Coping styles mediating the relationship between perceived chronic stress and conspiracy beliefs about COVID-19

• Published in: Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) N.J.), 2024-04, Vol.43 (15), p.13963-13971
• Main Authors: Pfeffer, Bettina, Goreis, Andreas, Reichmann, Adelais, Bauda, Ines, Klinger, Diana, Bock, Mercedes M., Plener, Paul L., Kothgassner, Oswald D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Behavioral Science and Psychology; Conspiracy; Coping; COVID-19; Psychology; Social Sciences; Stress
• ISSN: 1046-1310; 1936-4733
• DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-03625-7

As a global health crisis, COVID-19 has led to a rise in overall stress levels. Concurrently, conspiracy beliefs regarding the origin and spread of the disease have become widespread. Engaging in such beliefs can be explained as a form of coping in order to deal with elevated levels of stress. The present study investigated the indirect effects of coping strategies in the association between perceived chronic stress and COVID-related conspiracy beliefs. We report data from an online survey ( N  = 1,354 individuals: 807 female; 508 male; 8 diverse; 6 not specified; mean age 39.14 years) in German-speaking countries collected between January and March 2021. Our results indicate that people who felt more stressed were more prone to conspiracy beliefs. Coping via acceptance and self-blame was associated with decreased tendencies towards COVID-related conspiracy beliefs, while people who used denial as a strategy were more prone to these beliefs. These findings emphasize the need for stress management interventions and effective coping strategies during times of crisis in order to reduce chronic perceived stress, promote adaptive coping, and ultimately reduce conspiracy beliefs.