PDS Plate Versus Bone Graft in Orbital Floor Reconstruction: A Prospective Study to Identify the Better Alternative

• Published in: Indian journal of otolaryngology, and head, and neck surgery and head, and neck surgery, 2022-12, Vol.74 (Suppl 3), p.4699-4705
• Main Authors: Boro, Sumanjith, Suri, Manav P., Mathew, Anil K.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Diplopia; Head and Neck Surgery; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original; Original Article; Otorhinolaryngology; Skin & tissue grafts
• ISSN: 2231-3796; 0973-7707
• DOI: 10.1007/s12070-021-03036-3

The objective of this study is to compare the effect and outcome of orbital floor reconstruction with bone graft and PDS plate. A prospective cohort study was conducted at B J Medical College, Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad from 1st September 2013 to 28th February 2016 by the Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery on patients (N = 35) who reported with orbital floor fracture. Diplopia, enophthalmos, infection rate, hospital stay, and donor site complications were considered. The above variables were assessed as predictors of outcome in the management (PDS vs. bone graft). Inferential statistics was done by chi-square test. The significance level was kept at 5%. Follow-up of 35 patients (2 years), 26 male, and 9 females aged 26–65 years were made. Diplopia and enophthalmos were the main criteria's in the study and neither of them showed any statistical significance. Donor site morbidity was noted in 3 patients among the bone graft group which was managed conservatively. Both the bone graft and PDS plate in orbital floor reconstruction is comparable in almost all aspects of our study. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups. Pain and wound site infection are possible complications when a bone graft is used as the reconstructive option.