Interpersonal Consequences of Deceptive Expressions of Sadness

• Published in: Personality & social psychology bulletin 2023-01, Vol.49 (1), p.97-109
• Main Authors: Gunderson, Christopher A., Baker, Alysha, Pence, Alona D., ten Brinke, Leanne
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Behavioral responses; Cues; Deception; Emotions; Emotions - physiology; Facial Expression; Humans; Sadness; Social interaction; Sympathy
• ISSN: 0146-1672; 1552-7433; 1552-7433
• DOI: 10.1177/01461672211059700

Emotional expressions evoke predictable responses from observers; displays of sadness are commonly met with sympathy and help from others. Accordingly, people may be motivated to feign emotions to elicit a desired response. In the absence of suspicion, we predicted that emotional and behavioral responses to genuine (vs. deceptive) expressers would be guided by empirically valid cues of sadness authenticity. Consistent with this hypothesis, untrained observers (total N = 1,300) reported less sympathy and offered less help to deceptive (vs. genuine) expressers of sadness. This effect was replicated using both posed, low-stakes, laboratory-created stimuli, and spontaneous, real, high-stakes emotional appeals to the public. Furthermore, lens models suggest that sympathy reactions were guided by difficult-to-fake facial actions associated with sadness. Results suggest that naive observers use empirically valid cues to deception to coordinate social interactions, providing novel evidence that people are sensitive to subtle cues to deception.