The Ethics and Politics of Academic Knowledge Production: Thoughts on the Future of Business Ethics

• Published in: Journal of business ethics 2022-10, Vol.180 (3), p.917-940
• Main Authors: Burrell, Gibson, Hyman, Michael R., Michaelson, Christopher, Nelson, Julie A., Taylor, Scott, West, Andrew
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Business and Management; Business Ethics; Comments; Conventions; Editing; Education; Essay; Ethics; Founding; Hegemony; Inequality; Knowledge; Learning; Management; Marketing; Masculinity; Morality; Peer review; Philosophy; Politics; Positioning; Production; Provocation; Publishing; Quality of Life Research; Rules
• ISSN: 0167-4544; 1573-0697
• DOI: 10.1007/s10551-022-05243-6

To commemorate 40 years since the founding of the Journal of Business Ethics, the editors in chief of the journal have invited the editors to provide commentaries on the future of business ethics. This essay comprises a selection of commentaries aimed at creating dialogue around the theme The Ethics and Politics of Academic Knowledge Production. Questions of who produces knowledge about what, and how that knowledge is produced, are inherent to editing and publishing academic journals. At the Journal of Business Ethics, we understand the ethical responsibility of academic knowledge production as going far beyond conventions around the integrity of the research content and research processes. We are deeply aware that access to resources, knowledge of the rules of the game, and being able to set those rules, are systematically and unequally distributed. One could ask the question “for whom is knowledge now ethical’”? (See the Burrell commentary.) We have a responsibility to address these inequalities and open up our journal to lesser heard voices, ideas, and ways of being. Our six commentators pursue this through various aspects of the ethics and politics of academic knowledge production. Working with MacIntyre’s scheme of practices and institutions, Andrew West provides commentary on the internal good of business ethics learning and education. Inviting us to step out of the cave, Christopher Michaelson urges a clear-eyed, unblinking focus on the purposes and audiences of business ethics scholarship. As developmental editor, Scott Taylor uncovers some of the politics of peer review with the aim of nurturing of unconventional research. Mike Hyman presents his idiosyncratic view of marketing ethics. In the penultimate commentary, Julie Nelson attributes difficulties in the academic positioning of the Business Ethics field to the hegemony of a masculine-centric model of the firm. And finally, Gibson Burrell provides a powerful provocation to go undercover as researcher - investigators in a parallel ethics of the research process.