Harm Reduction, Solidarity, and Social Mobility as Target Functions: A Rortian Approach to Stakeholder Theory

Instrumental Stakeholder Theory has begun to suffer from what might be termed “mission drift.” Despite its initial success in creating a foothold for ethics in managerial decision-making, the efficiency arguments which now dominate this research stream have become counterproductive to the original g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of business ethics 2023-09, Vol.186 (3), p.479-492
Main Authors: Weitzner, David, Deutsch, Yuval
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Business and Management
Business Ethics
Capitalism
Decision making
Education
Ethics
Harm reduction
Irony
Management
Original Paper
Philosophy
Pragmatism
Quality of Life Research
Social cohesion
Social mobility
Stakeholders
Theory
Upward mobility
Vocabulary
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-a2cdb14b332ed212fc37f7ea05f1802dec5636de8414c0c74621c0abb083c5aa3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-a2cdb14b332ed212fc37f7ea05f1802dec5636de8414c0c74621c0abb083c5aa3
container_end_page 492
container_issue 3
container_start_page 479
container_title Journal of business ethics
container_volume 186
creator Weitzner, David
Deutsch, Yuval
description Instrumental Stakeholder Theory has begun to suffer from what might be termed “mission drift.” Despite its initial success in creating a foothold for ethics in managerial decision-making, the efficiency arguments which now dominate this research stream have become counterproductive to the original goal of connecting ethics and capitalism. We argue in this paper that the way forward is by re-centering contingency, conversation, and inefficiency in stakeholder theory. To start this process, there needs to be a reckoning of some unintended impacts of the success of the instrumental stream of stakeholder research. For a contrasting approach, we draw on Richard Rorty’s pragmatism and its foundation of ethical “irony,” a state of continuous doubts about the utility of one’s moral vocabulary. We offer a Rortian approach to stakeholder theory, unearthing the possibility for new corporate target functions in the goals of harm reduction, solidarity, and social mobility, the foundational building blocks of an ironist ethical perspective.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10551-022-05248-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9444697</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2847565771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-a2cdb14b332ed212fc37f7ea05f1802dec5636de8414c0c74621c0abb083c5aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS0EokPhD7BAltiwaOD6nWGBNKooRSpCaoe1deM4My5JPLUTpPn3uJ1SHgu8sez7nXN9fQh5yeAtAzDvMgOlWAWcV6C4rCv2iCyYMqICvTSPyQKYNpVUUh6RZzlfQ1mKyafkSGhYgmBiQYZzTAO99O3sphDHE3oV-9BiCtP-hOLYlrML2NMvsQl9uaSY6RrTxk_0bB7vNPk9XdHLmKaAI13tdimi29Ip0qsJv_tt7Fuf6HrrY9o_J0867LN_cb8fk29nH9en59XF10-fT1cXlVNaThVy1zZMNkJw33LGOydMZzyC6lgNvPUFE7r1tWTSgTNSc-YAmwZq4RSiOCYfDr67uRl86_w4JeztLoUB095GDPbvyhi2dhN_2KWUsvxdMXhzb5DizezzZIeQne97HH2cs-WGSdAgal3Q1_-g13FOYxnP8loapZUxrFD8QLkUc06-e3gMA3ubpj2kaUua9i5Neyt69ecYD5Jf8RVAHIBcSuPGp9-9_2P7E82vq3k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2847565771</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Harm Reduction, Solidarity, and Social Mobility as Target Functions: A Rortian Approach to Stakeholder Theory</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Archive</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Ultimate (EBSCOHost)</source><source>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</source><creator>Weitzner, David ; Deutsch, Yuval</creator><creatorcontrib>Weitzner, David ; Deutsch, Yuval</creatorcontrib><description>Instrumental Stakeholder Theory has begun to suffer from what might be termed “mission drift.” Despite its initial success in creating a foothold for ethics in managerial decision-making, the efficiency arguments which now dominate this research stream have become counterproductive to the original goal of connecting ethics and capitalism. We argue in this paper that the way forward is by re-centering contingency, conversation, and inefficiency in stakeholder theory. To start this process, there needs to be a reckoning of some unintended impacts of the success of the instrumental stream of stakeholder research. For a contrasting approach, we draw on Richard Rorty’s pragmatism and its foundation of ethical “irony,” a state of continuous doubts about the utility of one’s moral vocabulary. We offer a Rortian approach to stakeholder theory, unearthing the possibility for new corporate target functions in the goals of harm reduction, solidarity, and social mobility, the foundational building blocks of an ironist ethical perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10551-022-05248-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36090313</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Business Ethics ; Capitalism ; Decision making ; Education ; Ethics ; Harm reduction ; Irony ; Management ; Original Paper ; Philosophy ; Pragmatism ; Quality of Life Research ; Social cohesion ; Social mobility ; Stakeholders ; Theory ; Upward mobility ; Vocabulary</subject><ispartof>Journal of business ethics, 2023-09, Vol.186 (3), p.479-492</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-a2cdb14b332ed212fc37f7ea05f1802dec5636de8414c0c74621c0abb083c5aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-a2cdb14b332ed212fc37f7ea05f1802dec5636de8414c0c74621c0abb083c5aa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6083-3512</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2847565771/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2847565771?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,11667,11885,12826,12840,21366,21373,27843,27901,27902,33200,33588,33589,33962,33963,34752,34753,36027,36028,36037,36038,43709,43924,44176,44337,44339,73964,74211,74471,74636,74638</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36090313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weitzner, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deutsch, Yuval</creatorcontrib><title>Harm Reduction, Solidarity, and Social Mobility as Target Functions: A Rortian Approach to Stakeholder Theory</title><title>Journal of business ethics</title><addtitle>J Bus Ethics</addtitle><addtitle>J Bus Ethics</addtitle><description>Instrumental Stakeholder Theory has begun to suffer from what might be termed “mission drift.” Despite its initial success in creating a foothold for ethics in managerial decision-making, the efficiency arguments which now dominate this research stream have become counterproductive to the original goal of connecting ethics and capitalism. We argue in this paper that the way forward is by re-centering contingency, conversation, and inefficiency in stakeholder theory. To start this process, there needs to be a reckoning of some unintended impacts of the success of the instrumental stream of stakeholder research. For a contrasting approach, we draw on Richard Rorty’s pragmatism and its foundation of ethical “irony,” a state of continuous doubts about the utility of one’s moral vocabulary. We offer a Rortian approach to stakeholder theory, unearthing the possibility for new corporate target functions in the goals of harm reduction, solidarity, and social mobility, the foundational building blocks of an ironist ethical perspective.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business Ethics</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Harm reduction</subject><subject>Irony</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Pragmatism</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Social cohesion</subject><subject>Social mobility</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Upward mobility</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><issn>0167-4544</issn><issn>1573-0697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS0EokPhD7BAltiwaOD6nWGBNKooRSpCaoe1deM4My5JPLUTpPn3uJ1SHgu8sez7nXN9fQh5yeAtAzDvMgOlWAWcV6C4rCv2iCyYMqICvTSPyQKYNpVUUh6RZzlfQ1mKyafkSGhYgmBiQYZzTAO99O3sphDHE3oV-9BiCtP-hOLYlrML2NMvsQl9uaSY6RrTxk_0bB7vNPk9XdHLmKaAI13tdimi29Ip0qsJv_tt7Fuf6HrrY9o_J0867LN_cb8fk29nH9en59XF10-fT1cXlVNaThVy1zZMNkJw33LGOydMZzyC6lgNvPUFE7r1tWTSgTNSc-YAmwZq4RSiOCYfDr67uRl86_w4JeztLoUB095GDPbvyhi2dhN_2KWUsvxdMXhzb5DizezzZIeQne97HH2cs-WGSdAgal3Q1_-g13FOYxnP8loapZUxrFD8QLkUc06-e3gMA3ubpj2kaUua9i5Neyt69ecYD5Jf8RVAHIBcSuPGp9-9_2P7E82vq3k</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Weitzner, David</creator><creator>Deutsch, Yuval</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6083-3512</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Harm Reduction, Solidarity, and Social Mobility as Target Functions: A Rortian Approach to Stakeholder Theory</title><author>Weitzner, David ; Deutsch, Yuval</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-a2cdb14b332ed212fc37f7ea05f1802dec5636de8414c0c74621c0abb083c5aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business Ethics</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Harm reduction</topic><topic>Irony</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Pragmatism</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Social cohesion</topic><topic>Social mobility</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Upward mobility</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weitzner, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deutsch, Yuval</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weitzner, David</au><au>Deutsch, Yuval</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Harm Reduction, Solidarity, and Social Mobility as Target Functions: A Rortian Approach to Stakeholder Theory</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle><stitle>J Bus Ethics</stitle><addtitle>J Bus Ethics</addtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>186</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>479</spage><epage>492</epage><pages>479-492</pages><issn>0167-4544</issn><eissn>1573-0697</eissn><abstract>Instrumental Stakeholder Theory has begun to suffer from what might be termed “mission drift.” Despite its initial success in creating a foothold for ethics in managerial decision-making, the efficiency arguments which now dominate this research stream have become counterproductive to the original goal of connecting ethics and capitalism. We argue in this paper that the way forward is by re-centering contingency, conversation, and inefficiency in stakeholder theory. To start this process, there needs to be a reckoning of some unintended impacts of the success of the instrumental stream of stakeholder research. For a contrasting approach, we draw on Richard Rorty’s pragmatism and its foundation of ethical “irony,” a state of continuous doubts about the utility of one’s moral vocabulary. We offer a Rortian approach to stakeholder theory, unearthing the possibility for new corporate target functions in the goals of harm reduction, solidarity, and social mobility, the foundational building blocks of an ironist ethical perspective.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>36090313</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10551-022-05248-1</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6083-3512</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-4544
ispartof Journal of business ethics, 2023-09, Vol.186 (3), p.479-492
issn 0167-4544
1573-0697
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9444697
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Archive; Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List; PAIS Index; Business Source Ultimate (EBSCOHost); Art, Design & Architecture Collection
subjects Business and Management
Business Ethics
Capitalism
Decision making
Education
Ethics
Harm reduction
Irony
Management
Original Paper
Philosophy
Pragmatism
Quality of Life Research
Social cohesion
Social mobility
Stakeholders
Theory
Upward mobility
Vocabulary
title Harm Reduction, Solidarity, and Social Mobility as Target Functions: A Rortian Approach to Stakeholder Theory
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T04%3A04%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Harm%20Reduction,%20Solidarity,%20and%20Social%20Mobility%20as%20Target%20Functions:%20A%20Rortian%20Approach%20to%20Stakeholder%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20ethics&rft.au=Weitzner,%20David&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=186&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=479&rft.epage=492&rft.pages=479-492&rft.issn=0167-4544&rft.eissn=1573-0697&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10551-022-05248-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2847565771%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-a2cdb14b332ed212fc37f7ea05f1802dec5636de8414c0c74621c0abb083c5aa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2847565771&rft_id=info:pmid/36090313&rfr_iscdi=true