Evaluation of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction by Pelvic Floor Ultrasonography after Total Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer

Objective. To study the value of pelvic floor ultrasonography in evaluating pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) after total hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Methods. All the enrolled patients were given 4D pelvic floor ultrasound examination before and after surgery. The results of ultrasonic examinatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scanning 2022, Vol.2022, p.5914344-4
Main Authors: Liu, Dan-dan, Xin, Jing, Liu, Wei, Zhang, Yan-feng, Li, Peishan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bladder
Cancer
Cancer surgery
Cervical cancer
Evaluation
Female
Gynecology
Humans
Hysterectomy
Hysterectomy - adverse effects
Muscles
Neck
Pelvic Floor - diagnostic imaging
Pelvic Floor - physiology
Pelvic organ prolapse
Pelvis
Physiology
Quality of Life
Rotation
Software
Statistical analysis
Surgery
Tumors
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonic testing
Ultrasonography - methods
Urinary incontinence
Urine
Urogenital system
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery
Vagina
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective. To study the value of pelvic floor ultrasonography in evaluating pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) after total hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Methods. All the enrolled patients were given 4D pelvic floor ultrasound examination before and after surgery. The results of ultrasonic examination and the parameters of four-dimensional ultrasonic examination before and after surgery were analyzed, and the quality of life of the patients before and after surgery was evaluated. Results. Postoperatively, the posterior angle of bladder and urethra, the rotation angle of urethra, the decreased value of bladder neck, and the distance between bladder neck and pubic symphysis were (122.60±9.53)°, (136.47±14.67)°, (58.90±18.19)°, (18.14±7.32) mm, and (2.76±0.46) cm, significantly greater than the preoperative (89.90±9.59)°, (107.30±9.96)°, (27.59±10.96)°, (13.27±5.69) mm, and (2.24±0.21) cm (P
ISSN:0161-0457
1932-8745
DOI:10.1155/2022/5914344