Loading…

Dorsal incision shows more efficacy and safety to traditional incision in single-portal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery segmentectomy of LS9+10: a non-randomized prospective clinical trial

BackgroundSegmentectomy is increasingly performed as a surgical technique. Traditional anterior axillary line and mid-axillary line video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) incision meets difficulties when dealing with left segment 9+10 (LS9+10), as the distance and angle of view make it uneasy t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of thoracic disease 2022-10, Vol.14 (10), p.4073-4080
Main Authors: Luo, Taobo, Chen, Qixun, Zeng, Jian, Cai, Lei, Huang, Xiancong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 4080
container_issue 10
container_start_page 4073
container_title Journal of thoracic disease
container_volume 14
creator Luo, Taobo
Chen, Qixun
Zeng, Jian
Cai, Lei
Huang, Xiancong
description BackgroundSegmentectomy is increasingly performed as a surgical technique. Traditional anterior axillary line and mid-axillary line video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) incision meets difficulties when dealing with left segment 9+10 (LS9+10), as the distance and angle of view make it uneasy to expose the trachea, blood vessels and intersegment plane. As an alternative, dorsal incision may be advantageous as which faces the key structures of LS9+10, may facilitate the management of trachea and blood vessels of LS9+10, but there was no clinical proof reported ever. This study is targeted to compare the efficacy and safety of these two incisions in segmentectomy of LS9+10. MethodsThe dorsal incision is made behind the posterior axillary line, 8th intercostal space. Patients with ground glass opacity (GGO) which solid ingredients is less than 25%, locates at LS9+10, and segmentectomy of LS9+10 could ensure the cut edge were enrolled in the study and were allocated to the traditional incision group or dorsal incision group based on the parity of hospital number. Efficacy outcomes such as the duration of surgery and safety outcomes including postoperative air-leakage duration, length of hospital stay, amount of bleeding and pain score were recorded. The Independent-samples t-test and Mann-Whitey U test were applied in data analysis. ResultsA total of 68 patients were enrolled and allocated into the traditional incision group and dorsal incision group. In the traditional incision group, the average surgery time was 71.03±6.87 min (median 71.5 min), while that in the dorsal incision group was an average of 62.72±6.24 min (median 61.0 min, P=0.001). The postoperative duration of air-leakage was 2.16±1.63 and 1.36±1.33 days for traditional incision group and dorsal incision group (P=0.030), respectively. The traditional incision group had a greater length of postoperative hospital stay (3.69±1.36 days) than the dorsal incision group (3.08±1.03 days, P=0.041), when amount of bleeding and pain score showed no differences between these two groups. Data suggested a statistically significant advantage for the dorsal incision procedure. ConclusionsDorsal incision can facilitate the segmentectomy of LS9+10, and significantly reduce the surgery time, postoperative duration of air-leakage and length of hospital stay.
doi_str_mv 10.21037/jtd-22-1202
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9641346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2737472047</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-b03f83338e5cc5bf9e327260b3eb4a94e333f40a842ccdc79bf1fce8add520253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctu1DAUjRBIVG13fICXSBDq2J44YYGEWlqQRuoCWFuOcz3jKvENvp5B4e_4s5q2QuCNLZ_HPfapqlcNfycaLvXFXR5rIepGcPGsOhFc67pthXr-cC73SvYvq3OiO15Wy4XQ-qT6fYWJ7MRCdIECRkZ7_ElsxgQMvA_OupXZODKyHvLKMrKc7Bhy4f4rC0UZ4m6CesGUC3IMI2BtiQJlGFneY7IOyeESHKND2kFaGcFuhpjBZZxXhp5tv_ZvGv6eWRYx1qkMxjn8KvolIS2FF47A3BRiCTaVJMFOZ9ULbyeC86f9tPp-_enb5ed6e3vz5fLjtnay6XI9cOk7KWUHG-c2g-9BCi1aPkgYlO0VFMwrbjslnBud7gffeAedHcdN-dGNPK0-PPouh2GG0ZXcyU5mSWG2aTVog_kfiWFvdng0fasaqdpi8PrJIOGPA1A2cyAH02Qj4IGM0FIrLbjShfr2kerKsymB_zum4eahbVPaNkKYP23Le24VpKU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2737472047</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dorsal incision shows more efficacy and safety to traditional incision in single-portal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery segmentectomy of LS9+10: a non-randomized prospective clinical trial</title><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><creator>Luo, Taobo ; Chen, Qixun ; Zeng, Jian ; Cai, Lei ; Huang, Xiancong</creator><creatorcontrib>Luo, Taobo ; Chen, Qixun ; Zeng, Jian ; Cai, Lei ; Huang, Xiancong</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundSegmentectomy is increasingly performed as a surgical technique. Traditional anterior axillary line and mid-axillary line video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) incision meets difficulties when dealing with left segment 9+10 (LS9+10), as the distance and angle of view make it uneasy to expose the trachea, blood vessels and intersegment plane. As an alternative, dorsal incision may be advantageous as which faces the key structures of LS9+10, may facilitate the management of trachea and blood vessels of LS9+10, but there was no clinical proof reported ever. This study is targeted to compare the efficacy and safety of these two incisions in segmentectomy of LS9+10. MethodsThe dorsal incision is made behind the posterior axillary line, 8th intercostal space. Patients with ground glass opacity (GGO) which solid ingredients is less than 25%, locates at LS9+10, and segmentectomy of LS9+10 could ensure the cut edge were enrolled in the study and were allocated to the traditional incision group or dorsal incision group based on the parity of hospital number. Efficacy outcomes such as the duration of surgery and safety outcomes including postoperative air-leakage duration, length of hospital stay, amount of bleeding and pain score were recorded. The Independent-samples t-test and Mann-Whitey U test were applied in data analysis. ResultsA total of 68 patients were enrolled and allocated into the traditional incision group and dorsal incision group. In the traditional incision group, the average surgery time was 71.03±6.87 min (median 71.5 min), while that in the dorsal incision group was an average of 62.72±6.24 min (median 61.0 min, P=0.001). The postoperative duration of air-leakage was 2.16±1.63 and 1.36±1.33 days for traditional incision group and dorsal incision group (P=0.030), respectively. The traditional incision group had a greater length of postoperative hospital stay (3.69±1.36 days) than the dorsal incision group (3.08±1.03 days, P=0.041), when amount of bleeding and pain score showed no differences between these two groups. Data suggested a statistically significant advantage for the dorsal incision procedure. ConclusionsDorsal incision can facilitate the segmentectomy of LS9+10, and significantly reduce the surgery time, postoperative duration of air-leakage and length of hospital stay.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-1439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-6624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21037/jtd-22-1202</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>AME Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Journal of thoracic disease, 2022-10, Vol.14 (10), p.4073-4080</ispartof><rights>2022 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. 2022 Journal of Thoracic Disease.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641346/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641346/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luo, Taobo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Qixun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xiancong</creatorcontrib><title>Dorsal incision shows more efficacy and safety to traditional incision in single-portal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery segmentectomy of LS9+10: a non-randomized prospective clinical trial</title><title>Journal of thoracic disease</title><description>BackgroundSegmentectomy is increasingly performed as a surgical technique. Traditional anterior axillary line and mid-axillary line video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) incision meets difficulties when dealing with left segment 9+10 (LS9+10), as the distance and angle of view make it uneasy to expose the trachea, blood vessels and intersegment plane. As an alternative, dorsal incision may be advantageous as which faces the key structures of LS9+10, may facilitate the management of trachea and blood vessels of LS9+10, but there was no clinical proof reported ever. This study is targeted to compare the efficacy and safety of these two incisions in segmentectomy of LS9+10. MethodsThe dorsal incision is made behind the posterior axillary line, 8th intercostal space. Patients with ground glass opacity (GGO) which solid ingredients is less than 25%, locates at LS9+10, and segmentectomy of LS9+10 could ensure the cut edge were enrolled in the study and were allocated to the traditional incision group or dorsal incision group based on the parity of hospital number. Efficacy outcomes such as the duration of surgery and safety outcomes including postoperative air-leakage duration, length of hospital stay, amount of bleeding and pain score were recorded. The Independent-samples t-test and Mann-Whitey U test were applied in data analysis. ResultsA total of 68 patients were enrolled and allocated into the traditional incision group and dorsal incision group. In the traditional incision group, the average surgery time was 71.03±6.87 min (median 71.5 min), while that in the dorsal incision group was an average of 62.72±6.24 min (median 61.0 min, P=0.001). The postoperative duration of air-leakage was 2.16±1.63 and 1.36±1.33 days for traditional incision group and dorsal incision group (P=0.030), respectively. The traditional incision group had a greater length of postoperative hospital stay (3.69±1.36 days) than the dorsal incision group (3.08±1.03 days, P=0.041), when amount of bleeding and pain score showed no differences between these two groups. Data suggested a statistically significant advantage for the dorsal incision procedure. ConclusionsDorsal incision can facilitate the segmentectomy of LS9+10, and significantly reduce the surgery time, postoperative duration of air-leakage and length of hospital stay.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2072-1439</issn><issn>2077-6624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUctu1DAUjRBIVG13fICXSBDq2J44YYGEWlqQRuoCWFuOcz3jKvENvp5B4e_4s5q2QuCNLZ_HPfapqlcNfycaLvXFXR5rIepGcPGsOhFc67pthXr-cC73SvYvq3OiO15Wy4XQ-qT6fYWJ7MRCdIECRkZ7_ElsxgQMvA_OupXZODKyHvLKMrKc7Bhy4f4rC0UZ4m6CesGUC3IMI2BtiQJlGFneY7IOyeESHKND2kFaGcFuhpjBZZxXhp5tv_ZvGv6eWRYx1qkMxjn8KvolIS2FF47A3BRiCTaVJMFOZ9ULbyeC86f9tPp-_enb5ed6e3vz5fLjtnay6XI9cOk7KWUHG-c2g-9BCi1aPkgYlO0VFMwrbjslnBud7gffeAedHcdN-dGNPK0-PPouh2GG0ZXcyU5mSWG2aTVog_kfiWFvdng0fasaqdpi8PrJIOGPA1A2cyAH02Qj4IGM0FIrLbjShfr2kerKsymB_zum4eahbVPaNkKYP23Le24VpKU</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Luo, Taobo</creator><creator>Chen, Qixun</creator><creator>Zeng, Jian</creator><creator>Cai, Lei</creator><creator>Huang, Xiancong</creator><general>AME Publishing Company</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Dorsal incision shows more efficacy and safety to traditional incision in single-portal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery segmentectomy of LS9+10: a non-randomized prospective clinical trial</title><author>Luo, Taobo ; Chen, Qixun ; Zeng, Jian ; Cai, Lei ; Huang, Xiancong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-b03f83338e5cc5bf9e327260b3eb4a94e333f40a842ccdc79bf1fce8add520253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luo, Taobo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Qixun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xiancong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of thoracic disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luo, Taobo</au><au>Chen, Qixun</au><au>Zeng, Jian</au><au>Cai, Lei</au><au>Huang, Xiancong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dorsal incision shows more efficacy and safety to traditional incision in single-portal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery segmentectomy of LS9+10: a non-randomized prospective clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of thoracic disease</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>4073</spage><epage>4080</epage><pages>4073-4080</pages><issn>2072-1439</issn><eissn>2077-6624</eissn><abstract>BackgroundSegmentectomy is increasingly performed as a surgical technique. Traditional anterior axillary line and mid-axillary line video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) incision meets difficulties when dealing with left segment 9+10 (LS9+10), as the distance and angle of view make it uneasy to expose the trachea, blood vessels and intersegment plane. As an alternative, dorsal incision may be advantageous as which faces the key structures of LS9+10, may facilitate the management of trachea and blood vessels of LS9+10, but there was no clinical proof reported ever. This study is targeted to compare the efficacy and safety of these two incisions in segmentectomy of LS9+10. MethodsThe dorsal incision is made behind the posterior axillary line, 8th intercostal space. Patients with ground glass opacity (GGO) which solid ingredients is less than 25%, locates at LS9+10, and segmentectomy of LS9+10 could ensure the cut edge were enrolled in the study and were allocated to the traditional incision group or dorsal incision group based on the parity of hospital number. Efficacy outcomes such as the duration of surgery and safety outcomes including postoperative air-leakage duration, length of hospital stay, amount of bleeding and pain score were recorded. The Independent-samples t-test and Mann-Whitey U test were applied in data analysis. ResultsA total of 68 patients were enrolled and allocated into the traditional incision group and dorsal incision group. In the traditional incision group, the average surgery time was 71.03±6.87 min (median 71.5 min), while that in the dorsal incision group was an average of 62.72±6.24 min (median 61.0 min, P=0.001). The postoperative duration of air-leakage was 2.16±1.63 and 1.36±1.33 days for traditional incision group and dorsal incision group (P=0.030), respectively. The traditional incision group had a greater length of postoperative hospital stay (3.69±1.36 days) than the dorsal incision group (3.08±1.03 days, P=0.041), when amount of bleeding and pain score showed no differences between these two groups. Data suggested a statistically significant advantage for the dorsal incision procedure. ConclusionsDorsal incision can facilitate the segmentectomy of LS9+10, and significantly reduce the surgery time, postoperative duration of air-leakage and length of hospital stay.</abstract><pub>AME Publishing Company</pub><doi>10.21037/jtd-22-1202</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-1439
ispartof Journal of thoracic disease, 2022-10, Vol.14 (10), p.4073-4080
issn 2072-1439
2077-6624
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9641346
source NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)
subjects Original
title Dorsal incision shows more efficacy and safety to traditional incision in single-portal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery segmentectomy of LS9+10: a non-randomized prospective clinical trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A12%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dorsal%20incision%20shows%20more%20efficacy%20and%20safety%20to%20traditional%20incision%20in%20single-portal%20video-assisted%20thoracoscopic%20surgery%20segmentectomy%20of%20LS9+10:%20a%20non-randomized%20prospective%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20thoracic%20disease&rft.au=Luo,%20Taobo&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=4073&rft.epage=4080&rft.pages=4073-4080&rft.issn=2072-1439&rft.eissn=2077-6624&rft_id=info:doi/10.21037/jtd-22-1202&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2737472047%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-b03f83338e5cc5bf9e327260b3eb4a94e333f40a842ccdc79bf1fce8add520253%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2737472047&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true