Loading…

Socioeconomic Status, Race/Ethnicity, and Unexpected Variation in Dementia Classification in Longitudinal Survey Data

As dementia affects a growing number of older adults, it is important to understand its detection and progression. We identified patterns in dementia classification over time using a longitudinal, nationally representative sample of older adults. We examined the relationship between socioeconomic st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2022-12, Vol.77 (12), p.e234-e246
Main Authors: Luth, Elizabeth A, Prigerson, Holly G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-33c177a2575dc15658134444fa086b8cb1f7b73a92558221a19b9d88c64491133
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-33c177a2575dc15658134444fa086b8cb1f7b73a92558221a19b9d88c64491133
container_end_page e246
container_issue 12
container_start_page e234
container_title The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences
container_volume 77
creator Luth, Elizabeth A
Prigerson, Holly G
description As dementia affects a growing number of older adults, it is important to understand its detection and progression. We identified patterns in dementia classification over time using a longitudinal, nationally representative sample of older adults. We examined the relationship between socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity, and patterns in dementia classification. Data for 7,218 Medicare beneficiaries from the 2011-2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) were classified into five categories: consistently no dementia, consistently cognitive impairment, "typical" dementia progression, "expected" variation, and "unexpected" variation. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression assessed relative risk of dementia classification by sociodemographic and health factors. Among NHATS respondents, 59.5% consistently were recorded as having no dementia, 7% consistently cognitively impaired, 13% as having typical progression, 15% as having expected variation, and 5.5% as having unexpected variation. In multivariable models, compared with consistent dementia classification, less education, Medicare-Medicaid-dual enrollment, and identifying as non-Hispanic Black were associated with increased likelihood of unexpected variation (e.g., non-Hispanic Black adjusted risk ratio: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.61-2.78, p < .0001). A significant minority of individuals have unexpected patterns of dementia classification over time, particularly individuals with low socioeconomic status and identifying as non-Hispanic Black. Dementia classification uncertainty may make it challenging to activate resources (e.g., health care, caregiving) for effective disease management, underscoring the need to support persons from at-risk groups and to carefully evaluate cognitive assessment tools to ensure they are equally reliable across groups to avoid magnifying disparities.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/geronb/gbac128
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9799200</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2709020193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-33c177a2575dc15658134444fa086b8cb1f7b73a92558221a19b9d88c64491133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1r3DAUFKWh-WivOQYde4izkmVZ0qVQNp-wEMg2vYpnWd6o2NJWkkP238dhN0syl_dg5s08GIROKbmgRLHZysbgm9mqAUNL-QUdUcFlwVktv047EarghFaH6Dilf2QCFdU3dMhqUkleyyM0LoNxwZrgw-AMXmbIYzrHD2Ds7Co_eWdc3pxj8C1-9PZlbU22Lf4L0UF2wWPn8aUdrM8O8LyHlFznzJ5aBL9yeWydhx4vx_hsN_gSMnxHBx30yf7YzRP0eH31Z35bLO5v7ua_F4VhiuSCMUOFgJIL3hrKay4pqyZ0QGTdSNPQTjSCgSo5l2VJgapGtVKauqoUpYydoF9b3_XYDLY1058Rer2OboC40QGc_sx496RX4VkroVRJyGTwc2cQw__RpqwHl4zte_A2jEmXgihSEqresi62UhNDStF2-xhK9FtXetuV3nU1HZx9fG4vfy-HvQKaypO9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2709020193</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Socioeconomic Status, Race/Ethnicity, and Unexpected Variation in Dementia Classification in Longitudinal Survey Data</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Luth, Elizabeth A ; Prigerson, Holly G</creator><contributor>Kelley, Jessica</contributor><creatorcontrib>Luth, Elizabeth A ; Prigerson, Holly G ; Kelley, Jessica</creatorcontrib><description>As dementia affects a growing number of older adults, it is important to understand its detection and progression. We identified patterns in dementia classification over time using a longitudinal, nationally representative sample of older adults. We examined the relationship between socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity, and patterns in dementia classification. Data for 7,218 Medicare beneficiaries from the 2011-2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) were classified into five categories: consistently no dementia, consistently cognitive impairment, "typical" dementia progression, "expected" variation, and "unexpected" variation. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression assessed relative risk of dementia classification by sociodemographic and health factors. Among NHATS respondents, 59.5% consistently were recorded as having no dementia, 7% consistently cognitively impaired, 13% as having typical progression, 15% as having expected variation, and 5.5% as having unexpected variation. In multivariable models, compared with consistent dementia classification, less education, Medicare-Medicaid-dual enrollment, and identifying as non-Hispanic Black were associated with increased likelihood of unexpected variation (e.g., non-Hispanic Black adjusted risk ratio: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.61-2.78, p &lt; .0001). A significant minority of individuals have unexpected patterns of dementia classification over time, particularly individuals with low socioeconomic status and identifying as non-Hispanic Black. Dementia classification uncertainty may make it challenging to activate resources (e.g., health care, caregiving) for effective disease management, underscoring the need to support persons from at-risk groups and to carefully evaluate cognitive assessment tools to ensure they are equally reliable across groups to avoid magnifying disparities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1079-5014</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5368</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5368</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbac128</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36048568</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Ethnicity ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Medicare ; Minority Groups ; Social Class ; THE JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY: Social Sciences ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2022-12, Vol.77 (12), p.e234-e246</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-33c177a2575dc15658134444fa086b8cb1f7b73a92558221a19b9d88c64491133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-33c177a2575dc15658134444fa086b8cb1f7b73a92558221a19b9d88c64491133</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1496-1235</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36048568$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kelley, Jessica</contributor><creatorcontrib>Luth, Elizabeth A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prigerson, Holly G</creatorcontrib><title>Socioeconomic Status, Race/Ethnicity, and Unexpected Variation in Dementia Classification in Longitudinal Survey Data</title><title>The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences</title><addtitle>J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci</addtitle><description>As dementia affects a growing number of older adults, it is important to understand its detection and progression. We identified patterns in dementia classification over time using a longitudinal, nationally representative sample of older adults. We examined the relationship between socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity, and patterns in dementia classification. Data for 7,218 Medicare beneficiaries from the 2011-2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) were classified into five categories: consistently no dementia, consistently cognitive impairment, "typical" dementia progression, "expected" variation, and "unexpected" variation. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression assessed relative risk of dementia classification by sociodemographic and health factors. Among NHATS respondents, 59.5% consistently were recorded as having no dementia, 7% consistently cognitively impaired, 13% as having typical progression, 15% as having expected variation, and 5.5% as having unexpected variation. In multivariable models, compared with consistent dementia classification, less education, Medicare-Medicaid-dual enrollment, and identifying as non-Hispanic Black were associated with increased likelihood of unexpected variation (e.g., non-Hispanic Black adjusted risk ratio: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.61-2.78, p &lt; .0001). A significant minority of individuals have unexpected patterns of dementia classification over time, particularly individuals with low socioeconomic status and identifying as non-Hispanic Black. Dementia classification uncertainty may make it challenging to activate resources (e.g., health care, caregiving) for effective disease management, underscoring the need to support persons from at-risk groups and to carefully evaluate cognitive assessment tools to ensure they are equally reliable across groups to avoid magnifying disparities.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Minority Groups</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>THE JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY: Social Sciences</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>1079-5014</issn><issn>1758-5368</issn><issn>1758-5368</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1r3DAUFKWh-WivOQYde4izkmVZ0qVQNp-wEMg2vYpnWd6o2NJWkkP238dhN0syl_dg5s08GIROKbmgRLHZysbgm9mqAUNL-QUdUcFlwVktv047EarghFaH6Dilf2QCFdU3dMhqUkleyyM0LoNxwZrgw-AMXmbIYzrHD2Ds7Co_eWdc3pxj8C1-9PZlbU22Lf4L0UF2wWPn8aUdrM8O8LyHlFznzJ5aBL9yeWydhx4vx_hsN_gSMnxHBx30yf7YzRP0eH31Z35bLO5v7ua_F4VhiuSCMUOFgJIL3hrKay4pqyZ0QGTdSNPQTjSCgSo5l2VJgapGtVKauqoUpYydoF9b3_XYDLY1058Rer2OboC40QGc_sx496RX4VkroVRJyGTwc2cQw__RpqwHl4zte_A2jEmXgihSEqresi62UhNDStF2-xhK9FtXetuV3nU1HZx9fG4vfy-HvQKaypO9</recordid><startdate>20221229</startdate><enddate>20221229</enddate><creator>Luth, Elizabeth A</creator><creator>Prigerson, Holly G</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1496-1235</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221229</creationdate><title>Socioeconomic Status, Race/Ethnicity, and Unexpected Variation in Dementia Classification in Longitudinal Survey Data</title><author>Luth, Elizabeth A ; Prigerson, Holly G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-33c177a2575dc15658134444fa086b8cb1f7b73a92558221a19b9d88c64491133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Minority Groups</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>THE JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY: Social Sciences</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luth, Elizabeth A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prigerson, Holly G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luth, Elizabeth A</au><au>Prigerson, Holly G</au><au>Kelley, Jessica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Socioeconomic Status, Race/Ethnicity, and Unexpected Variation in Dementia Classification in Longitudinal Survey Data</atitle><jtitle>The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci</addtitle><date>2022-12-29</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e234</spage><epage>e246</epage><pages>e234-e246</pages><issn>1079-5014</issn><issn>1758-5368</issn><eissn>1758-5368</eissn><abstract>As dementia affects a growing number of older adults, it is important to understand its detection and progression. We identified patterns in dementia classification over time using a longitudinal, nationally representative sample of older adults. We examined the relationship between socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity, and patterns in dementia classification. Data for 7,218 Medicare beneficiaries from the 2011-2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) were classified into five categories: consistently no dementia, consistently cognitive impairment, "typical" dementia progression, "expected" variation, and "unexpected" variation. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression assessed relative risk of dementia classification by sociodemographic and health factors. Among NHATS respondents, 59.5% consistently were recorded as having no dementia, 7% consistently cognitively impaired, 13% as having typical progression, 15% as having expected variation, and 5.5% as having unexpected variation. In multivariable models, compared with consistent dementia classification, less education, Medicare-Medicaid-dual enrollment, and identifying as non-Hispanic Black were associated with increased likelihood of unexpected variation (e.g., non-Hispanic Black adjusted risk ratio: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.61-2.78, p &lt; .0001). A significant minority of individuals have unexpected patterns of dementia classification over time, particularly individuals with low socioeconomic status and identifying as non-Hispanic Black. Dementia classification uncertainty may make it challenging to activate resources (e.g., health care, caregiving) for effective disease management, underscoring the need to support persons from at-risk groups and to carefully evaluate cognitive assessment tools to ensure they are equally reliable across groups to avoid magnifying disparities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>36048568</pmid><doi>10.1093/geronb/gbac128</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1496-1235</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1079-5014
ispartof The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2022-12, Vol.77 (12), p.e234-e246
issn 1079-5014
1758-5368
1758-5368
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9799200
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Aged
Ethnicity
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Medicare
Minority Groups
Social Class
THE JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY: Social Sciences
United States - epidemiology
title Socioeconomic Status, Race/Ethnicity, and Unexpected Variation in Dementia Classification in Longitudinal Survey Data
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A24%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Socioeconomic%20Status,%20Race/Ethnicity,%20and%20Unexpected%20Variation%20in%20Dementia%20Classification%20in%20Longitudinal%20Survey%20Data&rft.jtitle=The%20journals%20of%20gerontology.%20Series%20B,%20Psychological%20sciences%20and%20social%20sciences&rft.au=Luth,%20Elizabeth%20A&rft.date=2022-12-29&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e234&rft.epage=e246&rft.pages=e234-e246&rft.issn=1079-5014&rft.eissn=1758-5368&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbac128&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2709020193%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-33c177a2575dc15658134444fa086b8cb1f7b73a92558221a19b9d88c64491133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2709020193&rft_id=info:pmid/36048568&rfr_iscdi=true