Loading…

Current practices for QSP model assessment: an IQ consortium survey

Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) modeling is increasingly applied in the pharmaceutical industry to influence decision making across a wide range of stages from early discovery to clinical development to post-marketing activities. Development of standards for how these models are constructed,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics 2024-10, Vol.51 (5), p.543-555
Main Authors: Chan, Jason R., Allen, Richard, Boras, Britton, Cabal, Antonio, Damian, Valeriu, Gibbons, Francis D., Gulati, Abhishek, Hosseini, Iraj, Kearns, Jeffrey D., Saito, Ryuta, Cucurull-Sanchez, Lourdes, Selimkhanov, Jangir, Stein, Andrew M., Umehara, Kenichi, Wang, Guanyu, Wang, Weirong, Neves-Zaph, Susana
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-31ed601c2244e213419efd199e83ef3439f0b2360d50717271bdb16571a0e1c83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-31ed601c2244e213419efd199e83ef3439f0b2360d50717271bdb16571a0e1c83
container_end_page 555
container_issue 5
container_start_page 543
container_title Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
container_volume 51
creator Chan, Jason R.
Allen, Richard
Boras, Britton
Cabal, Antonio
Damian, Valeriu
Gibbons, Francis D.
Gulati, Abhishek
Hosseini, Iraj
Kearns, Jeffrey D.
Saito, Ryuta
Cucurull-Sanchez, Lourdes
Selimkhanov, Jangir
Stein, Andrew M.
Umehara, Kenichi
Wang, Guanyu
Wang, Weirong
Neves-Zaph, Susana
description Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) modeling is increasingly applied in the pharmaceutical industry to influence decision making across a wide range of stages from early discovery to clinical development to post-marketing activities. Development of standards for how these models are constructed, assessed, and communicated is of active interest to the modeling community and regulators but is complicated by the wide variability in the structures and intended uses of the underlying models and the diverse expertise of QSP modelers. With this in mind, the IQ Consortium conducted a survey across the pharmaceutical/biotech industry to understand current practices for QSP modeling. This article presents the survey results and provides insights into current practices and methods used by QSP practitioners based on model type and the intended use at various stages of drug development. The survey also highlights key areas for future development including better integration with statistical methods, standardization of approaches towards virtual populations, and increased use of QSP models for late-stage clinical development and regulatory submissions.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10928-022-09811-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9371373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2702186328</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-31ed601c2244e213419efd199e83ef3439f0b2360d50717271bdb16571a0e1c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS1ERUvhC3BAlrhwSevxOHHCAQmtClSqBBWtxM3yOpOSKokXT1Kp375eti1_DhyssTRv3rzRT4hXoI5AKXvMoBpdF0rrQjU1QAFPxAGUFovaGvN0-69skd_3ffGc-VopqEqtnol9LJsSq8ociNVqSYmmWW6SD3MfiGUXkzz_9lWOsaVBemZiHrPknfSTPD2XIU4c09wvo-Ql3dDtC7HX-YHp5X09FJcfTy5Wn4uzL59OVx_OimCsmQsEaisFQWtjSAMaaKhroWmoRurQYNOptcZKtaWyYLWFdbvOiS14RRBqPBTvd76bZT1SG3Km5Ae3Sf3o062Lvnd_d6b-h7uKN65BC2gxG7y9N0jx50I8u7HnQMPgJ4oLO22VhrpCvd315h_pdVzSlM9zCKjK0mC9NdQ7VUiROVH3GAaU2zJyO0YuM3K_GDnIQ6__PONx5AFKFuBOwLk1XVH6vfs_tneH1JuZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3130554383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current practices for QSP model assessment: an IQ consortium survey</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Chan, Jason R. ; Allen, Richard ; Boras, Britton ; Cabal, Antonio ; Damian, Valeriu ; Gibbons, Francis D. ; Gulati, Abhishek ; Hosseini, Iraj ; Kearns, Jeffrey D. ; Saito, Ryuta ; Cucurull-Sanchez, Lourdes ; Selimkhanov, Jangir ; Stein, Andrew M. ; Umehara, Kenichi ; Wang, Guanyu ; Wang, Weirong ; Neves-Zaph, Susana</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Jason R. ; Allen, Richard ; Boras, Britton ; Cabal, Antonio ; Damian, Valeriu ; Gibbons, Francis D. ; Gulati, Abhishek ; Hosseini, Iraj ; Kearns, Jeffrey D. ; Saito, Ryuta ; Cucurull-Sanchez, Lourdes ; Selimkhanov, Jangir ; Stein, Andrew M. ; Umehara, Kenichi ; Wang, Guanyu ; Wang, Weirong ; Neves-Zaph, Susana</creatorcontrib><description>Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) modeling is increasingly applied in the pharmaceutical industry to influence decision making across a wide range of stages from early discovery to clinical development to post-marketing activities. Development of standards for how these models are constructed, assessed, and communicated is of active interest to the modeling community and regulators but is complicated by the wide variability in the structures and intended uses of the underlying models and the diverse expertise of QSP modelers. With this in mind, the IQ Consortium conducted a survey across the pharmaceutical/biotech industry to understand current practices for QSP modeling. This article presents the survey results and provides insights into current practices and methods used by QSP practitioners based on model type and the intended use at various stages of drug development. The survey also highlights key areas for future development including better integration with statistical methods, standardization of approaches towards virtual populations, and increased use of QSP models for late-stage clinical development and regulatory submissions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1567-567X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1573-8744</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8744</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10928-022-09811-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35953664</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Biochemistry ; Biology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Biomedical research ; Biomedicine ; Biotechnology industry ; Calibration ; Clinical outcomes ; Consortia ; Decision making ; Drug development ; Drug Development - methods ; Drug Industry - methods ; Humans ; Intelligence ; Models, Biological ; Network Pharmacology - methods ; Ordinary differential equations ; Original Paper ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmacodynamics ; Pharmacokinetics ; Pharmacology ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Pharmacy ; Quality standards ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Statistical models ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</subject><ispartof>Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2024-10, Vol.51 (5), p.543-555</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-31ed601c2244e213419efd199e83ef3439f0b2360d50717271bdb16571a0e1c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-31ed601c2244e213419efd199e83ef3439f0b2360d50717271bdb16571a0e1c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953664$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Jason R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boras, Britton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabal, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damian, Valeriu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, Francis D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulati, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosseini, Iraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearns, Jeffrey D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Ryuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cucurull-Sanchez, Lourdes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selimkhanov, Jangir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umehara, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Guanyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Weirong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves-Zaph, Susana</creatorcontrib><title>Current practices for QSP model assessment: an IQ consortium survey</title><title>Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics</title><addtitle>J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn</addtitle><addtitle>J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn</addtitle><description>Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) modeling is increasingly applied in the pharmaceutical industry to influence decision making across a wide range of stages from early discovery to clinical development to post-marketing activities. Development of standards for how these models are constructed, assessed, and communicated is of active interest to the modeling community and regulators but is complicated by the wide variability in the structures and intended uses of the underlying models and the diverse expertise of QSP modelers. With this in mind, the IQ Consortium conducted a survey across the pharmaceutical/biotech industry to understand current practices for QSP modeling. This article presents the survey results and provides insights into current practices and methods used by QSP practitioners based on model type and the intended use at various stages of drug development. The survey also highlights key areas for future development including better integration with statistical methods, standardization of approaches towards virtual populations, and increased use of QSP models for late-stage clinical development and regulatory submissions.</description><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Biomedical research</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biotechnology industry</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Drug development</subject><subject>Drug Development - methods</subject><subject>Drug Industry - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Network Pharmacology - methods</subject><subject>Ordinary differential equations</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmacodynamics</subject><subject>Pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Quality standards</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</subject><issn>1567-567X</issn><issn>1573-8744</issn><issn>1573-8744</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS1ERUvhC3BAlrhwSevxOHHCAQmtClSqBBWtxM3yOpOSKokXT1Kp375eti1_DhyssTRv3rzRT4hXoI5AKXvMoBpdF0rrQjU1QAFPxAGUFovaGvN0-69skd_3ffGc-VopqEqtnol9LJsSq8ociNVqSYmmWW6SD3MfiGUXkzz_9lWOsaVBemZiHrPknfSTPD2XIU4c09wvo-Ql3dDtC7HX-YHp5X09FJcfTy5Wn4uzL59OVx_OimCsmQsEaisFQWtjSAMaaKhroWmoRurQYNOptcZKtaWyYLWFdbvOiS14RRBqPBTvd76bZT1SG3Km5Ae3Sf3o062Lvnd_d6b-h7uKN65BC2gxG7y9N0jx50I8u7HnQMPgJ4oLO22VhrpCvd315h_pdVzSlM9zCKjK0mC9NdQ7VUiROVH3GAaU2zJyO0YuM3K_GDnIQ6__PONx5AFKFuBOwLk1XVH6vfs_tneH1JuZ</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Chan, Jason R.</creator><creator>Allen, Richard</creator><creator>Boras, Britton</creator><creator>Cabal, Antonio</creator><creator>Damian, Valeriu</creator><creator>Gibbons, Francis D.</creator><creator>Gulati, Abhishek</creator><creator>Hosseini, Iraj</creator><creator>Kearns, Jeffrey D.</creator><creator>Saito, Ryuta</creator><creator>Cucurull-Sanchez, Lourdes</creator><creator>Selimkhanov, Jangir</creator><creator>Stein, Andrew M.</creator><creator>Umehara, Kenichi</creator><creator>Wang, Guanyu</creator><creator>Wang, Weirong</creator><creator>Neves-Zaph, Susana</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Current practices for QSP model assessment: an IQ consortium survey</title><author>Chan, Jason R. ; Allen, Richard ; Boras, Britton ; Cabal, Antonio ; Damian, Valeriu ; Gibbons, Francis D. ; Gulati, Abhishek ; Hosseini, Iraj ; Kearns, Jeffrey D. ; Saito, Ryuta ; Cucurull-Sanchez, Lourdes ; Selimkhanov, Jangir ; Stein, Andrew M. ; Umehara, Kenichi ; Wang, Guanyu ; Wang, Weirong ; Neves-Zaph, Susana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-31ed601c2244e213419efd199e83ef3439f0b2360d50717271bdb16571a0e1c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Biomedical research</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biotechnology industry</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Drug development</topic><topic>Drug Development - methods</topic><topic>Drug Industry - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Network Pharmacology - methods</topic><topic>Ordinary differential equations</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmacodynamics</topic><topic>Pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Quality standards</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Jason R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boras, Britton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabal, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damian, Valeriu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, Francis D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulati, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosseini, Iraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearns, Jeffrey D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Ryuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cucurull-Sanchez, Lourdes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selimkhanov, Jangir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umehara, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Guanyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Weirong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves-Zaph, Susana</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Jason R.</au><au>Allen, Richard</au><au>Boras, Britton</au><au>Cabal, Antonio</au><au>Damian, Valeriu</au><au>Gibbons, Francis D.</au><au>Gulati, Abhishek</au><au>Hosseini, Iraj</au><au>Kearns, Jeffrey D.</au><au>Saito, Ryuta</au><au>Cucurull-Sanchez, Lourdes</au><au>Selimkhanov, Jangir</au><au>Stein, Andrew M.</au><au>Umehara, Kenichi</au><au>Wang, Guanyu</au><au>Wang, Weirong</au><au>Neves-Zaph, Susana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current practices for QSP model assessment: an IQ consortium survey</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics</jtitle><stitle>J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn</stitle><addtitle>J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn</addtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>555</epage><pages>543-555</pages><issn>1567-567X</issn><issn>1573-8744</issn><eissn>1573-8744</eissn><abstract>Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) modeling is increasingly applied in the pharmaceutical industry to influence decision making across a wide range of stages from early discovery to clinical development to post-marketing activities. Development of standards for how these models are constructed, assessed, and communicated is of active interest to the modeling community and regulators but is complicated by the wide variability in the structures and intended uses of the underlying models and the diverse expertise of QSP modelers. With this in mind, the IQ Consortium conducted a survey across the pharmaceutical/biotech industry to understand current practices for QSP modeling. This article presents the survey results and provides insights into current practices and methods used by QSP practitioners based on model type and the intended use at various stages of drug development. The survey also highlights key areas for future development including better integration with statistical methods, standardization of approaches towards virtual populations, and increased use of QSP models for late-stage clinical development and regulatory submissions.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>35953664</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10928-022-09811-1</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1567-567X
ispartof Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2024-10, Vol.51 (5), p.543-555
issn 1567-567X
1573-8744
1573-8744
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9371373
source Springer Nature
subjects Biochemistry
Biology
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering
Biomedical research
Biomedicine
Biotechnology industry
Calibration
Clinical outcomes
Consortia
Decision making
Drug development
Drug Development - methods
Drug Industry - methods
Humans
Intelligence
Models, Biological
Network Pharmacology - methods
Ordinary differential equations
Original Paper
Pharmaceutical industry
Pharmacodynamics
Pharmacokinetics
Pharmacology
Pharmacology/Toxicology
Pharmacy
Quality standards
R&D
Research & development
Statistical models
Surveys
Surveys and Questionnaires
Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science
title Current practices for QSP model assessment: an IQ consortium survey
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T06%3A16%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20practices%20for%20QSP%20model%20assessment:%20an%20IQ%20consortium%20survey&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pharmacokinetics%20and%20pharmacodynamics&rft.au=Chan,%20Jason%20R.&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=555&rft.pages=543-555&rft.issn=1567-567X&rft.eissn=1573-8744&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10928-022-09811-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2702186328%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-31ed601c2244e213419efd199e83ef3439f0b2360d50717271bdb16571a0e1c83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3130554383&rft_id=info:pmid/35953664&rfr_iscdi=true