Loading…
Current practices for QSP model assessment: an IQ consortium survey
Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) modeling is increasingly applied in the pharmaceutical industry to influence decision making across a wide range of stages from early discovery to clinical development to post-marketing activities. Development of standards for how these models are constructed,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics 2024-10, Vol.51 (5), p.543-555 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-31ed601c2244e213419efd199e83ef3439f0b2360d50717271bdb16571a0e1c83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-31ed601c2244e213419efd199e83ef3439f0b2360d50717271bdb16571a0e1c83 |
container_end_page | 555 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 543 |
container_title | Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Chan, Jason R. Allen, Richard Boras, Britton Cabal, Antonio Damian, Valeriu Gibbons, Francis D. Gulati, Abhishek Hosseini, Iraj Kearns, Jeffrey D. Saito, Ryuta Cucurull-Sanchez, Lourdes Selimkhanov, Jangir Stein, Andrew M. Umehara, Kenichi Wang, Guanyu Wang, Weirong Neves-Zaph, Susana |
description | Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) modeling is increasingly applied in the pharmaceutical industry to influence decision making across a wide range of stages from early discovery to clinical development to post-marketing activities. Development of standards for how these models are constructed, assessed, and communicated is of active interest to the modeling community and regulators but is complicated by the wide variability in the structures and intended uses of the underlying models and the diverse expertise of QSP modelers. With this in mind, the IQ Consortium conducted a survey across the pharmaceutical/biotech industry to understand current practices for QSP modeling. This article presents the survey results and provides insights into current practices and methods used by QSP practitioners based on model type and the intended use at various stages of drug development. The survey also highlights key areas for future development including better integration with statistical methods, standardization of approaches towards virtual populations, and increased use of QSP models for late-stage clinical development and regulatory submissions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10928-022-09811-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9371373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2702186328</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-31ed601c2244e213419efd199e83ef3439f0b2360d50717271bdb16571a0e1c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS1ERUvhC3BAlrhwSevxOHHCAQmtClSqBBWtxM3yOpOSKokXT1Kp375eti1_DhyssTRv3rzRT4hXoI5AKXvMoBpdF0rrQjU1QAFPxAGUFovaGvN0-69skd_3ffGc-VopqEqtnol9LJsSq8ociNVqSYmmWW6SD3MfiGUXkzz_9lWOsaVBemZiHrPknfSTPD2XIU4c09wvo-Ql3dDtC7HX-YHp5X09FJcfTy5Wn4uzL59OVx_OimCsmQsEaisFQWtjSAMaaKhroWmoRurQYNOptcZKtaWyYLWFdbvOiS14RRBqPBTvd76bZT1SG3Km5Ae3Sf3o062Lvnd_d6b-h7uKN65BC2gxG7y9N0jx50I8u7HnQMPgJ4oLO22VhrpCvd315h_pdVzSlM9zCKjK0mC9NdQ7VUiROVH3GAaU2zJyO0YuM3K_GDnIQ6__PONx5AFKFuBOwLk1XVH6vfs_tneH1JuZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3130554383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current practices for QSP model assessment: an IQ consortium survey</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Chan, Jason R. ; Allen, Richard ; Boras, Britton ; Cabal, Antonio ; Damian, Valeriu ; Gibbons, Francis D. ; Gulati, Abhishek ; Hosseini, Iraj ; Kearns, Jeffrey D. ; Saito, Ryuta ; Cucurull-Sanchez, Lourdes ; Selimkhanov, Jangir ; Stein, Andrew M. ; Umehara, Kenichi ; Wang, Guanyu ; Wang, Weirong ; Neves-Zaph, Susana</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Jason R. ; Allen, Richard ; Boras, Britton ; Cabal, Antonio ; Damian, Valeriu ; Gibbons, Francis D. ; Gulati, Abhishek ; Hosseini, Iraj ; Kearns, Jeffrey D. ; Saito, Ryuta ; Cucurull-Sanchez, Lourdes ; Selimkhanov, Jangir ; Stein, Andrew M. ; Umehara, Kenichi ; Wang, Guanyu ; Wang, Weirong ; Neves-Zaph, Susana</creatorcontrib><description>Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) modeling is increasingly applied in the pharmaceutical industry to influence decision making across a wide range of stages from early discovery to clinical development to post-marketing activities. Development of standards for how these models are constructed, assessed, and communicated is of active interest to the modeling community and regulators but is complicated by the wide variability in the structures and intended uses of the underlying models and the diverse expertise of QSP modelers. With this in mind, the IQ Consortium conducted a survey across the pharmaceutical/biotech industry to understand current practices for QSP modeling. This article presents the survey results and provides insights into current practices and methods used by QSP practitioners based on model type and the intended use at various stages of drug development. The survey also highlights key areas for future development including better integration with statistical methods, standardization of approaches towards virtual populations, and increased use of QSP models for late-stage clinical development and regulatory submissions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1567-567X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1573-8744</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8744</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10928-022-09811-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35953664</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Biochemistry ; Biology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Biomedical research ; Biomedicine ; Biotechnology industry ; Calibration ; Clinical outcomes ; Consortia ; Decision making ; Drug development ; Drug Development - methods ; Drug Industry - methods ; Humans ; Intelligence ; Models, Biological ; Network Pharmacology - methods ; Ordinary differential equations ; Original Paper ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmacodynamics ; Pharmacokinetics ; Pharmacology ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Pharmacy ; Quality standards ; R&D ; Research & development ; Statistical models ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</subject><ispartof>Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2024-10, Vol.51 (5), p.543-555</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-31ed601c2244e213419efd199e83ef3439f0b2360d50717271bdb16571a0e1c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-31ed601c2244e213419efd199e83ef3439f0b2360d50717271bdb16571a0e1c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953664$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Jason R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boras, Britton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabal, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damian, Valeriu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, Francis D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulati, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosseini, Iraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearns, Jeffrey D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Ryuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cucurull-Sanchez, Lourdes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selimkhanov, Jangir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umehara, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Guanyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Weirong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves-Zaph, Susana</creatorcontrib><title>Current practices for QSP model assessment: an IQ consortium survey</title><title>Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics</title><addtitle>J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn</addtitle><addtitle>J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn</addtitle><description>Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) modeling is increasingly applied in the pharmaceutical industry to influence decision making across a wide range of stages from early discovery to clinical development to post-marketing activities. Development of standards for how these models are constructed, assessed, and communicated is of active interest to the modeling community and regulators but is complicated by the wide variability in the structures and intended uses of the underlying models and the diverse expertise of QSP modelers. With this in mind, the IQ Consortium conducted a survey across the pharmaceutical/biotech industry to understand current practices for QSP modeling. This article presents the survey results and provides insights into current practices and methods used by QSP practitioners based on model type and the intended use at various stages of drug development. The survey also highlights key areas for future development including better integration with statistical methods, standardization of approaches towards virtual populations, and increased use of QSP models for late-stage clinical development and regulatory submissions.</description><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Biomedical research</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biotechnology industry</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Drug development</subject><subject>Drug Development - methods</subject><subject>Drug Industry - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Network Pharmacology - methods</subject><subject>Ordinary differential equations</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmacodynamics</subject><subject>Pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Quality standards</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</subject><issn>1567-567X</issn><issn>1573-8744</issn><issn>1573-8744</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS1ERUvhC3BAlrhwSevxOHHCAQmtClSqBBWtxM3yOpOSKokXT1Kp375eti1_DhyssTRv3rzRT4hXoI5AKXvMoBpdF0rrQjU1QAFPxAGUFovaGvN0-69skd_3ffGc-VopqEqtnol9LJsSq8ociNVqSYmmWW6SD3MfiGUXkzz_9lWOsaVBemZiHrPknfSTPD2XIU4c09wvo-Ql3dDtC7HX-YHp5X09FJcfTy5Wn4uzL59OVx_OimCsmQsEaisFQWtjSAMaaKhroWmoRurQYNOptcZKtaWyYLWFdbvOiS14RRBqPBTvd76bZT1SG3Km5Ae3Sf3o062Lvnd_d6b-h7uKN65BC2gxG7y9N0jx50I8u7HnQMPgJ4oLO22VhrpCvd315h_pdVzSlM9zCKjK0mC9NdQ7VUiROVH3GAaU2zJyO0YuM3K_GDnIQ6__PONx5AFKFuBOwLk1XVH6vfs_tneH1JuZ</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Chan, Jason R.</creator><creator>Allen, Richard</creator><creator>Boras, Britton</creator><creator>Cabal, Antonio</creator><creator>Damian, Valeriu</creator><creator>Gibbons, Francis D.</creator><creator>Gulati, Abhishek</creator><creator>Hosseini, Iraj</creator><creator>Kearns, Jeffrey D.</creator><creator>Saito, Ryuta</creator><creator>Cucurull-Sanchez, Lourdes</creator><creator>Selimkhanov, Jangir</creator><creator>Stein, Andrew M.</creator><creator>Umehara, Kenichi</creator><creator>Wang, Guanyu</creator><creator>Wang, Weirong</creator><creator>Neves-Zaph, Susana</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Current practices for QSP model assessment: an IQ consortium survey</title><author>Chan, Jason R. ; Allen, Richard ; Boras, Britton ; Cabal, Antonio ; Damian, Valeriu ; Gibbons, Francis D. ; Gulati, Abhishek ; Hosseini, Iraj ; Kearns, Jeffrey D. ; Saito, Ryuta ; Cucurull-Sanchez, Lourdes ; Selimkhanov, Jangir ; Stein, Andrew M. ; Umehara, Kenichi ; Wang, Guanyu ; Wang, Weirong ; Neves-Zaph, Susana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-31ed601c2244e213419efd199e83ef3439f0b2360d50717271bdb16571a0e1c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Biomedical research</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biotechnology industry</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Drug development</topic><topic>Drug Development - methods</topic><topic>Drug Industry - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Network Pharmacology - methods</topic><topic>Ordinary differential equations</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmacodynamics</topic><topic>Pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Quality standards</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Jason R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boras, Britton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabal, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damian, Valeriu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, Francis D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulati, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosseini, Iraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearns, Jeffrey D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Ryuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cucurull-Sanchez, Lourdes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selimkhanov, Jangir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umehara, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Guanyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Weirong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves-Zaph, Susana</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Jason R.</au><au>Allen, Richard</au><au>Boras, Britton</au><au>Cabal, Antonio</au><au>Damian, Valeriu</au><au>Gibbons, Francis D.</au><au>Gulati, Abhishek</au><au>Hosseini, Iraj</au><au>Kearns, Jeffrey D.</au><au>Saito, Ryuta</au><au>Cucurull-Sanchez, Lourdes</au><au>Selimkhanov, Jangir</au><au>Stein, Andrew M.</au><au>Umehara, Kenichi</au><au>Wang, Guanyu</au><au>Wang, Weirong</au><au>Neves-Zaph, Susana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current practices for QSP model assessment: an IQ consortium survey</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics</jtitle><stitle>J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn</stitle><addtitle>J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn</addtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>555</epage><pages>543-555</pages><issn>1567-567X</issn><issn>1573-8744</issn><eissn>1573-8744</eissn><abstract>Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) modeling is increasingly applied in the pharmaceutical industry to influence decision making across a wide range of stages from early discovery to clinical development to post-marketing activities. Development of standards for how these models are constructed, assessed, and communicated is of active interest to the modeling community and regulators but is complicated by the wide variability in the structures and intended uses of the underlying models and the diverse expertise of QSP modelers. With this in mind, the IQ Consortium conducted a survey across the pharmaceutical/biotech industry to understand current practices for QSP modeling. This article presents the survey results and provides insights into current practices and methods used by QSP practitioners based on model type and the intended use at various stages of drug development. The survey also highlights key areas for future development including better integration with statistical methods, standardization of approaches towards virtual populations, and increased use of QSP models for late-stage clinical development and regulatory submissions.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>35953664</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10928-022-09811-1</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1567-567X |
ispartof | Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2024-10, Vol.51 (5), p.543-555 |
issn | 1567-567X 1573-8744 1573-8744 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9371373 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Biochemistry Biology Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering Biomedical research Biomedicine Biotechnology industry Calibration Clinical outcomes Consortia Decision making Drug development Drug Development - methods Drug Industry - methods Humans Intelligence Models, Biological Network Pharmacology - methods Ordinary differential equations Original Paper Pharmaceutical industry Pharmacodynamics Pharmacokinetics Pharmacology Pharmacology/Toxicology Pharmacy Quality standards R&D Research & development Statistical models Surveys Surveys and Questionnaires Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science |
title | Current practices for QSP model assessment: an IQ consortium survey |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T06%3A16%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20practices%20for%20QSP%20model%20assessment:%20an%20IQ%20consortium%20survey&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pharmacokinetics%20and%20pharmacodynamics&rft.au=Chan,%20Jason%20R.&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=555&rft.pages=543-555&rft.issn=1567-567X&rft.eissn=1573-8744&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10928-022-09811-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2702186328%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-31ed601c2244e213419efd199e83ef3439f0b2360d50717271bdb16571a0e1c83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3130554383&rft_id=info:pmid/35953664&rfr_iscdi=true |