Robotic versus Conventional Overground Gait Training in Subacute Stroke Survivors: A Multicenter Controlled Clinical Trial

• Published in: Journal of clinical medicine 2023-01, Vol.12 (2), p.439
• Main Authors: Pournajaf, Sanaz, Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore, Naro, Antonino, Goffredo, Michela, Aprile, Irene, Tamburella, Federica, Filoni, Serena, Waldner, Andreas, Mazzoleni, Stefano, Focacci, Antonella, Ferraro, Francesco, Bonaiuti, Donatella, Franceschini, Marco, TreadStroke Group
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Clinical medicine; Clinical trials; Gait; Patients; Physical therapists; Physical therapy; Rehabilitation; Robotics; Robots; Stroke; Training; Walking
• ISSN: 2077-0383; 2077-0383
• DOI: 10.3390/jcm12020439

Although stroke survivors can benefit from robotic gait rehabilitation, stationary robot-assisted gait training needs further investigation. In this paper, we investigated the efficacy of this approach (with an exoskeleton or an end-effector robot) in comparison to the conventional overground gait training in subacute stroke survivors. In a multicenter controlled clinical trial, 89 subacute stroke survivors conducted twenty sessions of robot-assisted gait training (Robotic Group) or overground gait training (Control Group) in addition to the standard daily therapy. The robotic training was performed with an exoskeleton (RobotEXO-group) or an end-effector (RobotEND-group). Clinical outcomes were assessed before (T0) and after (T1) the treatment. The walking speed during the 10-Meter Walk Test (10 MWT) was the primary outcome of this study, and secondary outcomes were the 6-Minute Walk Test (6 MWT), Timed Up and Go test (TUG), and the modified Barthel Index (mBI). The main characteristics assessed in the Robotic and Control groups did not differ at baseline. A significant benefit was detected from the 10 MWT in the Robotic Group at the end of the study period (primary endpoint). A benefit was also observed from the following parameters: 6 MWT, TUG, and mBI. Moreover, patients belonging to the Robot Group outperformed the Control Group in gait speed, endurance, balance, and ADL. The RobotEND-group improved their walking speed more than the RobotEXO-group. The stationary robot-assisted training improved walking ability better than the conventional training in subacute stroke survivors. These results suggest that people with subacute stroke may benefit from Robot-Assisted training in potentiating gait speed and endurance. Our results also support that end-effector robots would be superior to exoskeleton robots for improving gait speed enhancement.