100/274), but not significant (p=0.1). The clinical pregnancy rate was similar and not significant (p=0.4) in normal Day-5 (32.4%), compared to delayed Day-6 (35%). Miscarriage rates were higher in normal Day-5 (13.3%) compared to delayed Day-6 (6.3%) blastocyst transfers but were not significant (p=0.06). On the other hand, the biochemical pregnancy rate was significantly higher (p=0.001) in the delayed Day-6 blastocysts (16.7%) transfer group compared to patients with normal Day-5 (2.4%) blastocyst transfers. Two patients had ectopic pregnancies from the delayed Day-6 blastocyst transfer group. Live-Birth rates were significantly higher in Day-5 blastocysts compared to Day-6 (p=0.03).Conclusions The developmental potential of embryos should not be considered a negative influence on pregnancy outcomes, especially good grade blastocysts vitrified on Days 5 and 6. Fully expanded blastocysts on Day-5 are considered similar in terms of outcomes to delayed Day-6 blastocysts; however, live-birth rates are significantly higher in Day-5 blastocysts.</description><subject>Birth rate</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Endometrium</subject><subject>Infertility</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Ovaries</subject><subject>Ovulation</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><issn>1518-0557</issn><issn>1517-5693</issn><issn>1518-0557</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd9qFDEUxoMottS-gFcBb7xwa_5sZiY3QrtttbDQIvU6ZM6etCkzyZpkFsZX8KWbpbWoN8nHyS8f55yPkPecnSgt1WeueLdgSrUnggnOONOvyOFL8fVf-oAc5_zAGOOaC7lkb8mBrBZdK9Uh-X2OOxzidsRQ7EBvYqnCVxUdxbFPc8x0EzHTEAu9GrcWCr1JeBdsgJleTwXiiPkT7adCfaGnziGUTNd-h_TMp3JPv9tSv_tAL1P8hYGeDTaXCHMu9DbZkB0mupphwPyOvHF2yHj8fB-RH5cXt6tvi_X116vV6XoBQgm9UC1bNqBQ68a1rgWpoeNOiE3PoK9AbcEJJ1lnlQTAxnW60cuNlU5paJyVR-TLk-926kfcQJ042cFskx9tmk203vz7Evy9uYs7U_eulopVg4_PBin-nDAXM_oMOAw2YJyyEY3WWnVcqIp--A99iFMKdTwjWta19Wh1pcQTBSnmnNC9NMOZ2cdt9mmafZrmT9zyEfpynds</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Andrabi, Syed Waseem</creator><creator>Arora, Puneet Rana</creator><creator>Mir, Jaffar</creator><creator>Kaur, Satinder</creator><creator>Khan, Aarish</creator><creator>Albarki, Abdul Salam</creator><general>Sociedade Brasileira de Reprodução Humana (Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction)</general><general>Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Developmental Potential of embryos does not Impact Pregnancy Outcomes, but it Affects Live Birth Rates in Frozen Blastocyst Transfer Cycles</title><author>Andrabi, Syed Waseem ; Arora, Puneet Rana ; Mir, Jaffar ; Kaur, Satinder ; Khan, Aarish ; Albarki, Abdul Salam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2529-57046c5e996f7f7c39c81f22db0cb529ffef2f308a53cce6f89694da3f59c6fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Birth rate</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Endometrium</topic><topic>Infertility</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Ovaries</topic><topic>Ovulation</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andrabi, Syed Waseem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arora, Puneet Rana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mir, Jaffar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaur, Satinder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Aarish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albarki, Abdul Salam</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JBRA assisted reproduction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andrabi, Syed Waseem</au><au>Arora, Puneet Rana</au><au>Mir, Jaffar</au><au>Kaur, Satinder</au><au>Khan, Aarish</au><au>Albarki, Abdul Salam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Developmental Potential of embryos does not Impact Pregnancy Outcomes, but it Affects Live Birth Rates in Frozen Blastocyst Transfer Cycles</atitle><jtitle>JBRA assisted reproduction</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>426</spage><epage>431</epage><pages>426-431</pages><issn>1518-0557</issn><issn>1517-5693</issn><eissn>1518-0557</eissn><abstract>Objective This study aimed to determine whether or not developmental potential impacts clinical outcomes, when good grade blastocysts from Days 5 and 6 were transferred in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.Methods 654 women, including 460 (70.33%) on Day 5 and 194 (29.66%) on Day 6 were analyzed, in which 905 Day-5 and 274 Day-6 blastocysts were transferred. Only grade AA, AB, BA, BB quality and expansion grade between 3-6 (Gardner grading system) blastocysts survived and were included.Results The implantation rate was higher, 41.9% (379/905) in normal Day-5 compared to delayed Day-6 blastocyst transfers - 36.5% (100/274), but not significant (p=0.1). The clinical pregnancy rate was similar and not significant (p=0.4) in normal Day-5 (32.4%), compared to delayed Day-6 (35%). Miscarriage rates were higher in normal Day-5 (13.3%) compared to delayed Day-6 (6.3%) blastocyst transfers but were not significant (p=0.06). On the other hand, the biochemical pregnancy rate was significantly higher (p=0.001) in the delayed Day-6 blastocysts (16.7%) transfer group compared to patients with normal Day-5 (2.4%) blastocyst transfers. Two patients had ectopic pregnancies from the delayed Day-6 blastocyst transfer group. Live-Birth rates were significantly higher in Day-5 blastocysts compared to Day-6 (p=0.03).Conclusions The developmental potential of embryos should not be considered a negative influence on pregnancy outcomes, especially good grade blastocysts vitrified on Days 5 and 6. Fully expanded blastocysts on Day-5 are considered similar in terms of outcomes to delayed Day-6 blastocysts; however, live-birth rates are significantly higher in Day-5 blastocysts.</abstract><cop>Brasilia</cop><pub>Sociedade Brasileira de Reprodução Humana (Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction)</pub><pmid>35938735</pmid><doi>10.5935/1518-0557.20210109</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1518-0557
ispartof JBRA assisted reproduction, 2022-01, Vol.26 (3), p.426-431
issn 1518-0557
1517-5693
1518-0557
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9355450
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Birth rate
Embryos
Endometrium
Infertility
Original
Ovaries
Ovulation
Pregnancy
title Developmental Potential of embryos does not Impact Pregnancy Outcomes, but it Affects Live Birth Rates in Frozen Blastocyst Transfer Cycles
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T10%3A01%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developmental%20Potential%20of%20embryos%20does%20not%20Impact%20Pregnancy%20Outcomes,%20but%20it%20Affects%20Live%20Birth%20Rates%20in%20Frozen%20Blastocyst%20Transfer%20Cycles&rft.jtitle=JBRA%20assisted%20reproduction&rft.au=Andrabi,%20Syed%20Waseem&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=426&rft.epage=431&rft.pages=426-431&rft.issn=1518-0557&rft.eissn=1518-0557&rft_id=info:doi/10.5935/1518-0557.20210109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2699958125%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2529-57046c5e996f7f7c39c81f22db0cb529ffef2f308a53cce6f89694da3f59c6fa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2708727079&rft_id=info:pmid/35938735&rfr_iscdi=true