Loading…

Hybrid flexible ureteroscopy strategy in the management of renal stones - a narrative review

The introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes (suFURSs) in daily practice tends to overcome the main limitations of reusable ureteroscopes (reFURSs), in terms of high acquisition costs, maintenance, breakages and repairing costs, reprocessing and sterilization, as retrograde intrarenal surge...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of medicine and life 2022-08, Vol.15 (8), p.919-926
Main Authors: Geavlete, Bogdan, Mareș, Cristian, Mulțescu, Răzvan, Georgescu, Dragoș, Geavlete, Petrișor
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3330-9017ab560804a7cf839e05f9aa37553c85099d5d05f4f1d8f26919e9bf30f5773
cites
container_end_page 926
container_issue 8
container_start_page 919
container_title Journal of medicine and life
container_volume 15
creator Geavlete, Bogdan
Mareș, Cristian
Mulțescu, Răzvan
Georgescu, Dragoș
Geavlete, Petrișor
description The introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes (suFURSs) in daily practice tends to overcome the main limitations of reusable ureteroscopes (reFURSs), in terms of high acquisition costs, maintenance, breakages and repairing costs, reprocessing and sterilization, as retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is promoted as first-line treatment of renal stones in most cases. A hybrid strategy implies having both instruments in the armamentarium of endourology and choosing the best strategy for cost-efficiency and protecting expensive reusable instruments in selected high-risk for breakage cases such as large stones of the inferior calyx, a steep infundibulopelvic angle or narrow infundibulum, or abnormal anatomy as in horseshoe and ectopic kidney. In terms of safety and efficiency, data present suFURSs as a safe alternative considering operating time, stone-free, and complication rates. An important aspect is highlighted by several authors about reusable instrument disinfection as various pathogens are still detected after proper sterilization. This comprehensive narrative review aims to analyze available data comparing suFURSs and reFURSs, considering economic, technical, and operative aspects of the two types of instruments, as well as the strategy of adopting a hybrid approach to selecting the most appropriate flexible ureteroscope in each case.
doi_str_mv 10.25122/jml-2022-0110
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9514813</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2731217050</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3330-9017ab560804a7cf839e05f9aa37553c85099d5d05f4f1d8f26919e9bf30f5773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFrHCEUhyW0JCHJNccg9NLLJE8dR70USmibQqCXFHooiDPz3LjMjFud2Xb_-7rNJrT1ovg-fzzfR8glg2suGec363GoOHBeAWNwRE6ZrutKMKZeHc4F-nZCLnJeQ1m1bJpGHJMT0TCtmxpOyfe7XZtCT_2Av0I7IF0Szphi7uJmR_Oc3IyrHQ0TnR-Rjm5yKxxxmmn0NOHkhsLECTOtqKOTS4UPWyylbcCf5-S1d0PGi8N-Rr5-_PBwe1fdf_n0-fb9fdUJIaAywJRrZQMaaqc6r4VBkN44J5SUotMSjOllX-5qz3rteWOYQdN6AV4qJc7Iu6fczdKO2Helv-QGu0lhdGlnowv238oUHu0qbq2RrNZMlIC3h4AUfyyYZzuG3OEwuAnjki1XHAxXGnRB3_yHruOSyiD2lGCcKZBQqOsnqiujzAn9SzMM7B93trize3d27648uPr7Cy_4synxG3XTlPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2731217050</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hybrid flexible ureteroscopy strategy in the management of renal stones - a narrative review</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Geavlete, Bogdan ; Mareș, Cristian ; Mulțescu, Răzvan ; Georgescu, Dragoș ; Geavlete, Petrișor</creator><creatorcontrib>Geavlete, Bogdan ; Mareș, Cristian ; Mulțescu, Răzvan ; Georgescu, Dragoș ; Geavlete, Petrișor ; Department of Urology, Emergency Clinical Hospital Sfântul Ioan, Bucharest, Romania ; Department of Urology, Sanador Hospital, Bucharest, Romania ; Cristian Mareș, Department of Urology, Emergency Clinical Hospital Sfântul Ioan, Bucharest, Romania. E-mail: dr.marescristian@gmail.com</creatorcontrib><description>The introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes (suFURSs) in daily practice tends to overcome the main limitations of reusable ureteroscopes (reFURSs), in terms of high acquisition costs, maintenance, breakages and repairing costs, reprocessing and sterilization, as retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is promoted as first-line treatment of renal stones in most cases. A hybrid strategy implies having both instruments in the armamentarium of endourology and choosing the best strategy for cost-efficiency and protecting expensive reusable instruments in selected high-risk for breakage cases such as large stones of the inferior calyx, a steep infundibulopelvic angle or narrow infundibulum, or abnormal anatomy as in horseshoe and ectopic kidney. In terms of safety and efficiency, data present suFURSs as a safe alternative considering operating time, stone-free, and complication rates. An important aspect is highlighted by several authors about reusable instrument disinfection as various pathogens are still detected after proper sterilization. This comprehensive narrative review aims to analyze available data comparing suFURSs and reFURSs, considering economic, technical, and operative aspects of the two types of instruments, as well as the strategy of adopting a hybrid approach to selecting the most appropriate flexible ureteroscope in each case.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1844-122X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1844-3117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.25122/jml-2022-0110</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36188640</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Romania: Carol Daila University Foundation</publisher><subject>Costs ; Efficiency ; Expenditures ; Humans ; Kidney Calculi - surgery ; Localization ; Nephrolithiasis ; Review ; Ureteroscopes ; Ureteroscopy - methods ; Urogenital system</subject><ispartof>Journal of medicine and life, 2022-08, Vol.15 (8), p.919-926</ispartof><rights>2022 JOURNAL of MEDICINE and LIFE.</rights><rights>Copyright Carol Daila University Foundation Aug 2022</rights><rights>2022 JOURNAL of MEDICINE and LIFE 2022</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3330-9017ab560804a7cf839e05f9aa37553c85099d5d05f4f1d8f26919e9bf30f5773</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9514813/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9514813/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36188640$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geavlete, Bogdan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mareș, Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulțescu, Răzvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgescu, Dragoș</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geavlete, Petrișor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Urology, Emergency Clinical Hospital Sfântul Ioan, Bucharest, Romania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Urology, Sanador Hospital, Bucharest, Romania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristian Mareș, Department of Urology, Emergency Clinical Hospital Sfântul Ioan, Bucharest, Romania. E-mail: dr.marescristian@gmail.com</creatorcontrib><title>Hybrid flexible ureteroscopy strategy in the management of renal stones - a narrative review</title><title>Journal of medicine and life</title><addtitle>J Med Life</addtitle><description>The introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes (suFURSs) in daily practice tends to overcome the main limitations of reusable ureteroscopes (reFURSs), in terms of high acquisition costs, maintenance, breakages and repairing costs, reprocessing and sterilization, as retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is promoted as first-line treatment of renal stones in most cases. A hybrid strategy implies having both instruments in the armamentarium of endourology and choosing the best strategy for cost-efficiency and protecting expensive reusable instruments in selected high-risk for breakage cases such as large stones of the inferior calyx, a steep infundibulopelvic angle or narrow infundibulum, or abnormal anatomy as in horseshoe and ectopic kidney. In terms of safety and efficiency, data present suFURSs as a safe alternative considering operating time, stone-free, and complication rates. An important aspect is highlighted by several authors about reusable instrument disinfection as various pathogens are still detected after proper sterilization. This comprehensive narrative review aims to analyze available data comparing suFURSs and reFURSs, considering economic, technical, and operative aspects of the two types of instruments, as well as the strategy of adopting a hybrid approach to selecting the most appropriate flexible ureteroscope in each case.</description><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - surgery</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Nephrolithiasis</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Ureteroscopes</subject><subject>Ureteroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Urogenital system</subject><issn>1844-122X</issn><issn>1844-3117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkcFrHCEUhyW0JCHJNccg9NLLJE8dR70USmibQqCXFHooiDPz3LjMjFud2Xb_-7rNJrT1ovg-fzzfR8glg2suGec363GoOHBeAWNwRE6ZrutKMKZeHc4F-nZCLnJeQ1m1bJpGHJMT0TCtmxpOyfe7XZtCT_2Av0I7IF0Szphi7uJmR_Oc3IyrHQ0TnR-Rjm5yKxxxmmn0NOHkhsLECTOtqKOTS4UPWyylbcCf5-S1d0PGi8N-Rr5-_PBwe1fdf_n0-fb9fdUJIaAywJRrZQMaaqc6r4VBkN44J5SUotMSjOllX-5qz3rteWOYQdN6AV4qJc7Iu6fczdKO2Helv-QGu0lhdGlnowv238oUHu0qbq2RrNZMlIC3h4AUfyyYZzuG3OEwuAnjki1XHAxXGnRB3_yHruOSyiD2lGCcKZBQqOsnqiujzAn9SzMM7B93trize3d27648uPr7Cy_4synxG3XTlPg</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Geavlete, Bogdan</creator><creator>Mareș, Cristian</creator><creator>Mulțescu, Răzvan</creator><creator>Georgescu, Dragoș</creator><creator>Geavlete, Petrișor</creator><general>Carol Daila University Foundation</general><general>Carol Davila University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Hybrid flexible ureteroscopy strategy in the management of renal stones - a narrative review</title><author>Geavlete, Bogdan ; Mareș, Cristian ; Mulțescu, Răzvan ; Georgescu, Dragoș ; Geavlete, Petrișor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3330-9017ab560804a7cf839e05f9aa37553c85099d5d05f4f1d8f26919e9bf30f5773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - surgery</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Nephrolithiasis</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Ureteroscopes</topic><topic>Ureteroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Urogenital system</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geavlete, Bogdan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mareș, Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulțescu, Răzvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgescu, Dragoș</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geavlete, Petrișor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Urology, Emergency Clinical Hospital Sfântul Ioan, Bucharest, Romania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Urology, Sanador Hospital, Bucharest, Romania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristian Mareș, Department of Urology, Emergency Clinical Hospital Sfântul Ioan, Bucharest, Romania. E-mail: dr.marescristian@gmail.com</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Health &amp; Medical Complete</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of medicine and life</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geavlete, Bogdan</au><au>Mareș, Cristian</au><au>Mulțescu, Răzvan</au><au>Georgescu, Dragoș</au><au>Geavlete, Petrișor</au><aucorp>Department of Urology, Emergency Clinical Hospital Sfântul Ioan, Bucharest, Romania</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Urology, Sanador Hospital, Bucharest, Romania</aucorp><aucorp>Cristian Mareș, Department of Urology, Emergency Clinical Hospital Sfântul Ioan, Bucharest, Romania. E-mail: dr.marescristian@gmail.com</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hybrid flexible ureteroscopy strategy in the management of renal stones - a narrative review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medicine and life</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Life</addtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>919</spage><epage>926</epage><pages>919-926</pages><issn>1844-122X</issn><eissn>1844-3117</eissn><abstract>The introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes (suFURSs) in daily practice tends to overcome the main limitations of reusable ureteroscopes (reFURSs), in terms of high acquisition costs, maintenance, breakages and repairing costs, reprocessing and sterilization, as retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is promoted as first-line treatment of renal stones in most cases. A hybrid strategy implies having both instruments in the armamentarium of endourology and choosing the best strategy for cost-efficiency and protecting expensive reusable instruments in selected high-risk for breakage cases such as large stones of the inferior calyx, a steep infundibulopelvic angle or narrow infundibulum, or abnormal anatomy as in horseshoe and ectopic kidney. In terms of safety and efficiency, data present suFURSs as a safe alternative considering operating time, stone-free, and complication rates. An important aspect is highlighted by several authors about reusable instrument disinfection as various pathogens are still detected after proper sterilization. This comprehensive narrative review aims to analyze available data comparing suFURSs and reFURSs, considering economic, technical, and operative aspects of the two types of instruments, as well as the strategy of adopting a hybrid approach to selecting the most appropriate flexible ureteroscope in each case.</abstract><cop>Romania</cop><pub>Carol Daila University Foundation</pub><pmid>36188640</pmid><doi>10.25122/jml-2022-0110</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1844-122X
ispartof Journal of medicine and life, 2022-08, Vol.15 (8), p.919-926
issn 1844-122X
1844-3117
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9514813
source PubMed Central Free
subjects Costs
Efficiency
Expenditures
Humans
Kidney Calculi - surgery
Localization
Nephrolithiasis
Review
Ureteroscopes
Ureteroscopy - methods
Urogenital system
title Hybrid flexible ureteroscopy strategy in the management of renal stones - a narrative review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T22%3A21%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hybrid%20flexible%20ureteroscopy%20strategy%20in%20the%20management%20of%20renal%20stones%20-%20a%20narrative%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medicine%20and%20life&rft.au=Geavlete,%20Bogdan&rft.aucorp=Department%20of%20Urology,%20Emergency%20Clinical%20Hospital%20Sf%C3%A2ntul%20Ioan,%20Bucharest,%20Romania&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=919&rft.epage=926&rft.pages=919-926&rft.issn=1844-122X&rft.eissn=1844-3117&rft_id=info:doi/10.25122/jml-2022-0110&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2731217050%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3330-9017ab560804a7cf839e05f9aa37553c85099d5d05f4f1d8f26919e9bf30f5773%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2731217050&rft_id=info:pmid/36188640&rfr_iscdi=true