Comparison of the efficacy of mud-pack and hot-pack treatments in chronic non-specific neck pain: A single-blind, randomized-controlled study

This study aims to compare the short-term efficacy of mud-pack (MP) and hot-pack (HP) treatments with the same temperature and duration on sleep, function, depression, and quality of life for chronic non-specific neck pain (CNNP) patients. Between December 2018 and September 2019, a total of 70 pati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2022-09, Vol.68 (3), p.381-390
Main Authors: Karaarslan, Fatih, Yılmaz, Halim, Akkurt, Halil Ekrem, Kaya, Fatih Muhammed, Şafak Yılmaz, Esra
Format: Article
Language:eng ; tur
Subjects:
Comparative analysis
Depression, Mental
Diagnosis
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Neck pain
Original
Political aspects
Sleep
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-cea95cf77dec223a4ed9398fcf0e8a51f93213fba56928645e2348748a9dbf2b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-cea95cf77dec223a4ed9398fcf0e8a51f93213fba56928645e2348748a9dbf2b3
container_end_page 390
container_issue 3
container_start_page 381
container_title Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation
container_volume 68
creator Karaarslan, Fatih
Yılmaz, Halim
Akkurt, Halil Ekrem
Kaya, Fatih Muhammed
Şafak Yılmaz, Esra
description This study aims to compare the short-term efficacy of mud-pack (MP) and hot-pack (HP) treatments with the same temperature and duration on sleep, function, depression, and quality of life for chronic non-specific neck pain (CNNP) patients. Between December 2018 and September 2019, a total of 70 patients with CNNP diagnosis (12 males, 58 females; mean age: 50.2±9.4 years; range, 24 to 65 years) were included. The patients were divided into two groups. The MP group (n=35) had a total of 15 sessions of MP for 20 min + transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 20 min + home exercise (HE) on five days per week for three weeks. The HP group (n=35) had 15 similar sessions of HP for 20 min + TENS for 20 min + HE. The patients were assessed with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS-pain), VAS physician's and patient's global assessments, modified Neck Disability Index (mNDI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) measures before treatment, at the end of post-treatment third week and one month later. In the MP group, there were statistically significant improvements in all parameters at the end of treatment three-week and one-month follow-up (p
doi_str_mv 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8575
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9706788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A717084063</galeid><sourcerecordid>A717084063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-cea95cf77dec223a4ed9398fcf0e8a51f93213fba56928645e2348748a9dbf2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl-L1DAUxYso7rLus28SEMQHO5smTZv4sDAM_oMFX_Q5pMnNNNomNUmF8Tv4nW2dcdkByUNyb37nwL2conhe4Q1rcHOTbY5mQzAhG85a9qi4JIy3JeaEPj69K8LwRXGd0jeMcSWEaHD9tLigTd0yLPhl8XsXxklFl4JHwaLcAwJrnVb6sNbjbMpJ6e9IeYP6kI9FjqDyCD4n5DzSfQzeaeSDL9ME2tm1gIWblPNv0RYl5_cDlN3gvHmD4uIVRvcLTKmDzzEMAxiU8mwOz4onVg0Jrk_3VfH1_bsvu4_l3ecPn3bbu1LXosqlBiWYtm1rQBNCVQ1GUMGtthi4YpUVlFTUdoo1gvCmZkBozduaK2E6Szp6Vdwefae5G8HoZZSoBjlFN6p4kEE5ef7jXS_34acULW5azheD1yeDGH7MkLIcXdIwDMpDmJMkLaO0YkywBX15RPdqAOm8DYujXnG5basW8xo3dKE2_6GWY2B0y5rAuqV_Jnj1QNCDGnKfwjBnF3w6B2-OoI4hpQj2fswKyzVH8m-O5JojueZoUbx4uJ17_l9q6B_QtsXn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2753315595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the efficacy of mud-pack and hot-pack treatments in chronic non-specific neck pain: A single-blind, randomized-controlled study</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><creator>Karaarslan, Fatih ; Yılmaz, Halim ; Akkurt, Halil Ekrem ; Kaya, Fatih Muhammed ; Şafak Yılmaz, Esra</creator><creatorcontrib>Karaarslan, Fatih ; Yılmaz, Halim ; Akkurt, Halil Ekrem ; Kaya, Fatih Muhammed ; Şafak Yılmaz, Esra</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[This study aims to compare the short-term efficacy of mud-pack (MP) and hot-pack (HP) treatments with the same temperature and duration on sleep, function, depression, and quality of life for chronic non-specific neck pain (CNNP) patients. Between December 2018 and September 2019, a total of 70 patients with CNNP diagnosis (12 males, 58 females; mean age: 50.2±9.4 years; range, 24 to 65 years) were included. The patients were divided into two groups. The MP group (n=35) had a total of 15 sessions of MP for 20 min + transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 20 min + home exercise (HE) on five days per week for three weeks. The HP group (n=35) had 15 similar sessions of HP for 20 min + TENS for 20 min + HE. The patients were assessed with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS-pain), VAS physician's and patient's global assessments, modified Neck Disability Index (mNDI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) measures before treatment, at the end of post-treatment third week and one month later. In the MP group, there were statistically significant improvements in all parameters at the end of treatment three-week and one-month follow-up (p<0.05), apart from SF-36 Vitality/Energy (SF-36V/E) at the end of treatment and SF-36 General Health (SF-36GH) at one month. In the HP group, there were statistically significant improvements observed for all parameters (p<0.05), apart from the SF-36 Physical Role and SF-36GH at the end of treatment third week and SF-36V/E at the first-month assessment. The VAS-pain(p<0.001), mNDI (p=0.019), BDI (p=0.002), SF-36GH (p<0.001), SF-36V/E (p<0.001) and SF-36 mental health (p<0.001) showed statistically significantly superior improvements in the MP group (p<0.05). In CNNP patients, both MP and HP treatments are effective. However, MP therapy has more positive effects on pain, function, depression, and quality of life parameters. The MP treatment may be used in addition to TENS treatment for CNNP patients.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 2587-1250</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1302-0234</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2587-0823</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2587-0823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8575</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36475098</identifier><language>eng ; tur</language><publisher>Turkey: Galenos Yayinevi Tic. Ltd</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Depression, Mental ; Diagnosis ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Neck pain ; Original ; Political aspects ; Sleep</subject><ispartof>Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2022-09, Vol.68 (3), p.381-390</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022, Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Galenos Yayinevi Tic. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022, Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2022 Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-cea95cf77dec223a4ed9398fcf0e8a51f93213fba56928645e2348748a9dbf2b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-cea95cf77dec223a4ed9398fcf0e8a51f93213fba56928645e2348748a9dbf2b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7983-6614 ; 0000-0002-3198-7173 ; 0000-0003-2715-4600 ; 0000-0002-5521-1214 ; 0000-0003-1107-5887</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706788/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706788/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36475098$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karaarslan, Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yılmaz, Halim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akkurt, Halil Ekrem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Fatih Muhammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şafak Yılmaz, Esra</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the efficacy of mud-pack and hot-pack treatments in chronic non-specific neck pain: A single-blind, randomized-controlled study</title><title>Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Turk J Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description><![CDATA[This study aims to compare the short-term efficacy of mud-pack (MP) and hot-pack (HP) treatments with the same temperature and duration on sleep, function, depression, and quality of life for chronic non-specific neck pain (CNNP) patients. Between December 2018 and September 2019, a total of 70 patients with CNNP diagnosis (12 males, 58 females; mean age: 50.2±9.4 years; range, 24 to 65 years) were included. The patients were divided into two groups. The MP group (n=35) had a total of 15 sessions of MP for 20 min + transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 20 min + home exercise (HE) on five days per week for three weeks. The HP group (n=35) had 15 similar sessions of HP for 20 min + TENS for 20 min + HE. The patients were assessed with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS-pain), VAS physician's and patient's global assessments, modified Neck Disability Index (mNDI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) measures before treatment, at the end of post-treatment third week and one month later. In the MP group, there were statistically significant improvements in all parameters at the end of treatment three-week and one-month follow-up (p<0.05), apart from SF-36 Vitality/Energy (SF-36V/E) at the end of treatment and SF-36 General Health (SF-36GH) at one month. In the HP group, there were statistically significant improvements observed for all parameters (p<0.05), apart from the SF-36 Physical Role and SF-36GH at the end of treatment third week and SF-36V/E at the first-month assessment. The VAS-pain(p<0.001), mNDI (p=0.019), BDI (p=0.002), SF-36GH (p<0.001), SF-36V/E (p<0.001) and SF-36 mental health (p<0.001) showed statistically significantly superior improvements in the MP group (p<0.05). In CNNP patients, both MP and HP treatments are effective. However, MP therapy has more positive effects on pain, function, depression, and quality of life parameters. The MP treatment may be used in addition to TENS treatment for CNNP patients.]]></description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Depression, Mental</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Neck pain</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><issn>2587-1250</issn><issn>1302-0234</issn><issn>2587-0823</issn><issn>2587-0823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkl-L1DAUxYso7rLus28SEMQHO5smTZv4sDAM_oMFX_Q5pMnNNNomNUmF8Tv4nW2dcdkByUNyb37nwL2conhe4Q1rcHOTbY5mQzAhG85a9qi4JIy3JeaEPj69K8LwRXGd0jeMcSWEaHD9tLigTd0yLPhl8XsXxklFl4JHwaLcAwJrnVb6sNbjbMpJ6e9IeYP6kI9FjqDyCD4n5DzSfQzeaeSDL9ME2tm1gIWblPNv0RYl5_cDlN3gvHmD4uIVRvcLTKmDzzEMAxiU8mwOz4onVg0Jrk_3VfH1_bsvu4_l3ecPn3bbu1LXosqlBiWYtm1rQBNCVQ1GUMGtthi4YpUVlFTUdoo1gvCmZkBozduaK2E6Szp6Vdwefae5G8HoZZSoBjlFN6p4kEE5ef7jXS_34acULW5azheD1yeDGH7MkLIcXdIwDMpDmJMkLaO0YkywBX15RPdqAOm8DYujXnG5basW8xo3dKE2_6GWY2B0y5rAuqV_Jnj1QNCDGnKfwjBnF3w6B2-OoI4hpQj2fswKyzVH8m-O5JojueZoUbx4uJ17_l9q6B_QtsXn</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Karaarslan, Fatih</creator><creator>Yılmaz, Halim</creator><creator>Akkurt, Halil Ekrem</creator><creator>Kaya, Fatih Muhammed</creator><creator>Şafak Yılmaz, Esra</creator><general>Galenos Yayinevi Tic. Ltd</general><general>Bayçınar Medical Publishing</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7983-6614</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3198-7173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2715-4600</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5521-1214</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1107-5887</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Comparison of the efficacy of mud-pack and hot-pack treatments in chronic non-specific neck pain: A single-blind, randomized-controlled study</title><author>Karaarslan, Fatih ; Yılmaz, Halim ; Akkurt, Halil Ekrem ; Kaya, Fatih Muhammed ; Şafak Yılmaz, Esra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-cea95cf77dec223a4ed9398fcf0e8a51f93213fba56928645e2348748a9dbf2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; tur</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Depression, Mental</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Neck pain</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karaarslan, Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yılmaz, Halim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akkurt, Halil Ekrem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Fatih Muhammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şafak Yılmaz, Esra</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karaarslan, Fatih</au><au>Yılmaz, Halim</au><au>Akkurt, Halil Ekrem</au><au>Kaya, Fatih Muhammed</au><au>Şafak Yılmaz, Esra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the efficacy of mud-pack and hot-pack treatments in chronic non-specific neck pain: A single-blind, randomized-controlled study</atitle><jtitle>Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Turk J Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>390</epage><pages>381-390</pages><issn>2587-1250</issn><issn>1302-0234</issn><issn>2587-0823</issn><eissn>2587-0823</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[This study aims to compare the short-term efficacy of mud-pack (MP) and hot-pack (HP) treatments with the same temperature and duration on sleep, function, depression, and quality of life for chronic non-specific neck pain (CNNP) patients. Between December 2018 and September 2019, a total of 70 patients with CNNP diagnosis (12 males, 58 females; mean age: 50.2±9.4 years; range, 24 to 65 years) were included. The patients were divided into two groups. The MP group (n=35) had a total of 15 sessions of MP for 20 min + transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 20 min + home exercise (HE) on five days per week for three weeks. The HP group (n=35) had 15 similar sessions of HP for 20 min + TENS for 20 min + HE. The patients were assessed with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS-pain), VAS physician's and patient's global assessments, modified Neck Disability Index (mNDI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) measures before treatment, at the end of post-treatment third week and one month later. In the MP group, there were statistically significant improvements in all parameters at the end of treatment three-week and one-month follow-up (p<0.05), apart from SF-36 Vitality/Energy (SF-36V/E) at the end of treatment and SF-36 General Health (SF-36GH) at one month. In the HP group, there were statistically significant improvements observed for all parameters (p<0.05), apart from the SF-36 Physical Role and SF-36GH at the end of treatment third week and SF-36V/E at the first-month assessment. The VAS-pain(p<0.001), mNDI (p=0.019), BDI (p=0.002), SF-36GH (p<0.001), SF-36V/E (p<0.001) and SF-36 mental health (p<0.001) showed statistically significantly superior improvements in the MP group (p<0.05). In CNNP patients, both MP and HP treatments are effective. However, MP therapy has more positive effects on pain, function, depression, and quality of life parameters. The MP treatment may be used in addition to TENS treatment for CNNP patients.]]></abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>Galenos Yayinevi Tic. Ltd</pub><pmid>36475098</pmid><doi>10.5606/tftrd.2022.8575</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7983-6614</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3198-7173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2715-4600</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5521-1214</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1107-5887</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2587-1250
ispartof Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2022-09, Vol.68 (3), p.381-390
issn 2587-1250
1302-0234
2587-0823
2587-0823
language eng ; tur
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9706788
source PubMed Central; SPORTDiscus with Full Text
subjects Comparative analysis
Depression, Mental
Diagnosis
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Neck pain
Original
Political aspects
Sleep
title Comparison of the efficacy of mud-pack and hot-pack treatments in chronic non-specific neck pain: A single-blind, randomized-controlled study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A04%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20efficacy%20of%20mud-pack%20and%20hot-pack%20treatments%20in%20chronic%20non-specific%20neck%20pain:%20A%20single-blind,%20randomized-controlled%20study&rft.jtitle=Turkish%20journal%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Karaarslan,%20Fatih&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=390&rft.pages=381-390&rft.issn=2587-1250&rft.eissn=2587-0823&rft_id=info:doi/10.5606/tftrd.2022.8575&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA717084063%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-cea95cf77dec223a4ed9398fcf0e8a51f93213fba56928645e2348748a9dbf2b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2753315595&rft_id=info:pmid/36475098&rft_galeid=A717084063&rfr_iscdi=true