Loading…

Microtomographic Evaluation of Canal Centralization and Dentine Removal after Canal Preparation with Two Rotary Systems: HyFlex EDM and ProTaper Next

Abstract Objective  This study compared the ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Sirona, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States) and HyFlex EDM (HEDM; Coltene/Whaledent AG, Alstätten, Switzerland) systems using micro–computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods  Twenty-one mesial roots classified as Vertucci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of dentistry 2022-07, Vol.16 (3), p.663-668
Main Authors: Ronquete, Vivian, Martin, Alexandre Sigrist de, Zuim, Karin, Coutinho, Thais Machado de Carvalho, Marceliano, Eduardo Fagury Videira, Goulart, Paula Avelar Da Silva Ribeiro, Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu, Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da, Marceliano-Alves, Marília Fagury Videira
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a4cb351eb7331978d656e459b9fc74e43af401c5b23e547a8cce0e532d4495b63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a4cb351eb7331978d656e459b9fc74e43af401c5b23e547a8cce0e532d4495b63
container_end_page 668
container_issue 3
container_start_page 663
container_title European journal of dentistry
container_volume 16
creator Ronquete, Vivian
Martin, Alexandre Sigrist de
Zuim, Karin
Coutinho, Thais Machado de Carvalho
Marceliano, Eduardo Fagury Videira
Goulart, Paula Avelar Da Silva Ribeiro
Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu
Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da
Marceliano-Alves, Marília Fagury Videira
description Abstract Objective  This study compared the ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Sirona, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States) and HyFlex EDM (HEDM; Coltene/Whaledent AG, Alstätten, Switzerland) systems using micro–computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods  Twenty-one mesial roots classified as Vertucci's type IV from extracted mandibular first molars with curvatures between 20 and 40 degrees were selected. The teeth were scanned using a micro-CT before and after root canal preparation by both systems, applied to the same root, in alternating canals. The following parameters were analyzed: canal centering, apical transportation, root canal diameter/root diameter. Results  No statistically significant differences between both systems were observed for any of the assessed morphological parameters ( p  > 0.05). All canals presented diameter enlargement of more than 40% in relation to root diameter in the cervical and middle segments. No statistically significant difference was noted between the HEDM and PTN groups. The wear percentage for the HEDM group in the cervical and middle thirds were 49.66 ± 8.65 and 46.48 ± 14.29, respectively, and 51.02 ± 11.81 and 45.48 ± 10.79 for the PTN group, respectively. Conclusion  Both systems displayed similar mandibular molar mesial canals preparation, with no differences noted for any of the assessed parameters. Both groups showed increased canal diameter in the cervical and middle thirds by more than 40%.
doi_str_mv 10.1055/s-0041-1739440
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9507560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2619218384</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a4cb351eb7331978d656e459b9fc74e43af401c5b23e547a8cce0e532d4495b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAURi0EoqWwZYm8ZJNixz-JWSCh6ZQitVCVYW05npuOqyRObaft8B68Ly4ZRrBgZcs-9_j6fgi9puSYEiHexYIQTgtaMcU5eYIOKSOiqLjkT_d7IQ_QixhvCJFMKvUcHTBBqCxZfYh-XjgbfPK9vw5m3DiLl3emm0xyfsC-xQszmA4vYEjBdO7HfG6GNT7JR24AfAW9zxXYtAnCDr8MMJows_cubfDq3uMrn0zY4m_bmKCP7_HZ9rSDB7w8ufjtuwx-Zcas-AIP6SV61pouwqvdeoS-ny5Xi7Pi_Ounz4uP54XlZZ0Kw23DBIWmYoyqql5LIYEL1ajWVhw4My0n1IqmZCB4ZWprgYBg5ZpzJRrJjtCH2TtOTQ9rO39Tj8H1uVftjdP_3gxuo6_9nVaCVEKSLHi7EwR_O0FMunfRQteZAfwUdSmpKmnNap7R4xnN844xQLt_hhL9mKWO-jFLvcsyF7z5u7k9_ie8DBQzkDYOetA3fgp5_PF_wl_9Vqrb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2619218384</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microtomographic Evaluation of Canal Centralization and Dentine Removal after Canal Preparation with Two Rotary Systems: HyFlex EDM and ProTaper Next</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</source><creator>Ronquete, Vivian ; Martin, Alexandre Sigrist de ; Zuim, Karin ; Coutinho, Thais Machado de Carvalho ; Marceliano, Eduardo Fagury Videira ; Goulart, Paula Avelar Da Silva Ribeiro ; Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu ; Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da ; Marceliano-Alves, Marília Fagury Videira</creator><creatorcontrib>Ronquete, Vivian ; Martin, Alexandre Sigrist de ; Zuim, Karin ; Coutinho, Thais Machado de Carvalho ; Marceliano, Eduardo Fagury Videira ; Goulart, Paula Avelar Da Silva Ribeiro ; Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu ; Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da ; Marceliano-Alves, Marília Fagury Videira</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective  This study compared the ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Sirona, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States) and HyFlex EDM (HEDM; Coltene/Whaledent AG, Alstätten, Switzerland) systems using micro–computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods  Twenty-one mesial roots classified as Vertucci's type IV from extracted mandibular first molars with curvatures between 20 and 40 degrees were selected. The teeth were scanned using a micro-CT before and after root canal preparation by both systems, applied to the same root, in alternating canals. The following parameters were analyzed: canal centering, apical transportation, root canal diameter/root diameter. Results  No statistically significant differences between both systems were observed for any of the assessed morphological parameters ( p  &gt; 0.05). All canals presented diameter enlargement of more than 40% in relation to root diameter in the cervical and middle segments. No statistically significant difference was noted between the HEDM and PTN groups. The wear percentage for the HEDM group in the cervical and middle thirds were 49.66 ± 8.65 and 46.48 ± 14.29, respectively, and 51.02 ± 11.81 and 45.48 ± 10.79 for the PTN group, respectively. Conclusion  Both systems displayed similar mandibular molar mesial canals preparation, with no differences noted for any of the assessed parameters. Both groups showed increased canal diameter in the cervical and middle thirds by more than 40%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1305-7456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1305-7464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739440</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35016238</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Original ; Original Article</subject><ispartof>European journal of dentistry, 2022-07, Vol.16 (3), p.663-668</ispartof><rights>The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).</rights><rights>The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( ) 2022 The Author(s).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a4cb351eb7331978d656e459b9fc74e43af401c5b23e547a8cce0e532d4495b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a4cb351eb7331978d656e459b9fc74e43af401c5b23e547a8cce0e532d4495b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9507560/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9507560/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,20891,27924,27925,53791,53793,54587,54615</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35016238$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ronquete, Vivian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Alexandre Sigrist de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuim, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coutinho, Thais Machado de Carvalho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marceliano, Eduardo Fagury Videira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goulart, Paula Avelar Da Silva Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marceliano-Alves, Marília Fagury Videira</creatorcontrib><title>Microtomographic Evaluation of Canal Centralization and Dentine Removal after Canal Preparation with Two Rotary Systems: HyFlex EDM and ProTaper Next</title><title>European journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>Eur J Dent</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective  This study compared the ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Sirona, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States) and HyFlex EDM (HEDM; Coltene/Whaledent AG, Alstätten, Switzerland) systems using micro–computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods  Twenty-one mesial roots classified as Vertucci's type IV from extracted mandibular first molars with curvatures between 20 and 40 degrees were selected. The teeth were scanned using a micro-CT before and after root canal preparation by both systems, applied to the same root, in alternating canals. The following parameters were analyzed: canal centering, apical transportation, root canal diameter/root diameter. Results  No statistically significant differences between both systems were observed for any of the assessed morphological parameters ( p  &gt; 0.05). All canals presented diameter enlargement of more than 40% in relation to root diameter in the cervical and middle segments. No statistically significant difference was noted between the HEDM and PTN groups. The wear percentage for the HEDM group in the cervical and middle thirds were 49.66 ± 8.65 and 46.48 ± 14.29, respectively, and 51.02 ± 11.81 and 45.48 ± 10.79 for the PTN group, respectively. Conclusion  Both systems displayed similar mandibular molar mesial canals preparation, with no differences noted for any of the assessed parameters. Both groups showed increased canal diameter in the cervical and middle thirds by more than 40%.</description><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><issn>1305-7456</issn><issn>1305-7464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0U6</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAURi0EoqWwZYm8ZJNixz-JWSCh6ZQitVCVYW05npuOqyRObaft8B68Ly4ZRrBgZcs-9_j6fgi9puSYEiHexYIQTgtaMcU5eYIOKSOiqLjkT_d7IQ_QixhvCJFMKvUcHTBBqCxZfYh-XjgbfPK9vw5m3DiLl3emm0xyfsC-xQszmA4vYEjBdO7HfG6GNT7JR24AfAW9zxXYtAnCDr8MMJows_cubfDq3uMrn0zY4m_bmKCP7_HZ9rSDB7w8ufjtuwx-Zcas-AIP6SV61pouwqvdeoS-ny5Xi7Pi_Ounz4uP54XlZZ0Kw23DBIWmYoyqql5LIYEL1ajWVhw4My0n1IqmZCB4ZWprgYBg5ZpzJRrJjtCH2TtOTQ9rO39Tj8H1uVftjdP_3gxuo6_9nVaCVEKSLHi7EwR_O0FMunfRQteZAfwUdSmpKmnNap7R4xnN844xQLt_hhL9mKWO-jFLvcsyF7z5u7k9_ie8DBQzkDYOetA3fgp5_PF_wl_9Vqrb</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Ronquete, Vivian</creator><creator>Martin, Alexandre Sigrist de</creator><creator>Zuim, Karin</creator><creator>Coutinho, Thais Machado de Carvalho</creator><creator>Marceliano, Eduardo Fagury Videira</creator><creator>Goulart, Paula Avelar Da Silva Ribeiro</creator><creator>Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu</creator><creator>Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da</creator><creator>Marceliano-Alves, Marília Fagury Videira</creator><general>Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>0U6</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Microtomographic Evaluation of Canal Centralization and Dentine Removal after Canal Preparation with Two Rotary Systems: HyFlex EDM and ProTaper Next</title><author>Ronquete, Vivian ; Martin, Alexandre Sigrist de ; Zuim, Karin ; Coutinho, Thais Machado de Carvalho ; Marceliano, Eduardo Fagury Videira ; Goulart, Paula Avelar Da Silva Ribeiro ; Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu ; Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da ; Marceliano-Alves, Marília Fagury Videira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a4cb351eb7331978d656e459b9fc74e43af401c5b23e547a8cce0e532d4495b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ronquete, Vivian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Alexandre Sigrist de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuim, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coutinho, Thais Machado de Carvalho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marceliano, Eduardo Fagury Videira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goulart, Paula Avelar Da Silva Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marceliano-Alves, Marília Fagury Videira</creatorcontrib><collection>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ronquete, Vivian</au><au>Martin, Alexandre Sigrist de</au><au>Zuim, Karin</au><au>Coutinho, Thais Machado de Carvalho</au><au>Marceliano, Eduardo Fagury Videira</au><au>Goulart, Paula Avelar Da Silva Ribeiro</au><au>Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu</au><au>Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da</au><au>Marceliano-Alves, Marília Fagury Videira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microtomographic Evaluation of Canal Centralization and Dentine Removal after Canal Preparation with Two Rotary Systems: HyFlex EDM and ProTaper Next</atitle><jtitle>European journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Dent</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>663</spage><epage>668</epage><pages>663-668</pages><issn>1305-7456</issn><eissn>1305-7464</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective  This study compared the ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Sirona, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States) and HyFlex EDM (HEDM; Coltene/Whaledent AG, Alstätten, Switzerland) systems using micro–computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods  Twenty-one mesial roots classified as Vertucci's type IV from extracted mandibular first molars with curvatures between 20 and 40 degrees were selected. The teeth were scanned using a micro-CT before and after root canal preparation by both systems, applied to the same root, in alternating canals. The following parameters were analyzed: canal centering, apical transportation, root canal diameter/root diameter. Results  No statistically significant differences between both systems were observed for any of the assessed morphological parameters ( p  &gt; 0.05). All canals presented diameter enlargement of more than 40% in relation to root diameter in the cervical and middle segments. No statistically significant difference was noted between the HEDM and PTN groups. The wear percentage for the HEDM group in the cervical and middle thirds were 49.66 ± 8.65 and 46.48 ± 14.29, respectively, and 51.02 ± 11.81 and 45.48 ± 10.79 for the PTN group, respectively. Conclusion  Both systems displayed similar mandibular molar mesial canals preparation, with no differences noted for any of the assessed parameters. Both groups showed increased canal diameter in the cervical and middle thirds by more than 40%.</abstract><cop>A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India</cop><pub>Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>35016238</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-0041-1739440</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1305-7456
ispartof European journal of dentistry, 2022-07, Vol.16 (3), p.663-668
issn 1305-7456
1305-7464
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9507560
source PubMed Central; Thieme Connect Journals Open Access
subjects Original
Original Article
title Microtomographic Evaluation of Canal Centralization and Dentine Removal after Canal Preparation with Two Rotary Systems: HyFlex EDM and ProTaper Next
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T21%3A11%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microtomographic%20Evaluation%20of%20Canal%20Centralization%20and%20Dentine%20Removal%20after%20Canal%20Preparation%20with%20Two%20Rotary%20Systems:%20HyFlex%20EDM%20and%20ProTaper%20Next&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Ronquete,%20Vivian&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=663&rft.epage=668&rft.pages=663-668&rft.issn=1305-7456&rft.eissn=1305-7464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-0041-1739440&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2619218384%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a4cb351eb7331978d656e459b9fc74e43af401c5b23e547a8cce0e532d4495b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2619218384&rft_id=info:pmid/35016238&rfr_iscdi=true