Loading…
Systematic comparison of machine learning algorithms to develop and validate predictive models for periodontitis
Aim The aim of this study was to compare the validity of different machine learning algorithms to develop and validate predictive models for periodontitis. Materials and Methods Using national survey data from Taiwan (n = 3453) and the United States (n = 3685), predictors of periodontitis were extra...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of clinical periodontology 2022-10, Vol.49 (10), p.958-969 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-18b501b0d259f8deb2e7bd3c65c77f7e6a0b7bef923aee576eba88c524f1f9213 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-18b501b0d259f8deb2e7bd3c65c77f7e6a0b7bef923aee576eba88c524f1f9213 |
container_end_page | 969 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 958 |
container_title | Journal of clinical periodontology |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Bashir, Nasir Z. Rahman, Zahid Chen, Sam Li‐Sheng |
description | Aim
The aim of this study was to compare the validity of different machine learning algorithms to develop and validate predictive models for periodontitis.
Materials and Methods
Using national survey data from Taiwan (n = 3453) and the United States (n = 3685), predictors of periodontitis were extracted from the datasets and pre‐processed, and then 10 machine learning algorithms were trained to develop predictive models. The models were validated both internally (bootstrap sampling) and externally (alternative country's dataset). The algorithms were compared across six performance metrics ([i] area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic [AUC], [ii] accuracy, [iii] sensitivity, [iv] specificity, [v] positive predictive value, and [vi] negative predictive value) and two methods of data pre‐processing ([i] machine‐learning‐based feature selection and [ii] dimensionality reduction into principal components).
Results
Many algorithms showed extremely strong performance during internal validation (AUC > 0.95, accuracy > 95%). However, this was not replicated in external validation, where predictive performance of all algorithms dropped off drastically. Furthermore, predictive performance differed according to data pre‐processing methodology and the cohort on which they were trained.
Conclusions
Larger sample sizes and more complex predictors of periodontitis are required before machine learning can be leveraged to its full potential. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jcpe.13692 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9796669</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2685033618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-18b501b0d259f8deb2e7bd3c65c77f7e6a0b7bef923aee576eba88c524f1f9213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2KFDEUhYMoTju68QEk4EaEGvNTSao2wtCMfwwoqOAupJJb3WlSSZmkW_rtrbHHQV2YTSD5-Dj3HoSeUnJBl_NqZ2e4oFz27B5aUUlIQwT9dh-tCCe8kb3qz9CjUnaEUMU5f4jOuFAdVYyt0Pz5WCpMpnqLbZpmk31JEacRT8ZufQQcwOTo4wabsEnZ1-1UcE3YwQFCmrGJDh9M8M5UwHMG5231B8BTchAKHlPGM2SfXIrVV18eowejCQWe3N7n6Oubqy_rd831x7fv15fXjW3bjjW0GwShA3FM9GPnYGCgBsetFFapUYE0ZFADjD3jBkAoCYPpOitYO9LlkfJz9PrknffDBM5CrNkEPWc_mXzUyXj990_0W71JB72sS0rZL4IXt4Kcvu-hVD35YiEEEyHti2ayE4RzSbsFff4Pukv7HJfxNFNUyK5thVqolyfK5lRKhvEuDCX6pkh9U6T-VeQCP_sz_h36u7kFoCfghw9w_I9Kf1h_ujpJfwIjWayL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2715684457</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic comparison of machine learning algorithms to develop and validate predictive models for periodontitis</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Bashir, Nasir Z. ; Rahman, Zahid ; Chen, Sam Li‐Sheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Bashir, Nasir Z. ; Rahman, Zahid ; Chen, Sam Li‐Sheng</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
The aim of this study was to compare the validity of different machine learning algorithms to develop and validate predictive models for periodontitis.
Materials and Methods
Using national survey data from Taiwan (n = 3453) and the United States (n = 3685), predictors of periodontitis were extracted from the datasets and pre‐processed, and then 10 machine learning algorithms were trained to develop predictive models. The models were validated both internally (bootstrap sampling) and externally (alternative country's dataset). The algorithms were compared across six performance metrics ([i] area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic [AUC], [ii] accuracy, [iii] sensitivity, [iv] specificity, [v] positive predictive value, and [vi] negative predictive value) and two methods of data pre‐processing ([i] machine‐learning‐based feature selection and [ii] dimensionality reduction into principal components).
Results
Many algorithms showed extremely strong performance during internal validation (AUC > 0.95, accuracy > 95%). However, this was not replicated in external validation, where predictive performance of all algorithms dropped off drastically. Furthermore, predictive performance differed according to data pre‐processing methodology and the cohort on which they were trained.
Conclusions
Larger sample sizes and more complex predictors of periodontitis are required before machine learning can be leveraged to its full potential.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-6979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-051X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13692</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35781722</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; computing ; Diagnosis, Epidemiology and Associated Co‐morbidities ; Gum disease ; Humans ; Learning algorithms ; Machine Learning ; Original ; Periodontitis ; Periodontitis - diagnosis ; Prediction models ; predictive modelling ; Predictive Value of Tests ; ROC Curve ; statistics</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical periodontology, 2022-10, Vol.49 (10), p.958-969</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Periodontology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-18b501b0d259f8deb2e7bd3c65c77f7e6a0b7bef923aee576eba88c524f1f9213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-18b501b0d259f8deb2e7bd3c65c77f7e6a0b7bef923aee576eba88c524f1f9213</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7416-7610 ; 0000-0001-9750-3015</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35781722$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bashir, Nasir Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Zahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Sam Li‐Sheng</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic comparison of machine learning algorithms to develop and validate predictive models for periodontitis</title><title>Journal of clinical periodontology</title><addtitle>J Clin Periodontol</addtitle><description>Aim
The aim of this study was to compare the validity of different machine learning algorithms to develop and validate predictive models for periodontitis.
Materials and Methods
Using national survey data from Taiwan (n = 3453) and the United States (n = 3685), predictors of periodontitis were extracted from the datasets and pre‐processed, and then 10 machine learning algorithms were trained to develop predictive models. The models were validated both internally (bootstrap sampling) and externally (alternative country's dataset). The algorithms were compared across six performance metrics ([i] area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic [AUC], [ii] accuracy, [iii] sensitivity, [iv] specificity, [v] positive predictive value, and [vi] negative predictive value) and two methods of data pre‐processing ([i] machine‐learning‐based feature selection and [ii] dimensionality reduction into principal components).
Results
Many algorithms showed extremely strong performance during internal validation (AUC > 0.95, accuracy > 95%). However, this was not replicated in external validation, where predictive performance of all algorithms dropped off drastically. Furthermore, predictive performance differed according to data pre‐processing methodology and the cohort on which they were trained.
Conclusions
Larger sample sizes and more complex predictors of periodontitis are required before machine learning can be leveraged to its full potential.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>computing</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Epidemiology and Associated Co‐morbidities</subject><subject>Gum disease</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Periodontitis</subject><subject>Periodontitis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>predictive modelling</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>statistics</subject><issn>0303-6979</issn><issn>1600-051X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2KFDEUhYMoTju68QEk4EaEGvNTSao2wtCMfwwoqOAupJJb3WlSSZmkW_rtrbHHQV2YTSD5-Dj3HoSeUnJBl_NqZ2e4oFz27B5aUUlIQwT9dh-tCCe8kb3qz9CjUnaEUMU5f4jOuFAdVYyt0Pz5WCpMpnqLbZpmk31JEacRT8ZufQQcwOTo4wabsEnZ1-1UcE3YwQFCmrGJDh9M8M5UwHMG5231B8BTchAKHlPGM2SfXIrVV18eowejCQWe3N7n6Oubqy_rd831x7fv15fXjW3bjjW0GwShA3FM9GPnYGCgBsetFFapUYE0ZFADjD3jBkAoCYPpOitYO9LlkfJz9PrknffDBM5CrNkEPWc_mXzUyXj990_0W71JB72sS0rZL4IXt4Kcvu-hVD35YiEEEyHti2ayE4RzSbsFff4Pukv7HJfxNFNUyK5thVqolyfK5lRKhvEuDCX6pkh9U6T-VeQCP_sz_h36u7kFoCfghw9w_I9Kf1h_ujpJfwIjWayL</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Bashir, Nasir Z.</creator><creator>Rahman, Zahid</creator><creator>Chen, Sam Li‐Sheng</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7416-7610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9750-3015</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Systematic comparison of machine learning algorithms to develop and validate predictive models for periodontitis</title><author>Bashir, Nasir Z. ; Rahman, Zahid ; Chen, Sam Li‐Sheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-18b501b0d259f8deb2e7bd3c65c77f7e6a0b7bef923aee576eba88c524f1f9213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>computing</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Epidemiology and Associated Co‐morbidities</topic><topic>Gum disease</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Periodontitis</topic><topic>Periodontitis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>predictive modelling</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>statistics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bashir, Nasir Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Zahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Sam Li‐Sheng</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley_OA刊</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical periodontology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bashir, Nasir Z.</au><au>Rahman, Zahid</au><au>Chen, Sam Li‐Sheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic comparison of machine learning algorithms to develop and validate predictive models for periodontitis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical periodontology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Periodontol</addtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>958</spage><epage>969</epage><pages>958-969</pages><issn>0303-6979</issn><eissn>1600-051X</eissn><abstract>Aim
The aim of this study was to compare the validity of different machine learning algorithms to develop and validate predictive models for periodontitis.
Materials and Methods
Using national survey data from Taiwan (n = 3453) and the United States (n = 3685), predictors of periodontitis were extracted from the datasets and pre‐processed, and then 10 machine learning algorithms were trained to develop predictive models. The models were validated both internally (bootstrap sampling) and externally (alternative country's dataset). The algorithms were compared across six performance metrics ([i] area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic [AUC], [ii] accuracy, [iii] sensitivity, [iv] specificity, [v] positive predictive value, and [vi] negative predictive value) and two methods of data pre‐processing ([i] machine‐learning‐based feature selection and [ii] dimensionality reduction into principal components).
Results
Many algorithms showed extremely strong performance during internal validation (AUC > 0.95, accuracy > 95%). However, this was not replicated in external validation, where predictive performance of all algorithms dropped off drastically. Furthermore, predictive performance differed according to data pre‐processing methodology and the cohort on which they were trained.
Conclusions
Larger sample sizes and more complex predictors of periodontitis are required before machine learning can be leveraged to its full potential.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>35781722</pmid><doi>10.1111/jcpe.13692</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7416-7610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9750-3015</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0303-6979 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical periodontology, 2022-10, Vol.49 (10), p.958-969 |
issn | 0303-6979 1600-051X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9796669 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Algorithms computing Diagnosis, Epidemiology and Associated Co‐morbidities Gum disease Humans Learning algorithms Machine Learning Original Periodontitis Periodontitis - diagnosis Prediction models predictive modelling Predictive Value of Tests ROC Curve statistics |
title | Systematic comparison of machine learning algorithms to develop and validate predictive models for periodontitis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A55%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20comparison%20of%20machine%20learning%20algorithms%20to%20develop%20and%20validate%20predictive%20models%20for%20periodontitis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20periodontology&rft.au=Bashir,%20Nasir%20Z.&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=958&rft.epage=969&rft.pages=958-969&rft.issn=0303-6979&rft.eissn=1600-051X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jcpe.13692&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2685033618%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-18b501b0d259f8deb2e7bd3c65c77f7e6a0b7bef923aee576eba88c524f1f9213%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2715684457&rft_id=info:pmid/35781722&rfr_iscdi=true |