Loading…
Hybrid flexible ureteroscopy strategy in the management of renal stones - a narrative review
The introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes (suFURSs) in daily practice tends to overcome the main limitations of reusable ureteroscopes (reFURSs), in terms of high acquisition costs, maintenance, breakages and repairing costs, reprocessing and sterilization, as retrograde intrarenal surge...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of medicine and life 2022-08, Vol.15 (8), p.919-926 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3330-9017ab560804a7cf839e05f9aa37553c85099d5d05f4f1d8f26919e9bf30f5773 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 926 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 919 |
container_title | Journal of medicine and life |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Geavlete, Bogdan Mareș, Cristian Mulțescu, Răzvan Georgescu, Dragoș Geavlete, Petrișor |
description | The introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes (suFURSs) in daily practice tends to overcome the main limitations of reusable ureteroscopes (reFURSs), in terms of high acquisition costs, maintenance, breakages and repairing costs, reprocessing and sterilization, as retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is promoted as first-line treatment of renal stones in most cases. A hybrid strategy implies having both instruments in the armamentarium of endourology and choosing the best strategy for cost-efficiency and protecting expensive reusable instruments in selected high-risk for breakage cases such as large stones of the inferior calyx, a steep infundibulopelvic angle or narrow infundibulum, or abnormal anatomy as in horseshoe and ectopic kidney. In terms of safety and efficiency, data present suFURSs as a safe alternative considering operating time, stone-free, and complication rates. An important aspect is highlighted by several authors about reusable instrument disinfection as various pathogens are still detected after proper sterilization. This comprehensive narrative review aims to analyze available data comparing suFURSs and reFURSs, considering economic, technical, and operative aspects of the two types of instruments, as well as the strategy of adopting a hybrid approach to selecting the most appropriate flexible ureteroscope in each case. |
doi_str_mv | 10.25122/jml-2022-0110 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9514813</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2731217050</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3330-9017ab560804a7cf839e05f9aa37553c85099d5d05f4f1d8f26919e9bf30f5773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFrHCEUhyW0JCHJNccg9NLLJE8dR70USmibQqCXFHooiDPz3LjMjFud2Xb_-7rNJrT1ovg-fzzfR8glg2suGec363GoOHBeAWNwRE6ZrutKMKZeHc4F-nZCLnJeQ1m1bJpGHJMT0TCtmxpOyfe7XZtCT_2Av0I7IF0Szphi7uJmR_Oc3IyrHQ0TnR-Rjm5yKxxxmmn0NOHkhsLECTOtqKOTS4UPWyylbcCf5-S1d0PGi8N-Rr5-_PBwe1fdf_n0-fb9fdUJIaAywJRrZQMaaqc6r4VBkN44J5SUotMSjOllX-5qz3rteWOYQdN6AV4qJc7Iu6fczdKO2Helv-QGu0lhdGlnowv238oUHu0qbq2RrNZMlIC3h4AUfyyYZzuG3OEwuAnjki1XHAxXGnRB3_yHruOSyiD2lGCcKZBQqOsnqiujzAn9SzMM7B93trize3d27648uPr7Cy_4synxG3XTlPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2731217050</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hybrid flexible ureteroscopy strategy in the management of renal stones - a narrative review</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Geavlete, Bogdan ; Mareș, Cristian ; Mulțescu, Răzvan ; Georgescu, Dragoș ; Geavlete, Petrișor</creator><creatorcontrib>Geavlete, Bogdan ; Mareș, Cristian ; Mulțescu, Răzvan ; Georgescu, Dragoș ; Geavlete, Petrișor ; Department of Urology, Emergency Clinical Hospital Sfântul Ioan, Bucharest, Romania ; Department of Urology, Sanador Hospital, Bucharest, Romania ; Cristian Mareș, Department of Urology, Emergency Clinical Hospital Sfântul Ioan, Bucharest, Romania. E-mail: dr.marescristian@gmail.com</creatorcontrib><description>The introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes (suFURSs) in daily practice tends to overcome the main limitations of reusable ureteroscopes (reFURSs), in terms of high acquisition costs, maintenance, breakages and repairing costs, reprocessing and sterilization, as retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is promoted as first-line treatment of renal stones in most cases. A hybrid strategy implies having both instruments in the armamentarium of endourology and choosing the best strategy for cost-efficiency and protecting expensive reusable instruments in selected high-risk for breakage cases such as large stones of the inferior calyx, a steep infundibulopelvic angle or narrow infundibulum, or abnormal anatomy as in horseshoe and ectopic kidney. In terms of safety and efficiency, data present suFURSs as a safe alternative considering operating time, stone-free, and complication rates. An important aspect is highlighted by several authors about reusable instrument disinfection as various pathogens are still detected after proper sterilization. This comprehensive narrative review aims to analyze available data comparing suFURSs and reFURSs, considering economic, technical, and operative aspects of the two types of instruments, as well as the strategy of adopting a hybrid approach to selecting the most appropriate flexible ureteroscope in each case.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1844-122X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1844-3117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.25122/jml-2022-0110</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36188640</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Romania: Carol Daila University Foundation</publisher><subject>Costs ; Efficiency ; Expenditures ; Humans ; Kidney Calculi - surgery ; Localization ; Nephrolithiasis ; Review ; Ureteroscopes ; Ureteroscopy - methods ; Urogenital system</subject><ispartof>Journal of medicine and life, 2022-08, Vol.15 (8), p.919-926</ispartof><rights>2022 JOURNAL of MEDICINE and LIFE.</rights><rights>Copyright Carol Daila University Foundation Aug 2022</rights><rights>2022 JOURNAL of MEDICINE and LIFE 2022</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3330-9017ab560804a7cf839e05f9aa37553c85099d5d05f4f1d8f26919e9bf30f5773</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9514813/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9514813/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36188640$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geavlete, Bogdan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mareș, Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulțescu, Răzvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgescu, Dragoș</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geavlete, Petrișor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Urology, Emergency Clinical Hospital Sfântul Ioan, Bucharest, Romania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Urology, Sanador Hospital, Bucharest, Romania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristian Mareș, Department of Urology, Emergency Clinical Hospital Sfântul Ioan, Bucharest, Romania. E-mail: dr.marescristian@gmail.com</creatorcontrib><title>Hybrid flexible ureteroscopy strategy in the management of renal stones - a narrative review</title><title>Journal of medicine and life</title><addtitle>J Med Life</addtitle><description>The introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes (suFURSs) in daily practice tends to overcome the main limitations of reusable ureteroscopes (reFURSs), in terms of high acquisition costs, maintenance, breakages and repairing costs, reprocessing and sterilization, as retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is promoted as first-line treatment of renal stones in most cases. A hybrid strategy implies having both instruments in the armamentarium of endourology and choosing the best strategy for cost-efficiency and protecting expensive reusable instruments in selected high-risk for breakage cases such as large stones of the inferior calyx, a steep infundibulopelvic angle or narrow infundibulum, or abnormal anatomy as in horseshoe and ectopic kidney. In terms of safety and efficiency, data present suFURSs as a safe alternative considering operating time, stone-free, and complication rates. An important aspect is highlighted by several authors about reusable instrument disinfection as various pathogens are still detected after proper sterilization. This comprehensive narrative review aims to analyze available data comparing suFURSs and reFURSs, considering economic, technical, and operative aspects of the two types of instruments, as well as the strategy of adopting a hybrid approach to selecting the most appropriate flexible ureteroscope in each case.</description><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - surgery</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Nephrolithiasis</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Ureteroscopes</subject><subject>Ureteroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Urogenital system</subject><issn>1844-122X</issn><issn>1844-3117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkcFrHCEUhyW0JCHJNccg9NLLJE8dR70USmibQqCXFHooiDPz3LjMjFud2Xb_-7rNJrT1ovg-fzzfR8glg2suGec363GoOHBeAWNwRE6ZrutKMKZeHc4F-nZCLnJeQ1m1bJpGHJMT0TCtmxpOyfe7XZtCT_2Av0I7IF0Szphi7uJmR_Oc3IyrHQ0TnR-Rjm5yKxxxmmn0NOHkhsLECTOtqKOTS4UPWyylbcCf5-S1d0PGi8N-Rr5-_PBwe1fdf_n0-fb9fdUJIaAywJRrZQMaaqc6r4VBkN44J5SUotMSjOllX-5qz3rteWOYQdN6AV4qJc7Iu6fczdKO2Helv-QGu0lhdGlnowv238oUHu0qbq2RrNZMlIC3h4AUfyyYZzuG3OEwuAnjki1XHAxXGnRB3_yHruOSyiD2lGCcKZBQqOsnqiujzAn9SzMM7B93trize3d27648uPr7Cy_4synxG3XTlPg</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Geavlete, Bogdan</creator><creator>Mareș, Cristian</creator><creator>Mulțescu, Răzvan</creator><creator>Georgescu, Dragoș</creator><creator>Geavlete, Petrișor</creator><general>Carol Daila University Foundation</general><general>Carol Davila University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Hybrid flexible ureteroscopy strategy in the management of renal stones - a narrative review</title><author>Geavlete, Bogdan ; Mareș, Cristian ; Mulțescu, Răzvan ; Georgescu, Dragoș ; Geavlete, Petrișor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3330-9017ab560804a7cf839e05f9aa37553c85099d5d05f4f1d8f26919e9bf30f5773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - surgery</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Nephrolithiasis</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Ureteroscopes</topic><topic>Ureteroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Urogenital system</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geavlete, Bogdan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mareș, Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulțescu, Răzvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgescu, Dragoș</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geavlete, Petrișor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Urology, Emergency Clinical Hospital Sfântul Ioan, Bucharest, Romania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Urology, Sanador Hospital, Bucharest, Romania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristian Mareș, Department of Urology, Emergency Clinical Hospital Sfântul Ioan, Bucharest, Romania. E-mail: dr.marescristian@gmail.com</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Health & Medical Complete</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of medicine and life</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geavlete, Bogdan</au><au>Mareș, Cristian</au><au>Mulțescu, Răzvan</au><au>Georgescu, Dragoș</au><au>Geavlete, Petrișor</au><aucorp>Department of Urology, Emergency Clinical Hospital Sfântul Ioan, Bucharest, Romania</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Urology, Sanador Hospital, Bucharest, Romania</aucorp><aucorp>Cristian Mareș, Department of Urology, Emergency Clinical Hospital Sfântul Ioan, Bucharest, Romania. E-mail: dr.marescristian@gmail.com</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hybrid flexible ureteroscopy strategy in the management of renal stones - a narrative review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medicine and life</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Life</addtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>919</spage><epage>926</epage><pages>919-926</pages><issn>1844-122X</issn><eissn>1844-3117</eissn><abstract>The introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes (suFURSs) in daily practice tends to overcome the main limitations of reusable ureteroscopes (reFURSs), in terms of high acquisition costs, maintenance, breakages and repairing costs, reprocessing and sterilization, as retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is promoted as first-line treatment of renal stones in most cases. A hybrid strategy implies having both instruments in the armamentarium of endourology and choosing the best strategy for cost-efficiency and protecting expensive reusable instruments in selected high-risk for breakage cases such as large stones of the inferior calyx, a steep infundibulopelvic angle or narrow infundibulum, or abnormal anatomy as in horseshoe and ectopic kidney. In terms of safety and efficiency, data present suFURSs as a safe alternative considering operating time, stone-free, and complication rates. An important aspect is highlighted by several authors about reusable instrument disinfection as various pathogens are still detected after proper sterilization. This comprehensive narrative review aims to analyze available data comparing suFURSs and reFURSs, considering economic, technical, and operative aspects of the two types of instruments, as well as the strategy of adopting a hybrid approach to selecting the most appropriate flexible ureteroscope in each case.</abstract><cop>Romania</cop><pub>Carol Daila University Foundation</pub><pmid>36188640</pmid><doi>10.25122/jml-2022-0110</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1844-122X |
ispartof | Journal of medicine and life, 2022-08, Vol.15 (8), p.919-926 |
issn | 1844-122X 1844-3117 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9514813 |
source | PubMed Central Free |
subjects | Costs Efficiency Expenditures Humans Kidney Calculi - surgery Localization Nephrolithiasis Review Ureteroscopes Ureteroscopy - methods Urogenital system |
title | Hybrid flexible ureteroscopy strategy in the management of renal stones - a narrative review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T22%3A21%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hybrid%20flexible%20ureteroscopy%20strategy%20in%20the%20management%20of%20renal%20stones%20-%20a%20narrative%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medicine%20and%20life&rft.au=Geavlete,%20Bogdan&rft.aucorp=Department%20of%20Urology,%20Emergency%20Clinical%20Hospital%20Sf%C3%A2ntul%20Ioan,%20Bucharest,%20Romania&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=919&rft.epage=926&rft.pages=919-926&rft.issn=1844-122X&rft.eissn=1844-3117&rft_id=info:doi/10.25122/jml-2022-0110&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2731217050%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3330-9017ab560804a7cf839e05f9aa37553c85099d5d05f4f1d8f26919e9bf30f5773%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2731217050&rft_id=info:pmid/36188640&rfr_iscdi=true |