Loading…
Microtomographic Evaluation of Canal Centralization and Dentine Removal after Canal Preparation with Two Rotary Systems: HyFlex EDM and ProTaper Next
Abstract Objective This study compared the ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Sirona, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States) and HyFlex EDM (HEDM; Coltene/Whaledent AG, Alstätten, Switzerland) systems using micro–computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods Twenty-one mesial roots classified as Vertucci...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of dentistry 2022-07, Vol.16 (3), p.663-668 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a4cb351eb7331978d656e459b9fc74e43af401c5b23e547a8cce0e532d4495b63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a4cb351eb7331978d656e459b9fc74e43af401c5b23e547a8cce0e532d4495b63 |
container_end_page | 668 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 663 |
container_title | European journal of dentistry |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Ronquete, Vivian Martin, Alexandre Sigrist de Zuim, Karin Coutinho, Thais Machado de Carvalho Marceliano, Eduardo Fagury Videira Goulart, Paula Avelar Da Silva Ribeiro Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da Marceliano-Alves, Marília Fagury Videira |
description | Abstract
Objective
This study compared the ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Sirona, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States) and HyFlex EDM (HEDM; Coltene/Whaledent AG, Alstätten, Switzerland) systems using micro–computed tomography (CT).
Materials and Methods
Twenty-one mesial roots classified as Vertucci's type IV from extracted mandibular first molars with curvatures between 20 and 40 degrees were selected. The teeth were scanned using a micro-CT before and after root canal preparation by both systems, applied to the same root, in alternating canals. The following parameters were analyzed: canal centering, apical transportation, root canal diameter/root diameter.
Results
No statistically significant differences between both systems were observed for any of the assessed morphological parameters (
p
> 0.05). All canals presented diameter enlargement of more than 40% in relation to root diameter in the cervical and middle segments. No statistically significant difference was noted between the HEDM and PTN groups. The wear percentage for the HEDM group in the cervical and middle thirds were 49.66 ± 8.65 and 46.48 ± 14.29, respectively, and 51.02 ± 11.81 and 45.48 ± 10.79 for the PTN group, respectively.
Conclusion
Both systems displayed similar mandibular molar mesial canals preparation, with no differences noted for any of the assessed parameters. Both groups showed increased canal diameter in the cervical and middle thirds by more than 40%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1055/s-0041-1739440 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9507560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2619218384</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a4cb351eb7331978d656e459b9fc74e43af401c5b23e547a8cce0e532d4495b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAURi0EoqWwZYm8ZJNixz-JWSCh6ZQitVCVYW05npuOqyRObaft8B68Ly4ZRrBgZcs-9_j6fgi9puSYEiHexYIQTgtaMcU5eYIOKSOiqLjkT_d7IQ_QixhvCJFMKvUcHTBBqCxZfYh-XjgbfPK9vw5m3DiLl3emm0xyfsC-xQszmA4vYEjBdO7HfG6GNT7JR24AfAW9zxXYtAnCDr8MMJows_cubfDq3uMrn0zY4m_bmKCP7_HZ9rSDB7w8ufjtuwx-Zcas-AIP6SV61pouwqvdeoS-ny5Xi7Pi_Ounz4uP54XlZZ0Kw23DBIWmYoyqql5LIYEL1ajWVhw4My0n1IqmZCB4ZWprgYBg5ZpzJRrJjtCH2TtOTQ9rO39Tj8H1uVftjdP_3gxuo6_9nVaCVEKSLHi7EwR_O0FMunfRQteZAfwUdSmpKmnNap7R4xnN844xQLt_hhL9mKWO-jFLvcsyF7z5u7k9_ie8DBQzkDYOetA3fgp5_PF_wl_9Vqrb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2619218384</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microtomographic Evaluation of Canal Centralization and Dentine Removal after Canal Preparation with Two Rotary Systems: HyFlex EDM and ProTaper Next</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</source><creator>Ronquete, Vivian ; Martin, Alexandre Sigrist de ; Zuim, Karin ; Coutinho, Thais Machado de Carvalho ; Marceliano, Eduardo Fagury Videira ; Goulart, Paula Avelar Da Silva Ribeiro ; Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu ; Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da ; Marceliano-Alves, Marília Fagury Videira</creator><creatorcontrib>Ronquete, Vivian ; Martin, Alexandre Sigrist de ; Zuim, Karin ; Coutinho, Thais Machado de Carvalho ; Marceliano, Eduardo Fagury Videira ; Goulart, Paula Avelar Da Silva Ribeiro ; Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu ; Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da ; Marceliano-Alves, Marília Fagury Videira</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Objective
This study compared the ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Sirona, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States) and HyFlex EDM (HEDM; Coltene/Whaledent AG, Alstätten, Switzerland) systems using micro–computed tomography (CT).
Materials and Methods
Twenty-one mesial roots classified as Vertucci's type IV from extracted mandibular first molars with curvatures between 20 and 40 degrees were selected. The teeth were scanned using a micro-CT before and after root canal preparation by both systems, applied to the same root, in alternating canals. The following parameters were analyzed: canal centering, apical transportation, root canal diameter/root diameter.
Results
No statistically significant differences between both systems were observed for any of the assessed morphological parameters (
p
> 0.05). All canals presented diameter enlargement of more than 40% in relation to root diameter in the cervical and middle segments. No statistically significant difference was noted between the HEDM and PTN groups. The wear percentage for the HEDM group in the cervical and middle thirds were 49.66 ± 8.65 and 46.48 ± 14.29, respectively, and 51.02 ± 11.81 and 45.48 ± 10.79 for the PTN group, respectively.
Conclusion
Both systems displayed similar mandibular molar mesial canals preparation, with no differences noted for any of the assessed parameters. Both groups showed increased canal diameter in the cervical and middle thirds by more than 40%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1305-7456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1305-7464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739440</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35016238</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Original ; Original Article</subject><ispartof>European journal of dentistry, 2022-07, Vol.16 (3), p.663-668</ispartof><rights>The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).</rights><rights>The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( ) 2022 The Author(s).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a4cb351eb7331978d656e459b9fc74e43af401c5b23e547a8cce0e532d4495b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a4cb351eb7331978d656e459b9fc74e43af401c5b23e547a8cce0e532d4495b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9507560/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9507560/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,20891,27924,27925,53791,53793,54587,54615</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35016238$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ronquete, Vivian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Alexandre Sigrist de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuim, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coutinho, Thais Machado de Carvalho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marceliano, Eduardo Fagury Videira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goulart, Paula Avelar Da Silva Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marceliano-Alves, Marília Fagury Videira</creatorcontrib><title>Microtomographic Evaluation of Canal Centralization and Dentine Removal after Canal Preparation with Two Rotary Systems: HyFlex EDM and ProTaper Next</title><title>European journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>Eur J Dent</addtitle><description>Abstract
Objective
This study compared the ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Sirona, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States) and HyFlex EDM (HEDM; Coltene/Whaledent AG, Alstätten, Switzerland) systems using micro–computed tomography (CT).
Materials and Methods
Twenty-one mesial roots classified as Vertucci's type IV from extracted mandibular first molars with curvatures between 20 and 40 degrees were selected. The teeth were scanned using a micro-CT before and after root canal preparation by both systems, applied to the same root, in alternating canals. The following parameters were analyzed: canal centering, apical transportation, root canal diameter/root diameter.
Results
No statistically significant differences between both systems were observed for any of the assessed morphological parameters (
p
> 0.05). All canals presented diameter enlargement of more than 40% in relation to root diameter in the cervical and middle segments. No statistically significant difference was noted between the HEDM and PTN groups. The wear percentage for the HEDM group in the cervical and middle thirds were 49.66 ± 8.65 and 46.48 ± 14.29, respectively, and 51.02 ± 11.81 and 45.48 ± 10.79 for the PTN group, respectively.
Conclusion
Both systems displayed similar mandibular molar mesial canals preparation, with no differences noted for any of the assessed parameters. Both groups showed increased canal diameter in the cervical and middle thirds by more than 40%.</description><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><issn>1305-7456</issn><issn>1305-7464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0U6</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAURi0EoqWwZYm8ZJNixz-JWSCh6ZQitVCVYW05npuOqyRObaft8B68Ly4ZRrBgZcs-9_j6fgi9puSYEiHexYIQTgtaMcU5eYIOKSOiqLjkT_d7IQ_QixhvCJFMKvUcHTBBqCxZfYh-XjgbfPK9vw5m3DiLl3emm0xyfsC-xQszmA4vYEjBdO7HfG6GNT7JR24AfAW9zxXYtAnCDr8MMJows_cubfDq3uMrn0zY4m_bmKCP7_HZ9rSDB7w8ufjtuwx-Zcas-AIP6SV61pouwqvdeoS-ny5Xi7Pi_Ounz4uP54XlZZ0Kw23DBIWmYoyqql5LIYEL1ajWVhw4My0n1IqmZCB4ZWprgYBg5ZpzJRrJjtCH2TtOTQ9rO39Tj8H1uVftjdP_3gxuo6_9nVaCVEKSLHi7EwR_O0FMunfRQteZAfwUdSmpKmnNap7R4xnN844xQLt_hhL9mKWO-jFLvcsyF7z5u7k9_ie8DBQzkDYOetA3fgp5_PF_wl_9Vqrb</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Ronquete, Vivian</creator><creator>Martin, Alexandre Sigrist de</creator><creator>Zuim, Karin</creator><creator>Coutinho, Thais Machado de Carvalho</creator><creator>Marceliano, Eduardo Fagury Videira</creator><creator>Goulart, Paula Avelar Da Silva Ribeiro</creator><creator>Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu</creator><creator>Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da</creator><creator>Marceliano-Alves, Marília Fagury Videira</creator><general>Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>0U6</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Microtomographic Evaluation of Canal Centralization and Dentine Removal after Canal Preparation with Two Rotary Systems: HyFlex EDM and ProTaper Next</title><author>Ronquete, Vivian ; Martin, Alexandre Sigrist de ; Zuim, Karin ; Coutinho, Thais Machado de Carvalho ; Marceliano, Eduardo Fagury Videira ; Goulart, Paula Avelar Da Silva Ribeiro ; Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu ; Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da ; Marceliano-Alves, Marília Fagury Videira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a4cb351eb7331978d656e459b9fc74e43af401c5b23e547a8cce0e532d4495b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ronquete, Vivian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Alexandre Sigrist de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuim, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coutinho, Thais Machado de Carvalho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marceliano, Eduardo Fagury Videira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goulart, Paula Avelar Da Silva Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marceliano-Alves, Marília Fagury Videira</creatorcontrib><collection>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ronquete, Vivian</au><au>Martin, Alexandre Sigrist de</au><au>Zuim, Karin</au><au>Coutinho, Thais Machado de Carvalho</au><au>Marceliano, Eduardo Fagury Videira</au><au>Goulart, Paula Avelar Da Silva Ribeiro</au><au>Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu</au><au>Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da</au><au>Marceliano-Alves, Marília Fagury Videira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microtomographic Evaluation of Canal Centralization and Dentine Removal after Canal Preparation with Two Rotary Systems: HyFlex EDM and ProTaper Next</atitle><jtitle>European journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Dent</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>663</spage><epage>668</epage><pages>663-668</pages><issn>1305-7456</issn><eissn>1305-7464</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Objective
This study compared the ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Sirona, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States) and HyFlex EDM (HEDM; Coltene/Whaledent AG, Alstätten, Switzerland) systems using micro–computed tomography (CT).
Materials and Methods
Twenty-one mesial roots classified as Vertucci's type IV from extracted mandibular first molars with curvatures between 20 and 40 degrees were selected. The teeth were scanned using a micro-CT before and after root canal preparation by both systems, applied to the same root, in alternating canals. The following parameters were analyzed: canal centering, apical transportation, root canal diameter/root diameter.
Results
No statistically significant differences between both systems were observed for any of the assessed morphological parameters (
p
> 0.05). All canals presented diameter enlargement of more than 40% in relation to root diameter in the cervical and middle segments. No statistically significant difference was noted between the HEDM and PTN groups. The wear percentage for the HEDM group in the cervical and middle thirds were 49.66 ± 8.65 and 46.48 ± 14.29, respectively, and 51.02 ± 11.81 and 45.48 ± 10.79 for the PTN group, respectively.
Conclusion
Both systems displayed similar mandibular molar mesial canals preparation, with no differences noted for any of the assessed parameters. Both groups showed increased canal diameter in the cervical and middle thirds by more than 40%.</abstract><cop>A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India</cop><pub>Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>35016238</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-0041-1739440</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1305-7456 |
ispartof | European journal of dentistry, 2022-07, Vol.16 (3), p.663-668 |
issn | 1305-7456 1305-7464 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9507560 |
source | PubMed Central; Thieme Connect Journals Open Access |
subjects | Original Original Article |
title | Microtomographic Evaluation of Canal Centralization and Dentine Removal after Canal Preparation with Two Rotary Systems: HyFlex EDM and ProTaper Next |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T21%3A11%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microtomographic%20Evaluation%20of%20Canal%20Centralization%20and%20Dentine%20Removal%20after%20Canal%20Preparation%20with%20Two%20Rotary%20Systems:%20HyFlex%20EDM%20and%20ProTaper%20Next&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Ronquete,%20Vivian&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=663&rft.epage=668&rft.pages=663-668&rft.issn=1305-7456&rft.eissn=1305-7464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-0041-1739440&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2619218384%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a4cb351eb7331978d656e459b9fc74e43af401c5b23e547a8cce0e532d4495b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2619218384&rft_id=info:pmid/35016238&rfr_iscdi=true |