Loading…
Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality between the 2nd Generation and 3rd Generation Dual-Source Single-Energy and Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT of the Abdomen
We compared the radiation dose and image quality between the 2nd generation and the 3rd generation dual-source single-energy (DSSE) and dual-source dual-energy (DSDE) CT of the abdomen. We included patients undergoing follow-up abdominal CT after partial or radical nephrectomy in the first 10 months...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology 2022-11, Vol.83 (6), p.1342-1353 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1904-dfb5922815214944b5327524d483c5f3cd4d9de0621c2b57f4eeae154356e5e93 |
container_end_page | 1353 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1342 |
container_title | Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Kim, Chang Gun Kim, See Hyung Cho, Seung Hyun Ryeom, Hun Kyu Kim, Won Hwa Kim, Hye Jung |
description | We compared the radiation dose and image quality between the 2nd generation and the 3rd generation dual-source single-energy (DSSE) and dual-source dual-energy (DSDE) CT of the abdomen.
We included patients undergoing follow-up abdominal CT after partial or radical nephrectomy in the first 10 months of 2019 (2nd generation DS CT) and the first 10 months of 2020 (3rd generation DS CT). We divided the 320 patients into 4 groups (A, 2nd generation DSSE CT; B, 2nd generation DSDE CT; C, 3rd generation DSSE CT; and D, 3rd generation DSDE CT) (
= 80 each) matched by sex and body mass index. Radiation dose and image quality (objective and subjective qualities) were compared between the groups.
The mean size-specific dose estimation of 3rd generation DSDE CT group was significantly lower than that of the 2nd generation DSSE CT (42.5%,
= 0.013) and 2nd generation DSDE CT (46.9%,
= 0.015) groups. Interobserver agreement was excellent for the overall image quality (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.8867) and image artifacts (ICC: 0.9423).
Our results showed a considerable reduction in the radiation dose while maintaining high image quality with 3rd generation DSDE CT as compared to the 2nd generation DSDE CT and 2nd generation DSSE CT. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3348/jksr.2021.0104 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9748459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2757162236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1904-dfb5922815214944b5327524d483c5f3cd4d9de0621c2b57f4eeae154356e5e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctKxDAUDaLooG5dSpZuOubZx0aQ8QmC-FqHtLkdo20yJq0y_-OH2jqj6Orm5jzugYPQASVTzkV-_PIaw5QRRqeEErGBJqyQNCE5kZtoQjOeJyzl2Q7aj_GFEMJykhc020Y7PJVCCiom6HPm24UONnqHfY3vtbG6s8Ny5iNg7Qy-bvUc8F2vG9stcQndB4DD3TNgNqCX4CCsFCOZh39fZ4MqefB9qAA_WDdvIDkfwPnym_wX_X6vsdnjGGW8cFoa34LbQ1u1biLsr-cuero4f5xdJTe3l9ez05ukogURialLWTCWU8moKIQoJWeZZMKInFey5pURpjBAUkYrVsqsFgAaqBRcpiCh4LvoZOW76MsWTAWuC7pRi2BbHZbKa6v-I84-q7l_V0UmciFHg6O1QfBvPcROtTZW0DTage-jGuJkNGWMpwN1uqJWwccYoP49Q4ka21Vju2psV43tDoLDv-F-6T9d8i8VpaH9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2757162236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality between the 2nd Generation and 3rd Generation Dual-Source Single-Energy and Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT of the Abdomen</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Kim, Chang Gun ; Kim, See Hyung ; Cho, Seung Hyun ; Ryeom, Hun Kyu ; Kim, Won Hwa ; Kim, Hye Jung</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chang Gun ; Kim, See Hyung ; Cho, Seung Hyun ; Ryeom, Hun Kyu ; Kim, Won Hwa ; Kim, Hye Jung</creatorcontrib><description>We compared the radiation dose and image quality between the 2nd generation and the 3rd generation dual-source single-energy (DSSE) and dual-source dual-energy (DSDE) CT of the abdomen.
We included patients undergoing follow-up abdominal CT after partial or radical nephrectomy in the first 10 months of 2019 (2nd generation DS CT) and the first 10 months of 2020 (3rd generation DS CT). We divided the 320 patients into 4 groups (A, 2nd generation DSSE CT; B, 2nd generation DSDE CT; C, 3rd generation DSSE CT; and D, 3rd generation DSDE CT) (
= 80 each) matched by sex and body mass index. Radiation dose and image quality (objective and subjective qualities) were compared between the groups.
The mean size-specific dose estimation of 3rd generation DSDE CT group was significantly lower than that of the 2nd generation DSSE CT (42.5%,
= 0.013) and 2nd generation DSDE CT (46.9%,
= 0.015) groups. Interobserver agreement was excellent for the overall image quality (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.8867) and image artifacts (ICC: 0.9423).
Our results showed a considerable reduction in the radiation dose while maintaining high image quality with 3rd generation DSDE CT as compared to the 2nd generation DSDE CT and 2nd generation DSSE CT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1738-2637</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2951-0805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2951-0805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2288-2928</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0104</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36545414</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): The Korean Society of Radiology</publisher><subject>Genitourinary Imaging</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, 2022-11, Vol.83 (6), p.1342-1353</ispartof><rights>Copyrights © 2022 The Korean Society of Radiology.</rights><rights>Copyrights © 2022 The Korean Society of Radiology 2022 The Korean Society of Radiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1904-dfb5922815214944b5327524d483c5f3cd4d9de0621c2b57f4eeae154356e5e93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7137-9968 ; 0000-0002-0263-0941 ; 0000-0003-4327-8777 ; 0000-0003-3980-8624 ; 0000-0002-3268-3091 ; 0000-0001-7617-7302</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9748459/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9748459/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36545414$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chang Gun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, See Hyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Seung Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryeom, Hun Kyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Won Hwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hye Jung</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality between the 2nd Generation and 3rd Generation Dual-Source Single-Energy and Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT of the Abdomen</title><title>Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology</title><addtitle>J Korean Soc Radiol</addtitle><description>We compared the radiation dose and image quality between the 2nd generation and the 3rd generation dual-source single-energy (DSSE) and dual-source dual-energy (DSDE) CT of the abdomen.
We included patients undergoing follow-up abdominal CT after partial or radical nephrectomy in the first 10 months of 2019 (2nd generation DS CT) and the first 10 months of 2020 (3rd generation DS CT). We divided the 320 patients into 4 groups (A, 2nd generation DSSE CT; B, 2nd generation DSDE CT; C, 3rd generation DSSE CT; and D, 3rd generation DSDE CT) (
= 80 each) matched by sex and body mass index. Radiation dose and image quality (objective and subjective qualities) were compared between the groups.
The mean size-specific dose estimation of 3rd generation DSDE CT group was significantly lower than that of the 2nd generation DSSE CT (42.5%,
= 0.013) and 2nd generation DSDE CT (46.9%,
= 0.015) groups. Interobserver agreement was excellent for the overall image quality (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.8867) and image artifacts (ICC: 0.9423).
Our results showed a considerable reduction in the radiation dose while maintaining high image quality with 3rd generation DSDE CT as compared to the 2nd generation DSDE CT and 2nd generation DSSE CT.</description><subject>Genitourinary Imaging</subject><issn>1738-2637</issn><issn>2951-0805</issn><issn>2951-0805</issn><issn>2288-2928</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUctKxDAUDaLooG5dSpZuOubZx0aQ8QmC-FqHtLkdo20yJq0y_-OH2jqj6Orm5jzugYPQASVTzkV-_PIaw5QRRqeEErGBJqyQNCE5kZtoQjOeJyzl2Q7aj_GFEMJykhc020Y7PJVCCiom6HPm24UONnqHfY3vtbG6s8Ny5iNg7Qy-bvUc8F2vG9stcQndB4DD3TNgNqCX4CCsFCOZh39fZ4MqefB9qAA_WDdvIDkfwPnym_wX_X6vsdnjGGW8cFoa34LbQ1u1biLsr-cuero4f5xdJTe3l9ez05ukogURialLWTCWU8moKIQoJWeZZMKInFey5pURpjBAUkYrVsqsFgAaqBRcpiCh4LvoZOW76MsWTAWuC7pRi2BbHZbKa6v-I84-q7l_V0UmciFHg6O1QfBvPcROtTZW0DTage-jGuJkNGWMpwN1uqJWwccYoP49Q4ka21Vju2psV43tDoLDv-F-6T9d8i8VpaH9</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Kim, Chang Gun</creator><creator>Kim, See Hyung</creator><creator>Cho, Seung Hyun</creator><creator>Ryeom, Hun Kyu</creator><creator>Kim, Won Hwa</creator><creator>Kim, Hye Jung</creator><general>The Korean Society of Radiology</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7137-9968</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0263-0941</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4327-8777</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3980-8624</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3268-3091</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7617-7302</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality between the 2nd Generation and 3rd Generation Dual-Source Single-Energy and Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT of the Abdomen</title><author>Kim, Chang Gun ; Kim, See Hyung ; Cho, Seung Hyun ; Ryeom, Hun Kyu ; Kim, Won Hwa ; Kim, Hye Jung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1904-dfb5922815214944b5327524d483c5f3cd4d9de0621c2b57f4eeae154356e5e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Genitourinary Imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chang Gun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, See Hyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Seung Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryeom, Hun Kyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Won Hwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hye Jung</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Chang Gun</au><au>Kim, See Hyung</au><au>Cho, Seung Hyun</au><au>Ryeom, Hun Kyu</au><au>Kim, Won Hwa</au><au>Kim, Hye Jung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality between the 2nd Generation and 3rd Generation Dual-Source Single-Energy and Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT of the Abdomen</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Korean Soc Radiol</addtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1342</spage><epage>1353</epage><pages>1342-1353</pages><issn>1738-2637</issn><issn>2951-0805</issn><eissn>2951-0805</eissn><eissn>2288-2928</eissn><abstract>We compared the radiation dose and image quality between the 2nd generation and the 3rd generation dual-source single-energy (DSSE) and dual-source dual-energy (DSDE) CT of the abdomen.
We included patients undergoing follow-up abdominal CT after partial or radical nephrectomy in the first 10 months of 2019 (2nd generation DS CT) and the first 10 months of 2020 (3rd generation DS CT). We divided the 320 patients into 4 groups (A, 2nd generation DSSE CT; B, 2nd generation DSDE CT; C, 3rd generation DSSE CT; and D, 3rd generation DSDE CT) (
= 80 each) matched by sex and body mass index. Radiation dose and image quality (objective and subjective qualities) were compared between the groups.
The mean size-specific dose estimation of 3rd generation DSDE CT group was significantly lower than that of the 2nd generation DSSE CT (42.5%,
= 0.013) and 2nd generation DSDE CT (46.9%,
= 0.015) groups. Interobserver agreement was excellent for the overall image quality (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.8867) and image artifacts (ICC: 0.9423).
Our results showed a considerable reduction in the radiation dose while maintaining high image quality with 3rd generation DSDE CT as compared to the 2nd generation DSDE CT and 2nd generation DSSE CT.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>The Korean Society of Radiology</pub><pmid>36545414</pmid><doi>10.3348/jksr.2021.0104</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7137-9968</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0263-0941</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4327-8777</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3980-8624</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3268-3091</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7617-7302</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1738-2637 |
ispartof | Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, 2022-11, Vol.83 (6), p.1342-1353 |
issn | 1738-2637 2951-0805 2951-0805 2288-2928 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9748459 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Directory of Open Access Journals |
subjects | Genitourinary Imaging |
title | Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality between the 2nd Generation and 3rd Generation Dual-Source Single-Energy and Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT of the Abdomen |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A21%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Radiation%20Dose%20and%20Image%20Quality%20between%20the%202nd%20Generation%20and%203rd%20Generation%20Dual-Source%20Single-Energy%20and%20Dual-Source%20Dual-Energy%20CT%20of%20the%20Abdomen&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Korean%20Society%20of%20Radiology&rft.au=Kim,%20Chang%20Gun&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1342&rft.epage=1353&rft.pages=1342-1353&rft.issn=1738-2637&rft.eissn=2951-0805&rft_id=info:doi/10.3348/jksr.2021.0104&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2757162236%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1904-dfb5922815214944b5327524d483c5f3cd4d9de0621c2b57f4eeae154356e5e93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2757162236&rft_id=info:pmid/36545414&rfr_iscdi=true |