Poor Knee-specific and Generic Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores at 6 Months Are Associated With Early Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

• Published in: Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2022-10, Vol.480 (10), p.1899-1909
• Main Authors: Ackerman, Ilana N., Harris, Ian A., Cashman, Kara, Rowden, Neville, Lorimer, Michelle, Graves, Stephen E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Age; Arthroplasty (knee); Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Australia; Back pain; Clinical outcomes; Gender; Humans; Joint replacement surgery; Knee; Low back pain; Low Back Pain - etiology; Mathematical models; Middle Aged; Orthopedics; Osteoarthritis; Pain, Postoperative - etiology; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Patients; Quality of Life; Registries; Regression analysis; Selected Papers from the 10th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registriesguest Editor: Ola Rolfson Md, Phd; Surgeons; Surgery; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0009-921X; 1528-1132
• DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002301

The ability to identify which patients are at a greater risk of early revision knee arthroplasty has important practical and resource implications. Many international arthroplasty registries administer patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to provide a holistic assessment of pain, function, and quality of life. However, few PROM scores have been evaluated as potential indicators of early revision knee arthroplasty, and earlier studies have largely focused on knee-specific measures. This national registry-based study asked: (1) Which 6-month postoperative knee-specific and generic PROM scores are associated with early revision knee arthroplasty (defined as revision surgery performed 6 to 24 months after the primary procedure)? (2) Is a clinically important improvement in PROM scores (based on thresholds for the minimal important change) after primary knee arthroplasty associated with a lower risk of early revision? Preoperative and 6-month postoperative PROM scores for patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty were sourced from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) and Arthroplasty Clinical Outcomes Registry National. Between January 2013 and December 2020, PROM data were available for 19,402 primary total knee arthroplasties; these data were linked to AOANJRR data on revision knee arthroplasty. Of these, 3448 procedures were excluded because they did not have 6-month PROM data, they had not reached the 6-month postoperative point, they had died before 24 months, or they had received revision knee arthroplasty before the 6-month PROMs assessment. After these exclusions, data were analyzed for 15,954 primary knee arthroplasties. Associations between knee-specific (knee pain, Oxford Knee Score, and 12-item Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS-12]) or generic PROM scores (5-level EuroQol quality of life instrument [EQ-5D], EQ VAS, perceived change, and satisfaction) and revision surgery were explored using t-tests, chi-square tests, and regression models. Ninety-four revision procedures were performed at 6 to 24 months, most commonly for infection (39% [37 procedures]). The early revision group was younger than the unrevised group (mean age 64 years versus 68 years) and a between-group difference in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade was noted. Apart from a small difference in preoperative low back pain for the early revision group (mean low back pain VAS 4.2 points for the ear