To what extent are anorectal function tests comparable? A study comparing digital rectal examination, anal electromyography, 3-dimensional high-resolution anal manometry, and transperineal ultrasound

• Published in: International journal of colorectal disease 2023-01, Vol.38 (1), p.12-12, Article 12
• Main Authors: Dekker, L., van Reijn-Baggen, D. A., Han-Geurts, I. J. M., Felt-Bersma, R. J. F.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anal Canal - diagnostic imaging; Ataxia - diagnosis; Constipation - diagnostic imaging; Defecation; Digital Rectal Examination; Electromyography; Fecal Incontinence - diagnosis; Female; Gastroenterology; Hepatology; Humans; Internal Medicine; Male; Manometry - methods; Medical examination; Medical research; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Medicine, Experimental; Middle Aged; Physical therapy; Proctology; Rectum; Rectum - diagnostic imaging; Surgery; Therapeutics, Physiological
• ISSN: 1432-1262; 0179-1958; 1432-1262
• DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04304-6

Background Anorectal function tests are helpful for objective investigation of anorectal (dys)function. A variety of tests are available, but there is no recommendation when to perform which test. Furthermore, which test is the most accurate is controversial and the correlation between these tests is not very clear. The aim of our study was to examine the correlation of anal pressures and the possibility to diagnose pelvic floor dyssynergia between digital rectal examination (DRE) and several anorectal function tests. Methods Between January 2020 and April 2022, all men and women aged 18 to 80 years, treated at the Proctos Clinic, who were referred for pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) by the surgeon and underwent anorectal function tests, were included. DRE was performed to establish the anal pressure at rest and during squeeze and straining. Anorectal function tests included 3D high-resolution anal manometry (3D-HRAM), balloon expulsion test (BET), transperineal ultrasound (TPUS), and surface electromyography (s-EMG). Results A total of 50 patients, 37 (74%) females, were included. Median age was 51 years. Twenty-three (62%) females had a history of two or more vaginal deliveries. The most frequent reason for referral for PFPT was fecal incontinence in 27 (54%) patients. The assessed pressures and pelvic floor function measured with DRE by the surgeon and the pelvic floor physical therapist during rest, squeeze, and straining correlated in 78%, 78%, and 84%, respectively. Correlation between DRE and 3D-HRAM or s-EMG was better for squeeze pressures than resting pressures. The correlation between s-EMG and 3D-HRAM was better during squeeze than at rest with an agreement of 59% and 37%, respectively. Conclusion DRE by an experienced investigator is of sufficient value for daily clinical practice to detect dyssynergia and to measure sphincter tone. Commonly performed anorectal function tests correlate poorly with DRE and with other anorectal function tests. When conservative treatment fails, further investigation is warranted; however, these results should be interpreted with caution. What does this paper add to the literature? Anorectal function tests such as the 3D high-resolution anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion test, surface electromyography, and transperineal ultrasound are all frequently performed in the diagnostic workup in patients with defecation disorders. No previous study has compared these tests regarding their outcomes, nor has the in