Loading…

Radiographic Response Assessment Strategies for Early-Phase Brain Trials in Complex Tumor Types and Drug Combinations: from Digital “Flipbooks” to Control Systems Theory

There is an urgent need for drug development in brain tumors. While current radiographic response assessment provides instructions for identifying large treatment effects in simple high- and low-grade gliomas, there remains a void of strategies to evaluate complex or difficult to measure tumors or t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neurotherapeutics 2022-10, Vol.19 (6), p.1855-1868
Main Authors: Ellingson, Benjamin M., Levin, Victor A., Cloughesy, Timothy F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-9638d373a2da8c75461c4aaa68d1ce938aa4cba48f6b3f10e3002de044c244213
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-9638d373a2da8c75461c4aaa68d1ce938aa4cba48f6b3f10e3002de044c244213
container_end_page 1868
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1855
container_title Neurotherapeutics
container_volume 19
creator Ellingson, Benjamin M.
Levin, Victor A.
Cloughesy, Timothy F.
description There is an urgent need for drug development in brain tumors. While current radiographic response assessment provides instructions for identifying large treatment effects in simple high- and low-grade gliomas, there remains a void of strategies to evaluate complex or difficult to measure tumors or tumors of mixed grade with enhancing and non-enhancing components. Furthermore, most patients exhibit some period of alteration in tumor growth after starting a new therapy, but simple response categorization (e.g., stable disease, progressive disease) fails to provide any meaningful insight into the depth or degree of potential “subclinical” therapeutic response. We propose a creative solution to these issues based on a tiered strategy meant to increase confidence in identifying therapeutic effects even in the most challenging tumor types, while also providing a framework for complex evaluation of combination and sequential treatment schemes. Specifically, we demonstrate the utility of digital “flipbooks” to quickly identify subtle changes in complex tumors. We show how a modified Levin criteria can be used to quantify the degree of visual changes, while establishing estimates of the association between tumor volume and visual inspection. Lastly, we introduce the concept of quantifying therapeutic response using control systems theory. We propose measuring changes in volume (proportional), the area under the volume vs. time curve (integral) and changes in growth rates (derivative) to utilize a “PID” controller model of single or combination therapeutic activity.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13311-022-01241-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9723080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2746776902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-9638d373a2da8c75461c4aaa68d1ce938aa4cba48f6b3f10e3002de044c244213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEohd4ARbIEhs2Ad8SOyyQymkLSJVAbVhbE8fJcUni1HYQZ9cHKY_AS_VJcDmlXBasPNJ888_Ff5Y9IfgFwVi8DIQxQnJMaY4J5SSX97JdIoXMBRfV_RRXjOWCEraT7YVwjnHBWCUfZjus4AUpRbmbfT-F1rrew7y2Gp2aMLspGHQQgglhNFNEZ9FDNL01AXXOoyPwwyb_uIZEvfFgJ1R7C0NAKVq5cR7MV1QvYyLrzZxqYGrRoV_6m2RjJ4g2NXiFOu9GdGh7G2FA15dXx4OdG-c-h-vLbyi6RE_RuwGdbUI0Y0D12ji_eZQ96FIv8_j23c8-HR_Vq3f5yYe371cHJ7nmgse8KplsmWBAW5BaFLwkmgNAKVuiTcUkANcNcNmVDesINgxj2hrMuaacp3vtZ6-3uvPSjKbV6Q4eBjV7O4LfKAdW_Z2Z7Fr17ouqBGVY4iTw_FbAu4vFhKhGG7QZBpiMW4KiZcFpVfCKJ_TZP-i5W_yU1lNU8FKIssI0UXRLae9C8Ka7G4ZgdeMGtXWDSm5QP92gZCp6-ucadyW_vj8BbAuElJp643_3_o_sDwg2xYo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2746776902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiographic Response Assessment Strategies for Early-Phase Brain Trials in Complex Tumor Types and Drug Combinations: from Digital “Flipbooks” to Control Systems Theory</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ellingson, Benjamin M. ; Levin, Victor A. ; Cloughesy, Timothy F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ellingson, Benjamin M. ; Levin, Victor A. ; Cloughesy, Timothy F.</creatorcontrib><description>There is an urgent need for drug development in brain tumors. While current radiographic response assessment provides instructions for identifying large treatment effects in simple high- and low-grade gliomas, there remains a void of strategies to evaluate complex or difficult to measure tumors or tumors of mixed grade with enhancing and non-enhancing components. Furthermore, most patients exhibit some period of alteration in tumor growth after starting a new therapy, but simple response categorization (e.g., stable disease, progressive disease) fails to provide any meaningful insight into the depth or degree of potential “subclinical” therapeutic response. We propose a creative solution to these issues based on a tiered strategy meant to increase confidence in identifying therapeutic effects even in the most challenging tumor types, while also providing a framework for complex evaluation of combination and sequential treatment schemes. Specifically, we demonstrate the utility of digital “flipbooks” to quickly identify subtle changes in complex tumors. We show how a modified Levin criteria can be used to quantify the degree of visual changes, while establishing estimates of the association between tumor volume and visual inspection. Lastly, we introduce the concept of quantifying therapeutic response using control systems theory. We propose measuring changes in volume (proportional), the area under the volume vs. time curve (integral) and changes in growth rates (derivative) to utilize a “PID” controller model of single or combination therapeutic activity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1933-7213</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1878-7479</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7479</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13311-022-01241-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35451676</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Brain - pathology ; Brain cancer ; Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Brain Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Brain Neoplasms - pathology ; Brain tumors ; Clinical trials ; Drug Combinations ; Drug development ; Glioma ; Glioma - diagnostic imaging ; Glioma - drug therapy ; Glioma - pathology ; Growth rate ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Neurobiology ; Neurology ; Neurosciences ; Neurosurgery ; Review ; System theory ; Systems Theory ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Neurotherapeutics, 2022-10, Vol.19 (6), p.1855-1868</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-9638d373a2da8c75461c4aaa68d1ce938aa4cba48f6b3f10e3002de044c244213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-9638d373a2da8c75461c4aaa68d1ce938aa4cba48f6b3f10e3002de044c244213</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2764-6640</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723080/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723080/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451676$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ellingson, Benjamin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Victor A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cloughesy, Timothy F.</creatorcontrib><title>Radiographic Response Assessment Strategies for Early-Phase Brain Trials in Complex Tumor Types and Drug Combinations: from Digital “Flipbooks” to Control Systems Theory</title><title>Neurotherapeutics</title><addtitle>Neurotherapeutics</addtitle><addtitle>Neurotherapeutics</addtitle><description>There is an urgent need for drug development in brain tumors. While current radiographic response assessment provides instructions for identifying large treatment effects in simple high- and low-grade gliomas, there remains a void of strategies to evaluate complex or difficult to measure tumors or tumors of mixed grade with enhancing and non-enhancing components. Furthermore, most patients exhibit some period of alteration in tumor growth after starting a new therapy, but simple response categorization (e.g., stable disease, progressive disease) fails to provide any meaningful insight into the depth or degree of potential “subclinical” therapeutic response. We propose a creative solution to these issues based on a tiered strategy meant to increase confidence in identifying therapeutic effects even in the most challenging tumor types, while also providing a framework for complex evaluation of combination and sequential treatment schemes. Specifically, we demonstrate the utility of digital “flipbooks” to quickly identify subtle changes in complex tumors. We show how a modified Levin criteria can be used to quantify the degree of visual changes, while establishing estimates of the association between tumor volume and visual inspection. Lastly, we introduce the concept of quantifying therapeutic response using control systems theory. We propose measuring changes in volume (proportional), the area under the volume vs. time curve (integral) and changes in growth rates (derivative) to utilize a “PID” controller model of single or combination therapeutic activity.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Brain - pathology</subject><subject>Brain cancer</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Brain tumors</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Drug Combinations</subject><subject>Drug development</subject><subject>Glioma</subject><subject>Glioma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Glioma - drug therapy</subject><subject>Glioma - pathology</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Neurobiology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>System theory</subject><subject>Systems Theory</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1933-7213</issn><issn>1878-7479</issn><issn>1878-7479</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEohd4ARbIEhs2Ad8SOyyQymkLSJVAbVhbE8fJcUni1HYQZ9cHKY_AS_VJcDmlXBasPNJ888_Ff5Y9IfgFwVi8DIQxQnJMaY4J5SSX97JdIoXMBRfV_RRXjOWCEraT7YVwjnHBWCUfZjus4AUpRbmbfT-F1rrew7y2Gp2aMLspGHQQgglhNFNEZ9FDNL01AXXOoyPwwyb_uIZEvfFgJ1R7C0NAKVq5cR7MV1QvYyLrzZxqYGrRoV_6m2RjJ4g2NXiFOu9GdGh7G2FA15dXx4OdG-c-h-vLbyi6RE_RuwGdbUI0Y0D12ji_eZQ96FIv8_j23c8-HR_Vq3f5yYe371cHJ7nmgse8KplsmWBAW5BaFLwkmgNAKVuiTcUkANcNcNmVDesINgxj2hrMuaacp3vtZ6-3uvPSjKbV6Q4eBjV7O4LfKAdW_Z2Z7Fr17ouqBGVY4iTw_FbAu4vFhKhGG7QZBpiMW4KiZcFpVfCKJ_TZP-i5W_yU1lNU8FKIssI0UXRLae9C8Ka7G4ZgdeMGtXWDSm5QP92gZCp6-ucadyW_vj8BbAuElJp643_3_o_sDwg2xYo</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Ellingson, Benjamin M.</creator><creator>Levin, Victor A.</creator><creator>Cloughesy, Timothy F.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2764-6640</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Radiographic Response Assessment Strategies for Early-Phase Brain Trials in Complex Tumor Types and Drug Combinations: from Digital “Flipbooks” to Control Systems Theory</title><author>Ellingson, Benjamin M. ; Levin, Victor A. ; Cloughesy, Timothy F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-9638d373a2da8c75461c4aaa68d1ce938aa4cba48f6b3f10e3002de044c244213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Brain - pathology</topic><topic>Brain cancer</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Brain tumors</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Drug Combinations</topic><topic>Drug development</topic><topic>Glioma</topic><topic>Glioma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Glioma - drug therapy</topic><topic>Glioma - pathology</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Neurobiology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>System theory</topic><topic>Systems Theory</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ellingson, Benjamin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Victor A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cloughesy, Timothy F.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neurotherapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ellingson, Benjamin M.</au><au>Levin, Victor A.</au><au>Cloughesy, Timothy F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiographic Response Assessment Strategies for Early-Phase Brain Trials in Complex Tumor Types and Drug Combinations: from Digital “Flipbooks” to Control Systems Theory</atitle><jtitle>Neurotherapeutics</jtitle><stitle>Neurotherapeutics</stitle><addtitle>Neurotherapeutics</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1855</spage><epage>1868</epage><pages>1855-1868</pages><issn>1933-7213</issn><issn>1878-7479</issn><eissn>1878-7479</eissn><abstract>There is an urgent need for drug development in brain tumors. While current radiographic response assessment provides instructions for identifying large treatment effects in simple high- and low-grade gliomas, there remains a void of strategies to evaluate complex or difficult to measure tumors or tumors of mixed grade with enhancing and non-enhancing components. Furthermore, most patients exhibit some period of alteration in tumor growth after starting a new therapy, but simple response categorization (e.g., stable disease, progressive disease) fails to provide any meaningful insight into the depth or degree of potential “subclinical” therapeutic response. We propose a creative solution to these issues based on a tiered strategy meant to increase confidence in identifying therapeutic effects even in the most challenging tumor types, while also providing a framework for complex evaluation of combination and sequential treatment schemes. Specifically, we demonstrate the utility of digital “flipbooks” to quickly identify subtle changes in complex tumors. We show how a modified Levin criteria can be used to quantify the degree of visual changes, while establishing estimates of the association between tumor volume and visual inspection. Lastly, we introduce the concept of quantifying therapeutic response using control systems theory. We propose measuring changes in volume (proportional), the area under the volume vs. time curve (integral) and changes in growth rates (derivative) to utilize a “PID” controller model of single or combination therapeutic activity.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>35451676</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13311-022-01241-8</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2764-6640</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1933-7213
ispartof Neurotherapeutics, 2022-10, Vol.19 (6), p.1855-1868
issn 1933-7213
1878-7479
1878-7479
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9723080
source ScienceDirect; Springer Nature; PubMed Central
subjects Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Brain - pathology
Brain cancer
Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Brain Neoplasms - drug therapy
Brain Neoplasms - pathology
Brain tumors
Clinical trials
Drug Combinations
Drug development
Glioma
Glioma - diagnostic imaging
Glioma - drug therapy
Glioma - pathology
Growth rate
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Neurobiology
Neurology
Neurosciences
Neurosurgery
Review
System theory
Systems Theory
Tumors
title Radiographic Response Assessment Strategies for Early-Phase Brain Trials in Complex Tumor Types and Drug Combinations: from Digital “Flipbooks” to Control Systems Theory
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A02%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiographic%20Response%20Assessment%20Strategies%20for%20Early-Phase%20Brain%20Trials%20in%20Complex%20Tumor%20Types%20and%20Drug%20Combinations:%20from%20Digital%20%E2%80%9CFlipbooks%E2%80%9D%20to%20Control%20Systems%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Neurotherapeutics&rft.au=Ellingson,%20Benjamin%20M.&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1855&rft.epage=1868&rft.pages=1855-1868&rft.issn=1933-7213&rft.eissn=1878-7479&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13311-022-01241-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2746776902%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-9638d373a2da8c75461c4aaa68d1ce938aa4cba48f6b3f10e3002de044c244213%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2746776902&rft_id=info:pmid/35451676&rfr_iscdi=true