Loading…
Inhaled Sedation in Patients with COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An International Retrospective Study
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the shortage of intravenous sedatives has led to renewed interest in inhaled sedation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We hypothesized that inhaled sedation would be associated with improved clinical outcomes in COVID-...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of clinical medicine 2022-12, Vol.12 (1), p.12 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b047f18b21f7efe76cebe6071870483c0eef0bbd9106f6346e0a74c888ceecd53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b047f18b21f7efe76cebe6071870483c0eef0bbd9106f6346e0a74c888ceecd53 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 12 |
container_title | Journal of clinical medicine |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Coupet, Randy Schläpfer, Martin Neff, Thomas A Boucher, Pierre Bailly, Pierre Bellgardt, Martin Badenes, Rafael Carbonell, Jose Becher, Tobias Varillon, Caroline Morand, Dominique Blondonnet, Raiko Constantin, Jean-Michel Pereira, Bruno O'Gara, Brian Jabaudon, Matthieu |
description | The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the shortage of intravenous sedatives has led to renewed interest in inhaled sedation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We hypothesized that inhaled sedation would be associated with improved clinical outcomes in COVID-19 ARDS patients.
Retrospective international study including mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 ARDS who required sedation and were admitted to 10 European and US intensive care units. The primary endpoint of ventilator-free days through day 28 was analyzed using zero-inflated negative binomial regression, before and after adjustment for site, clinically relevant covariates determined according to the univariate results, and propensity score matching.
A total of 196 patients were enrolled, 78 of whom died within 28 days. The number of ventilator-free days through day 28 did not differ significantly between the patients who received inhaled sedation for at least 24 h (
= 111) and those who received intravenous sedation only (
= 85), with medians of 0 (interquartile range [IQR] 0-8) and 0 (IQR 0-17), respectively (odds ratio for having zero ventilator-free days through day 28, 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-2.92,
= 0.10). The incidence rate ratio for the number of ventilator-free days through day 28 if not 0 was 1.13 (95% CI, 0.84-1.52,
= 0.40). Similar results were found after multivariable adjustment and propensity matching.
The use of inhaled sedation in COVID-19 ARDS was not associated with the number of ventilator-free days through day 28. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jcm12010012 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9821008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2761980027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b047f18b21f7efe76cebe6071870483c0eef0bbd9106f6346e0a74c888ceecd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1r3DAQxUVoSUKaU-9B0EuhuB1ZjiXnEFg2_VgIJGTbXoUsj7tabGkjySkL_eOrZtOw7VxmYH48Zt4j5DWD95w38GFtRlYCA2DlATkuQYgCuOQv9uYjchrjGnJJWZVMHJIjXteskowfk18Lt9IDdnSJnU7WO2odvc0TuhTpT5tWdH7zfXFVsKa4w0GnjM7MlJDeYdzYoJMPW3plYwoYI11uXRf8iBd05ujCJQzuUVUPmU_Bxw2aZB-QLtPUbV-Rl70eIp4-9RPy7dPHr_MvxfXN58V8dl2YCppUtFCJnsm2ZL3AHkVtsMUaBJMCKskNIPbQtl3DoO5rXtUIWlRGSmkQTXfOT8jlTncztSN2Jv8W9KA2wY46bJXXVv27cXalfvgH1cgyWyuzwNsngeDvJ4xJjTYaHAbt0E9RlaJmjQQoRUbf_Ieu_ZRdGHYUa6DikKl3O8pkT2LA_vkYBupPsGov2Eyf7d__zP6Nkf8GI66frw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2761190430</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inhaled Sedation in Patients with COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An International Retrospective Study</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Coupet, Randy ; Schläpfer, Martin ; Neff, Thomas A ; Boucher, Pierre ; Bailly, Pierre ; Bellgardt, Martin ; Badenes, Rafael ; Carbonell, Jose ; Becher, Tobias ; Varillon, Caroline ; Morand, Dominique ; Blondonnet, Raiko ; Constantin, Jean-Michel ; Pereira, Bruno ; O'Gara, Brian ; Jabaudon, Matthieu</creator><creatorcontrib>Coupet, Randy ; Schläpfer, Martin ; Neff, Thomas A ; Boucher, Pierre ; Bailly, Pierre ; Bellgardt, Martin ; Badenes, Rafael ; Carbonell, Jose ; Becher, Tobias ; Varillon, Caroline ; Morand, Dominique ; Blondonnet, Raiko ; Constantin, Jean-Michel ; Pereira, Bruno ; O'Gara, Brian ; Jabaudon, Matthieu ; ISCA Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the shortage of intravenous sedatives has led to renewed interest in inhaled sedation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We hypothesized that inhaled sedation would be associated with improved clinical outcomes in COVID-19 ARDS patients.
Retrospective international study including mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 ARDS who required sedation and were admitted to 10 European and US intensive care units. The primary endpoint of ventilator-free days through day 28 was analyzed using zero-inflated negative binomial regression, before and after adjustment for site, clinically relevant covariates determined according to the univariate results, and propensity score matching.
A total of 196 patients were enrolled, 78 of whom died within 28 days. The number of ventilator-free days through day 28 did not differ significantly between the patients who received inhaled sedation for at least 24 h (
= 111) and those who received intravenous sedation only (
= 85), with medians of 0 (interquartile range [IQR] 0-8) and 0 (IQR 0-17), respectively (odds ratio for having zero ventilator-free days through day 28, 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-2.92,
= 0.10). The incidence rate ratio for the number of ventilator-free days through day 28 if not 0 was 1.13 (95% CI, 0.84-1.52,
= 0.40). Similar results were found after multivariable adjustment and propensity matching.
The use of inhaled sedation in COVID-19 ARDS was not associated with the number of ventilator-free days through day 28.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm12010012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36614813</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical outcomes ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Ethics ; Inflammation ; Patients ; Respiratory distress syndrome ; Ventilators</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2022-12, Vol.12 (1), p.12</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b047f18b21f7efe76cebe6071870483c0eef0bbd9106f6346e0a74c888ceecd53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b047f18b21f7efe76cebe6071870483c0eef0bbd9106f6346e0a74c888ceecd53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4288-7124 ; 0000-0001-9447-0019 ; 0000-0001-7017-0150 ; 0000-0001-9881-8422 ; 0000-0003-3778-7161 ; 0000-0002-6314-5827 ; 0000-0002-8121-1680 ; 0000-0001-7837-3868</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2761190430/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2761190430?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,38516,43895,44590,53791,53793,74412,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36614813$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coupet, Randy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schläpfer, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neff, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boucher, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailly, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellgardt, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badenes, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carbonell, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becher, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varillon, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morand, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blondonnet, Raiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Constantin, Jean-Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Gara, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jabaudon, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ISCA Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Inhaled Sedation in Patients with COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An International Retrospective Study</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the shortage of intravenous sedatives has led to renewed interest in inhaled sedation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We hypothesized that inhaled sedation would be associated with improved clinical outcomes in COVID-19 ARDS patients.
Retrospective international study including mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 ARDS who required sedation and were admitted to 10 European and US intensive care units. The primary endpoint of ventilator-free days through day 28 was analyzed using zero-inflated negative binomial regression, before and after adjustment for site, clinically relevant covariates determined according to the univariate results, and propensity score matching.
A total of 196 patients were enrolled, 78 of whom died within 28 days. The number of ventilator-free days through day 28 did not differ significantly between the patients who received inhaled sedation for at least 24 h (
= 111) and those who received intravenous sedation only (
= 85), with medians of 0 (interquartile range [IQR] 0-8) and 0 (IQR 0-17), respectively (odds ratio for having zero ventilator-free days through day 28, 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-2.92,
= 0.10). The incidence rate ratio for the number of ventilator-free days through day 28 if not 0 was 1.13 (95% CI, 0.84-1.52,
= 0.40). Similar results were found after multivariable adjustment and propensity matching.
The use of inhaled sedation in COVID-19 ARDS was not associated with the number of ventilator-free days through day 28.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Respiratory distress syndrome</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1r3DAQxUVoSUKaU-9B0EuhuB1ZjiXnEFg2_VgIJGTbXoUsj7tabGkjySkL_eOrZtOw7VxmYH48Zt4j5DWD95w38GFtRlYCA2DlATkuQYgCuOQv9uYjchrjGnJJWZVMHJIjXteskowfk18Lt9IDdnSJnU7WO2odvc0TuhTpT5tWdH7zfXFVsKa4w0GnjM7MlJDeYdzYoJMPW3plYwoYI11uXRf8iBd05ujCJQzuUVUPmU_Bxw2aZB-QLtPUbV-Rl70eIp4-9RPy7dPHr_MvxfXN58V8dl2YCppUtFCJnsm2ZL3AHkVtsMUaBJMCKskNIPbQtl3DoO5rXtUIWlRGSmkQTXfOT8jlTncztSN2Jv8W9KA2wY46bJXXVv27cXalfvgH1cgyWyuzwNsngeDvJ4xJjTYaHAbt0E9RlaJmjQQoRUbf_Ieu_ZRdGHYUa6DikKl3O8pkT2LA_vkYBupPsGov2Eyf7d__zP6Nkf8GI66frw</recordid><startdate>20221220</startdate><enddate>20221220</enddate><creator>Coupet, Randy</creator><creator>Schläpfer, Martin</creator><creator>Neff, Thomas A</creator><creator>Boucher, Pierre</creator><creator>Bailly, Pierre</creator><creator>Bellgardt, Martin</creator><creator>Badenes, Rafael</creator><creator>Carbonell, Jose</creator><creator>Becher, Tobias</creator><creator>Varillon, Caroline</creator><creator>Morand, Dominique</creator><creator>Blondonnet, Raiko</creator><creator>Constantin, Jean-Michel</creator><creator>Pereira, Bruno</creator><creator>O'Gara, Brian</creator><creator>Jabaudon, Matthieu</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4288-7124</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9447-0019</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7017-0150</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9881-8422</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3778-7161</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6314-5827</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8121-1680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7837-3868</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221220</creationdate><title>Inhaled Sedation in Patients with COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An International Retrospective Study</title><author>Coupet, Randy ; Schläpfer, Martin ; Neff, Thomas A ; Boucher, Pierre ; Bailly, Pierre ; Bellgardt, Martin ; Badenes, Rafael ; Carbonell, Jose ; Becher, Tobias ; Varillon, Caroline ; Morand, Dominique ; Blondonnet, Raiko ; Constantin, Jean-Michel ; Pereira, Bruno ; O'Gara, Brian ; Jabaudon, Matthieu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b047f18b21f7efe76cebe6071870483c0eef0bbd9106f6346e0a74c888ceecd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Respiratory distress syndrome</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coupet, Randy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schläpfer, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neff, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boucher, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailly, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellgardt, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badenes, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carbonell, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becher, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varillon, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morand, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blondonnet, Raiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Constantin, Jean-Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Gara, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jabaudon, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ISCA Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coupet, Randy</au><au>Schläpfer, Martin</au><au>Neff, Thomas A</au><au>Boucher, Pierre</au><au>Bailly, Pierre</au><au>Bellgardt, Martin</au><au>Badenes, Rafael</au><au>Carbonell, Jose</au><au>Becher, Tobias</au><au>Varillon, Caroline</au><au>Morand, Dominique</au><au>Blondonnet, Raiko</au><au>Constantin, Jean-Michel</au><au>Pereira, Bruno</au><au>O'Gara, Brian</au><au>Jabaudon, Matthieu</au><aucorp>ISCA Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inhaled Sedation in Patients with COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An International Retrospective Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2022-12-20</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12</spage><pages>12-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the shortage of intravenous sedatives has led to renewed interest in inhaled sedation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We hypothesized that inhaled sedation would be associated with improved clinical outcomes in COVID-19 ARDS patients.
Retrospective international study including mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 ARDS who required sedation and were admitted to 10 European and US intensive care units. The primary endpoint of ventilator-free days through day 28 was analyzed using zero-inflated negative binomial regression, before and after adjustment for site, clinically relevant covariates determined according to the univariate results, and propensity score matching.
A total of 196 patients were enrolled, 78 of whom died within 28 days. The number of ventilator-free days through day 28 did not differ significantly between the patients who received inhaled sedation for at least 24 h (
= 111) and those who received intravenous sedation only (
= 85), with medians of 0 (interquartile range [IQR] 0-8) and 0 (IQR 0-17), respectively (odds ratio for having zero ventilator-free days through day 28, 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-2.92,
= 0.10). The incidence rate ratio for the number of ventilator-free days through day 28 if not 0 was 1.13 (95% CI, 0.84-1.52,
= 0.40). Similar results were found after multivariable adjustment and propensity matching.
The use of inhaled sedation in COVID-19 ARDS was not associated with the number of ventilator-free days through day 28.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>36614813</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm12010012</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4288-7124</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9447-0019</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7017-0150</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9881-8422</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3778-7161</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6314-5827</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8121-1680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7837-3868</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2077-0383 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical medicine, 2022-12, Vol.12 (1), p.12 |
issn | 2077-0383 2077-0383 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9821008 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Anesthesia Clinical medicine Clinical outcomes Coronaviruses COVID-19 Ethics Inflammation Patients Respiratory distress syndrome Ventilators |
title | Inhaled Sedation in Patients with COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An International Retrospective Study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A30%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inhaled%20Sedation%20in%20Patients%20with%20COVID-19-Related%20Acute%20Respiratory%20Distress%20Syndrome:%20An%20International%20Retrospective%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Coupet,%20Randy&rft.aucorp=ISCA%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2022-12-20&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12&rft.pages=12-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm12010012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2761980027%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b047f18b21f7efe76cebe6071870483c0eef0bbd9106f6346e0a74c888ceecd53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2761190430&rft_id=info:pmid/36614813&rfr_iscdi=true |