Loading…

An Indirect Comparison of Basal Insulin Plus Once-Weekly Semaglutide and Fully Optimised Basal–Bolus Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes

Introduction To date, there have been few head-to-head comparisons between semaglutide once-weekly (OW) and short-acting meal-time insulin in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with basal insulin and requiring treatment intensification. This indirect comparison evaluated the effects of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diabetes therapy 2023-01, Vol.14 (1), p.123-137
Main Authors: Lingvay, Ildiko, Catarig, Andrei-Mircea, Lawson, Jack, Chubb, Barrie, Gorst-Rasmussen, Anders, Evans, Lyndon Marc
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction To date, there have been few head-to-head comparisons between semaglutide once-weekly (OW) and short-acting meal-time insulin in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with basal insulin and requiring treatment intensification. This indirect comparison evaluated the effects of these regimens on glycated haemoglobin (HbA 1c ), body weight, hypoglycaemia, and other clinically relevant outcomes. Methods A post-hoc, unanchored, individual participant data meta-analysis was conducted on the basis of data from single treatment arms in the SUSTAIN 5 and DUAL 7 trials. Semaglutide 0.5 mg OW and 1.0 mg OW plus basal insulin were compared with an optimised (treat-to-target) basal–bolus regimen of insulin glargine and insulin aspart over 26 weeks, using regression adjustment to account for baseline differences between the trials. Results Over 26 weeks, semaglutide 1.0 mg OW plus basal insulin reduced mean HbA 1c by significantly more than the basal–bolus regimen (treatment difference: − 0.36%; p  = 0.003), while semaglutide 0.5 mg OW plus basal insulin was comparable with basal–bolus insulin (treatment difference: 0.08%, p  = 0.53). Both doses of semaglutide were associated with significant weight loss relative to insulin intensification (treatment differences: 6.8–9.4 kg; p  
ISSN:1869-6953
1869-6961
DOI:10.1007/s13300-022-01344-7