Loading…
An Indirect Comparison of Basal Insulin Plus Once-Weekly Semaglutide and Fully Optimised Basal–Bolus Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes
Introduction To date, there have been few head-to-head comparisons between semaglutide once-weekly (OW) and short-acting meal-time insulin in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with basal insulin and requiring treatment intensification. This indirect comparison evaluated the effects of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Diabetes therapy 2023-01, Vol.14 (1), p.123-137 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Introduction
To date, there have been few head-to-head comparisons between semaglutide once-weekly (OW) and short-acting meal-time insulin in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with basal insulin and requiring treatment intensification. This indirect comparison evaluated the effects of these regimens on glycated haemoglobin (HbA
1c
), body weight, hypoglycaemia, and other clinically relevant outcomes.
Methods
A post-hoc, unanchored, individual participant data meta-analysis was conducted on the basis of data from single treatment arms in the SUSTAIN 5 and DUAL 7 trials. Semaglutide 0.5 mg OW and 1.0 mg OW plus basal insulin were compared with an optimised (treat-to-target) basal–bolus regimen of insulin glargine and insulin aspart over 26 weeks, using regression adjustment to account for baseline differences between the trials.
Results
Over 26 weeks, semaglutide 1.0 mg OW plus basal insulin reduced mean HbA
1c
by significantly more than the basal–bolus regimen (treatment difference: − 0.36%;
p
= 0.003), while semaglutide 0.5 mg OW plus basal insulin was comparable with basal–bolus insulin (treatment difference: 0.08%,
p
= 0.53). Both doses of semaglutide were associated with significant weight loss relative to insulin intensification (treatment differences: 6.8–9.4 kg;
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1869-6953 1869-6961 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s13300-022-01344-7 |