Loading…

Usefulness of Tulip Airway in Edentulous Elderly Patients

Mask ventilation can be difficult in elderly edentulous patients. Various solutions have been proposed to address this challenge. This study assessed the use of a new airway-securing device called the Tulip Airway and investigated its application in simulated edentulous patients. This pilot study ut...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anesthesia progress 2022-09, Vol.69 (3), p.9-12
Main Authors: Imashuku, Yasuhiko, Kitagawa, Hirotoshi, Mizuno, Takayoshi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2861-70051cd4e3b6ec658f481aa6e12876e0a674163e63eb44b5a0ea78c690d669863
container_end_page 12
container_issue 3
container_start_page 9
container_title Anesthesia progress
container_volume 69
creator Imashuku, Yasuhiko
Kitagawa, Hirotoshi
Mizuno, Takayoshi
description Mask ventilation can be difficult in elderly edentulous patients. Various solutions have been proposed to address this challenge. This study assessed the use of a new airway-securing device called the Tulip Airway and investigated its application in simulated edentulous patients. This pilot study utilized a modified edentulous airway training mannequin and a high-performance simulator. Participants attempted to ventilate the edentulous mannequin using a Guedel oropharyngeal airway and face mask (M method) or the Tulip Airway (T method). Successful inflation of the mannequin model lung was confirmed visually. The time required for the insertion of the Tulip Airway was also assessed. A high-performance simulator was then used to compare ventilation volumes achieved using the M and T methods, and data subsequently analyzed. In the edentulous mannequin, lung inflation was not achieved by any participants using the M method, but all were successful using the T method. Insertion time for the Tulip Airway was ∼8 seconds. Median ventilation volumes achieved using the high-performance simulator were higher for the T method (308 mL) compared with the M method (192 mL; P < .05). The results of this pilot study indicate that the Tulip Airway is an effective airway device for use in edentulous patients with difficult mask ventilation.
doi_str_mv 10.2344/anpr-69-01-01
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9552620</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2724237849</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2861-70051cd4e3b6ec658f481aa6e12876e0a674163e63eb44b5a0ea78c690d669863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtLxDAUhYMozji6dCsFN26iN4_epBtBhvEBgi50HdI21Q6Zdkymyvx74_hAhQOBm49z7-EQcsjglAspz2y3DBQLCixpi4yZVpoqptQ2GQOAoAIAR2QvxjkAk8DlLhkJ5FwwjWNSPEbXDL5zMWZ9kz0Mvl1mF214s-us7bJZ7brV4PshZjNfu-DX2b1dtWkY98lOY310B1_vhDxezh6m1_T27upmenFLK66RUQWQs6qWTpToKsx1IzWzFh3jWqEDi0oyFC6plLLMLTirdIUF1IiFRjEh55--y6FcuLpKu4P1ZhnahQ1r09vW_P3p2mfz1L-aIs85ckgGJ18GoX8ZXFyZRRsr573tXApmuOKSC6VlkdDjf-i8H0KX4m0oBig2F9FPqgp9jME1P8cwMB-lmI9SDBYGWFLij34n-KG_WxDvzdiHaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2724106386</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Usefulness of Tulip Airway in Edentulous Elderly Patients</title><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><creator>Imashuku, Yasuhiko ; Kitagawa, Hirotoshi ; Mizuno, Takayoshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Imashuku, Yasuhiko ; Kitagawa, Hirotoshi ; Mizuno, Takayoshi</creatorcontrib><description>Mask ventilation can be difficult in elderly edentulous patients. Various solutions have been proposed to address this challenge. This study assessed the use of a new airway-securing device called the Tulip Airway and investigated its application in simulated edentulous patients. This pilot study utilized a modified edentulous airway training mannequin and a high-performance simulator. Participants attempted to ventilate the edentulous mannequin using a Guedel oropharyngeal airway and face mask (M method) or the Tulip Airway (T method). Successful inflation of the mannequin model lung was confirmed visually. The time required for the insertion of the Tulip Airway was also assessed. A high-performance simulator was then used to compare ventilation volumes achieved using the M and T methods, and data subsequently analyzed. In the edentulous mannequin, lung inflation was not achieved by any participants using the M method, but all were successful using the T method. Insertion time for the Tulip Airway was ∼8 seconds. Median ventilation volumes achieved using the high-performance simulator were higher for the T method (308 mL) compared with the M method (192 mL; P &lt; .05). The results of this pilot study indicate that the Tulip Airway is an effective airway device for use in edentulous patients with difficult mask ventilation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3006</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7177</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2344/anpr-69-01-01</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36223186</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Allen Press Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Edentulous ; General anesthesia ; Humans ; Intubation ; Intubation, Intratracheal ; Laryngeal Masks ; Manikins ; Medical personnel ; Methods ; Patients ; Pilot Projects ; Respiratory tract ; Scientific Reports ; Success ; Teeth ; Tulipa</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia progress, 2022-09, Vol.69 (3), p.9-12</ispartof><rights>2022 by the American Dental Society of Anesthesiology.</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Inc. Fall 2022</rights><rights>2022 by the American Dental Society of Anesthesiology 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2861-70051cd4e3b6ec658f481aa6e12876e0a674163e63eb44b5a0ea78c690d669863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552620/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552620/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36223186$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Imashuku, Yasuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitagawa, Hirotoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizuno, Takayoshi</creatorcontrib><title>Usefulness of Tulip Airway in Edentulous Elderly Patients</title><title>Anesthesia progress</title><addtitle>Anesth Prog</addtitle><description>Mask ventilation can be difficult in elderly edentulous patients. Various solutions have been proposed to address this challenge. This study assessed the use of a new airway-securing device called the Tulip Airway and investigated its application in simulated edentulous patients. This pilot study utilized a modified edentulous airway training mannequin and a high-performance simulator. Participants attempted to ventilate the edentulous mannequin using a Guedel oropharyngeal airway and face mask (M method) or the Tulip Airway (T method). Successful inflation of the mannequin model lung was confirmed visually. The time required for the insertion of the Tulip Airway was also assessed. A high-performance simulator was then used to compare ventilation volumes achieved using the M and T methods, and data subsequently analyzed. In the edentulous mannequin, lung inflation was not achieved by any participants using the M method, but all were successful using the T method. Insertion time for the Tulip Airway was ∼8 seconds. Median ventilation volumes achieved using the high-performance simulator were higher for the T method (308 mL) compared with the M method (192 mL; P &lt; .05). The results of this pilot study indicate that the Tulip Airway is an effective airway device for use in edentulous patients with difficult mask ventilation.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Edentulous</subject><subject>General anesthesia</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal</subject><subject>Laryngeal Masks</subject><subject>Manikins</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Respiratory tract</subject><subject>Scientific Reports</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Tulipa</subject><issn>0003-3006</issn><issn>1878-7177</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkUtLxDAUhYMozji6dCsFN26iN4_epBtBhvEBgi50HdI21Q6Zdkymyvx74_hAhQOBm49z7-EQcsjglAspz2y3DBQLCixpi4yZVpoqptQ2GQOAoAIAR2QvxjkAk8DlLhkJ5FwwjWNSPEbXDL5zMWZ9kz0Mvl1mF214s-us7bJZ7brV4PshZjNfu-DX2b1dtWkY98lOY310B1_vhDxezh6m1_T27upmenFLK66RUQWQs6qWTpToKsx1IzWzFh3jWqEDi0oyFC6plLLMLTirdIUF1IiFRjEh55--y6FcuLpKu4P1ZhnahQ1r09vW_P3p2mfz1L-aIs85ckgGJ18GoX8ZXFyZRRsr573tXApmuOKSC6VlkdDjf-i8H0KX4m0oBig2F9FPqgp9jME1P8cwMB-lmI9SDBYGWFLij34n-KG_WxDvzdiHaA</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Imashuku, Yasuhiko</creator><creator>Kitagawa, Hirotoshi</creator><creator>Mizuno, Takayoshi</creator><general>Allen Press Inc</general><general>American Dental Society of Anesthisiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Usefulness of Tulip Airway in Edentulous Elderly Patients</title><author>Imashuku, Yasuhiko ; Kitagawa, Hirotoshi ; Mizuno, Takayoshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2861-70051cd4e3b6ec658f481aa6e12876e0a674163e63eb44b5a0ea78c690d669863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Edentulous</topic><topic>General anesthesia</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal</topic><topic>Laryngeal Masks</topic><topic>Manikins</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Respiratory tract</topic><topic>Scientific Reports</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Tulipa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Imashuku, Yasuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitagawa, Hirotoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizuno, Takayoshi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia progress</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Imashuku, Yasuhiko</au><au>Kitagawa, Hirotoshi</au><au>Mizuno, Takayoshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Usefulness of Tulip Airway in Edentulous Elderly Patients</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia progress</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Prog</addtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>9-12</pages><issn>0003-3006</issn><eissn>1878-7177</eissn><abstract>Mask ventilation can be difficult in elderly edentulous patients. Various solutions have been proposed to address this challenge. This study assessed the use of a new airway-securing device called the Tulip Airway and investigated its application in simulated edentulous patients. This pilot study utilized a modified edentulous airway training mannequin and a high-performance simulator. Participants attempted to ventilate the edentulous mannequin using a Guedel oropharyngeal airway and face mask (M method) or the Tulip Airway (T method). Successful inflation of the mannequin model lung was confirmed visually. The time required for the insertion of the Tulip Airway was also assessed. A high-performance simulator was then used to compare ventilation volumes achieved using the M and T methods, and data subsequently analyzed. In the edentulous mannequin, lung inflation was not achieved by any participants using the M method, but all were successful using the T method. Insertion time for the Tulip Airway was ∼8 seconds. Median ventilation volumes achieved using the high-performance simulator were higher for the T method (308 mL) compared with the M method (192 mL; P &lt; .05). The results of this pilot study indicate that the Tulip Airway is an effective airway device for use in edentulous patients with difficult mask ventilation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Allen Press Inc</pub><pmid>36223186</pmid><doi>10.2344/anpr-69-01-01</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-3006
ispartof Anesthesia progress, 2022-09, Vol.69 (3), p.9-12
issn 0003-3006
1878-7177
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9552620
source PubMed Central(OpenAccess)
subjects Aged
Edentulous
General anesthesia
Humans
Intubation
Intubation, Intratracheal
Laryngeal Masks
Manikins
Medical personnel
Methods
Patients
Pilot Projects
Respiratory tract
Scientific Reports
Success
Teeth
Tulipa
title Usefulness of Tulip Airway in Edentulous Elderly Patients
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T23%3A12%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Usefulness%20of%20Tulip%20Airway%20in%20Edentulous%20Elderly%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20progress&rft.au=Imashuku,%20Yasuhiko&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=9-12&rft.issn=0003-3006&rft.eissn=1878-7177&rft_id=info:doi/10.2344/anpr-69-01-01&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2724237849%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2861-70051cd4e3b6ec658f481aa6e12876e0a674163e63eb44b5a0ea78c690d669863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2724106386&rft_id=info:pmid/36223186&rfr_iscdi=true