Loading…

Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality between the 2nd Generation and 3rd Generation Dual-Source Single-Energy and Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT of the Abdomen

We compared the radiation dose and image quality between the 2nd generation and the 3rd generation dual-source single-energy (DSSE) and dual-source dual-energy (DSDE) CT of the abdomen. We included patients undergoing follow-up abdominal CT after partial or radical nephrectomy in the first 10 months...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology 2022-11, Vol.83 (6), p.1342-1353
Main Authors: Kim, Chang Gun, Kim, See Hyung, Cho, Seung Hyun, Ryeom, Hun Kyu, Kim, Won Hwa, Kim, Hye Jung
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1904-dfb5922815214944b5327524d483c5f3cd4d9de0621c2b57f4eeae154356e5e93
container_end_page 1353
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1342
container_title Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
container_volume 83
creator Kim, Chang Gun
Kim, See Hyung
Cho, Seung Hyun
Ryeom, Hun Kyu
Kim, Won Hwa
Kim, Hye Jung
description We compared the radiation dose and image quality between the 2nd generation and the 3rd generation dual-source single-energy (DSSE) and dual-source dual-energy (DSDE) CT of the abdomen. We included patients undergoing follow-up abdominal CT after partial or radical nephrectomy in the first 10 months of 2019 (2nd generation DS CT) and the first 10 months of 2020 (3rd generation DS CT). We divided the 320 patients into 4 groups (A, 2nd generation DSSE CT; B, 2nd generation DSDE CT; C, 3rd generation DSSE CT; and D, 3rd generation DSDE CT) ( = 80 each) matched by sex and body mass index. Radiation dose and image quality (objective and subjective qualities) were compared between the groups. The mean size-specific dose estimation of 3rd generation DSDE CT group was significantly lower than that of the 2nd generation DSSE CT (42.5%, = 0.013) and 2nd generation DSDE CT (46.9%, = 0.015) groups. Interobserver agreement was excellent for the overall image quality (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.8867) and image artifacts (ICC: 0.9423). Our results showed a considerable reduction in the radiation dose while maintaining high image quality with 3rd generation DSDE CT as compared to the 2nd generation DSDE CT and 2nd generation DSSE CT.
doi_str_mv 10.3348/jksr.2021.0104
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9748459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2757162236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1904-dfb5922815214944b5327524d483c5f3cd4d9de0621c2b57f4eeae154356e5e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctKxDAUDaLooG5dSpZuOubZx0aQ8QmC-FqHtLkdo20yJq0y_-OH2jqj6Orm5jzugYPQASVTzkV-_PIaw5QRRqeEErGBJqyQNCE5kZtoQjOeJyzl2Q7aj_GFEMJykhc020Y7PJVCCiom6HPm24UONnqHfY3vtbG6s8Ny5iNg7Qy-bvUc8F2vG9stcQndB4DD3TNgNqCX4CCsFCOZh39fZ4MqefB9qAA_WDdvIDkfwPnym_wX_X6vsdnjGGW8cFoa34LbQ1u1biLsr-cuero4f5xdJTe3l9ez05ukogURialLWTCWU8moKIQoJWeZZMKInFey5pURpjBAUkYrVsqsFgAaqBRcpiCh4LvoZOW76MsWTAWuC7pRi2BbHZbKa6v-I84-q7l_V0UmciFHg6O1QfBvPcROtTZW0DTage-jGuJkNGWMpwN1uqJWwccYoP49Q4ka21Vju2psV43tDoLDv-F-6T9d8i8VpaH9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2757162236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality between the 2nd Generation and 3rd Generation Dual-Source Single-Energy and Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT of the Abdomen</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Kim, Chang Gun ; Kim, See Hyung ; Cho, Seung Hyun ; Ryeom, Hun Kyu ; Kim, Won Hwa ; Kim, Hye Jung</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chang Gun ; Kim, See Hyung ; Cho, Seung Hyun ; Ryeom, Hun Kyu ; Kim, Won Hwa ; Kim, Hye Jung</creatorcontrib><description>We compared the radiation dose and image quality between the 2nd generation and the 3rd generation dual-source single-energy (DSSE) and dual-source dual-energy (DSDE) CT of the abdomen. We included patients undergoing follow-up abdominal CT after partial or radical nephrectomy in the first 10 months of 2019 (2nd generation DS CT) and the first 10 months of 2020 (3rd generation DS CT). We divided the 320 patients into 4 groups (A, 2nd generation DSSE CT; B, 2nd generation DSDE CT; C, 3rd generation DSSE CT; and D, 3rd generation DSDE CT) ( = 80 each) matched by sex and body mass index. Radiation dose and image quality (objective and subjective qualities) were compared between the groups. The mean size-specific dose estimation of 3rd generation DSDE CT group was significantly lower than that of the 2nd generation DSSE CT (42.5%, = 0.013) and 2nd generation DSDE CT (46.9%, = 0.015) groups. Interobserver agreement was excellent for the overall image quality (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.8867) and image artifacts (ICC: 0.9423). Our results showed a considerable reduction in the radiation dose while maintaining high image quality with 3rd generation DSDE CT as compared to the 2nd generation DSDE CT and 2nd generation DSSE CT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1738-2637</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2951-0805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2951-0805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2288-2928</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0104</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36545414</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): The Korean Society of Radiology</publisher><subject>Genitourinary Imaging</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, 2022-11, Vol.83 (6), p.1342-1353</ispartof><rights>Copyrights © 2022 The Korean Society of Radiology.</rights><rights>Copyrights © 2022 The Korean Society of Radiology 2022 The Korean Society of Radiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1904-dfb5922815214944b5327524d483c5f3cd4d9de0621c2b57f4eeae154356e5e93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7137-9968 ; 0000-0002-0263-0941 ; 0000-0003-4327-8777 ; 0000-0003-3980-8624 ; 0000-0002-3268-3091 ; 0000-0001-7617-7302</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9748459/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9748459/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36545414$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chang Gun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, See Hyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Seung Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryeom, Hun Kyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Won Hwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hye Jung</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality between the 2nd Generation and 3rd Generation Dual-Source Single-Energy and Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT of the Abdomen</title><title>Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology</title><addtitle>J Korean Soc Radiol</addtitle><description>We compared the radiation dose and image quality between the 2nd generation and the 3rd generation dual-source single-energy (DSSE) and dual-source dual-energy (DSDE) CT of the abdomen. We included patients undergoing follow-up abdominal CT after partial or radical nephrectomy in the first 10 months of 2019 (2nd generation DS CT) and the first 10 months of 2020 (3rd generation DS CT). We divided the 320 patients into 4 groups (A, 2nd generation DSSE CT; B, 2nd generation DSDE CT; C, 3rd generation DSSE CT; and D, 3rd generation DSDE CT) ( = 80 each) matched by sex and body mass index. Radiation dose and image quality (objective and subjective qualities) were compared between the groups. The mean size-specific dose estimation of 3rd generation DSDE CT group was significantly lower than that of the 2nd generation DSSE CT (42.5%, = 0.013) and 2nd generation DSDE CT (46.9%, = 0.015) groups. Interobserver agreement was excellent for the overall image quality (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.8867) and image artifacts (ICC: 0.9423). Our results showed a considerable reduction in the radiation dose while maintaining high image quality with 3rd generation DSDE CT as compared to the 2nd generation DSDE CT and 2nd generation DSSE CT.</description><subject>Genitourinary Imaging</subject><issn>1738-2637</issn><issn>2951-0805</issn><issn>2951-0805</issn><issn>2288-2928</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUctKxDAUDaLooG5dSpZuOubZx0aQ8QmC-FqHtLkdo20yJq0y_-OH2jqj6Orm5jzugYPQASVTzkV-_PIaw5QRRqeEErGBJqyQNCE5kZtoQjOeJyzl2Q7aj_GFEMJykhc020Y7PJVCCiom6HPm24UONnqHfY3vtbG6s8Ny5iNg7Qy-bvUc8F2vG9stcQndB4DD3TNgNqCX4CCsFCOZh39fZ4MqefB9qAA_WDdvIDkfwPnym_wX_X6vsdnjGGW8cFoa34LbQ1u1biLsr-cuero4f5xdJTe3l9ez05ukogURialLWTCWU8moKIQoJWeZZMKInFey5pURpjBAUkYrVsqsFgAaqBRcpiCh4LvoZOW76MsWTAWuC7pRi2BbHZbKa6v-I84-q7l_V0UmciFHg6O1QfBvPcROtTZW0DTage-jGuJkNGWMpwN1uqJWwccYoP49Q4ka21Vju2psV43tDoLDv-F-6T9d8i8VpaH9</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Kim, Chang Gun</creator><creator>Kim, See Hyung</creator><creator>Cho, Seung Hyun</creator><creator>Ryeom, Hun Kyu</creator><creator>Kim, Won Hwa</creator><creator>Kim, Hye Jung</creator><general>The Korean Society of Radiology</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7137-9968</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0263-0941</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4327-8777</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3980-8624</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3268-3091</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7617-7302</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality between the 2nd Generation and 3rd Generation Dual-Source Single-Energy and Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT of the Abdomen</title><author>Kim, Chang Gun ; Kim, See Hyung ; Cho, Seung Hyun ; Ryeom, Hun Kyu ; Kim, Won Hwa ; Kim, Hye Jung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1904-dfb5922815214944b5327524d483c5f3cd4d9de0621c2b57f4eeae154356e5e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Genitourinary Imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chang Gun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, See Hyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Seung Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryeom, Hun Kyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Won Hwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hye Jung</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Chang Gun</au><au>Kim, See Hyung</au><au>Cho, Seung Hyun</au><au>Ryeom, Hun Kyu</au><au>Kim, Won Hwa</au><au>Kim, Hye Jung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality between the 2nd Generation and 3rd Generation Dual-Source Single-Energy and Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT of the Abdomen</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Korean Soc Radiol</addtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1342</spage><epage>1353</epage><pages>1342-1353</pages><issn>1738-2637</issn><issn>2951-0805</issn><eissn>2951-0805</eissn><eissn>2288-2928</eissn><abstract>We compared the radiation dose and image quality between the 2nd generation and the 3rd generation dual-source single-energy (DSSE) and dual-source dual-energy (DSDE) CT of the abdomen. We included patients undergoing follow-up abdominal CT after partial or radical nephrectomy in the first 10 months of 2019 (2nd generation DS CT) and the first 10 months of 2020 (3rd generation DS CT). We divided the 320 patients into 4 groups (A, 2nd generation DSSE CT; B, 2nd generation DSDE CT; C, 3rd generation DSSE CT; and D, 3rd generation DSDE CT) ( = 80 each) matched by sex and body mass index. Radiation dose and image quality (objective and subjective qualities) were compared between the groups. The mean size-specific dose estimation of 3rd generation DSDE CT group was significantly lower than that of the 2nd generation DSSE CT (42.5%, = 0.013) and 2nd generation DSDE CT (46.9%, = 0.015) groups. Interobserver agreement was excellent for the overall image quality (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.8867) and image artifacts (ICC: 0.9423). Our results showed a considerable reduction in the radiation dose while maintaining high image quality with 3rd generation DSDE CT as compared to the 2nd generation DSDE CT and 2nd generation DSSE CT.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>The Korean Society of Radiology</pub><pmid>36545414</pmid><doi>10.3348/jksr.2021.0104</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7137-9968</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0263-0941</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4327-8777</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3980-8624</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3268-3091</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7617-7302</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1738-2637
ispartof Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, 2022-11, Vol.83 (6), p.1342-1353
issn 1738-2637
2951-0805
2951-0805
2288-2928
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9748459
source PubMed (Medline); Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects Genitourinary Imaging
title Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality between the 2nd Generation and 3rd Generation Dual-Source Single-Energy and Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT of the Abdomen
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A21%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Radiation%20Dose%20and%20Image%20Quality%20between%20the%202nd%20Generation%20and%203rd%20Generation%20Dual-Source%20Single-Energy%20and%20Dual-Source%20Dual-Energy%20CT%20of%20the%20Abdomen&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Korean%20Society%20of%20Radiology&rft.au=Kim,%20Chang%20Gun&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1342&rft.epage=1353&rft.pages=1342-1353&rft.issn=1738-2637&rft.eissn=2951-0805&rft_id=info:doi/10.3348/jksr.2021.0104&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2757162236%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1904-dfb5922815214944b5327524d483c5f3cd4d9de0621c2b57f4eeae154356e5e93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2757162236&rft_id=info:pmid/36545414&rfr_iscdi=true