Statistical design considerations for trials that study multiple indications

Breakthroughs in cancer biology have defined new research programs emphasizing the development of therapies that target specific pathways in tumor cells. Innovations in clinical trial design have followed with master protocols defined by inclusive eligibility criteria and evaluations of multiple the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Statistical methods in medical research 2021-03, Vol.30 (3), p.785-798
Main Authors: Kaizer, Alexander M, Koopmeiners, Joseph S, Chen, Nan, Hobbs, Brian P
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bayes Theorem
Bayesian analysis
Biology
Cancer
Candidates
Clinical research
Clinical trials
Criteria
Heterogeneity
Humans
Innovations
Optimization
Research Design
Statistical methods
Tumors
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Breakthroughs in cancer biology have defined new research programs emphasizing the development of therapies that target specific pathways in tumor cells. Innovations in clinical trial design have followed with master protocols defined by inclusive eligibility criteria and evaluations of multiple therapies and/or histologies. Consequently, characterization of subpopulation heterogeneity has become central to the formulation and selection of a study design. However, this transition to master protocols has led to challenges in identifying the optimal trial design and proper calibration of hyperparameters. We often evaluate a range of null and alternative scenarios; however, there has been little guidance on how to synthesize the potentially disparate recommendations for what may be optimal. This may lead to the selection of suboptimal designs and statistical methods that do not fully accommodate the subpopulation heterogeneity. This article proposes novel optimization criteria for calibrating and evaluating candidate statistical designs of master protocols in the presence of the potential for treatment effect heterogeneity among enrolled patient subpopulations. The framework is applied to demonstrate the statistical properties of conventional study designs when treatments offer heterogeneous benefit as well as identify optimal designs devised to monitor the potential for heterogeneity among patients with differing clinical indications using Bayesian modeling.
ISSN:0962-2802
1477-0334
1477-0334
DOI:10.1177/0962280220975187