Loading…
Does an Online Positive Psychological Intervention Improve Positive Affect in Young Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic?
Meta-analyses indicate that positive psychological interventions are effective at increasing positive affect, as well as reducing anxiety and depression; however, it is unclear how well these effects generalize during periods of high stress. Therefore, the current study tested whether a 2-week onlin...
Saved in:
Published in: | Affective science 2023-03, Vol.4 (1), p.101-117 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-612a22449786f5146bd5ee1a437c18a23cee49110bf55588290e58a27eac086e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-612a22449786f5146bd5ee1a437c18a23cee49110bf55588290e58a27eac086e3 |
container_end_page | 117 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 101 |
container_title | Affective science |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | DuPont, Caitlin M. Pressman, Sarah D. Reed, Rebecca G. Manuck, Stephen B. Marsland, Anna L. Gianaros, Peter J. |
description | Meta-analyses indicate that positive psychological interventions are effective at increasing positive affect, as well as reducing anxiety and depression; however, it is unclear how well these effects generalize during periods of high stress. Therefore, the current study tested whether a 2-week online positive psychological intervention delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic, a naturalistic stressor, (1) increased positive affect; (2) improved psychological well-being, optimism, life satisfaction, perceived social support, and loneliness; (3) and reduced negative affect in college students, a group known to have high pandemic distress. Participants (
N
= 250; 76.9% female) ages 18–45 were recruited from the University of Pittsburgh undergraduate subject pool between September and November of 2020. Participants were randomized to the online positive psychological intervention or active control condition and stratified by trait positive affect, sex, and year in college. Participants in both conditions completed one writing activity every other day for two consecutive weeks. Control participants documented their activities for that day (e.g., meals, going to gym). Intervention participants chose from six positive psychology activities. All outcome variables were assessed pre- and post-intervention by validated questionnaires. Across both conditions, positive and negative affect decreased from pre- to post-intervention. No other psychological factor differed by condition, time, or their interaction. The current null findings are in line with a more recent meta-analysis indicating that positive psychological interventions may have smaller effects on psychological well-being and depressive symptoms than was reported pre-pandemic. Study findings may suggest reduced efficacy of virtual positive psychological interventions under highly stressful circumstances. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s42761-022-00148-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9589760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2730646791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-612a22449786f5146bd5ee1a437c18a23cee49110bf55588290e58a27eac086e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi0EolXpH-CAfOSy4LG99u4FFCV8RKqUHgDByXKc2cTVrh3s3Yj21-OSEpULJ489z7zjmZeQl8DeAGP6bZZcK6gY5xVjIJvq7gk550rxirP6-9NTLOGMXOZ8wxjjAoRs4Dk5E0oAcGjPya9FxExtoKvQ-4D0OmY_-kMJ8q3bxT5uvbM9XYYR0wHD6GOgy2Gf4uERO-s6dCP1gf6IU9jS2Wbqx0wXU_LlNu6QzlfflosKWnptwwYH796_IM8622e8fDgvyNePH77MP1dXq0_L-eyqckKrsVLALedStrpRXQ1SrTc1IlgptIPGcuEQZQvA1l1d103DW4Z1eddoHWsUigvy7qi7n9YDblyZIdne7JMfbLo10Xrzbyb4ndnGg2nrptWKFYHXDwIp_pwwj2bw2WHf24BxyoZrwZRUuoWC8iPqUsw5YXdqA8zcu2aOrpnimvnjmrkrRa8ef_BU8tejAogjkPf3-8RkbuKUQlna_2R_A3G1o-E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2730646791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does an Online Positive Psychological Intervention Improve Positive Affect in Young Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic?</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>DuPont, Caitlin M. ; Pressman, Sarah D. ; Reed, Rebecca G. ; Manuck, Stephen B. ; Marsland, Anna L. ; Gianaros, Peter J.</creator><creatorcontrib>DuPont, Caitlin M. ; Pressman, Sarah D. ; Reed, Rebecca G. ; Manuck, Stephen B. ; Marsland, Anna L. ; Gianaros, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><description>Meta-analyses indicate that positive psychological interventions are effective at increasing positive affect, as well as reducing anxiety and depression; however, it is unclear how well these effects generalize during periods of high stress. Therefore, the current study tested whether a 2-week online positive psychological intervention delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic, a naturalistic stressor, (1) increased positive affect; (2) improved psychological well-being, optimism, life satisfaction, perceived social support, and loneliness; (3) and reduced negative affect in college students, a group known to have high pandemic distress. Participants (
N
= 250; 76.9% female) ages 18–45 were recruited from the University of Pittsburgh undergraduate subject pool between September and November of 2020. Participants were randomized to the online positive psychological intervention or active control condition and stratified by trait positive affect, sex, and year in college. Participants in both conditions completed one writing activity every other day for two consecutive weeks. Control participants documented their activities for that day (e.g., meals, going to gym). Intervention participants chose from six positive psychology activities. All outcome variables were assessed pre- and post-intervention by validated questionnaires. Across both conditions, positive and negative affect decreased from pre- to post-intervention. No other psychological factor differed by condition, time, or their interaction. The current null findings are in line with a more recent meta-analysis indicating that positive psychological interventions may have smaller effects on psychological well-being and depressive symptoms than was reported pre-pandemic. Study findings may suggest reduced efficacy of virtual positive psychological interventions under highly stressful circumstances.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2662-2041</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2662-205X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2662-205X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s42761-022-00148-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36311219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Psychology ; Research Article</subject><ispartof>Affective science, 2023-03, Vol.4 (1), p.101-117</ispartof><rights>The Society for Affective Science 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>The Society for Affective Science 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-612a22449786f5146bd5ee1a437c18a23cee49110bf55588290e58a27eac086e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-612a22449786f5146bd5ee1a437c18a23cee49110bf55588290e58a27eac086e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1576-6466 ; 0000-0003-0794-594X ; 0000-0002-8102-5845 ; 0000-0003-0484-7324 ; 0000-0001-8951-7513 ; 0000-0003-2313-5277</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9589760/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9589760/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36311219$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DuPont, Caitlin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pressman, Sarah D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Rebecca G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manuck, Stephen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsland, Anna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianaros, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><title>Does an Online Positive Psychological Intervention Improve Positive Affect in Young Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic?</title><title>Affective science</title><addtitle>Affec Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Affect Sci</addtitle><description>Meta-analyses indicate that positive psychological interventions are effective at increasing positive affect, as well as reducing anxiety and depression; however, it is unclear how well these effects generalize during periods of high stress. Therefore, the current study tested whether a 2-week online positive psychological intervention delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic, a naturalistic stressor, (1) increased positive affect; (2) improved psychological well-being, optimism, life satisfaction, perceived social support, and loneliness; (3) and reduced negative affect in college students, a group known to have high pandemic distress. Participants (
N
= 250; 76.9% female) ages 18–45 were recruited from the University of Pittsburgh undergraduate subject pool between September and November of 2020. Participants were randomized to the online positive psychological intervention or active control condition and stratified by trait positive affect, sex, and year in college. Participants in both conditions completed one writing activity every other day for two consecutive weeks. Control participants documented their activities for that day (e.g., meals, going to gym). Intervention participants chose from six positive psychology activities. All outcome variables were assessed pre- and post-intervention by validated questionnaires. Across both conditions, positive and negative affect decreased from pre- to post-intervention. No other psychological factor differed by condition, time, or their interaction. The current null findings are in line with a more recent meta-analysis indicating that positive psychological interventions may have smaller effects on psychological well-being and depressive symptoms than was reported pre-pandemic. Study findings may suggest reduced efficacy of virtual positive psychological interventions under highly stressful circumstances.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><issn>2662-2041</issn><issn>2662-205X</issn><issn>2662-205X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi0EolXpH-CAfOSy4LG99u4FFCV8RKqUHgDByXKc2cTVrh3s3Yj21-OSEpULJ489z7zjmZeQl8DeAGP6bZZcK6gY5xVjIJvq7gk550rxirP6-9NTLOGMXOZ8wxjjAoRs4Dk5E0oAcGjPya9FxExtoKvQ-4D0OmY_-kMJ8q3bxT5uvbM9XYYR0wHD6GOgy2Gf4uERO-s6dCP1gf6IU9jS2Wbqx0wXU_LlNu6QzlfflosKWnptwwYH796_IM8622e8fDgvyNePH77MP1dXq0_L-eyqckKrsVLALedStrpRXQ1SrTc1IlgptIPGcuEQZQvA1l1d103DW4Z1eddoHWsUigvy7qi7n9YDblyZIdne7JMfbLo10Xrzbyb4ndnGg2nrptWKFYHXDwIp_pwwj2bw2WHf24BxyoZrwZRUuoWC8iPqUsw5YXdqA8zcu2aOrpnimvnjmrkrRa8ef_BU8tejAogjkPf3-8RkbuKUQlna_2R_A3G1o-E</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>DuPont, Caitlin M.</creator><creator>Pressman, Sarah D.</creator><creator>Reed, Rebecca G.</creator><creator>Manuck, Stephen B.</creator><creator>Marsland, Anna L.</creator><creator>Gianaros, Peter J.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1576-6466</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0794-594X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8102-5845</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0484-7324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8951-7513</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2313-5277</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Does an Online Positive Psychological Intervention Improve Positive Affect in Young Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic?</title><author>DuPont, Caitlin M. ; Pressman, Sarah D. ; Reed, Rebecca G. ; Manuck, Stephen B. ; Marsland, Anna L. ; Gianaros, Peter J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-612a22449786f5146bd5ee1a437c18a23cee49110bf55588290e58a27eac086e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DuPont, Caitlin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pressman, Sarah D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Rebecca G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manuck, Stephen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsland, Anna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianaros, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Affective science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DuPont, Caitlin M.</au><au>Pressman, Sarah D.</au><au>Reed, Rebecca G.</au><au>Manuck, Stephen B.</au><au>Marsland, Anna L.</au><au>Gianaros, Peter J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does an Online Positive Psychological Intervention Improve Positive Affect in Young Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic?</atitle><jtitle>Affective science</jtitle><stitle>Affec Sci</stitle><addtitle>Affect Sci</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>101-117</pages><issn>2662-2041</issn><issn>2662-205X</issn><eissn>2662-205X</eissn><abstract>Meta-analyses indicate that positive psychological interventions are effective at increasing positive affect, as well as reducing anxiety and depression; however, it is unclear how well these effects generalize during periods of high stress. Therefore, the current study tested whether a 2-week online positive psychological intervention delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic, a naturalistic stressor, (1) increased positive affect; (2) improved psychological well-being, optimism, life satisfaction, perceived social support, and loneliness; (3) and reduced negative affect in college students, a group known to have high pandemic distress. Participants (
N
= 250; 76.9% female) ages 18–45 were recruited from the University of Pittsburgh undergraduate subject pool between September and November of 2020. Participants were randomized to the online positive psychological intervention or active control condition and stratified by trait positive affect, sex, and year in college. Participants in both conditions completed one writing activity every other day for two consecutive weeks. Control participants documented their activities for that day (e.g., meals, going to gym). Intervention participants chose from six positive psychology activities. All outcome variables were assessed pre- and post-intervention by validated questionnaires. Across both conditions, positive and negative affect decreased from pre- to post-intervention. No other psychological factor differed by condition, time, or their interaction. The current null findings are in line with a more recent meta-analysis indicating that positive psychological interventions may have smaller effects on psychological well-being and depressive symptoms than was reported pre-pandemic. Study findings may suggest reduced efficacy of virtual positive psychological interventions under highly stressful circumstances.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>36311219</pmid><doi>10.1007/s42761-022-00148-z</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1576-6466</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0794-594X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8102-5845</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0484-7324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8951-7513</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2313-5277</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2662-2041 |
ispartof | Affective science, 2023-03, Vol.4 (1), p.101-117 |
issn | 2662-2041 2662-205X 2662-205X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9589760 |
source | Springer Nature; PubMed Central |
subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Psychology Research Article |
title | Does an Online Positive Psychological Intervention Improve Positive Affect in Young Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A39%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20an%20Online%20Positive%20Psychological%20Intervention%20Improve%20Positive%20Affect%20in%20Young%20Adults%20During%20the%20COVID-19%20Pandemic?&rft.jtitle=Affective%20science&rft.au=DuPont,%20Caitlin%20M.&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=101-117&rft.issn=2662-2041&rft.eissn=2662-205X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s42761-022-00148-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2730646791%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-612a22449786f5146bd5ee1a437c18a23cee49110bf55588290e58a27eac086e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2730646791&rft_id=info:pmid/36311219&rfr_iscdi=true |