Efficacy and safety of metronomic chemotherapy in maintenance therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

• Published in: Medicine (Baltimore) 2022-11, Vol.101 (46), p.e31659-e31659
• Main Authors: Chen, Li, Cao, Xin, Li, Jing, Liu, ChaoMin, Jiang, Ting
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bevacizumab - adverse effects; Colonic Neoplasms - drug therapy; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology; Humans; Lymphoma, Follicular - drug therapy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rectal Neoplasms - drug therapy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
• ISSN: 1536-5964; 0025-7974; 1536-5964
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031659

The current studies on metronomic chemotherapy in mCRC are all aimed at patients after multi-line therapy failure, and only a few studies have focused on maintenance treatment after successful first-line therapy. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, CNKI, and VIP were searched, and the relevant data was extracted, including media progression-free survival (mPFS), media overall survival (mOS), and grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs). We included 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 2 RCTs showed that metronomic maintenance chemotherapy could significantly improve mPFS compared to observation group; another RCT showed that metronomic maintenance chemotherapy group did not have low mPFS than the bevacizumab maintenance treatment (MT). The final RCT showed that dual-agent metronomic chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab MT did not improve mPFS compared with bevacizumab MT. The 3 RCTs showed that the metronomic maintenance therapy could not effectively improve mOS in mCRC compared to observation group or bevacizumab MT, while another RCT reported that the mOS in metronomic maintenance chemotherapy group was similar to bevacizumab MT. AEs was mostly mild and manageable. Grade ≥ 3 AEs are mostly nonhematological toxicity, and no deaths related to AEs were reported. This systematic review indicates that metronomic chemotherapy for mCRC MT can improve mPFS in some patients and is relatively safe. However, improvements in OS in most RCTs are arguable. Therefore, we need further studies to verify its long-term efficacy.