Loading…

Comparison of automated determination of phosphatidylethanol (PEth) in dried blood spots (DBS) with previous manual processing and testing

Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a sensitive and specific biomarker of alcohol consumption in the prior 2–3 weeks. Standard, manual PEth testing using dried blood spots (DBS) is a multi-step time-consuming process. A novel, automated processing and testing method has been developed to decrease DBS proc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2022-02, Vol.98, p.51-54
Main Authors: Fatch, Robin, Luginbühl, Marc, Cheng, Debbie M., Gaugler, Stefan, Emenyonu, Nneka I., Ngabirano, Christine, Adong, Julian, Muyindike, Winnie R., Samet, Jeffrey H., Bryant, Kendall, Hahn, Judith A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-2924298311c1512dd9840c5da100ed61e9e723acb87d0f1c8c49015b772c44d63
container_end_page 54
container_issue
container_start_page 51
container_title Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.)
container_volume 98
creator Fatch, Robin
Luginbühl, Marc
Cheng, Debbie M.
Gaugler, Stefan
Emenyonu, Nneka I.
Ngabirano, Christine
Adong, Julian
Muyindike, Winnie R.
Samet, Jeffrey H.
Bryant, Kendall
Hahn, Judith A.
description Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a sensitive and specific biomarker of alcohol consumption in the prior 2–3 weeks. Standard, manual PEth testing using dried blood spots (DBS) is a multi-step time-consuming process. A novel, automated processing and testing method has been developed to decrease DBS processing and testing time. We conducted automated testing, using regioisomerically pure PEth reference material, on randomly selected DBS, which had previously been tested via manual methods and then stored for 3–6 years at −80 °C, to compare the results (PEth 16:0/18:1 homologue). We chose samples for re-testing using categories found in the literature as follows: 1) PEth 200–1000 ng/mL; 4) PEth >1000 ng/mL. We calculated agreement between the categories using the weighted kappa statistic (n = 49 DBS). We quantified agreement between continuous measures using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and further described the relationship between variables using Spearman correlation. The median PEth result was 155 ng/mL (interquartile range [IQR]: 1–1312 ng/mL) via automated methods and 98.8 ng/mL (IQR: 10.2–625.0 ng/mL) via manual methods. The weighted kappa comparing the automated to manual PEth results was 0.76 [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.66–0.86]. The ICC was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.54–0.79), and the Spearman correlation was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95–0.99). While the new methods yielded somewhat higher PEth values, we found good to excellent agreement between clinically relevant PEth categories. Automated DBS processing and testing using new reference standards are promising methods for PEth testing. •We found good to excellent agreement between PEth results using manual and automated PEth testing methods.•We observed excellent agreement between clinically relevant PEth categories obtained via two methods.•A novel automated DBS processing method for PEth testing shows promise.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.alcohol.2021.11.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9829025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0741832921001361</els_id><sourcerecordid>2613259340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-2924298311c1512dd9840c5da100ed61e9e723acb87d0f1c8c49015b772c44d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2PFCEQhjtG446rP0FD4mX20C1Ff9BcNDquH8kmmqhnwkDNNpNuaIEes3_BXy2bGTfqxQtQqafequItiqdAK6DQvdhXatR-8GPFKIMKoKIU7hUr6Hlddj2r7xcryhso-5qJs-JRjHtKKedcPCzO6oZ3XDT9qvi58dOsgo3eEb8jakl-UgkNMZgwTNapZI-pefBxHnJobkZMg3J-JOvPl2m4INYRE2wu2o7eGxJnnyJZv33z5YL8sGkgc8CD9Uskk3KLGnPsNcZo3TVRzpCEMeX34-LBTo0Rn5zu8-Lbu8uvmw_l1af3Hzevr0rdNHUqmWANE30NoKEFZozoG6pbo4BSNB2gQM5qpbc9N3QHuteNoNBuOWdZwHT1efHyqDsv2wmNRpeCGuUc7KTCjfTKyr8zzg7y2h-k6JmgrM0C65NA8N-XPLycbNQ4jsph3lKyVvBG5BMy-vwfdO-X4PJ6knVQZ6ZuaKbaI6WDjzHg7m4YoPLWbbmXJ7flrdsSQGa3c92zPze5q_ptbwZeHQHM_3mwGGTUFp1GYwPqJI23_2nxC3JywD8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2613259340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of automated determination of phosphatidylethanol (PEth) in dried blood spots (DBS) with previous manual processing and testing</title><source>Criminology Collection</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>Fatch, Robin ; Luginbühl, Marc ; Cheng, Debbie M. ; Gaugler, Stefan ; Emenyonu, Nneka I. ; Ngabirano, Christine ; Adong, Julian ; Muyindike, Winnie R. ; Samet, Jeffrey H. ; Bryant, Kendall ; Hahn, Judith A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fatch, Robin ; Luginbühl, Marc ; Cheng, Debbie M. ; Gaugler, Stefan ; Emenyonu, Nneka I. ; Ngabirano, Christine ; Adong, Julian ; Muyindike, Winnie R. ; Samet, Jeffrey H. ; Bryant, Kendall ; Hahn, Judith A.</creatorcontrib><description>Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a sensitive and specific biomarker of alcohol consumption in the prior 2–3 weeks. Standard, manual PEth testing using dried blood spots (DBS) is a multi-step time-consuming process. A novel, automated processing and testing method has been developed to decrease DBS processing and testing time. We conducted automated testing, using regioisomerically pure PEth reference material, on randomly selected DBS, which had previously been tested via manual methods and then stored for 3–6 years at −80 °C, to compare the results (PEth 16:0/18:1 homologue). We chose samples for re-testing using categories found in the literature as follows: 1) PEth &lt;20 ng/mL; 2) PEth 20–200 ng/mL; 3) PEth &gt;200–1000 ng/mL; 4) PEth &gt;1000 ng/mL. We calculated agreement between the categories using the weighted kappa statistic (n = 49 DBS). We quantified agreement between continuous measures using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and further described the relationship between variables using Spearman correlation. The median PEth result was 155 ng/mL (interquartile range [IQR]: 1–1312 ng/mL) via automated methods and 98.8 ng/mL (IQR: 10.2–625.0 ng/mL) via manual methods. The weighted kappa comparing the automated to manual PEth results was 0.76 [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.66–0.86]. The ICC was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.54–0.79), and the Spearman correlation was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95–0.99). While the new methods yielded somewhat higher PEth values, we found good to excellent agreement between clinically relevant PEth categories. Automated DBS processing and testing using new reference standards are promising methods for PEth testing. •We found good to excellent agreement between PEth results using manual and automated PEth testing methods.•We observed excellent agreement between clinically relevant PEth categories obtained via two methods.•A novel automated DBS processing method for PEth testing shows promise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-8329</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2021.11.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34767948</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome ; Agreements ; AIDS ; Alcohol biomarker ; Alcohol Drinking ; Alcohol use ; Automated ; Automation ; Biomarkers ; Dried Blood Spot Testing - methods ; Dried blood spots ; Glycerophospholipids ; HIV ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; LC-MS/MS ; Methods ; PEth ; Phosphatidylethanol ; Reference materials ; Testing laboratories</subject><ispartof>Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.), 2022-02, Vol.98, p.51-54</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-2924298311c1512dd9840c5da100ed61e9e723acb87d0f1c8c49015b772c44d63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0348-316X ; 0000-0002-2697-8264 ; 0000-0002-8423-3471</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2613259340/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2613259340?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,21376,21394,27924,27925,33611,33612,33769,33770,43733,43814,74221,74310</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34767948$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fatch, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luginbühl, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Debbie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaugler, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emenyonu, Nneka I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngabirano, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adong, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muyindike, Winnie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samet, Jeffrey H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryant, Kendall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Judith A.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of automated determination of phosphatidylethanol (PEth) in dried blood spots (DBS) with previous manual processing and testing</title><title>Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Alcohol</addtitle><description>Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a sensitive and specific biomarker of alcohol consumption in the prior 2–3 weeks. Standard, manual PEth testing using dried blood spots (DBS) is a multi-step time-consuming process. A novel, automated processing and testing method has been developed to decrease DBS processing and testing time. We conducted automated testing, using regioisomerically pure PEth reference material, on randomly selected DBS, which had previously been tested via manual methods and then stored for 3–6 years at −80 °C, to compare the results (PEth 16:0/18:1 homologue). We chose samples for re-testing using categories found in the literature as follows: 1) PEth &lt;20 ng/mL; 2) PEth 20–200 ng/mL; 3) PEth &gt;200–1000 ng/mL; 4) PEth &gt;1000 ng/mL. We calculated agreement between the categories using the weighted kappa statistic (n = 49 DBS). We quantified agreement between continuous measures using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and further described the relationship between variables using Spearman correlation. The median PEth result was 155 ng/mL (interquartile range [IQR]: 1–1312 ng/mL) via automated methods and 98.8 ng/mL (IQR: 10.2–625.0 ng/mL) via manual methods. The weighted kappa comparing the automated to manual PEth results was 0.76 [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.66–0.86]. The ICC was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.54–0.79), and the Spearman correlation was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95–0.99). While the new methods yielded somewhat higher PEth values, we found good to excellent agreement between clinically relevant PEth categories. Automated DBS processing and testing using new reference standards are promising methods for PEth testing. •We found good to excellent agreement between PEth results using manual and automated PEth testing methods.•We observed excellent agreement between clinically relevant PEth categories obtained via two methods.•A novel automated DBS processing method for PEth testing shows promise.</description><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</subject><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>AIDS</subject><subject>Alcohol biomarker</subject><subject>Alcohol Drinking</subject><subject>Alcohol use</subject><subject>Automated</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Dried Blood Spot Testing - methods</subject><subject>Dried blood spots</subject><subject>Glycerophospholipids</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>LC-MS/MS</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>PEth</subject><subject>Phosphatidylethanol</subject><subject>Reference materials</subject><subject>Testing laboratories</subject><issn>0741-8329</issn><issn>1873-6823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BGRYB</sourceid><sourceid>M0O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2PFCEQhjtG446rP0FD4mX20C1Ff9BcNDquH8kmmqhnwkDNNpNuaIEes3_BXy2bGTfqxQtQqafequItiqdAK6DQvdhXatR-8GPFKIMKoKIU7hUr6Hlddj2r7xcryhso-5qJs-JRjHtKKedcPCzO6oZ3XDT9qvi58dOsgo3eEb8jakl-UgkNMZgwTNapZI-pefBxHnJobkZMg3J-JOvPl2m4INYRE2wu2o7eGxJnnyJZv33z5YL8sGkgc8CD9Uskk3KLGnPsNcZo3TVRzpCEMeX34-LBTo0Rn5zu8-Lbu8uvmw_l1af3Hzevr0rdNHUqmWANE30NoKEFZozoG6pbo4BSNB2gQM5qpbc9N3QHuteNoNBuOWdZwHT1efHyqDsv2wmNRpeCGuUc7KTCjfTKyr8zzg7y2h-k6JmgrM0C65NA8N-XPLycbNQ4jsph3lKyVvBG5BMy-vwfdO-X4PJ6knVQZ6ZuaKbaI6WDjzHg7m4YoPLWbbmXJ7flrdsSQGa3c92zPze5q_ptbwZeHQHM_3mwGGTUFp1GYwPqJI23_2nxC3JywD8</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Fatch, Robin</creator><creator>Luginbühl, Marc</creator><creator>Cheng, Debbie M.</creator><creator>Gaugler, Stefan</creator><creator>Emenyonu, Nneka I.</creator><creator>Ngabirano, Christine</creator><creator>Adong, Julian</creator><creator>Muyindike, Winnie R.</creator><creator>Samet, Jeffrey H.</creator><creator>Bryant, Kendall</creator><creator>Hahn, Judith A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0348-316X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2697-8264</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8423-3471</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Comparison of automated determination of phosphatidylethanol (PEth) in dried blood spots (DBS) with previous manual processing and testing</title><author>Fatch, Robin ; Luginbühl, Marc ; Cheng, Debbie M. ; Gaugler, Stefan ; Emenyonu, Nneka I. ; Ngabirano, Christine ; Adong, Julian ; Muyindike, Winnie R. ; Samet, Jeffrey H. ; Bryant, Kendall ; Hahn, Judith A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-2924298311c1512dd9840c5da100ed61e9e723acb87d0f1c8c49015b772c44d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</topic><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>AIDS</topic><topic>Alcohol biomarker</topic><topic>Alcohol Drinking</topic><topic>Alcohol use</topic><topic>Automated</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Dried Blood Spot Testing - methods</topic><topic>Dried blood spots</topic><topic>Glycerophospholipids</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>LC-MS/MS</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>PEth</topic><topic>Phosphatidylethanol</topic><topic>Reference materials</topic><topic>Testing laboratories</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fatch, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luginbühl, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Debbie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaugler, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emenyonu, Nneka I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngabirano, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adong, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muyindike, Winnie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samet, Jeffrey H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryant, Kendall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Judith A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fatch, Robin</au><au>Luginbühl, Marc</au><au>Cheng, Debbie M.</au><au>Gaugler, Stefan</au><au>Emenyonu, Nneka I.</au><au>Ngabirano, Christine</au><au>Adong, Julian</au><au>Muyindike, Winnie R.</au><au>Samet, Jeffrey H.</au><au>Bryant, Kendall</au><au>Hahn, Judith A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of automated determination of phosphatidylethanol (PEth) in dried blood spots (DBS) with previous manual processing and testing</atitle><jtitle>Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Alcohol</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>98</volume><spage>51</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>51-54</pages><issn>0741-8329</issn><eissn>1873-6823</eissn><abstract>Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a sensitive and specific biomarker of alcohol consumption in the prior 2–3 weeks. Standard, manual PEth testing using dried blood spots (DBS) is a multi-step time-consuming process. A novel, automated processing and testing method has been developed to decrease DBS processing and testing time. We conducted automated testing, using regioisomerically pure PEth reference material, on randomly selected DBS, which had previously been tested via manual methods and then stored for 3–6 years at −80 °C, to compare the results (PEth 16:0/18:1 homologue). We chose samples for re-testing using categories found in the literature as follows: 1) PEth &lt;20 ng/mL; 2) PEth 20–200 ng/mL; 3) PEth &gt;200–1000 ng/mL; 4) PEth &gt;1000 ng/mL. We calculated agreement between the categories using the weighted kappa statistic (n = 49 DBS). We quantified agreement between continuous measures using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and further described the relationship between variables using Spearman correlation. The median PEth result was 155 ng/mL (interquartile range [IQR]: 1–1312 ng/mL) via automated methods and 98.8 ng/mL (IQR: 10.2–625.0 ng/mL) via manual methods. The weighted kappa comparing the automated to manual PEth results was 0.76 [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.66–0.86]. The ICC was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.54–0.79), and the Spearman correlation was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95–0.99). While the new methods yielded somewhat higher PEth values, we found good to excellent agreement between clinically relevant PEth categories. Automated DBS processing and testing using new reference standards are promising methods for PEth testing. •We found good to excellent agreement between PEth results using manual and automated PEth testing methods.•We observed excellent agreement between clinically relevant PEth categories obtained via two methods.•A novel automated DBS processing method for PEth testing shows promise.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34767948</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.alcohol.2021.11.001</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0348-316X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2697-8264</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8423-3471</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-8329
ispartof Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.), 2022-02, Vol.98, p.51-54
issn 0741-8329
1873-6823
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9829025
source Criminology Collection; ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024; Social Science Premium Collection
subjects Acquired immune deficiency syndrome
Agreements
AIDS
Alcohol biomarker
Alcohol Drinking
Alcohol use
Automated
Automation
Biomarkers
Dried Blood Spot Testing - methods
Dried blood spots
Glycerophospholipids
HIV
Human immunodeficiency virus
LC-MS/MS
Methods
PEth
Phosphatidylethanol
Reference materials
Testing laboratories
title Comparison of automated determination of phosphatidylethanol (PEth) in dried blood spots (DBS) with previous manual processing and testing
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T02%3A07%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20automated%20determination%20of%20phosphatidylethanol%20(PEth)%20in%20dried%20blood%20spots%20(DBS)%20with%20previous%20manual%20processing%20and%20testing&rft.jtitle=Alcohol%20(Fayetteville,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Fatch,%20Robin&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=98&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=51-54&rft.issn=0741-8329&rft.eissn=1873-6823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.alcohol.2021.11.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2613259340%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-2924298311c1512dd9840c5da100ed61e9e723acb87d0f1c8c49015b772c44d63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2613259340&rft_id=info:pmid/34767948&rfr_iscdi=true