Sutureless versus purse string with complete sac dissection in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children: a randomized clinical trial

Introduction Pediatric inguinal hernia is a common surgical condition with a cumulative incidence of 4.2%. Minimal invasive surgery is playing a growing role in the treatment of this condition. We compared the outcomes of laparoscopic sutureless herniotomy and purse string with sac dissection repair...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of pediatric endoscopic surgery 2022-12, Vol.4 (4), p.173-176
Main Authors: Elsayem, Karam, Abdelmotaal, Yehia S., Kaddah, Sherif, Elbarbary, Mohammed M., Taher, Heba
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Abdominal Surgery
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Original Research
Pediatric Surgery
Surgery
Thoracic Surgery
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1867-85216c48dd8074f97d0338d9f9ace9657f4390019f1c5f739b8f0fbb19da2b9c3
container_end_page 176
container_issue 4
container_start_page 173
container_title Journal of pediatric endoscopic surgery
container_volume 4
creator Elsayem, Karam
Abdelmotaal, Yehia S.
Kaddah, Sherif
Elbarbary, Mohammed M.
Taher, Heba
description Introduction Pediatric inguinal hernia is a common surgical condition with a cumulative incidence of 4.2%. Minimal invasive surgery is playing a growing role in the treatment of this condition. We compared the outcomes of laparoscopic sutureless herniotomy and purse string with sac dissection repair with regards to complications and operative time. Methods One hundred fifty-two patients were operated on in two centers with two different techniques: sac dissection and purse-string suture, and sutureless repair. Operative time and recurrence were the main outcomes for comparison. Results Sutureless repair has a shorter operative time (29 ± 10 min) compared to purse string repair (38 ± 13 min). The recurrence rate showed no statistical significance difference. However, the recurrence rate of sutureless repair was three times higher than that of purse string repair, and all recurrences were in large defects of 10–15 mm. Conclusions Sutureless repair is safe for defects up to 10 mm with excellent operative time. However, it had an unfavorable outcome in larger defects.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s42804-022-00156-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9660100</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9660100</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1867-85216c48dd8074f97d0338d9f9ace9657f4390019f1c5f739b8f0fbb19da2b9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKxDAUhoMoOIzzAq7yAtU0vSRxIcjgDQZcqOuQ5jLNkKYlaUf0FXxpM1YEN66SnJPvP5z_B-A8Rxc5QuQylpiiMkMYZwjlVZ2RI7DAFS4zQmlx_Hsn1SlYxbhDCGFSlKQmC_D5PI1T0E7HCPc6xCnCYQpRwzgG67fwzY4tlH03OD2mopBQ2Ri1HG3vofXQiUGEPsp-sDK9t5P1wsFWB28FDHoQNhy-ydY6FbS_gqkqvOo7-6EVlM56KxOQhgl3Bk6McFGvfs4leL27fVk_ZJun-8f1zSaTOa1JRiuc17KkSlFESsOIQkVBFTNMSM3qipiyYMkIZnJZGVKwhhpkmiZnSuCGyWIJrmfdYWo6raT2YxCOD8F2IrzzXlj-t-Nty7f9nrO6RsnxJIBnAZlWj0GbXzZH_BAJnyPhKRL-HQknCSpmKA4HZ3Xgu34Kya34H_UFCDeT-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sutureless versus purse string with complete sac dissection in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children: a randomized clinical trial</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Elsayem, Karam ; Abdelmotaal, Yehia S. ; Kaddah, Sherif ; Elbarbary, Mohammed M. ; Taher, Heba</creator><creatorcontrib>Elsayem, Karam ; Abdelmotaal, Yehia S. ; Kaddah, Sherif ; Elbarbary, Mohammed M. ; Taher, Heba</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Pediatric inguinal hernia is a common surgical condition with a cumulative incidence of 4.2%. Minimal invasive surgery is playing a growing role in the treatment of this condition. We compared the outcomes of laparoscopic sutureless herniotomy and purse string with sac dissection repair with regards to complications and operative time. Methods One hundred fifty-two patients were operated on in two centers with two different techniques: sac dissection and purse-string suture, and sutureless repair. Operative time and recurrence were the main outcomes for comparison. Results Sutureless repair has a shorter operative time (29 ± 10 min) compared to purse string repair (38 ± 13 min). The recurrence rate showed no statistical significance difference. However, the recurrence rate of sutureless repair was three times higher than that of purse string repair, and all recurrences were in large defects of 10–15 mm. Conclusions Sutureless repair is safe for defects up to 10 mm with excellent operative time. However, it had an unfavorable outcome in larger defects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2524-7875</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2524-7883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s42804-022-00156-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Minimally Invasive Surgery ; Original Research ; Pediatric Surgery ; Surgery ; Thoracic Surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of pediatric endoscopic surgery, 2022-12, Vol.4 (4), p.173-176</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1867-85216c48dd8074f97d0338d9f9ace9657f4390019f1c5f739b8f0fbb19da2b9c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4479-6592</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elsayem, Karam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelmotaal, Yehia S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaddah, Sherif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elbarbary, Mohammed M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taher, Heba</creatorcontrib><title>Sutureless versus purse string with complete sac dissection in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children: a randomized clinical trial</title><title>Journal of pediatric endoscopic surgery</title><addtitle>J Ped Endosc Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction Pediatric inguinal hernia is a common surgical condition with a cumulative incidence of 4.2%. Minimal invasive surgery is playing a growing role in the treatment of this condition. We compared the outcomes of laparoscopic sutureless herniotomy and purse string with sac dissection repair with regards to complications and operative time. Methods One hundred fifty-two patients were operated on in two centers with two different techniques: sac dissection and purse-string suture, and sutureless repair. Operative time and recurrence were the main outcomes for comparison. Results Sutureless repair has a shorter operative time (29 ± 10 min) compared to purse string repair (38 ± 13 min). The recurrence rate showed no statistical significance difference. However, the recurrence rate of sutureless repair was three times higher than that of purse string repair, and all recurrences were in large defects of 10–15 mm. Conclusions Sutureless repair is safe for defects up to 10 mm with excellent operative time. However, it had an unfavorable outcome in larger defects.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgery</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pediatric Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Thoracic Surgery</subject><issn>2524-7875</issn><issn>2524-7883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctKxDAUhoMoOIzzAq7yAtU0vSRxIcjgDQZcqOuQ5jLNkKYlaUf0FXxpM1YEN66SnJPvP5z_B-A8Rxc5QuQylpiiMkMYZwjlVZ2RI7DAFS4zQmlx_Hsn1SlYxbhDCGFSlKQmC_D5PI1T0E7HCPc6xCnCYQpRwzgG67fwzY4tlH03OD2mopBQ2Ri1HG3vofXQiUGEPsp-sDK9t5P1wsFWB28FDHoQNhy-ydY6FbS_gqkqvOo7-6EVlM56KxOQhgl3Bk6McFGvfs4leL27fVk_ZJun-8f1zSaTOa1JRiuc17KkSlFESsOIQkVBFTNMSM3qipiyYMkIZnJZGVKwhhpkmiZnSuCGyWIJrmfdYWo6raT2YxCOD8F2IrzzXlj-t-Nty7f9nrO6RsnxJIBnAZlWj0GbXzZH_BAJnyPhKRL-HQknCSpmKA4HZ3Xgu34Kya34H_UFCDeT-g</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Elsayem, Karam</creator><creator>Abdelmotaal, Yehia S.</creator><creator>Kaddah, Sherif</creator><creator>Elbarbary, Mohammed M.</creator><creator>Taher, Heba</creator><general>Springer Nature Singapore</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4479-6592</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Sutureless versus purse string with complete sac dissection in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children: a randomized clinical trial</title><author>Elsayem, Karam ; Abdelmotaal, Yehia S. ; Kaddah, Sherif ; Elbarbary, Mohammed M. ; Taher, Heba</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1867-85216c48dd8074f97d0338d9f9ace9657f4390019f1c5f739b8f0fbb19da2b9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgery</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pediatric Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Thoracic Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elsayem, Karam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelmotaal, Yehia S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaddah, Sherif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elbarbary, Mohammed M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taher, Heba</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of pediatric endoscopic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elsayem, Karam</au><au>Abdelmotaal, Yehia S.</au><au>Kaddah, Sherif</au><au>Elbarbary, Mohammed M.</au><au>Taher, Heba</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sutureless versus purse string with complete sac dissection in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children: a randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pediatric endoscopic surgery</jtitle><stitle>J Ped Endosc Surg</stitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>173-176</pages><issn>2524-7875</issn><eissn>2524-7883</eissn><abstract>Introduction Pediatric inguinal hernia is a common surgical condition with a cumulative incidence of 4.2%. Minimal invasive surgery is playing a growing role in the treatment of this condition. We compared the outcomes of laparoscopic sutureless herniotomy and purse string with sac dissection repair with regards to complications and operative time. Methods One hundred fifty-two patients were operated on in two centers with two different techniques: sac dissection and purse-string suture, and sutureless repair. Operative time and recurrence were the main outcomes for comparison. Results Sutureless repair has a shorter operative time (29 ± 10 min) compared to purse string repair (38 ± 13 min). The recurrence rate showed no statistical significance difference. However, the recurrence rate of sutureless repair was three times higher than that of purse string repair, and all recurrences were in large defects of 10–15 mm. Conclusions Sutureless repair is safe for defects up to 10 mm with excellent operative time. However, it had an unfavorable outcome in larger defects.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Nature Singapore</pub><doi>10.1007/s42804-022-00156-7</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4479-6592</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2524-7875
ispartof Journal of pediatric endoscopic surgery, 2022-12, Vol.4 (4), p.173-176
issn 2524-7875
2524-7883
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9660100
source Springer Link
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Original Research
Pediatric Surgery
Surgery
Thoracic Surgery
title Sutureless versus purse string with complete sac dissection in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children: a randomized clinical trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A47%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sutureless%20versus%20purse%20string%20with%20complete%20sac%20dissection%20in%20laparoscopic%20inguinal%20hernia%20repair%20in%20children:%20a%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pediatric%20endoscopic%20surgery&rft.au=Elsayem,%20Karam&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=173-176&rft.issn=2524-7875&rft.eissn=2524-7883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s42804-022-00156-7&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_cross%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9660100%3C/pubmedcentral_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1867-85216c48dd8074f97d0338d9f9ace9657f4390019f1c5f739b8f0fbb19da2b9c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true