Loading…

Did the COVID-19 pandemic lead to an increase in academic misconduct in higher education?

The shift to online instruction in higher education related to the COVID-19 pandemic has raised worldwide concerns about an increase in academic misconduct (cheating and plagiarism). However, data to document any increase is sparse. For this study, we collected survey data from 484 students in 11 un...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Higher education 2024-01, Vol.87 (1), p.111-129
Main Authors: Ives, Bob, Cazan, Ana-Maria
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-81988a13d8b2e33efda793ee4683656a9aa3d79cf804c1ab27c6f7318c13c3923
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-81988a13d8b2e33efda793ee4683656a9aa3d79cf804c1ab27c6f7318c13c3923
container_end_page 129
container_issue 1
container_start_page 111
container_title Higher education
container_volume 87
creator Ives, Bob
Cazan, Ana-Maria
description The shift to online instruction in higher education related to the COVID-19 pandemic has raised worldwide concerns about an increase in academic misconduct (cheating and plagiarism). However, data to document any increase is sparse. For this study, we collected survey data from 484 students in 11 universities in the USA, and 410 students in five universities in Romania. The data support the conclusions that (1) cheating on exams increased with the shift to online instruction, but plagiarism and cheating on assignments may not have increased, (2) significant differences between the two countries suggest that intervention planning should avoid assuming that results from one context may generalize to another, and (3) influencing student beliefs about rates of AM among their peers may be a fruitful new route for reducing academic misconduct.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10734-023-00996-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9860225</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A781879918</galeid><sourcerecordid>A781879918</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-81988a13d8b2e33efda793ee4683656a9aa3d79cf804c1ab27c6f7318c13c3923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhi0EokvhD3BAkbj04uKPxB8XULUtUKlSL4DgZHmdya6rrL3YCRL99XVIPyhacbI988zr8fhF6DUlx5QQ-S5TInmNCeOYEK0Fvn6CFrSRHFNZf3-KFoRQhWkjyAF6kfMVIYTRhj9HB1xIyikXC_Tj1LfVsIFqefnt_BRTXe1saGHrXdWDLalY2VD54BLYDGVTWWfn_NZnF0M7umEKb_x6A6mCcraDj-HDS_Sss32GV7frIfr68ezL8jO-uPx0vjy5wK6ResCKaqUs5a1aMeAcutZKzQFqobhohNXW8lZq1ylSO2pXTDrRSU6Vo9xxzfghej_r7sbVFloHYUi2N7vktzb9NtF68zgT_Mas4y-jlSCMNUXg6FYgxZ8j5MFML4O-twHimA2TkhKlCK8L-vYf9CqOKZTnGVZaEUzwWj1Qa9uD8aGL5V43iZoTqaiSWtOJwnuoNQQoTcYAnS_hR_zxHv7uN_YWsLnApZhzgu5-JpSYyUBmNpApBjJ_DGSuS9Gbv6d5X3LnmALwGcglFdaQHkbwH9kbQtzOpQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2923626348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Did the COVID-19 pandemic lead to an increase in academic misconduct in higher education?</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Ives, Bob ; Cazan, Ana-Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Ives, Bob ; Cazan, Ana-Maria</creatorcontrib><description>The shift to online instruction in higher education related to the COVID-19 pandemic has raised worldwide concerns about an increase in academic misconduct (cheating and plagiarism). However, data to document any increase is sparse. For this study, we collected survey data from 484 students in 11 universities in the USA, and 410 students in five universities in Romania. The data support the conclusions that (1) cheating on exams increased with the shift to online instruction, but plagiarism and cheating on assignments may not have increased, (2) significant differences between the two countries suggest that intervention planning should avoid assuming that results from one context may generalize to another, and (3) influencing student beliefs about rates of AM among their peers may be a fruitful new route for reducing academic misconduct.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-1560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-174X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10734-023-00996-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36713136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Academic disciplines ; Academic misconduct ; Cheating ; Cheating (Education) ; College students ; COVID-19 ; Data ; Distance learning ; Education ; Educational aspects ; Epidemics ; Higher Education ; Misconduct ; Pandemics ; Plagiarism ; Prevention ; Romania ; Statistics ; Surveys ; Teaching ; Tests ; United States</subject><ispartof>Higher education, 2024-01, Vol.87 (1), p.111-129</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-81988a13d8b2e33efda793ee4683656a9aa3d79cf804c1ab27c6f7318c13c3923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-81988a13d8b2e33efda793ee4683656a9aa3d79cf804c1ab27c6f7318c13c3923</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0912-1944</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2923626348/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2923626348?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,11667,12826,21357,21366,21373,27843,27901,27902,33200,33588,33589,33854,33855,33962,33963,36037,36038,43709,43856,43924,44339,62634,62635,62637,62650,73939,73964,74140,74211,74638</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36713136$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ives, Bob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cazan, Ana-Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Did the COVID-19 pandemic lead to an increase in academic misconduct in higher education?</title><title>Higher education</title><addtitle>High Educ</addtitle><addtitle>High Educ (Dordr)</addtitle><description>The shift to online instruction in higher education related to the COVID-19 pandemic has raised worldwide concerns about an increase in academic misconduct (cheating and plagiarism). However, data to document any increase is sparse. For this study, we collected survey data from 484 students in 11 universities in the USA, and 410 students in five universities in Romania. The data support the conclusions that (1) cheating on exams increased with the shift to online instruction, but plagiarism and cheating on assignments may not have increased, (2) significant differences between the two countries suggest that intervention planning should avoid assuming that results from one context may generalize to another, and (3) influencing student beliefs about rates of AM among their peers may be a fruitful new route for reducing academic misconduct.</description><subject>Academic disciplines</subject><subject>Academic misconduct</subject><subject>Cheating</subject><subject>Cheating (Education)</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational aspects</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Misconduct</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Plagiarism</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Romania</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0018-1560</issn><issn>1573-174X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhi0EokvhD3BAkbj04uKPxB8XULUtUKlSL4DgZHmdya6rrL3YCRL99XVIPyhacbI988zr8fhF6DUlx5QQ-S5TInmNCeOYEK0Fvn6CFrSRHFNZf3-KFoRQhWkjyAF6kfMVIYTRhj9HB1xIyikXC_Tj1LfVsIFqefnt_BRTXe1saGHrXdWDLalY2VD54BLYDGVTWWfn_NZnF0M7umEKb_x6A6mCcraDj-HDS_Sss32GV7frIfr68ezL8jO-uPx0vjy5wK6ResCKaqUs5a1aMeAcutZKzQFqobhohNXW8lZq1ylSO2pXTDrRSU6Vo9xxzfghej_r7sbVFloHYUi2N7vktzb9NtF68zgT_Mas4y-jlSCMNUXg6FYgxZ8j5MFML4O-twHimA2TkhKlCK8L-vYf9CqOKZTnGVZaEUzwWj1Qa9uD8aGL5V43iZoTqaiSWtOJwnuoNQQoTcYAnS_hR_zxHv7uN_YWsLnApZhzgu5-JpSYyUBmNpApBjJ_DGSuS9Gbv6d5X3LnmALwGcglFdaQHkbwH9kbQtzOpQ</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Ives, Bob</creator><creator>Cazan, Ana-Maria</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0912-1944</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Did the COVID-19 pandemic lead to an increase in academic misconduct in higher education?</title><author>Ives, Bob ; Cazan, Ana-Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-81988a13d8b2e33efda793ee4683656a9aa3d79cf804c1ab27c6f7318c13c3923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Academic disciplines</topic><topic>Academic misconduct</topic><topic>Cheating</topic><topic>Cheating (Education)</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational aspects</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Misconduct</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Plagiarism</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Romania</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ives, Bob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cazan, Ana-Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ives, Bob</au><au>Cazan, Ana-Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Did the COVID-19 pandemic lead to an increase in academic misconduct in higher education?</atitle><jtitle>Higher education</jtitle><stitle>High Educ</stitle><addtitle>High Educ (Dordr)</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>129</epage><pages>111-129</pages><issn>0018-1560</issn><eissn>1573-174X</eissn><abstract>The shift to online instruction in higher education related to the COVID-19 pandemic has raised worldwide concerns about an increase in academic misconduct (cheating and plagiarism). However, data to document any increase is sparse. For this study, we collected survey data from 484 students in 11 universities in the USA, and 410 students in five universities in Romania. The data support the conclusions that (1) cheating on exams increased with the shift to online instruction, but plagiarism and cheating on assignments may not have increased, (2) significant differences between the two countries suggest that intervention planning should avoid assuming that results from one context may generalize to another, and (3) influencing student beliefs about rates of AM among their peers may be a fruitful new route for reducing academic misconduct.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>36713136</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10734-023-00996-z</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0912-1944</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-1560
ispartof Higher education, 2024-01, Vol.87 (1), p.111-129
issn 0018-1560
1573-174X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9860225
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; Springer Nature; PAIS Index; ProQuest One Literature; Education Collection
subjects Academic disciplines
Academic misconduct
Cheating
Cheating (Education)
College students
COVID-19
Data
Distance learning
Education
Educational aspects
Epidemics
Higher Education
Misconduct
Pandemics
Plagiarism
Prevention
Romania
Statistics
Surveys
Teaching
Tests
United States
title Did the COVID-19 pandemic lead to an increase in academic misconduct in higher education?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T00%3A44%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Did%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic%20lead%20to%20an%20increase%20in%20academic%20misconduct%20in%20higher%20education?&rft.jtitle=Higher%20education&rft.au=Ives,%20Bob&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=129&rft.pages=111-129&rft.issn=0018-1560&rft.eissn=1573-174X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10734-023-00996-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA781879918%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-81988a13d8b2e33efda793ee4683656a9aa3d79cf804c1ab27c6f7318c13c3923%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2923626348&rft_id=info:pmid/36713136&rft_galeid=A781879918&rfr_iscdi=true