Observation on the Effect of High-Quality Nursing Intervention plus Health Education in Chemotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Its Influence on the Physical and Mental Health of Patients

Objective. The objective is to analyze the effect of high-quality nursing intervention combined with health education in the chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer and its impact on the physical and mental health of patients. Methods. The study included 136 patients with non-small cell lung can...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine 2022-08, Vol.2022, p.2459013-8
Main Authors: Feng, Liyun, Yang, Dongmei
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cancer therapies
Chemotherapy
Cisplatin
Cognitive ability
Disease prevention
Drug dosages
Gemcitabine
Health education
Hemoptysis
Informed consent
Intervention
Lung cancer
Mental disorders
Mental health
Non-small cell lung carcinoma
Nurses
Nursing
Nursing care
Nutrition research
Pain
Patients
Pharmaceuticals
Quality of life
Remission (Medicine)
Small cell lung carcinoma
Tumors
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective. The objective is to analyze the effect of high-quality nursing intervention combined with health education in the chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer and its impact on the physical and mental health of patients. Methods. The study included 136 patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated at our hospital from March 2020 to December 2021, who were divided into the observation group and the routine/control group by randomization, with 68 patients in each. All patients received the GP (gemcitabine + cisplatin) chemotherapy. The control group received routine nursing care, whereas the observation group received high-quality nursing care mixed with health education. The effect of nursing intervention, patient self-management, and the influence on the physical and mental health of the patients was compared between the two groups. Results. The total efficacy rate (89.71%) of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the routine group (57.35%) (P
ISSN:1741-427X
1741-4288
DOI:10.1155/2022/2459013