Loading…
Improved GRFS after posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based vs ATG-based HLA-mismatched unrelated donor transplant
A common method to prevent graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) is tacrolimus, methotrexate, and antithymocyte globulin (ATG). The use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) showed promise in a prospectiv...
Saved in:
Published in: | Blood advances 2022-08, Vol.6 (15), p.4491-4500 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-b5f676e840ea3038c4ac51cdd662d7213dfcc76d179bf6b97c97abd341d255963 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-b5f676e840ea3038c4ac51cdd662d7213dfcc76d179bf6b97c97abd341d255963 |
container_end_page | 4500 |
container_issue | 15 |
container_start_page | 4491 |
container_title | Blood advances |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Jimenez Jimenez, Antonio Komanduri, Krishna Brown, Samantha Wang, Trent Pereira, Denise Goodman, Mark Beitinjaneh, Amer Lekakis, Lazaros Chinapen, Stephanie Devlin, Sean Ponce, Doris Sauter, Craig Perales, Miguel-Angel Shaffer, Brian C. |
description | A common method to prevent graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) is tacrolimus, methotrexate, and antithymocyte globulin (ATG). The use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) showed promise in a prospective trial for MMUD HCT. We compared 1-year graft-versus-host disease–free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) in 128 recipients of prophylaxis based on tacrolimus/methotrexate/ATG (ATG group, n = 46) vs PTCy, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus or sirolimus (PTCy group, n = 82) after MMUD HCT. Patients receiving HCT from a MMUD mismatched at ≥1 locus among HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1 were included. The 2 groups were well matched for HCT indication, high-risk disease, and HCT comorbidity index, whereas more patients on PTCy received bone marrow (50% vs 26%; P = .01) and >1 locus HLA-mismatched (30.5% vs 2.2%; P = .001) grafts. The 1-year GRFS was 16% (95% confidence interval (CI): 8%-31%) vs 54% (95% CI: 44%-66%; P < .001) in the ATG and PTCy groups, respectively. The multivariable adjusted hazard ratio for GRFS was 0.34 (95% CI: 0.21-0.55; P < .001) with the use of PTCy. The 1-year overall survival in the ATG group was 45% (95% CI: 32%-62%) vs 75% (95% CI: 66%-85%) in the PTCy group (P < .001). Relapse incidence was similar. One-year nonrelapse mortality was greater after ATG-based prophylaxis: 38% (95% CI: 23%-52%) vs 16% (95 CI: 9%-25%), P < .001. In summary, PTCy-based prophylaxis resulted in superior GRFS and overall survival in recipients of MMUD.
•PTCy improved GRFS compared with recipients of ATG-based prophylaxis after MMUD allogeneic HCT.•Allograft recipients of ATG-based prophylaxis had higher nonrelapse mortality and impaired humoral immune reconstitution.
[Display omitted] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007596 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9636312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2473952922004177</els_id><sourcerecordid>2686055891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-b5f676e840ea3038c4ac51cdd662d7213dfcc76d179bf6b97c97abd341d255963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9LJDEQxYPsouL6Hfq4l9b86SSdy8IoOgoDguueQzqpdiLdnTbJNPjtjcygeNpTqsh7v6TqIVQRfEFISy-7IQRn3GImC-mCYkoxllyJI3RKG8lqxZn88VlTdYLOU3rBGBMpGFf0GJ0wLhVrODlF8_04x7CAq9aPt38r02eI1RxSztFMaR7MlCv7Zocwb0Oat2b0DurOpGJYUrV6Wh-au82qHn0aTbbb0u6mCIPJpXJhCrH6ov1CP3szJDg_nGfo3-3N0_VdvXlY31-vNrVtuMh1x3shBbQNBsMwa21jLCfWOSGok5Qw11srhSNSdb3olLRKms6xhjjKyzLYGfqz5867bgRnYSp_GPQc_Wjimw7G6-83k9_q57Do4hWM0AL4fQDE8LqDlHWZz8JQhoCwS5qKVmDOW0WKtN1LbQwpReg_nyFYf2Smv2WmvzIr1qu9FcouFg9RJ-uhqJyPYLN2wf8f8g6s4acR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2686055891</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improved GRFS after posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based vs ATG-based HLA-mismatched unrelated donor transplant</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jimenez Jimenez, Antonio ; Komanduri, Krishna ; Brown, Samantha ; Wang, Trent ; Pereira, Denise ; Goodman, Mark ; Beitinjaneh, Amer ; Lekakis, Lazaros ; Chinapen, Stephanie ; Devlin, Sean ; Ponce, Doris ; Sauter, Craig ; Perales, Miguel-Angel ; Shaffer, Brian C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jimenez Jimenez, Antonio ; Komanduri, Krishna ; Brown, Samantha ; Wang, Trent ; Pereira, Denise ; Goodman, Mark ; Beitinjaneh, Amer ; Lekakis, Lazaros ; Chinapen, Stephanie ; Devlin, Sean ; Ponce, Doris ; Sauter, Craig ; Perales, Miguel-Angel ; Shaffer, Brian C.</creatorcontrib><description>A common method to prevent graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) is tacrolimus, methotrexate, and antithymocyte globulin (ATG). The use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) showed promise in a prospective trial for MMUD HCT. We compared 1-year graft-versus-host disease–free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) in 128 recipients of prophylaxis based on tacrolimus/methotrexate/ATG (ATG group, n = 46) vs PTCy, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus or sirolimus (PTCy group, n = 82) after MMUD HCT. Patients receiving HCT from a MMUD mismatched at ≥1 locus among HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1 were included. The 2 groups were well matched for HCT indication, high-risk disease, and HCT comorbidity index, whereas more patients on PTCy received bone marrow (50% vs 26%; P = .01) and >1 locus HLA-mismatched (30.5% vs 2.2%; P = .001) grafts. The 1-year GRFS was 16% (95% confidence interval (CI): 8%-31%) vs 54% (95% CI: 44%-66%; P < .001) in the ATG and PTCy groups, respectively. The multivariable adjusted hazard ratio for GRFS was 0.34 (95% CI: 0.21-0.55; P < .001) with the use of PTCy. The 1-year overall survival in the ATG group was 45% (95% CI: 32%-62%) vs 75% (95% CI: 66%-85%) in the PTCy group (P < .001). Relapse incidence was similar. One-year nonrelapse mortality was greater after ATG-based prophylaxis: 38% (95% CI: 23%-52%) vs 16% (95 CI: 9%-25%), P < .001. In summary, PTCy-based prophylaxis resulted in superior GRFS and overall survival in recipients of MMUD.
•PTCy improved GRFS compared with recipients of ATG-based prophylaxis after MMUD allogeneic HCT.•Allograft recipients of ATG-based prophylaxis had higher nonrelapse mortality and impaired humoral immune reconstitution.
[Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 2473-9529</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-9537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007596</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35793451</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Transplantation</subject><ispartof>Blood advances, 2022-08, Vol.6 (15), p.4491-4500</ispartof><rights>2022 The American Society of Hematology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The American Society of Hematology. 2022 The American Society of Hematology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-b5f676e840ea3038c4ac51cdd662d7213dfcc76d179bf6b97c97abd341d255963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-b5f676e840ea3038c4ac51cdd662d7213dfcc76d179bf6b97c97abd341d255963</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6308-9346 ; 0000-0001-5352-974X ; 0000-0002-5910-4571 ; 0000-0002-9422-5766 ; 0000-0003-2817-6836</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636312/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2473952922004177$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3549,27924,27925,45780,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jimenez Jimenez, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komanduri, Krishna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Samantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Trent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beitinjaneh, Amer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lekakis, Lazaros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chinapen, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devlin, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponce, Doris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauter, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perales, Miguel-Angel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaffer, Brian C.</creatorcontrib><title>Improved GRFS after posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based vs ATG-based HLA-mismatched unrelated donor transplant</title><title>Blood advances</title><description>A common method to prevent graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) is tacrolimus, methotrexate, and antithymocyte globulin (ATG). The use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) showed promise in a prospective trial for MMUD HCT. We compared 1-year graft-versus-host disease–free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) in 128 recipients of prophylaxis based on tacrolimus/methotrexate/ATG (ATG group, n = 46) vs PTCy, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus or sirolimus (PTCy group, n = 82) after MMUD HCT. Patients receiving HCT from a MMUD mismatched at ≥1 locus among HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1 were included. The 2 groups were well matched for HCT indication, high-risk disease, and HCT comorbidity index, whereas more patients on PTCy received bone marrow (50% vs 26%; P = .01) and >1 locus HLA-mismatched (30.5% vs 2.2%; P = .001) grafts. The 1-year GRFS was 16% (95% confidence interval (CI): 8%-31%) vs 54% (95% CI: 44%-66%; P < .001) in the ATG and PTCy groups, respectively. The multivariable adjusted hazard ratio for GRFS was 0.34 (95% CI: 0.21-0.55; P < .001) with the use of PTCy. The 1-year overall survival in the ATG group was 45% (95% CI: 32%-62%) vs 75% (95% CI: 66%-85%) in the PTCy group (P < .001). Relapse incidence was similar. One-year nonrelapse mortality was greater after ATG-based prophylaxis: 38% (95% CI: 23%-52%) vs 16% (95 CI: 9%-25%), P < .001. In summary, PTCy-based prophylaxis resulted in superior GRFS and overall survival in recipients of MMUD.
•PTCy improved GRFS compared with recipients of ATG-based prophylaxis after MMUD allogeneic HCT.•Allograft recipients of ATG-based prophylaxis had higher nonrelapse mortality and impaired humoral immune reconstitution.
[Display omitted]</description><subject>Transplantation</subject><issn>2473-9529</issn><issn>2473-9537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9LJDEQxYPsouL6Hfq4l9b86SSdy8IoOgoDguueQzqpdiLdnTbJNPjtjcygeNpTqsh7v6TqIVQRfEFISy-7IQRn3GImC-mCYkoxllyJI3RKG8lqxZn88VlTdYLOU3rBGBMpGFf0GJ0wLhVrODlF8_04x7CAq9aPt38r02eI1RxSztFMaR7MlCv7Zocwb0Oat2b0DurOpGJYUrV6Wh-au82qHn0aTbbb0u6mCIPJpXJhCrH6ov1CP3szJDg_nGfo3-3N0_VdvXlY31-vNrVtuMh1x3shBbQNBsMwa21jLCfWOSGok5Qw11srhSNSdb3olLRKms6xhjjKyzLYGfqz5867bgRnYSp_GPQc_Wjimw7G6-83k9_q57Do4hWM0AL4fQDE8LqDlHWZz8JQhoCwS5qKVmDOW0WKtN1LbQwpReg_nyFYf2Smv2WmvzIr1qu9FcouFg9RJ-uhqJyPYLN2wf8f8g6s4acR</recordid><startdate>20220809</startdate><enddate>20220809</enddate><creator>Jimenez Jimenez, Antonio</creator><creator>Komanduri, Krishna</creator><creator>Brown, Samantha</creator><creator>Wang, Trent</creator><creator>Pereira, Denise</creator><creator>Goodman, Mark</creator><creator>Beitinjaneh, Amer</creator><creator>Lekakis, Lazaros</creator><creator>Chinapen, Stephanie</creator><creator>Devlin, Sean</creator><creator>Ponce, Doris</creator><creator>Sauter, Craig</creator><creator>Perales, Miguel-Angel</creator><creator>Shaffer, Brian C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>The American Society of Hematology</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6308-9346</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5352-974X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5910-4571</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9422-5766</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2817-6836</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220809</creationdate><title>Improved GRFS after posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based vs ATG-based HLA-mismatched unrelated donor transplant</title><author>Jimenez Jimenez, Antonio ; Komanduri, Krishna ; Brown, Samantha ; Wang, Trent ; Pereira, Denise ; Goodman, Mark ; Beitinjaneh, Amer ; Lekakis, Lazaros ; Chinapen, Stephanie ; Devlin, Sean ; Ponce, Doris ; Sauter, Craig ; Perales, Miguel-Angel ; Shaffer, Brian C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-b5f676e840ea3038c4ac51cdd662d7213dfcc76d179bf6b97c97abd341d255963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jimenez Jimenez, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komanduri, Krishna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Samantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Trent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beitinjaneh, Amer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lekakis, Lazaros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chinapen, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devlin, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponce, Doris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauter, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perales, Miguel-Angel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaffer, Brian C.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Blood advances</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jimenez Jimenez, Antonio</au><au>Komanduri, Krishna</au><au>Brown, Samantha</au><au>Wang, Trent</au><au>Pereira, Denise</au><au>Goodman, Mark</au><au>Beitinjaneh, Amer</au><au>Lekakis, Lazaros</au><au>Chinapen, Stephanie</au><au>Devlin, Sean</au><au>Ponce, Doris</au><au>Sauter, Craig</au><au>Perales, Miguel-Angel</au><au>Shaffer, Brian C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improved GRFS after posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based vs ATG-based HLA-mismatched unrelated donor transplant</atitle><jtitle>Blood advances</jtitle><date>2022-08-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>4491</spage><epage>4500</epage><pages>4491-4500</pages><issn>2473-9529</issn><eissn>2473-9537</eissn><abstract>A common method to prevent graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) is tacrolimus, methotrexate, and antithymocyte globulin (ATG). The use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) showed promise in a prospective trial for MMUD HCT. We compared 1-year graft-versus-host disease–free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) in 128 recipients of prophylaxis based on tacrolimus/methotrexate/ATG (ATG group, n = 46) vs PTCy, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus or sirolimus (PTCy group, n = 82) after MMUD HCT. Patients receiving HCT from a MMUD mismatched at ≥1 locus among HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1 were included. The 2 groups were well matched for HCT indication, high-risk disease, and HCT comorbidity index, whereas more patients on PTCy received bone marrow (50% vs 26%; P = .01) and >1 locus HLA-mismatched (30.5% vs 2.2%; P = .001) grafts. The 1-year GRFS was 16% (95% confidence interval (CI): 8%-31%) vs 54% (95% CI: 44%-66%; P < .001) in the ATG and PTCy groups, respectively. The multivariable adjusted hazard ratio for GRFS was 0.34 (95% CI: 0.21-0.55; P < .001) with the use of PTCy. The 1-year overall survival in the ATG group was 45% (95% CI: 32%-62%) vs 75% (95% CI: 66%-85%) in the PTCy group (P < .001). Relapse incidence was similar. One-year nonrelapse mortality was greater after ATG-based prophylaxis: 38% (95% CI: 23%-52%) vs 16% (95 CI: 9%-25%), P < .001. In summary, PTCy-based prophylaxis resulted in superior GRFS and overall survival in recipients of MMUD.
•PTCy improved GRFS compared with recipients of ATG-based prophylaxis after MMUD allogeneic HCT.•Allograft recipients of ATG-based prophylaxis had higher nonrelapse mortality and impaired humoral immune reconstitution.
[Display omitted]</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35793451</pmid><doi>10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007596</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6308-9346</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5352-974X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5910-4571</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9422-5766</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2817-6836</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2473-9529 |
ispartof | Blood advances, 2022-08, Vol.6 (15), p.4491-4500 |
issn | 2473-9529 2473-9537 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9636312 |
source | PubMed (Medline); ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Transplantation |
title | Improved GRFS after posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based vs ATG-based HLA-mismatched unrelated donor transplant |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T04%3A52%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improved%20GRFS%20after%20posttransplant%20cyclophosphamide-based%20vs%20ATG-based%20HLA-mismatched%20unrelated%20donor%20transplant&rft.jtitle=Blood%20advances&rft.au=Jimenez%20Jimenez,%20Antonio&rft.date=2022-08-09&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=4491&rft.epage=4500&rft.pages=4491-4500&rft.issn=2473-9529&rft.eissn=2473-9537&rft_id=info:doi/10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007596&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2686055891%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-b5f676e840ea3038c4ac51cdd662d7213dfcc76d179bf6b97c97abd341d255963%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2686055891&rft_id=info:pmid/35793451&rfr_iscdi=true |