Personalization improves the biomechanical efficacy of foot progression angle modifications in individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis

• Published in: Journal of biomechanics 2022-11, Vol.144, p.111312-111312, Article 111312
• Main Authors: Uhlrich, Scott D., Kolesar, Julie A., Kidziński, Łukasz, Boswell, Melissa A., Silder, Amy, Gold, Garry E., Delp, Scott L., Beaupre, Gary S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ankle; Arthritis; Biofeedback; Biomechanical Phenomena; Biomechanics; Center of pressure; Customization; Feedback; Feet; Fitness equipment; Foot; Gait; Gait retraining; Humans; Kinematics; Knee; Knee adduction moment; Knee Joint; Motion capture; Osteoarthritis; Osteoarthritis, Knee - therapy; Pain; Precision medicine; Tibia; Toe; Walking
• ISSN: 0021-9290; 1873-2380
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111312

Modifying the foot progression angle during walking can reduce the knee adduction moment, a surrogate measure of medial knee loading. However, not all individuals reduce their knee adduction moment with the same modification. This study evaluates whether a personalized approach to prescribing foot progression angle modifications increases the proportion of individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis who reduce their knee adduction moment, compared to a non-personalized approach. Individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis (N=107) walked with biofeedback instructing them to toe-in and toe-out by 5° and 10° relative to their self-selected angle. We selected individuals’ personalized foot progression angle as the modification that maximally reduced their larger knee adduction moment peak. Additionally, we used lasso regression to identify which secondary kinematic changes made a 10° toe-in gait modification more effective at reducing the first knee adduction moment peak. Seventy percent of individuals reduced their larger knee adduction moment peak by at least 5% with a personalized foot progression angle modification, which was more than (p≤0.002) the 23–57% of individuals who reduced it with a uniformly assigned 5° or 10° toe-in or toe-out modification. When toeing-in, greater reductions in the first knee adduction moment peak were related to an increased frontal-plane tibia angle (knee more medial than ankle), a more valgus knee abduction angle, reduced contralateral pelvic drop, and a more medialized center of pressure in the foot reference frame. In summary, personalization increases the proportion of individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis who may benefit from a foot progression angle modification.