Multi-Stage Classification-Based Deep Learning for Gleason System Grading Using Histopathological Images

In this work, we introduced an automated diagnostic system for Gleason system grading and grade groups (GG) classification using whole slide images (WSIs) of digitized prostate biopsy specimens (PBSs). Our system first classifies the Gleason pattern (GP) from PBSs and then identifies the Gleason sco...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancers 2022-11, Vol.14 (23), p.5897
Main Authors: Hammouda, Kamal, Khalifa, Fahmi, Alghamdi, Norah Saleh, Darwish, Hanan, El-Baz, Ayman
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Diagnosis
Histology, Pathological
Machine learning
Methods
Prostate cancer
Tumor staging
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this work, we introduced an automated diagnostic system for Gleason system grading and grade groups (GG) classification using whole slide images (WSIs) of digitized prostate biopsy specimens (PBSs). Our system first classifies the Gleason pattern (GP) from PBSs and then identifies the Gleason score (GS) and GG. We developed a comprehensive DL-based approach to develop a grading pipeline system for the digitized PBSs and consider GP as a classification problem (not segmentation) compared to current research studies (deals with as a segmentation problem). A multilevel binary classification was implemented to enhance the segmentation accuracy for GP. Also, we created three levels of analysis (pyramidal levels) to extract different types of features. Each level has four shallow binary CNN to classify five GP labels. A majority fusion is applied for each pixel that has a total of 39 labeled images to create the final output for GP. The proposed framework is trained, validated, and tested on 3080 WSIs of PBS. The overall diagnostic accuracy for each CNN is evaluated using several metrics: precision (PR), recall (RE), and accuracy, which are documented by the confusion matrices.The results proved our system's potential for classifying all five GP and, thus, GG. The overall accuracy for the GG is evaluated using two metrics, PR and RE. The grade GG results are between 50% to 92% for RE and 50% to 92% for PR. Also, a comparison between our CNN architecture and the standard CNN (ResNet50) highlights our system's advantage. Finally, our deep-learning system achieved an agreement with the consensus grade groups.
ISSN:2072-6694
2072-6694
DOI:10.3390/cancers14235897