Loading…

Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, improving indoor air quality (IAQ) has become vital for the public as COVID-19 and other infectious diseases can transmit via inhalable aerosols. Air cleaning devices with filtration and targeted pollutant treatment capabilities can help improve IAQ. However, only a few...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of environmental research and public health 2022-12, Vol.19 (23), p.16135
Main Authors: Li, Peiyang, Koziel, Jacek A, Macedo, Nubia, Zimmerman, Jeffrey J, Wrzesinski, Danielle, Sobotka, Erin, Balderas, Mateo, Walz, William B, Paris, Reid Vincent, Lee, Myeongseong, Liu, Dongjie, Yedilbayev, Bauyrzhan, Ramirez, Brett C, Jenks, William S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-31d7596c74b2d09ad644acd19d1ccefcc9daf46d83cb3c2db3aab7f1da392e9a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-31d7596c74b2d09ad644acd19d1ccefcc9daf46d83cb3c2db3aab7f1da392e9a3
container_end_page
container_issue 23
container_start_page 16135
container_title International journal of environmental research and public health
container_volume 19
creator Li, Peiyang
Koziel, Jacek A
Macedo, Nubia
Zimmerman, Jeffrey J
Wrzesinski, Danielle
Sobotka, Erin
Balderas, Mateo
Walz, William B
Paris, Reid Vincent
Lee, Myeongseong
Liu, Dongjie
Yedilbayev, Bauyrzhan
Ramirez, Brett C
Jenks, William S
description Since the COVID-19 pandemic, improving indoor air quality (IAQ) has become vital for the public as COVID-19 and other infectious diseases can transmit via inhalable aerosols. Air cleaning devices with filtration and targeted pollutant treatment capabilities can help improve IAQ. However, only a few filtration/UV devices have been formally tested for their effectiveness, and little data is publicly available and UV doses comparable. In this research, we upgraded a particulate matter (PM) air filtration prototype by adding UV-C (germicidal) light. We developed realistic UV dose metrics for fast-moving air and selected performance scenarios to quantify the mitigation effect on viable airborne bacteria and PM. The targeted PM included total suspended particulate (TSP) and a coarse-to-fine range sized at PM , PM , PM , and PM . The PM and viable airborne bacteria concentrations were compared between the inlet and outlet of the prototype at 0.5 and 1.0 m /s (low and high) air flow modes. The upgraded prototype inactivated nearly 100% of viable airborne bacteria and removed up to 97% of TSP, 91% of PM , 87% of PM , 87% of PM , and 88% of PM . The performance in the low flow rate mode was generally better than in the high flow rate mode. The combination of filtration and UV-C treatment provided 'double-barrier' assurance for air purification and lowered the risk of spreading infectious micro-organisms.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ijerph192316135
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9735963</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2753312690</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-31d7596c74b2d09ad644acd19d1ccefcc9daf46d83cb3c2db3aab7f1da392e9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkk9v1DAQxSMEon_gzA1Z4sJlqR17nZgDUrvdQqUiEGp7jSb2pOuVY6eOs6hfjM-Ht1uq0pMtze-9mSe9onjH6CfOFT2ya4zDiqmSM8n4_EWxz6SkMyEpe_nkv1ccjOOaUl4LqV4Xe1wKVZe03i_-LDfgJkg2eBI6Ap4c20gWDsFbf0NOcWM1kuXtZIcBDflt04qcWZfiTgLekKvrz2QR-gGiHXcuv7AP2ZYsu85qi17fkTz4CTFZPTlISL5DShjv5dcWWofbtW2IHskJ6DyyQKwnaYXk3DtM9-RlxKw1W_RN8aoDN-Lbh_ewuDpbXi6-zS5-fD1fHF_MtChZmnFmqrmSuhJtaagCI4UAbZgyTGvstFYGOiFNzXXLdWlaDtBWHTPAVYkK-GHxZec7TG2PRqPPyV0zRNtDvGsC2Ob_iber5iZsGlXxvJhng48PBjHcTjimprejRufAY5jGpqzmnLNSKprRD8_QdZiiz_EyJeq5qLNfpo52lI5hHCN2j8cw2mw70TzrRFa8f5rhkf9XAv4XKJG3mA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2748548633</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Li, Peiyang ; Koziel, Jacek A ; Macedo, Nubia ; Zimmerman, Jeffrey J ; Wrzesinski, Danielle ; Sobotka, Erin ; Balderas, Mateo ; Walz, William B ; Paris, Reid Vincent ; Lee, Myeongseong ; Liu, Dongjie ; Yedilbayev, Bauyrzhan ; Ramirez, Brett C ; Jenks, William S</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Peiyang ; Koziel, Jacek A ; Macedo, Nubia ; Zimmerman, Jeffrey J ; Wrzesinski, Danielle ; Sobotka, Erin ; Balderas, Mateo ; Walz, William B ; Paris, Reid Vincent ; Lee, Myeongseong ; Liu, Dongjie ; Yedilbayev, Bauyrzhan ; Ramirez, Brett C ; Jenks, William S</creatorcontrib><description>Since the COVID-19 pandemic, improving indoor air quality (IAQ) has become vital for the public as COVID-19 and other infectious diseases can transmit via inhalable aerosols. Air cleaning devices with filtration and targeted pollutant treatment capabilities can help improve IAQ. However, only a few filtration/UV devices have been formally tested for their effectiveness, and little data is publicly available and UV doses comparable. In this research, we upgraded a particulate matter (PM) air filtration prototype by adding UV-C (germicidal) light. We developed realistic UV dose metrics for fast-moving air and selected performance scenarios to quantify the mitigation effect on viable airborne bacteria and PM. The targeted PM included total suspended particulate (TSP) and a coarse-to-fine range sized at PM , PM , PM , and PM . The PM and viable airborne bacteria concentrations were compared between the inlet and outlet of the prototype at 0.5 and 1.0 m /s (low and high) air flow modes. The upgraded prototype inactivated nearly 100% of viable airborne bacteria and removed up to 97% of TSP, 91% of PM , 87% of PM , 87% of PM , and 88% of PM . The performance in the low flow rate mode was generally better than in the high flow rate mode. The combination of filtration and UV-C treatment provided 'double-barrier' assurance for air purification and lowered the risk of spreading infectious micro-organisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192316135</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36498208</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Air flow ; Air Pollutants - analysis ; Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis ; Air Pollution, Indoor - prevention &amp; control ; Air quality ; Airborne bacteria ; Airborne microorganisms ; Airborne particulates ; Bacteria ; Cleaning ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - prevention &amp; control ; Disease transmission ; Environmental Monitoring ; Filtration ; Flow velocity ; Health risks ; Humans ; Indoor air pollution ; Indoor environments ; Infectious diseases ; Low flow ; Pandemics ; Particle Size ; Particulate emissions ; Particulate matter ; Particulate Matter - analysis ; Particulates ; Pollutants ; Public health ; Respiratory Aerosols and Droplets ; Ultraviolet radiation ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022-12, Vol.19 (23), p.16135</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-31d7596c74b2d09ad644acd19d1ccefcc9daf46d83cb3c2db3aab7f1da392e9a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-31d7596c74b2d09ad644acd19d1ccefcc9daf46d83cb3c2db3aab7f1da392e9a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6111-8059 ; 0000-0002-3072-593X ; 0000-0002-8107-2422 ; 0000-0002-7534-6108 ; 0000-0001-9382-9261 ; 0000-0002-2387-0354 ; 0000-0002-3205-9723</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2748548633/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2748548633?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,38516,43895,44590,53791,53793,74412,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498208$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Peiyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koziel, Jacek A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macedo, Nubia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, Jeffrey J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wrzesinski, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobotka, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balderas, Mateo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walz, William B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paris, Reid Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Myeongseong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Dongjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yedilbayev, Bauyrzhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramirez, Brett C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenks, William S</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>Since the COVID-19 pandemic, improving indoor air quality (IAQ) has become vital for the public as COVID-19 and other infectious diseases can transmit via inhalable aerosols. Air cleaning devices with filtration and targeted pollutant treatment capabilities can help improve IAQ. However, only a few filtration/UV devices have been formally tested for their effectiveness, and little data is publicly available and UV doses comparable. In this research, we upgraded a particulate matter (PM) air filtration prototype by adding UV-C (germicidal) light. We developed realistic UV dose metrics for fast-moving air and selected performance scenarios to quantify the mitigation effect on viable airborne bacteria and PM. The targeted PM included total suspended particulate (TSP) and a coarse-to-fine range sized at PM , PM , PM , and PM . The PM and viable airborne bacteria concentrations were compared between the inlet and outlet of the prototype at 0.5 and 1.0 m /s (low and high) air flow modes. The upgraded prototype inactivated nearly 100% of viable airborne bacteria and removed up to 97% of TSP, 91% of PM , 87% of PM , 87% of PM , and 88% of PM . The performance in the low flow rate mode was generally better than in the high flow rate mode. The combination of filtration and UV-C treatment provided 'double-barrier' assurance for air purification and lowered the risk of spreading infectious micro-organisms.</description><subject>Air flow</subject><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis</subject><subject>Air Pollution, Indoor - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Airborne bacteria</subject><subject>Airborne microorganisms</subject><subject>Airborne particulates</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Cleaning</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indoor air pollution</subject><subject>Indoor environments</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Low flow</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Particulate emissions</subject><subject>Particulate matter</subject><subject>Particulate Matter - analysis</subject><subject>Particulates</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Respiratory Aerosols and Droplets</subject><subject>Ultraviolet radiation</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkk9v1DAQxSMEon_gzA1Z4sJlqR17nZgDUrvdQqUiEGp7jSb2pOuVY6eOs6hfjM-Ht1uq0pMtze-9mSe9onjH6CfOFT2ya4zDiqmSM8n4_EWxz6SkMyEpe_nkv1ccjOOaUl4LqV4Xe1wKVZe03i_-LDfgJkg2eBI6Ap4c20gWDsFbf0NOcWM1kuXtZIcBDflt04qcWZfiTgLekKvrz2QR-gGiHXcuv7AP2ZYsu85qi17fkTz4CTFZPTlISL5DShjv5dcWWofbtW2IHskJ6DyyQKwnaYXk3DtM9-RlxKw1W_RN8aoDN-Lbh_ewuDpbXi6-zS5-fD1fHF_MtChZmnFmqrmSuhJtaagCI4UAbZgyTGvstFYGOiFNzXXLdWlaDtBWHTPAVYkK-GHxZec7TG2PRqPPyV0zRNtDvGsC2Ob_iber5iZsGlXxvJhng48PBjHcTjimprejRufAY5jGpqzmnLNSKprRD8_QdZiiz_EyJeq5qLNfpo52lI5hHCN2j8cw2mw70TzrRFa8f5rhkf9XAv4XKJG3mA</recordid><startdate>20221202</startdate><enddate>20221202</enddate><creator>Li, Peiyang</creator><creator>Koziel, Jacek A</creator><creator>Macedo, Nubia</creator><creator>Zimmerman, Jeffrey J</creator><creator>Wrzesinski, Danielle</creator><creator>Sobotka, Erin</creator><creator>Balderas, Mateo</creator><creator>Walz, William B</creator><creator>Paris, Reid Vincent</creator><creator>Lee, Myeongseong</creator><creator>Liu, Dongjie</creator><creator>Yedilbayev, Bauyrzhan</creator><creator>Ramirez, Brett C</creator><creator>Jenks, William S</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6111-8059</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3072-593X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8107-2422</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7534-6108</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9382-9261</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2387-0354</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3205-9723</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221202</creationdate><title>Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air</title><author>Li, Peiyang ; Koziel, Jacek A ; Macedo, Nubia ; Zimmerman, Jeffrey J ; Wrzesinski, Danielle ; Sobotka, Erin ; Balderas, Mateo ; Walz, William B ; Paris, Reid Vincent ; Lee, Myeongseong ; Liu, Dongjie ; Yedilbayev, Bauyrzhan ; Ramirez, Brett C ; Jenks, William S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-31d7596c74b2d09ad644acd19d1ccefcc9daf46d83cb3c2db3aab7f1da392e9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Air flow</topic><topic>Air Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis</topic><topic>Air Pollution, Indoor - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Airborne bacteria</topic><topic>Airborne microorganisms</topic><topic>Airborne particulates</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Cleaning</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indoor air pollution</topic><topic>Indoor environments</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Low flow</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Particulate emissions</topic><topic>Particulate matter</topic><topic>Particulate Matter - analysis</topic><topic>Particulates</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Respiratory Aerosols and Droplets</topic><topic>Ultraviolet radiation</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Peiyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koziel, Jacek A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macedo, Nubia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, Jeffrey J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wrzesinski, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobotka, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balderas, Mateo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walz, William B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paris, Reid Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Myeongseong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Dongjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yedilbayev, Bauyrzhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramirez, Brett C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenks, William S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Peiyang</au><au>Koziel, Jacek A</au><au>Macedo, Nubia</au><au>Zimmerman, Jeffrey J</au><au>Wrzesinski, Danielle</au><au>Sobotka, Erin</au><au>Balderas, Mateo</au><au>Walz, William B</au><au>Paris, Reid Vincent</au><au>Lee, Myeongseong</au><au>Liu, Dongjie</au><au>Yedilbayev, Bauyrzhan</au><au>Ramirez, Brett C</au><au>Jenks, William S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2022-12-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>16135</spage><pages>16135-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>Since the COVID-19 pandemic, improving indoor air quality (IAQ) has become vital for the public as COVID-19 and other infectious diseases can transmit via inhalable aerosols. Air cleaning devices with filtration and targeted pollutant treatment capabilities can help improve IAQ. However, only a few filtration/UV devices have been formally tested for their effectiveness, and little data is publicly available and UV doses comparable. In this research, we upgraded a particulate matter (PM) air filtration prototype by adding UV-C (germicidal) light. We developed realistic UV dose metrics for fast-moving air and selected performance scenarios to quantify the mitigation effect on viable airborne bacteria and PM. The targeted PM included total suspended particulate (TSP) and a coarse-to-fine range sized at PM , PM , PM , and PM . The PM and viable airborne bacteria concentrations were compared between the inlet and outlet of the prototype at 0.5 and 1.0 m /s (low and high) air flow modes. The upgraded prototype inactivated nearly 100% of viable airborne bacteria and removed up to 97% of TSP, 91% of PM , 87% of PM , 87% of PM , and 88% of PM . The performance in the low flow rate mode was generally better than in the high flow rate mode. The combination of filtration and UV-C treatment provided 'double-barrier' assurance for air purification and lowered the risk of spreading infectious micro-organisms.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>36498208</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph192316135</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6111-8059</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3072-593X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8107-2422</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7534-6108</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9382-9261</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2387-0354</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3205-9723</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1660-4601
ispartof International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022-12, Vol.19 (23), p.16135
issn 1660-4601
1661-7827
1660-4601
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9735963
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database; Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Air flow
Air Pollutants - analysis
Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis
Air Pollution, Indoor - prevention & control
Air quality
Airborne bacteria
Airborne microorganisms
Airborne particulates
Bacteria
Cleaning
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
COVID-19 - prevention & control
Disease transmission
Environmental Monitoring
Filtration
Flow velocity
Health risks
Humans
Indoor air pollution
Indoor environments
Infectious diseases
Low flow
Pandemics
Particle Size
Particulate emissions
Particulate matter
Particulate Matter - analysis
Particulates
Pollutants
Public health
Respiratory Aerosols and Droplets
Ultraviolet radiation
Viruses
title Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T07%3A25%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20an%20Air%20Cleaning%20Device%20Equipped%20with%20Filtration%20and%20UV:%20Comparison%20of%20Removal%20Efficiency%20on%20Particulate%20Matter%20and%20Viable%20Airborne%20Bacteria%20in%20the%20Inlet%20and%20Treated%20Air&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Li,%20Peiyang&rft.date=2022-12-02&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=16135&rft.pages=16135-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph192316135&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2753312690%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-31d7596c74b2d09ad644acd19d1ccefcc9daf46d83cb3c2db3aab7f1da392e9a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2748548633&rft_id=info:pmid/36498208&rfr_iscdi=true