Loading…
Radiographic Response Assessment Strategies for Early-Phase Brain Trials in Complex Tumor Types and Drug Combinations: from Digital “Flipbooks” to Control Systems Theory
There is an urgent need for drug development in brain tumors. While current radiographic response assessment provides instructions for identifying large treatment effects in simple high- and low-grade gliomas, there remains a void of strategies to evaluate complex or difficult to measure tumors or t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Neurotherapeutics 2022-10, Vol.19 (6), p.1855-1868 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-9638d373a2da8c75461c4aaa68d1ce938aa4cba48f6b3f10e3002de044c244213 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-9638d373a2da8c75461c4aaa68d1ce938aa4cba48f6b3f10e3002de044c244213 |
container_end_page | 1868 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1855 |
container_title | Neurotherapeutics |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Ellingson, Benjamin M. Levin, Victor A. Cloughesy, Timothy F. |
description | There is an urgent need for drug development in brain tumors. While current radiographic response assessment provides instructions for identifying large treatment effects in simple high- and low-grade gliomas, there remains a void of strategies to evaluate complex or difficult to measure tumors or tumors of mixed grade with enhancing and non-enhancing components. Furthermore, most patients exhibit some period of alteration in tumor growth after starting a new therapy, but simple response categorization (e.g., stable disease, progressive disease) fails to provide any meaningful insight into the depth or degree of potential “subclinical” therapeutic response. We propose a creative solution to these issues based on a tiered strategy meant to increase confidence in identifying therapeutic effects even in the most challenging tumor types, while also providing a framework for complex evaluation of combination and sequential treatment schemes. Specifically, we demonstrate the utility of digital “flipbooks” to quickly identify subtle changes in complex tumors. We show how a modified Levin criteria can be used to quantify the degree of visual changes, while establishing estimates of the association between tumor volume and visual inspection. Lastly, we introduce the concept of quantifying therapeutic response using control systems theory. We propose measuring changes in volume (proportional), the area under the volume vs. time curve (integral) and changes in growth rates (derivative) to utilize a “PID” controller model of single or combination therapeutic activity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13311-022-01241-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9723080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2746776902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-9638d373a2da8c75461c4aaa68d1ce938aa4cba48f6b3f10e3002de044c244213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEohd4ARbIEhs2Ad8SOyyQymkLSJVAbVhbE8fJcUni1HYQZ9cHKY_AS_VJcDmlXBasPNJ888_Ff5Y9IfgFwVi8DIQxQnJMaY4J5SSX97JdIoXMBRfV_RRXjOWCEraT7YVwjnHBWCUfZjus4AUpRbmbfT-F1rrew7y2Gp2aMLspGHQQgglhNFNEZ9FDNL01AXXOoyPwwyb_uIZEvfFgJ1R7C0NAKVq5cR7MV1QvYyLrzZxqYGrRoV_6m2RjJ4g2NXiFOu9GdGh7G2FA15dXx4OdG-c-h-vLbyi6RE_RuwGdbUI0Y0D12ji_eZQ96FIv8_j23c8-HR_Vq3f5yYe371cHJ7nmgse8KplsmWBAW5BaFLwkmgNAKVuiTcUkANcNcNmVDesINgxj2hrMuaacp3vtZ6-3uvPSjKbV6Q4eBjV7O4LfKAdW_Z2Z7Fr17ouqBGVY4iTw_FbAu4vFhKhGG7QZBpiMW4KiZcFpVfCKJ_TZP-i5W_yU1lNU8FKIssI0UXRLae9C8Ka7G4ZgdeMGtXWDSm5QP92gZCp6-ucadyW_vj8BbAuElJp643_3_o_sDwg2xYo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2746776902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiographic Response Assessment Strategies for Early-Phase Brain Trials in Complex Tumor Types and Drug Combinations: from Digital “Flipbooks” to Control Systems Theory</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ellingson, Benjamin M. ; Levin, Victor A. ; Cloughesy, Timothy F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ellingson, Benjamin M. ; Levin, Victor A. ; Cloughesy, Timothy F.</creatorcontrib><description>There is an urgent need for drug development in brain tumors. While current radiographic response assessment provides instructions for identifying large treatment effects in simple high- and low-grade gliomas, there remains a void of strategies to evaluate complex or difficult to measure tumors or tumors of mixed grade with enhancing and non-enhancing components. Furthermore, most patients exhibit some period of alteration in tumor growth after starting a new therapy, but simple response categorization (e.g., stable disease, progressive disease) fails to provide any meaningful insight into the depth or degree of potential “subclinical” therapeutic response. We propose a creative solution to these issues based on a tiered strategy meant to increase confidence in identifying therapeutic effects even in the most challenging tumor types, while also providing a framework for complex evaluation of combination and sequential treatment schemes. Specifically, we demonstrate the utility of digital “flipbooks” to quickly identify subtle changes in complex tumors. We show how a modified Levin criteria can be used to quantify the degree of visual changes, while establishing estimates of the association between tumor volume and visual inspection. Lastly, we introduce the concept of quantifying therapeutic response using control systems theory. We propose measuring changes in volume (proportional), the area under the volume vs. time curve (integral) and changes in growth rates (derivative) to utilize a “PID” controller model of single or combination therapeutic activity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1933-7213</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1878-7479</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7479</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13311-022-01241-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35451676</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Brain - pathology ; Brain cancer ; Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Brain Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Brain Neoplasms - pathology ; Brain tumors ; Clinical trials ; Drug Combinations ; Drug development ; Glioma ; Glioma - diagnostic imaging ; Glioma - drug therapy ; Glioma - pathology ; Growth rate ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Neurobiology ; Neurology ; Neurosciences ; Neurosurgery ; Review ; System theory ; Systems Theory ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Neurotherapeutics, 2022-10, Vol.19 (6), p.1855-1868</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-9638d373a2da8c75461c4aaa68d1ce938aa4cba48f6b3f10e3002de044c244213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-9638d373a2da8c75461c4aaa68d1ce938aa4cba48f6b3f10e3002de044c244213</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2764-6640</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723080/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723080/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451676$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ellingson, Benjamin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Victor A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cloughesy, Timothy F.</creatorcontrib><title>Radiographic Response Assessment Strategies for Early-Phase Brain Trials in Complex Tumor Types and Drug Combinations: from Digital “Flipbooks” to Control Systems Theory</title><title>Neurotherapeutics</title><addtitle>Neurotherapeutics</addtitle><addtitle>Neurotherapeutics</addtitle><description>There is an urgent need for drug development in brain tumors. While current radiographic response assessment provides instructions for identifying large treatment effects in simple high- and low-grade gliomas, there remains a void of strategies to evaluate complex or difficult to measure tumors or tumors of mixed grade with enhancing and non-enhancing components. Furthermore, most patients exhibit some period of alteration in tumor growth after starting a new therapy, but simple response categorization (e.g., stable disease, progressive disease) fails to provide any meaningful insight into the depth or degree of potential “subclinical” therapeutic response. We propose a creative solution to these issues based on a tiered strategy meant to increase confidence in identifying therapeutic effects even in the most challenging tumor types, while also providing a framework for complex evaluation of combination and sequential treatment schemes. Specifically, we demonstrate the utility of digital “flipbooks” to quickly identify subtle changes in complex tumors. We show how a modified Levin criteria can be used to quantify the degree of visual changes, while establishing estimates of the association between tumor volume and visual inspection. Lastly, we introduce the concept of quantifying therapeutic response using control systems theory. We propose measuring changes in volume (proportional), the area under the volume vs. time curve (integral) and changes in growth rates (derivative) to utilize a “PID” controller model of single or combination therapeutic activity.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Brain - pathology</subject><subject>Brain cancer</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Brain tumors</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Drug Combinations</subject><subject>Drug development</subject><subject>Glioma</subject><subject>Glioma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Glioma - drug therapy</subject><subject>Glioma - pathology</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Neurobiology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>System theory</subject><subject>Systems Theory</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1933-7213</issn><issn>1878-7479</issn><issn>1878-7479</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEohd4ARbIEhs2Ad8SOyyQymkLSJVAbVhbE8fJcUni1HYQZ9cHKY_AS_VJcDmlXBasPNJ888_Ff5Y9IfgFwVi8DIQxQnJMaY4J5SSX97JdIoXMBRfV_RRXjOWCEraT7YVwjnHBWCUfZjus4AUpRbmbfT-F1rrew7y2Gp2aMLspGHQQgglhNFNEZ9FDNL01AXXOoyPwwyb_uIZEvfFgJ1R7C0NAKVq5cR7MV1QvYyLrzZxqYGrRoV_6m2RjJ4g2NXiFOu9GdGh7G2FA15dXx4OdG-c-h-vLbyi6RE_RuwGdbUI0Y0D12ji_eZQ96FIv8_j23c8-HR_Vq3f5yYe371cHJ7nmgse8KplsmWBAW5BaFLwkmgNAKVuiTcUkANcNcNmVDesINgxj2hrMuaacp3vtZ6-3uvPSjKbV6Q4eBjV7O4LfKAdW_Z2Z7Fr17ouqBGVY4iTw_FbAu4vFhKhGG7QZBpiMW4KiZcFpVfCKJ_TZP-i5W_yU1lNU8FKIssI0UXRLae9C8Ka7G4ZgdeMGtXWDSm5QP92gZCp6-ucadyW_vj8BbAuElJp643_3_o_sDwg2xYo</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Ellingson, Benjamin M.</creator><creator>Levin, Victor A.</creator><creator>Cloughesy, Timothy F.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2764-6640</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Radiographic Response Assessment Strategies for Early-Phase Brain Trials in Complex Tumor Types and Drug Combinations: from Digital “Flipbooks” to Control Systems Theory</title><author>Ellingson, Benjamin M. ; Levin, Victor A. ; Cloughesy, Timothy F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-9638d373a2da8c75461c4aaa68d1ce938aa4cba48f6b3f10e3002de044c244213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Brain - pathology</topic><topic>Brain cancer</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Brain tumors</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Drug Combinations</topic><topic>Drug development</topic><topic>Glioma</topic><topic>Glioma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Glioma - drug therapy</topic><topic>Glioma - pathology</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Neurobiology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>System theory</topic><topic>Systems Theory</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ellingson, Benjamin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Victor A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cloughesy, Timothy F.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neurotherapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ellingson, Benjamin M.</au><au>Levin, Victor A.</au><au>Cloughesy, Timothy F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiographic Response Assessment Strategies for Early-Phase Brain Trials in Complex Tumor Types and Drug Combinations: from Digital “Flipbooks” to Control Systems Theory</atitle><jtitle>Neurotherapeutics</jtitle><stitle>Neurotherapeutics</stitle><addtitle>Neurotherapeutics</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1855</spage><epage>1868</epage><pages>1855-1868</pages><issn>1933-7213</issn><issn>1878-7479</issn><eissn>1878-7479</eissn><abstract>There is an urgent need for drug development in brain tumors. While current radiographic response assessment provides instructions for identifying large treatment effects in simple high- and low-grade gliomas, there remains a void of strategies to evaluate complex or difficult to measure tumors or tumors of mixed grade with enhancing and non-enhancing components. Furthermore, most patients exhibit some period of alteration in tumor growth after starting a new therapy, but simple response categorization (e.g., stable disease, progressive disease) fails to provide any meaningful insight into the depth or degree of potential “subclinical” therapeutic response. We propose a creative solution to these issues based on a tiered strategy meant to increase confidence in identifying therapeutic effects even in the most challenging tumor types, while also providing a framework for complex evaluation of combination and sequential treatment schemes. Specifically, we demonstrate the utility of digital “flipbooks” to quickly identify subtle changes in complex tumors. We show how a modified Levin criteria can be used to quantify the degree of visual changes, while establishing estimates of the association between tumor volume and visual inspection. Lastly, we introduce the concept of quantifying therapeutic response using control systems theory. We propose measuring changes in volume (proportional), the area under the volume vs. time curve (integral) and changes in growth rates (derivative) to utilize a “PID” controller model of single or combination therapeutic activity.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>35451676</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13311-022-01241-8</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2764-6640</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1933-7213 |
ispartof | Neurotherapeutics, 2022-10, Vol.19 (6), p.1855-1868 |
issn | 1933-7213 1878-7479 1878-7479 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9723080 |
source | ScienceDirect; Springer Nature; PubMed Central |
subjects | Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Brain - pathology Brain cancer Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Brain Neoplasms - drug therapy Brain Neoplasms - pathology Brain tumors Clinical trials Drug Combinations Drug development Glioma Glioma - diagnostic imaging Glioma - drug therapy Glioma - pathology Growth rate Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Neurobiology Neurology Neurosciences Neurosurgery Review System theory Systems Theory Tumors |
title | Radiographic Response Assessment Strategies for Early-Phase Brain Trials in Complex Tumor Types and Drug Combinations: from Digital “Flipbooks” to Control Systems Theory |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A02%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiographic%20Response%20Assessment%20Strategies%20for%20Early-Phase%20Brain%20Trials%20in%20Complex%20Tumor%20Types%20and%20Drug%20Combinations:%20from%20Digital%20%E2%80%9CFlipbooks%E2%80%9D%20to%20Control%20Systems%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Neurotherapeutics&rft.au=Ellingson,%20Benjamin%20M.&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1855&rft.epage=1868&rft.pages=1855-1868&rft.issn=1933-7213&rft.eissn=1878-7479&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13311-022-01241-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2746776902%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-9638d373a2da8c75461c4aaa68d1ce938aa4cba48f6b3f10e3002de044c244213%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2746776902&rft_id=info:pmid/35451676&rfr_iscdi=true |