Chimerism analysis for clinicians: a review of the literature and worldwide practices

This review highlights literature pertinent to chimerism analysis in the context of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We also conducted a survey of testing practices of program members of CIBMTR worldwide. Questions included testing methods, time points, specimen type, cell lineage tested an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke) 2022-03, Vol.57 (3), p.347-359
Main Authors: Blouin, Amanda G., Askar, Medhat
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
45/23
45/77
692/699/1541/1990
692/700/139/1512
692/700/565/2319
Bone marrow
Cell Biology
Cell lineage
Chimerism
Decisions
Hematology
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Heterogeneity
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Histocompatibility antigen HLA
Humans
Internal Medicine
Laboratories
Literature reviews
Low level
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Next-generation sequencing
Polls & surveys
Public Health
Recurrence
Review Article
Sensitivity
Sensitivity analysis
Stem cell transplantation
Stem Cells
Transplantation
Transplantation Chimera
Transplants & implants
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This review highlights literature pertinent to chimerism analysis in the context of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We also conducted a survey of testing practices of program members of CIBMTR worldwide. Questions included testing methods, time points, specimen type, cell lineage tested and testing indications. Recent literature suggests that detection of low level mixed chimerism has a clinical utility in predicting relapse. There is also increasing recognition of HLA loss relapse to potentially guide rescue decisions in cases of relapse. These developments coincide with wider access to high sensitivity next generation sequencing (NGS) in clinical laboratories. Our survey revealed a heterogeneity in practices as well as in findings and conclusions of published studies. Although the most commonly used method is STR, studies support more sensitive methods such as NGS, especially for predicting relapse. There is no conclusive evidence to support testing chimerism in BM over PB, particularly when using a high sensitivity testing method. Periodic monitoring of chimerism especially in diagnoses with a high risk of relapse is advantageous. Lineage specific chimerism is more sensitive than whole blood in predicting impending relapse. Further studies that critically assess how to utilize chimerism testing results will inform evidence based clinical management decisions.
ISSN:0268-3369
1476-5365
DOI:10.1038/s41409-022-01579-9