Impacts of human movement and ventilation mode on the indoor environment, droplet evaporation, and aerosol transmission risk at airport terminals

• Published in: Building and environment 2022-10, Vol.224, p.109527-109527, Article 109527
• Main Authors: Zhao, Yu, Feng, Yao, Ma, Liangdong
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Airport terminal; Droplets; Thermal environment; Ventilation; Walking
• ISSN: 0360-1323; 1873-684X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109527

The dispersion of the coronavirus pandemic has caused immense damage worldwide, and people have begun to ruminate epidemic prevention strategies for public places. Airport terminals with a high number of occupied passengers have become potentially high-risk regions for aerosol transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this study, the Eulerian–Lagrangian approach and realizable k-ε turbulence model were used to numerically simulate airflow organization and aerosol transmission when passengers are moving slowly in a line. During the aerosol transmission period, evaporation was considered a key factor influencing the particle size distribution at the beginning of aerosol transmission from humans. Moreover, passenger movement at the airport terminal was attained by employing dynamic mesh algorithms. Based on the relative direction of passengers and air vents when queuing in the terminal building, we studied three conditions: windward walking, leeward walking, and crosswind walking. The results of this study showed that the walking has an important influence on droplet distribution. Droplet distribution indicates that individuals standing behind patients during queuing movements have a higher risk of infection than those standing in front of them. A significant aerosol accumulation was discovered at 0.5 m behind the patient when passengers moved simultaneously. An aerosol transmission distance of 15 s aligned with the passenger's walking direction could reach up to 9.32 m. Furthermore, although the evaporation time of the large droplets was longer than that of the small droplets, both large and small droplets evaporated rapidly after exhalation. The crosswind influence caused the droplets to travel farther away in a direction perpendicular to human movement, which increased the distance by approximately 1.26 m compared to the absence of the crosswind influence. •Piston effect induced by human movement at the airport terminal.•Impacts of human movement and ventilation mode on aerosol transmission.•People standing behind patients during movement have higher risk of infection.•Aerosol diffuses to 9.32 m against the patient's walking direction when moving 15s.•Cross wind causes the droplets to travel nearly 1.26 m long in transverse direction.