Loading…

Overnight joint replacement surgery: a pilot Australian study

Background With a stretched healthcare system and elective surgery backlog, measures to improve efficiency and decrease costs associated with surgical procedures need to be prioritized. This study compares the benefits of multi‐disciplinary involvement in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:ANZ journal of surgery 2022-10, Vol.92 (10), p.2683-2687
Main Authors: Qurashi, Sol, Chinnappa, Jason, Aktas, Sam, Dabboussi, Abdul Majid, Rahman, Md Bayzidur
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4437-d7dd9eeb24df9ce0408f9cdde42dd41380c48ede9d2f4ab3c5af5920a6a6df9e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4437-d7dd9eeb24df9ce0408f9cdde42dd41380c48ede9d2f4ab3c5af5920a6a6df9e3
container_end_page 2687
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2683
container_title ANZ journal of surgery
container_volume 92
creator Qurashi, Sol
Chinnappa, Jason
Aktas, Sam
Dabboussi, Abdul Majid
Rahman, Md Bayzidur
description Background With a stretched healthcare system and elective surgery backlog, measures to improve efficiency and decrease costs associated with surgical procedures need to be prioritized. This study compares the benefits of multi‐disciplinary involvement in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol‐led overnight model following total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR). Methods Patients in each of two private hospitals undergoing THR or TKR were prospectively enrolled. One hospital (Overnight) was fully committed to the ERAS protocol implementation on all levels and formed the treatment group while in the other hospital (control), patients only had the anaesthetic and operative procedure as part of the ERAS protocol but did not follow the perioperative measures of the protocol. Outcomes on hospital length of stay (LOS), inpatient rehabilitation, functional outcomes, satisfaction, adverse events and readmission rates were investigated. Results Median LOS in the Overnight group was significantly smaller than in the control group (1 vs. 3 days, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ans.17977
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9804704</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2723661462</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4437-d7dd9eeb24df9ce0408f9cdde42dd41380c48ede9d2f4ab3c5af5920a6a6df9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LAzEQhoMotlYP_gFZ8KKH2nztZiMolOIXFHtQzyHdzLYp292a7Fb6701tLSqYOczAPHl5hxehU4KvSHg9XforIqQQe6hNOI-7lEixv50JZ6yFjryfYUySRMaHqMUSSkmoNroZLcGVdjKto1llyzpysCh0BnMIs2_cBNzqOtLRwhZVHfUbXztdWF1Gvm7M6hgd5LrwcLLtHfR2f_c6eOwORw9Pg_6wm3HORNcIYyTAmHKTywwwx2noxgCnxnDCUpzxFAxIQ3OuxyyLdR5LinWik_ADWAfdbnQXzXgOJgvmgg21cHau3UpV2qrfm9JO1aRaKpliLjAPAhdbAVe9N-BrNbc-g6LQJVSNV1RQTplMYxHQ8z_orGpcGc5bUyxJCE9ooC43VOYq7x3kOzMEq3UoKoSivkIJ7NlP9zvyO4UA9DbAhy1g9b-S6j-_bCQ_Ab_rmCM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2723661462</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Overnight joint replacement surgery: a pilot Australian study</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Qurashi, Sol ; Chinnappa, Jason ; Aktas, Sam ; Dabboussi, Abdul Majid ; Rahman, Md Bayzidur</creator><creatorcontrib>Qurashi, Sol ; Chinnappa, Jason ; Aktas, Sam ; Dabboussi, Abdul Majid ; Rahman, Md Bayzidur</creatorcontrib><description>Background With a stretched healthcare system and elective surgery backlog, measures to improve efficiency and decrease costs associated with surgical procedures need to be prioritized. This study compares the benefits of multi‐disciplinary involvement in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol‐led overnight model following total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR). Methods Patients in each of two private hospitals undergoing THR or TKR were prospectively enrolled. One hospital (Overnight) was fully committed to the ERAS protocol implementation on all levels and formed the treatment group while in the other hospital (control), patients only had the anaesthetic and operative procedure as part of the ERAS protocol but did not follow the perioperative measures of the protocol. Outcomes on hospital length of stay (LOS), inpatient rehabilitation, functional outcomes, satisfaction, adverse events and readmission rates were investigated. Results Median LOS in the Overnight group was significantly smaller than in the control group (1 vs. 3 days, P &lt; 0.0001). The Overnight group had lower rates of inpatient rehabilitation utilization (4% vs. 41.2%, P &lt; 0.0001), similar improvements in functional hip and knee scores and no increased rate of adverse events or readmission. All patients in both groups were satisfied with their treatment. Conclusion Overnight THR and TKR can safely be performed in the majority of patients, with a multi‐disciplinary approach protocol and involvement of all perioperative stakeholders. There are significant public and private elective surgery backlogs as a result of the pandemic measures needed for COVID‐19. Overnight short stay joint replacement is safe and feasible with similar patient functional outcomes as well as satisfaction when an ERAS protocol is implemented with the involvement of all stakeholders. Overnight short‐stay joint replacement surgery will save costs and hospital resources, therefore allowing more patients to undergo surgery within a defined budget.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1445-1433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1445-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ans.17977</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36221212</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - rehabilitation ; Australia ; Biomedical materials ; enhanced recovery after surgery ; health care rationing ; health economics ; Health services ; Hip ; Humans ; Knee ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Length of Stay ; Orthopaedic implants ; Orthopaedic Surgery ; Patients ; Recovery (Medical) ; Rehabilitation ; Surgery ; Total hip arthroplasty ; total hip replacement ; total knee replacement</subject><ispartof>ANZ journal of surgery, 2022-10, Vol.92 (10), p.2683-2687</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4437-d7dd9eeb24df9ce0408f9cdde42dd41380c48ede9d2f4ab3c5af5920a6a6df9e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4437-d7dd9eeb24df9ce0408f9cdde42dd41380c48ede9d2f4ab3c5af5920a6a6df9e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4077-4938</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36221212$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qurashi, Sol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chinnappa, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aktas, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dabboussi, Abdul Majid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Md Bayzidur</creatorcontrib><title>Overnight joint replacement surgery: a pilot Australian study</title><title>ANZ journal of surgery</title><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><description>Background With a stretched healthcare system and elective surgery backlog, measures to improve efficiency and decrease costs associated with surgical procedures need to be prioritized. This study compares the benefits of multi‐disciplinary involvement in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol‐led overnight model following total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR). Methods Patients in each of two private hospitals undergoing THR or TKR were prospectively enrolled. One hospital (Overnight) was fully committed to the ERAS protocol implementation on all levels and formed the treatment group while in the other hospital (control), patients only had the anaesthetic and operative procedure as part of the ERAS protocol but did not follow the perioperative measures of the protocol. Outcomes on hospital length of stay (LOS), inpatient rehabilitation, functional outcomes, satisfaction, adverse events and readmission rates were investigated. Results Median LOS in the Overnight group was significantly smaller than in the control group (1 vs. 3 days, P &lt; 0.0001). The Overnight group had lower rates of inpatient rehabilitation utilization (4% vs. 41.2%, P &lt; 0.0001), similar improvements in functional hip and knee scores and no increased rate of adverse events or readmission. All patients in both groups were satisfied with their treatment. Conclusion Overnight THR and TKR can safely be performed in the majority of patients, with a multi‐disciplinary approach protocol and involvement of all perioperative stakeholders. There are significant public and private elective surgery backlogs as a result of the pandemic measures needed for COVID‐19. Overnight short stay joint replacement is safe and feasible with similar patient functional outcomes as well as satisfaction when an ERAS protocol is implemented with the involvement of all stakeholders. Overnight short‐stay joint replacement surgery will save costs and hospital resources, therefore allowing more patients to undergo surgery within a defined budget.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>enhanced recovery after surgery</subject><subject>health care rationing</subject><subject>health economics</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Hip</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Orthopaedic implants</subject><subject>Orthopaedic Surgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Recovery (Medical)</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Total hip arthroplasty</subject><subject>total hip replacement</subject><subject>total knee replacement</subject><issn>1445-1433</issn><issn>1445-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1LAzEQhoMotlYP_gFZ8KKH2nztZiMolOIXFHtQzyHdzLYp292a7Fb6701tLSqYOczAPHl5hxehU4KvSHg9XforIqQQe6hNOI-7lEixv50JZ6yFjryfYUySRMaHqMUSSkmoNroZLcGVdjKto1llyzpysCh0BnMIs2_cBNzqOtLRwhZVHfUbXztdWF1Gvm7M6hgd5LrwcLLtHfR2f_c6eOwORw9Pg_6wm3HORNcIYyTAmHKTywwwx2noxgCnxnDCUpzxFAxIQ3OuxyyLdR5LinWik_ADWAfdbnQXzXgOJgvmgg21cHau3UpV2qrfm9JO1aRaKpliLjAPAhdbAVe9N-BrNbc-g6LQJVSNV1RQTplMYxHQ8z_orGpcGc5bUyxJCE9ooC43VOYq7x3kOzMEq3UoKoSivkIJ7NlP9zvyO4UA9DbAhy1g9b-S6j-_bCQ_Ab_rmCM</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Qurashi, Sol</creator><creator>Chinnappa, Jason</creator><creator>Aktas, Sam</creator><creator>Dabboussi, Abdul Majid</creator><creator>Rahman, Md Bayzidur</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4077-4938</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Overnight joint replacement surgery: a pilot Australian study</title><author>Qurashi, Sol ; Chinnappa, Jason ; Aktas, Sam ; Dabboussi, Abdul Majid ; Rahman, Md Bayzidur</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4437-d7dd9eeb24df9ce0408f9cdde42dd41380c48ede9d2f4ab3c5af5920a6a6df9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>enhanced recovery after surgery</topic><topic>health care rationing</topic><topic>health economics</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Hip</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Orthopaedic implants</topic><topic>Orthopaedic Surgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Recovery (Medical)</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Total hip arthroplasty</topic><topic>total hip replacement</topic><topic>total knee replacement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qurashi, Sol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chinnappa, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aktas, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dabboussi, Abdul Majid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Md Bayzidur</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qurashi, Sol</au><au>Chinnappa, Jason</au><au>Aktas, Sam</au><au>Dabboussi, Abdul Majid</au><au>Rahman, Md Bayzidur</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Overnight joint replacement surgery: a pilot Australian study</atitle><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2683</spage><epage>2687</epage><pages>2683-2687</pages><issn>1445-1433</issn><eissn>1445-2197</eissn><abstract>Background With a stretched healthcare system and elective surgery backlog, measures to improve efficiency and decrease costs associated with surgical procedures need to be prioritized. This study compares the benefits of multi‐disciplinary involvement in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol‐led overnight model following total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR). Methods Patients in each of two private hospitals undergoing THR or TKR were prospectively enrolled. One hospital (Overnight) was fully committed to the ERAS protocol implementation on all levels and formed the treatment group while in the other hospital (control), patients only had the anaesthetic and operative procedure as part of the ERAS protocol but did not follow the perioperative measures of the protocol. Outcomes on hospital length of stay (LOS), inpatient rehabilitation, functional outcomes, satisfaction, adverse events and readmission rates were investigated. Results Median LOS in the Overnight group was significantly smaller than in the control group (1 vs. 3 days, P &lt; 0.0001). The Overnight group had lower rates of inpatient rehabilitation utilization (4% vs. 41.2%, P &lt; 0.0001), similar improvements in functional hip and knee scores and no increased rate of adverse events or readmission. All patients in both groups were satisfied with their treatment. Conclusion Overnight THR and TKR can safely be performed in the majority of patients, with a multi‐disciplinary approach protocol and involvement of all perioperative stakeholders. There are significant public and private elective surgery backlogs as a result of the pandemic measures needed for COVID‐19. Overnight short stay joint replacement is safe and feasible with similar patient functional outcomes as well as satisfaction when an ERAS protocol is implemented with the involvement of all stakeholders. Overnight short‐stay joint replacement surgery will save costs and hospital resources, therefore allowing more patients to undergo surgery within a defined budget.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>36221212</pmid><doi>10.1111/ans.17977</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4077-4938</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1445-1433
ispartof ANZ journal of surgery, 2022-10, Vol.92 (10), p.2683-2687
issn 1445-1433
1445-2197
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9804704
source Wiley
subjects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - rehabilitation
Australia
Biomedical materials
enhanced recovery after surgery
health care rationing
health economics
Health services
Hip
Humans
Knee
Knee Joint - surgery
Length of Stay
Orthopaedic implants
Orthopaedic Surgery
Patients
Recovery (Medical)
Rehabilitation
Surgery
Total hip arthroplasty
total hip replacement
total knee replacement
title Overnight joint replacement surgery: a pilot Australian study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A32%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Overnight%20joint%20replacement%20surgery:%20a%20pilot%20Australian%20study&rft.jtitle=ANZ%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Qurashi,%20Sol&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2683&rft.epage=2687&rft.pages=2683-2687&rft.issn=1445-1433&rft.eissn=1445-2197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ans.17977&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2723661462%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4437-d7dd9eeb24df9ce0408f9cdde42dd41380c48ede9d2f4ab3c5af5920a6a6df9e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2723661462&rft_id=info:pmid/36221212&rfr_iscdi=true