Loading…
Determinants of the decision to be vaccinated against COVID-19 as exemplified by employees of a long-term health care centre
Abstract Introduction Health care professionals cover the front line in the battle against infectious diseases. Vaccination of healthcare workers represents a vital element of the strategy for enhancing epidemic safety and improving the quality of health care, inter alia, by limiting microorganism t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of public health (Oxford, England) England), 2023-03, Vol.45 (1), p.237-244 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-8bed51a3736d67c0e4151154e9abfebb16b95d25b20a097bd4e6912527756f373 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-8bed51a3736d67c0e4151154e9abfebb16b95d25b20a097bd4e6912527756f373 |
container_end_page | 244 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 237 |
container_title | Journal of public health (Oxford, England) |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Tylec, Aneta Janiszewska, Mariola Siejko, Krzysztof Kucharska, Katarzyna |
description | Abstract
Introduction
Health care professionals cover the front line in the battle against infectious diseases. Vaccination of healthcare workers represents a vital element of the strategy for enhancing epidemic safety and improving the quality of health care, inter alia, by limiting microorganism transmission, and reducing patient morbidity and mortality.
Method
The study group consisted of all employees of the long-term health care centre in Lublin, Poland. Participants were requested to complete a questionnaire prepared for the purpose of the study, along with a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination interview questionnaire.
Results
The vaccination coverage rate for the group of medical workers was 77.3% and of non-medical 86%. The most frequently indicated sources of information on vaccination were the mass media. Males more often than females used the press as a source of information on vaccination. Scientific articles were the most common source of information for both people with higher education and medical professionals. The most common motive for vaccination for females is concern for the health of one's family, and for HCWs and people with at least secondary education-concern for the health of patients.
Conclusion
At least one assessed factor influences the decision to be vaccinated. The mass media are of the greatest importance in obtaining information about vaccination. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/pubmed/fdab395 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9383155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/pubmed/fdab395</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2612379028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-8bed51a3736d67c0e4151154e9abfebb16b95d25b20a097bd4e6912527756f373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1P4zAQxS0EAha4ckQ-wiHgjzipL0io7AISEhfgao2dSWuUxCV2EZX44zelpYITJ481v3lvNI-QY87OOdPyYja3LVYXdQVWarVF9nmZ80yOFNve1LnYI39ifGFMaMHULtmTuRa6lHKffFxjwr71HXQp0lDTNEVaofPRh46mQC3SN3BuABJWFCbgu5jo-OH57jrjmkKk-I7trPG1H_p2QZefsED8VAPahG6SLS3oFKFJU-qgR-qwSz0ekp0amohH6_eAPP37-zi-ze4fbu7GV_eZy0WespHFSnGQpSyqonQMc644VzlqsDVaywurVSWUFQyYLm2VY6G5UKIsVVEPYwfkcqW7utanOTRm1vsW-oUJ4M3PTuenZhLejJYjyZUaBE7XAn14nWNMpvXRYdNAh2EejSi4kKVmYjSg5yvU9SHGHuuNDWdmGdnayqwjGwZOvi-3wb8yGoCzFRDms9_E_gN6yKQ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2612379028</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determinants of the decision to be vaccinated against COVID-19 as exemplified by employees of a long-term health care centre</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Tylec, Aneta ; Janiszewska, Mariola ; Siejko, Krzysztof ; Kucharska, Katarzyna</creator><creatorcontrib>Tylec, Aneta ; Janiszewska, Mariola ; Siejko, Krzysztof ; Kucharska, Katarzyna</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Introduction
Health care professionals cover the front line in the battle against infectious diseases. Vaccination of healthcare workers represents a vital element of the strategy for enhancing epidemic safety and improving the quality of health care, inter alia, by limiting microorganism transmission, and reducing patient morbidity and mortality.
Method
The study group consisted of all employees of the long-term health care centre in Lublin, Poland. Participants were requested to complete a questionnaire prepared for the purpose of the study, along with a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination interview questionnaire.
Results
The vaccination coverage rate for the group of medical workers was 77.3% and of non-medical 86%. The most frequently indicated sources of information on vaccination were the mass media. Males more often than females used the press as a source of information on vaccination. Scientific articles were the most common source of information for both people with higher education and medical professionals. The most common motive for vaccination for females is concern for the health of one's family, and for HCWs and people with at least secondary education-concern for the health of patients.
Conclusion
At least one assessed factor influences the decision to be vaccinated. The mass media are of the greatest importance in obtaining information about vaccination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1741-3842</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3850</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab395</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34929733</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 - prevention & control ; COVID-19 Vaccines - therapeutic use ; Female ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Influenza, Human - prevention & control ; Male ; Original</subject><ispartof>Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2023-03, Vol.45 (1), p.237-244</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-8bed51a3736d67c0e4151154e9abfebb16b95d25b20a097bd4e6912527756f373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-8bed51a3736d67c0e4151154e9abfebb16b95d25b20a097bd4e6912527756f373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34929733$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tylec, Aneta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janiszewska, Mariola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siejko, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kucharska, Katarzyna</creatorcontrib><title>Determinants of the decision to be vaccinated against COVID-19 as exemplified by employees of a long-term health care centre</title><title>Journal of public health (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>J Public Health (Oxf)</addtitle><description>Abstract
Introduction
Health care professionals cover the front line in the battle against infectious diseases. Vaccination of healthcare workers represents a vital element of the strategy for enhancing epidemic safety and improving the quality of health care, inter alia, by limiting microorganism transmission, and reducing patient morbidity and mortality.
Method
The study group consisted of all employees of the long-term health care centre in Lublin, Poland. Participants were requested to complete a questionnaire prepared for the purpose of the study, along with a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination interview questionnaire.
Results
The vaccination coverage rate for the group of medical workers was 77.3% and of non-medical 86%. The most frequently indicated sources of information on vaccination were the mass media. Males more often than females used the press as a source of information on vaccination. Scientific articles were the most common source of information for both people with higher education and medical professionals. The most common motive for vaccination for females is concern for the health of one's family, and for HCWs and people with at least secondary education-concern for the health of patients.
Conclusion
At least one assessed factor influences the decision to be vaccinated. The mass media are of the greatest importance in obtaining information about vaccination.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - prevention & control</subject><subject>COVID-19 Vaccines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influenza, Human - prevention & control</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Original</subject><issn>1741-3842</issn><issn>1741-3850</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1P4zAQxS0EAha4ckQ-wiHgjzipL0io7AISEhfgao2dSWuUxCV2EZX44zelpYITJ481v3lvNI-QY87OOdPyYja3LVYXdQVWarVF9nmZ80yOFNve1LnYI39ifGFMaMHULtmTuRa6lHKffFxjwr71HXQp0lDTNEVaofPRh46mQC3SN3BuABJWFCbgu5jo-OH57jrjmkKk-I7trPG1H_p2QZefsED8VAPahG6SLS3oFKFJU-qgR-qwSz0ekp0amohH6_eAPP37-zi-ze4fbu7GV_eZy0WespHFSnGQpSyqonQMc644VzlqsDVaywurVSWUFQyYLm2VY6G5UKIsVVEPYwfkcqW7utanOTRm1vsW-oUJ4M3PTuenZhLejJYjyZUaBE7XAn14nWNMpvXRYdNAh2EejSi4kKVmYjSg5yvU9SHGHuuNDWdmGdnayqwjGwZOvi-3wb8yGoCzFRDms9_E_gN6yKQ0</recordid><startdate>20230314</startdate><enddate>20230314</enddate><creator>Tylec, Aneta</creator><creator>Janiszewska, Mariola</creator><creator>Siejko, Krzysztof</creator><creator>Kucharska, Katarzyna</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230314</creationdate><title>Determinants of the decision to be vaccinated against COVID-19 as exemplified by employees of a long-term health care centre</title><author>Tylec, Aneta ; Janiszewska, Mariola ; Siejko, Krzysztof ; Kucharska, Katarzyna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-8bed51a3736d67c0e4151154e9abfebb16b95d25b20a097bd4e6912527756f373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - prevention & control</topic><topic>COVID-19 Vaccines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influenza, Human - prevention & control</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tylec, Aneta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janiszewska, Mariola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siejko, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kucharska, Katarzyna</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of public health (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tylec, Aneta</au><au>Janiszewska, Mariola</au><au>Siejko, Krzysztof</au><au>Kucharska, Katarzyna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determinants of the decision to be vaccinated against COVID-19 as exemplified by employees of a long-term health care centre</atitle><jtitle>Journal of public health (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>J Public Health (Oxf)</addtitle><date>2023-03-14</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>237</spage><epage>244</epage><pages>237-244</pages><issn>1741-3842</issn><eissn>1741-3850</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Introduction
Health care professionals cover the front line in the battle against infectious diseases. Vaccination of healthcare workers represents a vital element of the strategy for enhancing epidemic safety and improving the quality of health care, inter alia, by limiting microorganism transmission, and reducing patient morbidity and mortality.
Method
The study group consisted of all employees of the long-term health care centre in Lublin, Poland. Participants were requested to complete a questionnaire prepared for the purpose of the study, along with a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination interview questionnaire.
Results
The vaccination coverage rate for the group of medical workers was 77.3% and of non-medical 86%. The most frequently indicated sources of information on vaccination were the mass media. Males more often than females used the press as a source of information on vaccination. Scientific articles were the most common source of information for both people with higher education and medical professionals. The most common motive for vaccination for females is concern for the health of one's family, and for HCWs and people with at least secondary education-concern for the health of patients.
Conclusion
At least one assessed factor influences the decision to be vaccinated. The mass media are of the greatest importance in obtaining information about vaccination.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>34929733</pmid><doi>10.1093/pubmed/fdab395</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1741-3842 |
ispartof | Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2023-03, Vol.45 (1), p.237-244 |
issn | 1741-3842 1741-3850 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9383155 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel COVID-19 - epidemiology COVID-19 - prevention & control COVID-19 Vaccines - therapeutic use Female Health Personnel Humans Influenza, Human - prevention & control Male Original |
title | Determinants of the decision to be vaccinated against COVID-19 as exemplified by employees of a long-term health care centre |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T23%3A24%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determinants%20of%20the%20decision%20to%20be%20vaccinated%20against%20COVID-19%20as%20exemplified%20by%20employees%20of%20a%20long-term%20health%20care%20centre&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20public%20health%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Tylec,%20Aneta&rft.date=2023-03-14&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=244&rft.pages=237-244&rft.issn=1741-3842&rft.eissn=1741-3850&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdab395&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2612379028%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-8bed51a3736d67c0e4151154e9abfebb16b95d25b20a097bd4e6912527756f373%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2612379028&rft_id=info:pmid/34929733&rft_oup_id=10.1093/pubmed/fdab395&rfr_iscdi=true |