Loading…
Socioeconomic Status, Race/Ethnicity, and Unexpected Variation in Dementia Classification in Longitudinal Survey Data
As dementia affects a growing number of older adults, it is important to understand its detection and progression. We identified patterns in dementia classification over time using a longitudinal, nationally representative sample of older adults. We examined the relationship between socioeconomic st...
Saved in:
Published in: | The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2022-12, Vol.77 (12), p.e234-e246 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-33c177a2575dc15658134444fa086b8cb1f7b73a92558221a19b9d88c64491133 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-33c177a2575dc15658134444fa086b8cb1f7b73a92558221a19b9d88c64491133 |
container_end_page | e246 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e234 |
container_title | The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Luth, Elizabeth A Prigerson, Holly G |
description | As dementia affects a growing number of older adults, it is important to understand its detection and progression. We identified patterns in dementia classification over time using a longitudinal, nationally representative sample of older adults. We examined the relationship between socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity, and patterns in dementia classification.
Data for 7,218 Medicare beneficiaries from the 2011-2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) were classified into five categories: consistently no dementia, consistently cognitive impairment, "typical" dementia progression, "expected" variation, and "unexpected" variation. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression assessed relative risk of dementia classification by sociodemographic and health factors.
Among NHATS respondents, 59.5% consistently were recorded as having no dementia, 7% consistently cognitively impaired, 13% as having typical progression, 15% as having expected variation, and 5.5% as having unexpected variation. In multivariable models, compared with consistent dementia classification, less education, Medicare-Medicaid-dual enrollment, and identifying as non-Hispanic Black were associated with increased likelihood of unexpected variation (e.g., non-Hispanic Black adjusted risk ratio: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.61-2.78, p < .0001).
A significant minority of individuals have unexpected patterns of dementia classification over time, particularly individuals with low socioeconomic status and identifying as non-Hispanic Black. Dementia classification uncertainty may make it challenging to activate resources (e.g., health care, caregiving) for effective disease management, underscoring the need to support persons from at-risk groups and to carefully evaluate cognitive assessment tools to ensure they are equally reliable across groups to avoid magnifying disparities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/geronb/gbac128 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9799200</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2709020193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-33c177a2575dc15658134444fa086b8cb1f7b73a92558221a19b9d88c64491133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1r3DAUFKWh-WivOQYde4izkmVZ0qVQNp-wEMg2vYpnWd6o2NJWkkP238dhN0syl_dg5s08GIROKbmgRLHZysbgm9mqAUNL-QUdUcFlwVktv047EarghFaH6Dilf2QCFdU3dMhqUkleyyM0LoNxwZrgw-AMXmbIYzrHD2Ds7Co_eWdc3pxj8C1-9PZlbU22Lf4L0UF2wWPn8aUdrM8O8LyHlFznzJ5aBL9yeWydhx4vx_hsN_gSMnxHBx30yf7YzRP0eH31Z35bLO5v7ua_F4VhiuSCMUOFgJIL3hrKay4pqyZ0QGTdSNPQTjSCgSo5l2VJgapGtVKauqoUpYydoF9b3_XYDLY1058Rer2OboC40QGc_sx496RX4VkroVRJyGTwc2cQw__RpqwHl4zte_A2jEmXgihSEqresi62UhNDStF2-xhK9FtXetuV3nU1HZx9fG4vfy-HvQKaypO9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2709020193</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Socioeconomic Status, Race/Ethnicity, and Unexpected Variation in Dementia Classification in Longitudinal Survey Data</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Luth, Elizabeth A ; Prigerson, Holly G</creator><contributor>Kelley, Jessica</contributor><creatorcontrib>Luth, Elizabeth A ; Prigerson, Holly G ; Kelley, Jessica</creatorcontrib><description>As dementia affects a growing number of older adults, it is important to understand its detection and progression. We identified patterns in dementia classification over time using a longitudinal, nationally representative sample of older adults. We examined the relationship between socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity, and patterns in dementia classification.
Data for 7,218 Medicare beneficiaries from the 2011-2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) were classified into five categories: consistently no dementia, consistently cognitive impairment, "typical" dementia progression, "expected" variation, and "unexpected" variation. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression assessed relative risk of dementia classification by sociodemographic and health factors.
Among NHATS respondents, 59.5% consistently were recorded as having no dementia, 7% consistently cognitively impaired, 13% as having typical progression, 15% as having expected variation, and 5.5% as having unexpected variation. In multivariable models, compared with consistent dementia classification, less education, Medicare-Medicaid-dual enrollment, and identifying as non-Hispanic Black were associated with increased likelihood of unexpected variation (e.g., non-Hispanic Black adjusted risk ratio: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.61-2.78, p < .0001).
A significant minority of individuals have unexpected patterns of dementia classification over time, particularly individuals with low socioeconomic status and identifying as non-Hispanic Black. Dementia classification uncertainty may make it challenging to activate resources (e.g., health care, caregiving) for effective disease management, underscoring the need to support persons from at-risk groups and to carefully evaluate cognitive assessment tools to ensure they are equally reliable across groups to avoid magnifying disparities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1079-5014</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5368</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5368</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbac128</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36048568</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Ethnicity ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Medicare ; Minority Groups ; Social Class ; THE JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY: Social Sciences ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2022-12, Vol.77 (12), p.e234-e246</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-33c177a2575dc15658134444fa086b8cb1f7b73a92558221a19b9d88c64491133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-33c177a2575dc15658134444fa086b8cb1f7b73a92558221a19b9d88c64491133</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1496-1235</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36048568$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kelley, Jessica</contributor><creatorcontrib>Luth, Elizabeth A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prigerson, Holly G</creatorcontrib><title>Socioeconomic Status, Race/Ethnicity, and Unexpected Variation in Dementia Classification in Longitudinal Survey Data</title><title>The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences</title><addtitle>J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci</addtitle><description>As dementia affects a growing number of older adults, it is important to understand its detection and progression. We identified patterns in dementia classification over time using a longitudinal, nationally representative sample of older adults. We examined the relationship between socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity, and patterns in dementia classification.
Data for 7,218 Medicare beneficiaries from the 2011-2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) were classified into five categories: consistently no dementia, consistently cognitive impairment, "typical" dementia progression, "expected" variation, and "unexpected" variation. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression assessed relative risk of dementia classification by sociodemographic and health factors.
Among NHATS respondents, 59.5% consistently were recorded as having no dementia, 7% consistently cognitively impaired, 13% as having typical progression, 15% as having expected variation, and 5.5% as having unexpected variation. In multivariable models, compared with consistent dementia classification, less education, Medicare-Medicaid-dual enrollment, and identifying as non-Hispanic Black were associated with increased likelihood of unexpected variation (e.g., non-Hispanic Black adjusted risk ratio: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.61-2.78, p < .0001).
A significant minority of individuals have unexpected patterns of dementia classification over time, particularly individuals with low socioeconomic status and identifying as non-Hispanic Black. Dementia classification uncertainty may make it challenging to activate resources (e.g., health care, caregiving) for effective disease management, underscoring the need to support persons from at-risk groups and to carefully evaluate cognitive assessment tools to ensure they are equally reliable across groups to avoid magnifying disparities.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Minority Groups</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>THE JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY: Social Sciences</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>1079-5014</issn><issn>1758-5368</issn><issn>1758-5368</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1r3DAUFKWh-WivOQYde4izkmVZ0qVQNp-wEMg2vYpnWd6o2NJWkkP238dhN0syl_dg5s08GIROKbmgRLHZysbgm9mqAUNL-QUdUcFlwVktv047EarghFaH6Dilf2QCFdU3dMhqUkleyyM0LoNxwZrgw-AMXmbIYzrHD2Ds7Co_eWdc3pxj8C1-9PZlbU22Lf4L0UF2wWPn8aUdrM8O8LyHlFznzJ5aBL9yeWydhx4vx_hsN_gSMnxHBx30yf7YzRP0eH31Z35bLO5v7ua_F4VhiuSCMUOFgJIL3hrKay4pqyZ0QGTdSNPQTjSCgSo5l2VJgapGtVKauqoUpYydoF9b3_XYDLY1058Rer2OboC40QGc_sx496RX4VkroVRJyGTwc2cQw__RpqwHl4zte_A2jEmXgihSEqresi62UhNDStF2-xhK9FtXetuV3nU1HZx9fG4vfy-HvQKaypO9</recordid><startdate>20221229</startdate><enddate>20221229</enddate><creator>Luth, Elizabeth A</creator><creator>Prigerson, Holly G</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1496-1235</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221229</creationdate><title>Socioeconomic Status, Race/Ethnicity, and Unexpected Variation in Dementia Classification in Longitudinal Survey Data</title><author>Luth, Elizabeth A ; Prigerson, Holly G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-33c177a2575dc15658134444fa086b8cb1f7b73a92558221a19b9d88c64491133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Minority Groups</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>THE JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY: Social Sciences</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luth, Elizabeth A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prigerson, Holly G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luth, Elizabeth A</au><au>Prigerson, Holly G</au><au>Kelley, Jessica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Socioeconomic Status, Race/Ethnicity, and Unexpected Variation in Dementia Classification in Longitudinal Survey Data</atitle><jtitle>The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci</addtitle><date>2022-12-29</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e234</spage><epage>e246</epage><pages>e234-e246</pages><issn>1079-5014</issn><issn>1758-5368</issn><eissn>1758-5368</eissn><abstract>As dementia affects a growing number of older adults, it is important to understand its detection and progression. We identified patterns in dementia classification over time using a longitudinal, nationally representative sample of older adults. We examined the relationship between socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity, and patterns in dementia classification.
Data for 7,218 Medicare beneficiaries from the 2011-2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) were classified into five categories: consistently no dementia, consistently cognitive impairment, "typical" dementia progression, "expected" variation, and "unexpected" variation. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression assessed relative risk of dementia classification by sociodemographic and health factors.
Among NHATS respondents, 59.5% consistently were recorded as having no dementia, 7% consistently cognitively impaired, 13% as having typical progression, 15% as having expected variation, and 5.5% as having unexpected variation. In multivariable models, compared with consistent dementia classification, less education, Medicare-Medicaid-dual enrollment, and identifying as non-Hispanic Black were associated with increased likelihood of unexpected variation (e.g., non-Hispanic Black adjusted risk ratio: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.61-2.78, p < .0001).
A significant minority of individuals have unexpected patterns of dementia classification over time, particularly individuals with low socioeconomic status and identifying as non-Hispanic Black. Dementia classification uncertainty may make it challenging to activate resources (e.g., health care, caregiving) for effective disease management, underscoring the need to support persons from at-risk groups and to carefully evaluate cognitive assessment tools to ensure they are equally reliable across groups to avoid magnifying disparities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>36048568</pmid><doi>10.1093/geronb/gbac128</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1496-1235</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1079-5014 |
ispartof | The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2022-12, Vol.77 (12), p.e234-e246 |
issn | 1079-5014 1758-5368 1758-5368 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9799200 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Aged Ethnicity Humans Longitudinal Studies Medicare Minority Groups Social Class THE JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY: Social Sciences United States - epidemiology |
title | Socioeconomic Status, Race/Ethnicity, and Unexpected Variation in Dementia Classification in Longitudinal Survey Data |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A24%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Socioeconomic%20Status,%20Race/Ethnicity,%20and%20Unexpected%20Variation%20in%20Dementia%20Classification%20in%20Longitudinal%20Survey%20Data&rft.jtitle=The%20journals%20of%20gerontology.%20Series%20B,%20Psychological%20sciences%20and%20social%20sciences&rft.au=Luth,%20Elizabeth%20A&rft.date=2022-12-29&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e234&rft.epage=e246&rft.pages=e234-e246&rft.issn=1079-5014&rft.eissn=1758-5368&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbac128&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2709020193%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-33c177a2575dc15658134444fa086b8cb1f7b73a92558221a19b9d88c64491133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2709020193&rft_id=info:pmid/36048568&rfr_iscdi=true |