Loading…

Does an Online Positive Psychological Intervention Improve Positive Affect in Young Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Meta-analyses indicate that positive psychological interventions are effective at increasing positive affect, as well as reducing anxiety and depression; however, it is unclear how well these effects generalize during periods of high stress. Therefore, the current study tested whether a 2-week onlin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Affective science 2023-03, Vol.4 (1), p.101-117
Main Authors: DuPont, Caitlin M., Pressman, Sarah D., Reed, Rebecca G., Manuck, Stephen B., Marsland, Anna L., Gianaros, Peter J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-612a22449786f5146bd5ee1a437c18a23cee49110bf55588290e58a27eac086e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-612a22449786f5146bd5ee1a437c18a23cee49110bf55588290e58a27eac086e3
container_end_page 117
container_issue 1
container_start_page 101
container_title Affective science
container_volume 4
creator DuPont, Caitlin M.
Pressman, Sarah D.
Reed, Rebecca G.
Manuck, Stephen B.
Marsland, Anna L.
Gianaros, Peter J.
description Meta-analyses indicate that positive psychological interventions are effective at increasing positive affect, as well as reducing anxiety and depression; however, it is unclear how well these effects generalize during periods of high stress. Therefore, the current study tested whether a 2-week online positive psychological intervention delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic, a naturalistic stressor, (1) increased positive affect; (2) improved psychological well-being, optimism, life satisfaction, perceived social support, and loneliness; (3) and reduced negative affect in college students, a group known to have high pandemic distress. Participants ( N = 250; 76.9% female) ages 18–45 were recruited from the University of Pittsburgh undergraduate subject pool between September and November of 2020. Participants were randomized to the online positive psychological intervention or active control condition and stratified by trait positive affect, sex, and year in college. Participants in both conditions completed one writing activity every other day for two consecutive weeks. Control participants documented their activities for that day (e.g., meals, going to gym). Intervention participants chose from six positive psychology activities. All outcome variables were assessed pre- and post-intervention by validated questionnaires. Across both conditions, positive and negative affect decreased from pre- to post-intervention. No other psychological factor differed by condition, time, or their interaction. The current null findings are in line with a more recent meta-analysis indicating that positive psychological interventions may have smaller effects on psychological well-being and depressive symptoms than was reported pre-pandemic. Study findings may suggest reduced efficacy of virtual positive psychological interventions under highly stressful circumstances.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s42761-022-00148-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9589760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2730646791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-612a22449786f5146bd5ee1a437c18a23cee49110bf55588290e58a27eac086e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi0EolXpH-CAfOSy4LG99u4FFCV8RKqUHgDByXKc2cTVrh3s3Yj21-OSEpULJ489z7zjmZeQl8DeAGP6bZZcK6gY5xVjIJvq7gk550rxirP6-9NTLOGMXOZ8wxjjAoRs4Dk5E0oAcGjPya9FxExtoKvQ-4D0OmY_-kMJ8q3bxT5uvbM9XYYR0wHD6GOgy2Gf4uERO-s6dCP1gf6IU9jS2Wbqx0wXU_LlNu6QzlfflosKWnptwwYH796_IM8622e8fDgvyNePH77MP1dXq0_L-eyqckKrsVLALedStrpRXQ1SrTc1IlgptIPGcuEQZQvA1l1d103DW4Z1eddoHWsUigvy7qi7n9YDblyZIdne7JMfbLo10Xrzbyb4ndnGg2nrptWKFYHXDwIp_pwwj2bw2WHf24BxyoZrwZRUuoWC8iPqUsw5YXdqA8zcu2aOrpnimvnjmrkrRa8ef_BU8tejAogjkPf3-8RkbuKUQlna_2R_A3G1o-E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2730646791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does an Online Positive Psychological Intervention Improve Positive Affect in Young Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic?</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>DuPont, Caitlin M. ; Pressman, Sarah D. ; Reed, Rebecca G. ; Manuck, Stephen B. ; Marsland, Anna L. ; Gianaros, Peter J.</creator><creatorcontrib>DuPont, Caitlin M. ; Pressman, Sarah D. ; Reed, Rebecca G. ; Manuck, Stephen B. ; Marsland, Anna L. ; Gianaros, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><description>Meta-analyses indicate that positive psychological interventions are effective at increasing positive affect, as well as reducing anxiety and depression; however, it is unclear how well these effects generalize during periods of high stress. Therefore, the current study tested whether a 2-week online positive psychological intervention delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic, a naturalistic stressor, (1) increased positive affect; (2) improved psychological well-being, optimism, life satisfaction, perceived social support, and loneliness; (3) and reduced negative affect in college students, a group known to have high pandemic distress. Participants ( N = 250; 76.9% female) ages 18–45 were recruited from the University of Pittsburgh undergraduate subject pool between September and November of 2020. Participants were randomized to the online positive psychological intervention or active control condition and stratified by trait positive affect, sex, and year in college. Participants in both conditions completed one writing activity every other day for two consecutive weeks. Control participants documented their activities for that day (e.g., meals, going to gym). Intervention participants chose from six positive psychology activities. All outcome variables were assessed pre- and post-intervention by validated questionnaires. Across both conditions, positive and negative affect decreased from pre- to post-intervention. No other psychological factor differed by condition, time, or their interaction. The current null findings are in line with a more recent meta-analysis indicating that positive psychological interventions may have smaller effects on psychological well-being and depressive symptoms than was reported pre-pandemic. Study findings may suggest reduced efficacy of virtual positive psychological interventions under highly stressful circumstances.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2662-2041</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2662-205X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2662-205X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s42761-022-00148-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36311219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Psychology ; Research Article</subject><ispartof>Affective science, 2023-03, Vol.4 (1), p.101-117</ispartof><rights>The Society for Affective Science 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>The Society for Affective Science 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-612a22449786f5146bd5ee1a437c18a23cee49110bf55588290e58a27eac086e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-612a22449786f5146bd5ee1a437c18a23cee49110bf55588290e58a27eac086e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1576-6466 ; 0000-0003-0794-594X ; 0000-0002-8102-5845 ; 0000-0003-0484-7324 ; 0000-0001-8951-7513 ; 0000-0003-2313-5277</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9589760/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9589760/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36311219$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DuPont, Caitlin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pressman, Sarah D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Rebecca G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manuck, Stephen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsland, Anna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianaros, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><title>Does an Online Positive Psychological Intervention Improve Positive Affect in Young Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic?</title><title>Affective science</title><addtitle>Affec Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Affect Sci</addtitle><description>Meta-analyses indicate that positive psychological interventions are effective at increasing positive affect, as well as reducing anxiety and depression; however, it is unclear how well these effects generalize during periods of high stress. Therefore, the current study tested whether a 2-week online positive psychological intervention delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic, a naturalistic stressor, (1) increased positive affect; (2) improved psychological well-being, optimism, life satisfaction, perceived social support, and loneliness; (3) and reduced negative affect in college students, a group known to have high pandemic distress. Participants ( N = 250; 76.9% female) ages 18–45 were recruited from the University of Pittsburgh undergraduate subject pool between September and November of 2020. Participants were randomized to the online positive psychological intervention or active control condition and stratified by trait positive affect, sex, and year in college. Participants in both conditions completed one writing activity every other day for two consecutive weeks. Control participants documented their activities for that day (e.g., meals, going to gym). Intervention participants chose from six positive psychology activities. All outcome variables were assessed pre- and post-intervention by validated questionnaires. Across both conditions, positive and negative affect decreased from pre- to post-intervention. No other psychological factor differed by condition, time, or their interaction. The current null findings are in line with a more recent meta-analysis indicating that positive psychological interventions may have smaller effects on psychological well-being and depressive symptoms than was reported pre-pandemic. Study findings may suggest reduced efficacy of virtual positive psychological interventions under highly stressful circumstances.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><issn>2662-2041</issn><issn>2662-205X</issn><issn>2662-205X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi0EolXpH-CAfOSy4LG99u4FFCV8RKqUHgDByXKc2cTVrh3s3Yj21-OSEpULJ489z7zjmZeQl8DeAGP6bZZcK6gY5xVjIJvq7gk550rxirP6-9NTLOGMXOZ8wxjjAoRs4Dk5E0oAcGjPya9FxExtoKvQ-4D0OmY_-kMJ8q3bxT5uvbM9XYYR0wHD6GOgy2Gf4uERO-s6dCP1gf6IU9jS2Wbqx0wXU_LlNu6QzlfflosKWnptwwYH796_IM8622e8fDgvyNePH77MP1dXq0_L-eyqckKrsVLALedStrpRXQ1SrTc1IlgptIPGcuEQZQvA1l1d103DW4Z1eddoHWsUigvy7qi7n9YDblyZIdne7JMfbLo10Xrzbyb4ndnGg2nrptWKFYHXDwIp_pwwj2bw2WHf24BxyoZrwZRUuoWC8iPqUsw5YXdqA8zcu2aOrpnimvnjmrkrRa8ef_BU8tejAogjkPf3-8RkbuKUQlna_2R_A3G1o-E</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>DuPont, Caitlin M.</creator><creator>Pressman, Sarah D.</creator><creator>Reed, Rebecca G.</creator><creator>Manuck, Stephen B.</creator><creator>Marsland, Anna L.</creator><creator>Gianaros, Peter J.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1576-6466</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0794-594X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8102-5845</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0484-7324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8951-7513</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2313-5277</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Does an Online Positive Psychological Intervention Improve Positive Affect in Young Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic?</title><author>DuPont, Caitlin M. ; Pressman, Sarah D. ; Reed, Rebecca G. ; Manuck, Stephen B. ; Marsland, Anna L. ; Gianaros, Peter J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-612a22449786f5146bd5ee1a437c18a23cee49110bf55588290e58a27eac086e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DuPont, Caitlin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pressman, Sarah D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Rebecca G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manuck, Stephen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsland, Anna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianaros, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Affective science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DuPont, Caitlin M.</au><au>Pressman, Sarah D.</au><au>Reed, Rebecca G.</au><au>Manuck, Stephen B.</au><au>Marsland, Anna L.</au><au>Gianaros, Peter J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does an Online Positive Psychological Intervention Improve Positive Affect in Young Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic?</atitle><jtitle>Affective science</jtitle><stitle>Affec Sci</stitle><addtitle>Affect Sci</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>101-117</pages><issn>2662-2041</issn><issn>2662-205X</issn><eissn>2662-205X</eissn><abstract>Meta-analyses indicate that positive psychological interventions are effective at increasing positive affect, as well as reducing anxiety and depression; however, it is unclear how well these effects generalize during periods of high stress. Therefore, the current study tested whether a 2-week online positive psychological intervention delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic, a naturalistic stressor, (1) increased positive affect; (2) improved psychological well-being, optimism, life satisfaction, perceived social support, and loneliness; (3) and reduced negative affect in college students, a group known to have high pandemic distress. Participants ( N = 250; 76.9% female) ages 18–45 were recruited from the University of Pittsburgh undergraduate subject pool between September and November of 2020. Participants were randomized to the online positive psychological intervention or active control condition and stratified by trait positive affect, sex, and year in college. Participants in both conditions completed one writing activity every other day for two consecutive weeks. Control participants documented their activities for that day (e.g., meals, going to gym). Intervention participants chose from six positive psychology activities. All outcome variables were assessed pre- and post-intervention by validated questionnaires. Across both conditions, positive and negative affect decreased from pre- to post-intervention. No other psychological factor differed by condition, time, or their interaction. The current null findings are in line with a more recent meta-analysis indicating that positive psychological interventions may have smaller effects on psychological well-being and depressive symptoms than was reported pre-pandemic. Study findings may suggest reduced efficacy of virtual positive psychological interventions under highly stressful circumstances.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>36311219</pmid><doi>10.1007/s42761-022-00148-z</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1576-6466</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0794-594X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8102-5845</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0484-7324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8951-7513</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2313-5277</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2662-2041
ispartof Affective science, 2023-03, Vol.4 (1), p.101-117
issn 2662-2041
2662-205X
2662-205X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9589760
source Springer Nature; PubMed Central
subjects Behavioral Science and Psychology
Psychology
Research Article
title Does an Online Positive Psychological Intervention Improve Positive Affect in Young Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A39%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20an%20Online%20Positive%20Psychological%20Intervention%20Improve%20Positive%20Affect%20in%20Young%20Adults%20During%20the%20COVID-19%20Pandemic?&rft.jtitle=Affective%20science&rft.au=DuPont,%20Caitlin%20M.&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=101-117&rft.issn=2662-2041&rft.eissn=2662-205X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s42761-022-00148-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2730646791%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-612a22449786f5146bd5ee1a437c18a23cee49110bf55588290e58a27eac086e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2730646791&rft_id=info:pmid/36311219&rfr_iscdi=true