Loading…
Anti-pandemic restrictions, uncertainty and sentiment in seven countries
We investigate how the stringency of government anti-pandemic policy measures might affect economic policy uncertainty in countries with different degrees of press freedom, various press reporting styles and writing conventions. We apply a text-based measure of uncertainty using data from over 400,0...
Saved in:
Published in: | Economic change and restructuring 2023-02, Vol.56 (1), p.1-27 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ec278e16882ca007e3d53de78b6c789cf6c81a80c20c0548819a07febaa378003 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ec278e16882ca007e3d53de78b6c789cf6c81a80c20c0548819a07febaa378003 |
container_end_page | 27 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Economic change and restructuring |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Charemza, Wojciech Makarova, Svetlana Rybiński, Krzysztof |
description | We investigate how the stringency of government anti-pandemic policy measures might affect economic policy uncertainty in countries with different degrees of press freedom, various press reporting styles and writing conventions. We apply a text-based measure of uncertainty using data from over 400,000 press articles from Belarus, Kazakhstan, Poland, Russia, Ukraine, the UK and the USA published before the wide-scale vaccination programmes were introduced. The measure accounts for pandemic-related words and negative sentiment scores weight the selected articles. We then tested the dynamic panel data model where the relative changes in these measures were explained by levels and changes in the stringency measures. We have found that introducing and then maintaining unchanged for a relatively long time a constant level of anti-pandemic stringency measures reduce uncertainty. In contrast, a change in such a level has the opposite effect. This result is robust across the countries, despite their differences in political systems, press control and freedom of speech. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10644-022-09447-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9548311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2768983936</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ec278e16882ca007e3d53de78b6c789cf6c81a80c20c0548819a07febaa378003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LwzAYxoMoOKdfwFPBq9E3TdskF2EMdcLAi55Dlr6dGVs6k3awb2-2iuLFS_4-zy9PHkKuGdwxAHEfGVRFQSHPKaiiEFSekBErxeFIiNPjmlNVsOKcXMS4AihBARuR2cR3jm6Nr3HjbBYwdsHZzrU-3ma9txg643y3z5Iii5jEmzRkzqfNDn1m294nB8ZLctaYdcSr73lM3p8e36YzOn99fplO5tRywTuKNhcSWSVlbk1KjrwueY1CLiorpLJNZSUzEmwOFspCSqYMiAYXxnAhAfiYPAzcbb_YYG1TmmDWehvcxoS9bo3Tf2-8-9DLdqdVonHGEuDmGxDazz79V6_aPviUWeeikkpyxaukygeVDW2MAZufFxjoQ-V6qFynyvWxci2TiQ-mmMR-ieEX_Y_rC_vRhfM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2768983936</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anti-pandemic restrictions, uncertainty and sentiment in seven countries</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Charemza, Wojciech ; Makarova, Svetlana ; Rybiński, Krzysztof</creator><creatorcontrib>Charemza, Wojciech ; Makarova, Svetlana ; Rybiński, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><description>We investigate how the stringency of government anti-pandemic policy measures might affect economic policy uncertainty in countries with different degrees of press freedom, various press reporting styles and writing conventions. We apply a text-based measure of uncertainty using data from over 400,000 press articles from Belarus, Kazakhstan, Poland, Russia, Ukraine, the UK and the USA published before the wide-scale vaccination programmes were introduced. The measure accounts for pandemic-related words and negative sentiment scores weight the selected articles. We then tested the dynamic panel data model where the relative changes in these measures were explained by levels and changes in the stringency measures. We have found that introducing and then maintaining unchanged for a relatively long time a constant level of anti-pandemic stringency measures reduce uncertainty. In contrast, a change in such a level has the opposite effect. This result is robust across the countries, despite their differences in political systems, press control and freedom of speech.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1573-9414</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1574-0277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10644-022-09447-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Changes ; Conventions ; Development Economics ; Economic Growth ; Economic Policy ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Freedom of speech ; Freedom of the press ; Immunization ; International Economics ; Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics ; Measures ; Pandemics ; Panel data ; Political Economy/Economic Systems ; Political systems ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Economic change and restructuring, 2023-02, Vol.56 (1), p.1-27</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ec278e16882ca007e3d53de78b6c789cf6c81a80c20c0548819a07febaa378003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ec278e16882ca007e3d53de78b6c789cf6c81a80c20c0548819a07febaa378003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4748-2655 ; 0000-0002-4604-7993 ; 0000-0001-6601-2491</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2768983936/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2768983936?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,11687,12846,21393,27865,27923,27924,33222,33610,36059,43732,44362,74092,74766</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Charemza, Wojciech</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makarova, Svetlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rybiński, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><title>Anti-pandemic restrictions, uncertainty and sentiment in seven countries</title><title>Economic change and restructuring</title><addtitle>Econ Change Restruct</addtitle><description>We investigate how the stringency of government anti-pandemic policy measures might affect economic policy uncertainty in countries with different degrees of press freedom, various press reporting styles and writing conventions. We apply a text-based measure of uncertainty using data from over 400,000 press articles from Belarus, Kazakhstan, Poland, Russia, Ukraine, the UK and the USA published before the wide-scale vaccination programmes were introduced. The measure accounts for pandemic-related words and negative sentiment scores weight the selected articles. We then tested the dynamic panel data model where the relative changes in these measures were explained by levels and changes in the stringency measures. We have found that introducing and then maintaining unchanged for a relatively long time a constant level of anti-pandemic stringency measures reduce uncertainty. In contrast, a change in such a level has the opposite effect. This result is robust across the countries, despite their differences in political systems, press control and freedom of speech.</description><subject>Changes</subject><subject>Conventions</subject><subject>Development Economics</subject><subject>Economic Growth</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Freedom of speech</subject><subject>Freedom of the press</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>International Economics</subject><subject>Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics</subject><subject>Measures</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Panel data</subject><subject>Political Economy/Economic Systems</subject><subject>Political systems</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>1573-9414</issn><issn>1574-0277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LwzAYxoMoOKdfwFPBq9E3TdskF2EMdcLAi55Dlr6dGVs6k3awb2-2iuLFS_4-zy9PHkKuGdwxAHEfGVRFQSHPKaiiEFSekBErxeFIiNPjmlNVsOKcXMS4AihBARuR2cR3jm6Nr3HjbBYwdsHZzrU-3ma9txg643y3z5Iii5jEmzRkzqfNDn1m294nB8ZLctaYdcSr73lM3p8e36YzOn99fplO5tRywTuKNhcSWSVlbk1KjrwueY1CLiorpLJNZSUzEmwOFspCSqYMiAYXxnAhAfiYPAzcbb_YYG1TmmDWehvcxoS9bo3Tf2-8-9DLdqdVonHGEuDmGxDazz79V6_aPviUWeeikkpyxaukygeVDW2MAZufFxjoQ-V6qFynyvWxci2TiQ-mmMR-ieEX_Y_rC_vRhfM</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Charemza, Wojciech</creator><creator>Makarova, Svetlana</creator><creator>Rybiński, Krzysztof</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4748-2655</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4604-7993</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6601-2491</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>Anti-pandemic restrictions, uncertainty and sentiment in seven countries</title><author>Charemza, Wojciech ; Makarova, Svetlana ; Rybiński, Krzysztof</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ec278e16882ca007e3d53de78b6c789cf6c81a80c20c0548819a07febaa378003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Changes</topic><topic>Conventions</topic><topic>Development Economics</topic><topic>Economic Growth</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Freedom of speech</topic><topic>Freedom of the press</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>International Economics</topic><topic>Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics</topic><topic>Measures</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Panel data</topic><topic>Political Economy/Economic Systems</topic><topic>Political systems</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Charemza, Wojciech</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makarova, Svetlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rybiński, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Economic change and restructuring</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Charemza, Wojciech</au><au>Makarova, Svetlana</au><au>Rybiński, Krzysztof</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anti-pandemic restrictions, uncertainty and sentiment in seven countries</atitle><jtitle>Economic change and restructuring</jtitle><stitle>Econ Change Restruct</stitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>1-27</pages><issn>1573-9414</issn><eissn>1574-0277</eissn><abstract>We investigate how the stringency of government anti-pandemic policy measures might affect economic policy uncertainty in countries with different degrees of press freedom, various press reporting styles and writing conventions. We apply a text-based measure of uncertainty using data from over 400,000 press articles from Belarus, Kazakhstan, Poland, Russia, Ukraine, the UK and the USA published before the wide-scale vaccination programmes were introduced. The measure accounts for pandemic-related words and negative sentiment scores weight the selected articles. We then tested the dynamic panel data model where the relative changes in these measures were explained by levels and changes in the stringency measures. We have found that introducing and then maintaining unchanged for a relatively long time a constant level of anti-pandemic stringency measures reduce uncertainty. In contrast, a change in such a level has the opposite effect. This result is robust across the countries, despite their differences in political systems, press control and freedom of speech.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10644-022-09447-8</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4748-2655</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4604-7993</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6601-2491</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1573-9414 |
ispartof | Economic change and restructuring, 2023-02, Vol.56 (1), p.1-27 |
issn | 1573-9414 1574-0277 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9548311 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; PAIS Index; Springer Link |
subjects | Changes Conventions Development Economics Economic Growth Economic Policy Economics Economics and Finance Freedom of speech Freedom of the press Immunization International Economics Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics Measures Pandemics Panel data Political Economy/Economic Systems Political systems Uncertainty |
title | Anti-pandemic restrictions, uncertainty and sentiment in seven countries |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T02%3A16%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anti-pandemic%20restrictions,%20uncertainty%20and%20sentiment%20in%20seven%20countries&rft.jtitle=Economic%20change%20and%20restructuring&rft.au=Charemza,%20Wojciech&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=1-27&rft.issn=1573-9414&rft.eissn=1574-0277&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10644-022-09447-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2768983936%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ec278e16882ca007e3d53de78b6c789cf6c81a80c20c0548819a07febaa378003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2768983936&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |