Pesticide effects on the abundance of springtails and mites in field mesocosms at an agricultural site

• Published in: Ecotoxicology (London) 2022-11, Vol.31 (9), p.1450-1461
• Main Authors: Konestabo, Heidi Sjursen, Birkemoe, Tone, Leinaas, Hans Petter, van Gestel, Cornelis A. M., Sengupta, Sagnik, Borgå, Katrine
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abundance; Agricultural industry; Agricultural land; Agrochemicals; Aquatic insects; Biodiversity; Closed ecological systems; Collembola; Community composition; Cores; Earth and Environmental Science; Ecological function; Ecology; Ecotoxicology; Environment; Environmental Management; Exposure; Imidacloprid; Insecticides; Mesocosms; Mites; Nontarget organisms; Nutrient cycles; Organisms; Pesticide application; Pesticides; Plant protection; Protection and preservation; Soil; Soils; Species diversity
• ISSN: 0963-9292; 1573-3017
• DOI: 10.1007/s10646-022-02599-3

The use of pesticides to protect crops often affects non-target organisms vital to ecosystem functioning. A functional soil mesofauna is important for decomposition and nutrient cycling processes in agricultural soils, which generally have low biodiversity. To assess pesticide effects on natural soil communities we enclosed intact soil cores in situ in an agricultural field in 5 cm wide mesocosms. We used two types of mesh lids on the mesocosms, allowing or preventing migration of mesofauna. The mesocosms were exposed to the insecticide imidacloprid (0, 0.1, 1, and 10 mg/kg dry soil) and left in the field for 20 days. Overall, regardless of lid type, mesocosm enclosure did not affect springtail or mite abundances during the experiment when compared with undisturbed soil. Imidacloprid exposure reduced the abundance of both surface- and soil-living springtails in a concentration-dependent manner, by 65–90% at the two highest concentrations, and 21–23% at 0.1 mg/kg, a concentration found in some agricultural soils after pesticide application. Surface-living springtails were more affected by imidacloprid exposure than soil-living ones. In contrast, neither predatory nor saprotrophic mites showed imidacloprid-dependent changes in abundance, concurring with previous findings indicating that mites are generally less sensitive to neonicotinoids than other soil organisms. The possibility to migrate did not affect the springtail or mite abundance responses to imidacloprid. We show that under realistic exposure concentrations in the field, soil arthropod community composition and abundance can be substantially altered in an organism-dependent manner, thus affecting the soil community diversity.